Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The role of opioid therapy in chronic musculoskeletal disease continues to be controversial. However, recent years have seen a gradual shift towards the use of opioid therapy in chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) following recognition that at least a subpopulation of such patients appears to benefit from long-term opioid treatment. Misconceptions about opioids and the associated risk of dependence stemmed from older research that was fundamentally flawed. More recent, rigorous research has yielded clearer statistics on opioid dependence and has highlighted the need for screening to identify individuals who may require closer monitoring during long-term opioid therapy. Controlled-release formulations (oral and transdermal) for the management of steady pain, in conjunction with fast-acting, immediate-release formulations for the management of breakthrough pain, may be available for a wide range of opioid analgesics, providing comprehensive therapy systems for use in CNMP. However, there are no universal criteria that can be confidently used to select CNMP patients who might profit from or be responsive to opioid therapy. Opioid treatment must therefore be individualised for each patient, based on a clear understanding of drug absorption, metabolism, toxicity and binding characteristics, using opioid switching strategies where appropriate. Practical guidelines for opioid therapy in CNMP include regular and systematic checks of treatment results to adjust therapy for each individual patient and to ensure optimum benefit.
 ...
PMID:Individual choice of opioids and formulations: strategies to achieve the optimum for the patient. 1195

The three-step analgesic ladder, originally proposed for cancer pain relief by the World Health Organization (WHO), is now widely employed for all types of pain, including the chronic pain of musculoskeletal disease. Tramadol, an analgesic with weak opioid receptor affinity and possessing monoaminergic activity, has proved suitable for use at Step 2 of the WHO ladder. Owing to its pharmacological properties, tramadol is more appropriate than NSAIDs for patients suffering from gastrointestinal and renal problems. Importantly, the analgesic potency of tramadol is greater than that of NSAIDs and of other weak opioids (codeine, dextropropoxyphene). It also causes fewer opioid-type adverse effects, e.g. nausea, drowsiness, vomiting, dry mouth and constipation. In chronic musculoskeletal pain it is recommended that tramadol should be given by mouth and by the clock; the initial dose should be titrated upward gradually to reach the individual level required for suitable pain control. This dosage strategy will also minimise the usual opioid-type adverse effects encountered with tramadol. Four recent publications are reviewed to illustrate the efficacy of tramadol, alone or in conjunction with an NSAID, in the management of low back pain, osteoarthritis pain and breakthrough pain.
 ...
PMID:Tramadol in musculoskeletal pain--a survey. 1195 1

Although the hazards of using Demerol for pain management is well documented, physicians at a 350-bed tertiary-care center in the upper midwest continued to follow the antiquated practice of ordering intramuscular Demerol and Vistaril to manage pain for patients with acute pancreatitis. Their reasoning was based on early evidence that Demerol, unlike morphine, does not cause biliary-tract spasms resulting in epigastric or right upper quadrant pain. In an effort to change practice patterns, a multidisciplinary team was formed to study the efficacy of using Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) fentanyl to manage pain in this patient population. Thirty-two subjects were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of using TTS fentanyl with intramuscular Demerol for breakthrough pain in comparison to using a placebo system and intramuscular Demerol. There was no statistically significant difference in self-reported pain intensity between the control and experimental groups on the first day of hospitalization. This finding would be expected because serum fentanyl concentrations rise gradually during the first 12 to 14 hours after application of the TTS fentanyl and plateau at 24 hours. There was a statistically significant difference between groups at 36 hours (exact p <.0154) and 45 hours (exact p <.0132) after application of the TTS fentanyl. This is probably because of greater serum fentanyl concentrations observed during the 36- to 48-hour period after application of TTS fentanyl. Although not statistically significant, trends in the data revealed that the experimental group had lower self-reported pain intensity scores than the control group throughout the course of hospitalization. Even though the experimental group had significantly more previous hospitalizations for acute pancreatitis and a higher pain intensity score on admission, this group had a significantly shorter length of stay in the hospital c2 (1, N = 31) = 4.3706 p <.05. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for self-reported satisfaction with pain management.
 ...
PMID:Transdermal fentanyl for the management of acute pancreatitis pain. 1199 27

The objective of this open-label, repeated-dose, single-treatment, multicenter study was to evaluate the outcomes associated with a standardized conversion from prior opioid therapy to a novel, once-daily, OROS osmotic technology, extended-release (ER) hydromorphone formulation in an outpatient population with chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain. The study period was divided into 3 phases: the prior opioid stabilization phase (> or =3 days), the conversion and titration phase (3-21 days), and the maintenance phase (14 days). Patients were evaluated at 5 visits during the study period. Analgesic efficacy was measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). At baseline, patients were required to have daily oral morphine equivalent requirements of > or =45 mg. Prior oral or transdermal opioid therapy was converted to single daily doses of ER hydromorphone (8, 16, 32, and 64 mg tablets) at a 5:1 (morphine equivalent to hydromorphone) ratio. Immediate-release (IR) hydromorphone was given as rescue medication for breakthrough pain. Among the 445 patients who enrolled, 404 received the study medication. Of these, 73 (18.1%) had chronic malignant pain and 331 (81.9%) had chronic nonmalignant pain. Dose stabilization (defined as a 3-day period during which the total daily dose of ER hydromorphone remained unchanged and < or =3 doses of IR hydromorphone per day were required) was attained by 73.8% of patients (298/404), of whom 70.1% (209/298) were stabilized with < or =2 titration steps. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) time to dose stabilization was 12.1 +/- 5.7 days (range of 3 to 33 days). The mean +/- SD final daily dose of ER hydromorphone was 63.4 +/- 129.2 mg. The mean +/- SD final daily dose of IR hydromorphone was 11.5 +/- 36.4 mg, and the mean +/- SD final number of daily doses of IR hydromorphone was 1.7 +/- 1.3. Intent-to-treat and completer analysis demonstrated significant improvements in BPI ratings from prior opioid therapy to the end of ER hydromorphone therapy (P < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Adverse events were consistent with those expected of an opioid agonist in such a patient group, affecting primarily the gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. This uncontrolled study delineates a regimen by which patients with chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain can be readily converted from prior opioid therapy and titrated to an appropriate maintenance dose of ER hydromorphone. Controlled longitudinal studies are required to further evaluate the use of ER hydromorphone in patients with discrete chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain conditions.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 May
PMID:Dose conversion and titration with a novel, once-daily, OROS osmotic technology, extended-release hydromorphone formulation in the treatment of chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain. 1200 54

Two nationwide surveys were carried out using an electronic poll of 2,000 GPs and postal questionnaires were sent to 30,000 patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Both surveys found a high level of gastro-intestinal (GI) side-effects in patients treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Almost every GP (97%) reported experience of patients suffering GI symptoms while on an NSAID, 38% reported patients who had been hospitalised and 4% reported patients who had died owing to NSAID-induced side-effects. Most GPs (92%) said they were concerned about GI safety when prescribing an NSAID and almost a third (32%) said they were concerned about litigation from patients who had experienced a bleed. Use of NSAIDs in OA remained high, with 44% of GPs prescribing conventional NSAIDs to at least three quarters of their patients, 57% of GPs using simple analgesia and just 12% using a cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor in over 74% of patients. Some 45% of patients reported receiving NSAIDs compared with 43% on simple analgesia and 4% on COX-2 selective inhibitors. Most GPs (69%) stated that their main therapeutic objective in using an NSAID to treat OA was to control pain without GI side-effects. Almost a quarter (24%) said they used low-dose NSAIDs in the hope that this would control pain without GI side-effects. Dissatisfaction with treatment was the most common reason reported by GPs for patients on an NSAID to re-present, with 73% citing either breakthrough pain or incomplete pain relief as the most common reason for patient dissatisfaction. This mirrored the patients' perception, with 63% citing inadequate pain relief as their main reason for dissatisfaction with current painkillers compared to 17% who cited stomach upsets or irritation. Patient and GP appear to be united in their concern at the GI risks of NSAID treatment. In the light of this and recent data on the efficacy, safety profile and cost-effectiveness of COX-2 selective inhibitors, GPs should re-examine their medical management of OA.
 ...
PMID:GP and patient perspectives on treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in osteoarthritis. 1201 16

The effects of sublingual fentanyl citrate (SLFC) were assessed in 11 hospice inpatients with cancer-related breakthrough pain. Patients were asked to rate their pain, using a visual analogue scale, before SLFC, then after 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. Six patients (55%) had reductions in pain scores at 10 min and nine patients (82%) at 15 min. Ratings for SLFC were very good (18%), good (36%), moderate (28%), and bad (18%). Compared to the usual breakthrough medication, SLFC was better (46%), the same (36%), or worse (18%). Advantages of SLFC included ease of use, quick onset of action and no associated drowsiness. No systemic adverse events were noted, but two patients reported dry mouth and two a bitter taste. Two patients found it difficult to retain the medication under the tongue. Seven patients (64%) said they would continue to use SLFC. Sublingual fentanyl citrate appears safe and well tolerated by these patients. Randomized placebo-controlled and dose ranging studies are required to confirm these findings.
 ...
PMID:Sublingual fentanyl citrate for cancer-related breakthrough pain: a pilot study. 1205 49

Scheduled preoperative and postoperative analgesia should be offered in a multimodal management model. By a combined drug synergy effect, the central nervous system, afferent pathways, and peripheral wound site are modified collectively. In an ongoing effort to improve perioperative pain management, we retrospectively compared the results of a previously reported pain management protocol with 2 more recent groups of patients managed with modified pain protocols. In the earlier control protocol, epidural anesthesia was discontinued on arrival to the postanesthesia care unit, and regularly scheduled oral opioids and intravenous hydromorphone for breakthrough pain were initiated. The first more recent group used epidural anesthesia, and the second group used spinal anesthesia. Both protocols featured the use of cyclooxygenase-2-inhibiting anti-inflammatory medication administered for 2 weeks preoperatively and continued for 10 days postoperatively and patient-controlled analgesia for 24 hours followed by scheduled oral opioids.
 ...
PMID:Pain management for joint arthroplasty: preemptive analgesia. 1206 23

Oral mucosal drug delivery is an alternative method of systemic drug delivery that offers several advantages over both injectable and enteral methods. Because the oral mucosa is highly vascularised, drugs that are absorbed through the oral mucosa directly enter the systemic circulation, bypassing the gastrointestinal tract and first-pass metabolism in the liver. For some drugs, this results in rapid onset of action via a more comfortable and convenient delivery route than the intravenous route. Not all drugs, however, can be administered through the oral mucosa because of the characteristics of the oral mucosa and the physicochemical properties of the drug. Several cardiovascular drugs administered transmucosally have been studied extensively. Nitroglycerin is one of the most common drugs delivered through the oral mucosa. Research on other cardiovascular drugs, such as captopril, verapamil and propafenone, has proven promising. Oral transmucosal delivery of analgesics has received considerable attention. Oral transmucosal fentanyl is designed to deliver rapid analgesia for breakthrough pain, providing patients with a noninvasive, easy to use and nonintimidating option. For analgesics that are used to treat mild to moderate pain, rapid onset has relatively little benefit and oral mucosal delivery is a poor option. Oral mucosal delivery of sedatives such as midazolam, triazolam and etomidate has shown favourable results with clinical advantages over other routes of administration. Oral mucosal delivery of the antinausea drugs scopolamine and prochlorperazine has received some attention, as has oral mucosal delivery of drugs for erectile dysfunction. Oral transmucosal formulations of testosterone and estrogen have been developed. In clinical studies, sublingual testosterone has been shown to result in increases in lean muscle mass and muscle strength, improvement in positive mood parameters, and increases in genital responsiveness in women. Short-term administration of estrogen to menopausal women with cardiovascular disease has been shown to produce coronary and peripheral vasodilation, reduction of vascular resistance and improvement in endothelial function. Studies of sublingual administration of estrogen are needed to clarify the most beneficial regimen. Although many drugs have been evaluated for oral transmucosal delivery, few are commercially available. The clinical need for oral transmucosal delivery of a drug must be high enough to offset the high costs associated with developing this type of product. Drugs considered for oral transmucosal delivery are limited to existing products, and until there is a change in the selection and development process for new drugs, candidates for oral transmucosal delivery will be limited.
 ...
PMID:Oral mucosal drug delivery: clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic applications. 1212 58

Breakthrough pain (BTP), a transitory exacerbation of pain superimposed on a background of persistent, usually adequately controlled pain, has been reported to occur in 50% to 75% of cancer patients. However, a 23% prevalence of BTP was recently reported in a study of Spanish patients with advanced cancers, showing probably a low detection rate of this clinical problem. The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence of BTP among oncology patients managed by palliative care teams in Catalonia, Spain, and to characterize the frequency, intensity, and treatment of BTP episodes. Sixty-two teams studied 397 patients on a predetermined index day. BTP was reported by 163 (41%) patients, with a total of 244 episodes (mean 1.5 episodes/patient/day). Mean (SD) intensity of BTP episodes was 7.3 (2.0), compared with 2.9 (2.7) for persistent pain (both 0-10 scales). Morphine was used to treat 52% of BTP episodes, while 25% were untreated. These findings indicate that BTP remains underrecognized and undertreated in Spain.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jul
PMID:Breakthrough cancer pain: prevalence and characteristics in patients in Catalonia, Spain. 1218 94

(1) Some cancer patients suffer occasional breakthrough pain despite well-conducted opiate treatment, warranting the use of immediate-release oral morphine. (2) A fentanyl preparation for oral transmucosal administration has just been granted this indication in France. (3) The evaluation file mainly contains results from a randomised double-blind cross-over trial comparing transmucosal fentanyl with oral morphine tablets in cancer patients. It showed a small gain in terms of rapidity and efficacy of pain relief with fentanyl relative to morphine, but this was of dubious clinical relevance. (4) The adverse effects of oral transmucosal fentanyl are those of all opiates, such as drowsiness, dizziness, nausea, vomiting and confusion. (5) The oral transmucosal fentanyl preparation has the taste and appearance of a lollipop, and may therefore be attractive to children. The packaging seems to take this risk into account, but precautions must be taken to keep this treatment away from children, especially after opening. (6) Immediate-release oral morphine remains the standard treatment for breakthrough pain in patients receiving opiate therapy. If it is inadequate, oral transmucosal fentanyl may sometimes be slightly better.
 ...
PMID:Oral transmucosal fentanyl: new preparation. For breakthrough cancer pain when morphine fails. 1219 62


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>