Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cerebral function was studied in a group of 34 cancer patients being treated with stable doses of 30-920 mg morphine/24 h using measurement of continuous reaction time. Sedation visual analog scale, pain visual analog scale and time from last medication were registered. This group was compared to a group of 32 healthy controls taking no opioids. Small but statistically significant prolongations of continuous reaction time were seen in the opioid group. Analgesic dose and sedation visual analog scales were weakly positively correlated to continuous reaction time, but factors other than opioid treatment must influence cancer patients' performance of continuous reaction time.
Clin J Pain 1990 Jun
PMID:Cerebral effects of long-term oral opioids in cancer patients measured by continuous reaction time. 213 9

We sought to compare epidural lidocaine to several short-acting epidural narcotics for their efficacy in controlling pain during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), hemodynamic changes, side effects and patient acceptance. To determine what contribution, if any, the local anesthetic test dose makes to the above factors, we also compared epidural sufentanil with and without a preceding test dose of local anesthetic with epinephrine. One hundred ASA I-III patients scheduled for elective ESWL were divided equally into five groups to receive one of the following epidural drugs through an epidural catheter: 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (Group L), 1000 micrograms alfentanil (Group A), 200 micrograms fentanyl (Group F) or 60 micrograms sufentanil (Groups S and S-). Group S- differed from all other groups in omission of the test dose and direct injection of the opioid through the epidural needle. Significant hypotension occurred in 20% of patients in Group L compared to 0% in the narcotic groups (p less than 0.01). Clinically significant respiratory depression was not observed in any group. Mild pruritus was observed in up to 60% of patients in the narcotic groups (p less than 0.01). Sedation was observed in all of the narcotic groups, particularly in Group S-, in which more than half of patients were drowsy (p less than 0.05). Requirements for adjuvant analgesics during ESWL were highest in Group A. Patient acceptance was high throughout the study. We conclude that epidural alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil are as effective as epidural lidocaine plus epinephrine in providing analgesia during ESWL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A comparison of epidural narcotics, with and without a test dose, to epidural lidocaine for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. 214 29

The authors conducted a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing groups of patients receiving iv or epidural fentanyl infusions to determine whether, at comparable levels of analgesia, 1) the severity of side effects was different; and 2) plasma fentanyl concentrations differed between the two groups. Twenty-eight ASA physical status 2 women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups to either receive fentanyl intravenously and saline epidurally or fentanyl epidurally and saline intravenously. After delivery of the infants under epidural anesthesia, each patient received a bolus of fentanyl 1.5 microgram/kg either intravenously or epidurally, and a fentanyl infusion was begun via the same route. Concurrently, a saline bolus and infusion were given via the alternate route. The rates of the fentanyl and saline infusions were adjusted until each patient was comfortable. Patients rated their pain, nausea, and pruritus on visual analogue scales. Sedation was evaluated by an observer. Respiratory depression was evaluated by end-tidal PCO2. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tail t tests. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured at 12 and 24 h. Three patients in the iv group were dropped from the study because of inadequate pain relief. For the remaining 25 patients, similar infusion rates of fentanyl were required to produce similar levels of analgesia at 12 and 24 h. The severity of nausea, pruritus and sedation, and end-tidal PCO2 were similar for both groups. The plasma concentrations of fentanyl were significantly greater in those who received iv fentanyl at 12 h but not at 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after cesarean section. 200 64

Nalbuphine is a new partly agonistic antagonistic opioid, that may offer some advantages especially in postoperative pain relief. We compared meperidine (1 mg kg-1) in 100 patients and nalbuphine (0.3 mg kg-1) in 70 patients, administering both agents intravenously after gynaecological operations. Standardised halothane anaesthesia without any opioid was used. After arrival in the recovery room, vigilance (sedation), quality and duration of pain relief were measured by different methods at four different times (0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes). Sedation was significantly more pronounced in the nalbuphine group, but no difference could be found in pain relief and duration between both groups. 6 patients of the n-group showed a short lasting wake-up reaction due to receptor antagonism. 36 patients had to be reinjected at the end of the first hour. We consider nalbuphine to be a safe opioid, however, the marked sedation should be taken into account.
 ...
PMID:[Nalbuphine as compared with pethidine for postoperative pain therapy]. 230 99

The efficacy of a single dose of intramuscular ketorolac 10 mg or 90 mg was compared with pethidine 100 mg in a randomized double-blind study in 121 patients reporting at least moderate pain due to renal colic. Pain was assessed before drug administration, and then at 1 hour and 12 hours after the dose. Sedation was also assessed at these times, and additionally at the 12 hour assessment the time of the next analgesic dose was recorded. At 1 hour after dosing, pain scores had decreased in all groups; the largest decrease was seen in the ketorolac 90 mg group. The difference in the decrease was significant between the two ketorolac groups, but the differences between ketorolac and pethidine were not significant. Fewer patients in the ketorolac 90 mg group (17%) required a further dose of analgesic within 10 hours than in either the ketorolac 10 mg group (39%) or the pethidine 100 mg group (47%). The difference between ketorolac 90 mg and pethidine 100 mg was statistically significant. At both assessment times the proportion of patients with no sedation was higher in the two ketorolac groups than in the pethidine group. The overall incidence of adverse events was low with all drugs, notably so for the occurrence of vomiting after ketorolac. The results of the study show that intramuscular ketorolac is efficacious in the treatment of renal colic.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind single dose comparison of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and pethidine in the treatment of renal colic. 234 81

Critically ill cancer patients may present special problems. Often these patients are terminally ill and mortality in a critical care unit devoted to cancer patients is higher than in other units. Sedation becomes paramount in the treatment of these patients. Some techniques may be inappropriate, such as epidural narcotics in a patient who is thrombocytopenic from chemotherapy. Drug pharmacokinetics are ill defined in these patients who often have liver and renal failure either resulting from tumor or chemotherapy. As the number of available drugs increases, interactions among these drugs become more important. Very little investigations has been done with the drugs we used everyday in the ICU. One should carefully titrate medication to effect--not rely on standard dosage regimens that have been primarily determined in relatively healthy patients. Combinations of techniques are being used, such as PCA with epidural narcotic administration with short acting, lipid soluble narcotics. Nerve blocks, primarily intercostal for chest trauma, were used in the past, but the requirement for frequent reinjection has made them less desirable. Recently thoracic paravertebral block has been used successfully for 9 to 10 hour pain relief with chest trauma. With this armamentarium of techniques and drugs, the critical care physicians should be able to go a long way to relieve pain and suffering of patients in the ICU.
 ...
PMID:Sedation and pain management for the critically ill. 246 65

We studied the effect of nalbuphine on the ventilatory and occlusion pressure responses to carbon dioxide rebreathing in six healthy male volunteers (mean age 25.5 yr) in a single-blind laboratory study. On four separate days volunteers were assigned randomly to receive either placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) or three i.v. doses of nalbuphine (15, 30 and 60 mg 70 kg-1), followed 90 min later by naloxone 0.4 mg 70 kg-1. Duplicate rebreathing tests were performed and the mean intercept at PE'CO2 7 kPa and the slopes of the linear relationship between inspiratory minute ventilation (Vl) or occlusion pressure (P0.1) with PE'CO2 were measured. Nalbuphine significantly decreased the mean intercept of the Vl (P less than 0.01) and P0.1 (P less than 0.05) responses, but caused no changes in the slopes. No significant difference between the doses was noted, suggesting that an Effect maximum (E'max) for respiratory depression was reached with a dose of approximately 15 mg 70 kg-1. Naloxone was less effective in antagonizing the depression in Vl at the higher dose of nalbuphine. Similar P0.1 values were associated with the same inspiratory flow rate (1 litre s-1) before and after drug treatment, suggesting that nalbuphine acts centrally to depress ventilation. Sedation increased significantly following each dose of nalbuphine (P less than 0.001). No demonstrable difference between the doses was shown, suggesting an Effect maximum (E'max) for sedation was reached at about 15 mg 70 kg-1. Administration of nalbuphine was associated with pain at the injection site, dizziness, dreaming, nausea and vomiting. Cardiovascular stability was maintained in all subjects.
 ...
PMID:Effect of nalbuphine hydrochloride on the ventilatory and occlusion pressure responses to carbon dioxide in volunteers. 250 65

Midazolam 15 mg orally, was compared with the combination of pentobarbital, promethazine, opial and scopolamine as premedication for ear surgery under local anaesthesia in the first of a series of three double blind clinical trials. Sedation, pain sensation and appreciation by patient and surgeon alike were in favour of the pentobarbital regime. Anxiolysis was the same for both regimes. The number of actions needed to administer the medication was basically lower for midazolam. Comparing in a similar, second study midazolam 15 mg with higher doses of 20 mg and 25 mg, the results were satisfactory with the highest dose. Pain during the administration of the local anaesthesia was felt in 16% of the patients. Adding 10 mg morphine intramuscularly in a third study did not prove to diminish the percentage of patients with pain complaints. It is concluded that 25 mg midazolam taken orally 45 minutes pre-operatively is a satisfactory premedication for ear surgery and less troublesome than the pentobarbital, promethazine, opial, scopolamine we used before. In day-care surgery this short acting premedication in our opinion is quite useful.
 ...
PMID:[Premedication in ENT operations under local anesthesia]. 268 76

Thirty patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly assigned postoperatively into two groups for a double-blind evaluation of the analgesic potency and cardiorespiratory effects of either 50 micrograms sufentanil or 5 mg morphine injected epidurally. After sufentanil injection, good postoperative analgesia was obtained, with a linear analog score (LAS) of less than 5 starting 5 min after injection and lasting for more than 6 hr. Linear analog scores obtained during coughing (LASC) and during movement (LASM) were less than 5 after 10 min and lasted for more than 4 hr. Respiratory rate decreased significantly for 2 hr after sufentanil injection. After morphine, pain relief started after 20 min and lasted for more than 12 hr. Respiratory rate decreased after 30 min. Sedation was greater after sufentanil than after morphine. PaCO2, which increased significantly 1 hr after sufentanil, did not change after morphine. Peak expiratory flow significantly improved for 2 hr after both sufentanil and morphine, whereas forced vital capacity improved for 4 hr after sufentanil and 8 hr after morphine administration. Forced expiratory volume did not change with either drug. It is concluded that 5 mg morphine injected epidurally provides longer lasting analgesia than does 50 micrograms sufentanil, but that in the first hours analgesia is better after sufentanil. Injection of either drug was accompanied by remarkable cardiovascular stability.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic and cardiorespiratory effects of epidural sufentanil and morphine in humans. 288 21

The efficacy and tolerance of flumazenil were assessed in a double-blind randomized multicentre trial on 120 ASA I or II patients aged 40.3 +/- 13.9 years. They were anaesthetized with flunitrazepam (25.1 +/- 10.5 micrograms.kg-1.h-1), fentanyl (4.4 +/- 1.9 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) and either vecuronium or pancuronium; residual neuromuscular blockade was antagonized at the end of surgery. 61 patients received flumazenil and 59 a placebo. Sedation comprehension and temporo-spatial orientation were scored at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after the administration of flumazenil or placebo. Local and general tolerances were evaluated 1 h and 24 h after administration. At the 24th h, the observer's assessment of consciousness, pain, respiration, coughing and vomiting were noted, as well as his identification, or not, of flumazenil or the placebo and their efficacy. Both groups were statistically homogeneous and comparable. Significant and marked efficacy was noted between the 5th and 30th min. There was no difference, at 24 h, between the flumazenil and placebo groups. In most cases, flumazenil was identified by the observer and its efficacy felt to be excellent. No major untoward effect of flumazenil was noted; however a mild and short lasting anxiety occurred in three patients. Tolerance was deemed to be excellent.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of flumazenil in antagonism of the effects of flunitrazepam on the central nervous system]. 312 69


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>