Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fecal soiling is a common complaint among school-age children. The fecal soiling is often accompanied by chronic constipation and so-called "idiopathic," "functional," or "psychogenic" megacolon, the cause of which is undetermined. The records of all children presenting to a pediatric gastroenterology clinic between 1981 and 1990 with difficult defecation were reviewed to determine the incidence of painful defecation and its relationship to chronic impaction and fecal soiling. There were 227 children; 74 were younger than 36 months of age and 153 were older than 36 months. Of the younger children, 86% presented with pain, 71% with impaction, and 97% with severe withholding. The younger children had painful defecation for a mean of 14 +/- 9 (SD) months before presentation. Of the older children, 85% presented with fecal soiling, 57% with pain, and 73% with fecal impaction, and 96% exhibited withholding; the older children had difficult defecation for a mean of 56 +/- 42 months before presentation. Sixty-three percent of the children presenting with fecal soiling had a history of painful defecation beginning before 36 months of age. Painful defecation frequently precedes chronic fecal impaction and fecal soiling in American children. Early, effective treatment of painful defecation in infancy might reduce the incidence of chronic fecal impaction and fecal soiling in school-age children.
 ...
PMID:Painful defecation and fecal soiling in children. 159 38

The effect of four days of preoperative lactulose on posthaemorrhoidectomy pain was studied in a prospective double blind randomized trial. All patients received lactulose on admission to hospital, 20 received lactulose for four days before admission, and 22 received placebo. The preoperative lactulose treatment group suffered significantly less pain on defecation for the first four days that they opened their bowels (visual analogue scores in cm: day 1, 4.4 v 5.9; day 2, 4.1 v 6.3; day 3, 4.5 v 6.1; day 4, 4.6 v 6.5), suffered significantly less pain during the first two 24 hour periods after defecation (visual analogue scores in cm: day 1, 5.0 v 7.0; day 2, 3.9 v 6.1), and required significantly less analgesia daily after defecation (0.76 g paracetamol/day v 1.29 g paracetamol/day). These results show that lactulose given for four days preoperatively reduces pain after haemorrhoidectomy.
 ...
PMID:Effect of four days of preoperative lactulose on posthaemorrhoidectomy pain: results of placebo controlled trial. 311 49

Anorectal dyschezia is due to a defect in the coordination between the forces which try and expel the stool and the relaxation of the anus. There are two types: congenital and acquired. In the first case, there is a distal aganglionic zone; these are in fact cases of Hirschsprung's disease. In the acquired cases, the mesenteric plexuses are normal and the aetiology lies in the painful process which affects the anus. Forced dilatation is the only treatment for anorectal dyschezia and it should replace the use of sphincterotomy. In cases of acquired dyschezia, medical treatment consisting of curing the anal cause of the pain, evacuating the rectum of faecalomas, lubricating the faeces recommending the use of a laxative, is successful in the majority of cases. In cases unresponsive to this treatment, forced dilatation of the anus will help achieve cure. We present 255 cases of anorectal dyschezia: 17 cases were congenital and 238 were acquired. In the first group, good results were obtained with forced dilatation in 14 cases. In the second group, this procedure had to be performed in 23 patients for whom medical treatment was unsuccessful. It resulted in remission of symptoms in 20 cases.
 ...
PMID:[Anorectal dyschezia. Megarectum]. 609 82

Our objective was to obtain national data of the estimated prevalence, sociodemographic relationships, and health impact of persons with functional gastrointestinal disorders. We surveyed a stratified probability random sample of U.S. householders selected from a data base of a national market firm (National Family Opinion, Inc.). Questions were asked about bowel symptoms, sociodemographic associations, work absenteeism, and physician visits. The sampling frame was constructed to be demographically similar to the U.S. householder population based on geographic region, age of householder, population density, household income, and household size. Of 8250 mailings, 5430 were returned suitable for analysis (66% response). The survey assessed the prevalence of 20 functional gastrointestinal syndromes based on fulfillment of multinational diagnostic (Rome) criteria. Additional variables studied included: demographic status, work absenteeism, health care use, employment status, family income, geographic area of residence, population density, and number of persons in household. For this sample, 69% reported having at least one of 20 functional gastrointestinal syndromes in the previous three months. The symptoms were attributed to four major anatomic regions: esophageal (42%), gastroduodenal (26%), bowel (44%), and anorectal (26%), with considerable overlap. Females reported greater frequencies of globus, functional dysphagia, irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, functional abdominal pain, functional biliary pain and dyschezia; males reported greater frequencies of aerophagia and functional bloating. Symptom reporting, except for incontinence, declines with age, and low income is associated with greater symptom reporting. The rate of work/school absenteeism and physician visits is increased for those having a functional gastrointestinal disorder. Furthermore, the greatest rates are associated with those having gross fecal incontinence and certain more painful functional gastrointestinal disorders such as chronic abdominal pain, biliary pain, functional dyspepsia and IBS. Preliminary information on the prevalence, socio-demographic features and health impact is provided for persons who fulfill diagnostic criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders.
 ...
PMID:U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. 835 66

A study was undertaken to assess the evaluation and treatment of chronic intractable rectal pain. Sixty consecutive patients, 23 males and 37 females with a mean age of 69 (range, 29-87) years and a mean length of symptoms of 4.5 years, were evaluated by questionnaire, office examination, anal manometry, electromyography, cinedefecography, and pudendal nerve study. In all cases, organic abdominopelvic and anorectal etiologies for the pain were excluded by extensive radiologic and endoscopic evaluation. All patients had failed conservative and medical therapy. Ninety-five percent of patients had one or more associated factors: constipation or dyschezia (57 percent), prior pelvic surgery (43 percent), prior anal surgery (32 percent), prior spinal surgery (8 percent), irritable bowel syndrome (10 percent), or psychiatric disorders (depression or anxiety; 25 percent). Possible etiologies for the pain included levator spasm or anismus in 62 percent, coccygodynia in 8 percent, and pudendal neuropathy in 24 percent of patients. Therapy for pain control included electrogalvanic stimulation (EGS) in 29, biofeedback (BF) in 14, and steroid caudal block (SCB) in 11 patients. Pain control was assessed by an independent observer at a mean of 15 (range, 2-36) months after completion of therapy. Continued successful pain relief was classified by patients as good or excellent after EGS in 38 percent, after BF in 43 percent, and after SCB in 18 percent; overall success was reported by 47 percent of patients. The presence of levator spasm, coccygodynia, or pudendal neuropathy did not influence outcome. The routine use of physiologic investigation of rectal pain may not be justifiable. Moreover, more than half of the patients were refractory to all three therapeutic options used in this study.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation and treatment of chronic intractable rectal pain--a frustrating endeavor. 1185 48

Studies reveal endometriosis to be present in 38-51% of women undergoing laparoscopy for chronic pelvic pain. Symptoms attributable to endometriosis include dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, generalized pelvic pain, dyschezia, and radiation of pain to the back or leg. Psychological factors may also contribute to a more intense pain experience. Medical therapy provides symptom relief in 72-93% of patients, although recurrence is common following treatment discontinuation. Surgical therapy has had varying results for long-term pain relief; adequacy of the initial surgical treatment appears to be a critical factor. Important adjunctive measures include presacral neurectomy and excisional techniques to remove deep, fibrotic, retroperitoneal lesions. The quality of life of women with endometriosis will improve with greater focus on achieving the long-term relief of pelvic pain. Limitation of pain recurrence would benefit the patient greatly, by providing symptom relief and preventing the cycle of its probably adverse effects on physical activity, work productivity, sexual fulfilment, and mood.
 ...
PMID:Pain recurrence: a quality of life issue in endometriosis. 852 72

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the functional and clinical results of laparoscopic rectopexy with those of the open technique in two similar groups of patients with complete rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. Between November 1992 and June 1997, 21 patients underwent abdominal rectopexy. Thirteen patients (group A: 12 women and 1 man, mean age 52.9 years, range 28-70) and 8 patients (group B: 8 women, mean age 58.2 years, range 20-76) were submitted to Well's rectopexy by the open technique and the laparoscopic approach, respectively, without division of the lateral rectal ligaments. Assignment to each group was done randomly. Before the operation, a detailed clinical history was taken, and patients were studied with inspection and digital examination of the anorectum, proctosigmoidoscopy, determination of pancolonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography. After the operation, all patients underwent perineal physiotherapy, external electric stimulation, and perineal biofeedback. The mean follow-up time was 29.5 months (range 6-54) in group A and 25.7 months (range 8-45) in group B. Values were compared by chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests, as appropriate; differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. In both groups, dyschezia and fecal incontinence improved significantly (p < 0.05) after the operation. Basal pressure of anal sphincter, squeezing pressure, and rectoanal reflex improved without significance, whereas anoperineal pain was not significantly reduced. In group B, the postoperative hospital stay was shorter than in group A, with a marked reduction of costs. Laparoscopic Well's rectopexy has the same clinical and functional results as the open technique, with a shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower costs.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: clinical and functional results. 986 16

Several reports of coccygodynia have been confined to the causes, the methods of treatment, and the methods of radiological examination. As far as we know, there has been no previous study about the objective measurement of the coccyx. The purpose of this study was to find the possible cause of idiopathic coccygodynia by comparing the clinical and radiological differences between traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia by innovative objective clinical and radiological measurements. Thirty-two patients with coccygodynia were evaluated retrospectively. We divided the patients into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 19 patients with traumatic coccygodynia and group 2 consisted of 13 patients with idiopathic coccygodynia. We reviewed medical records and checked age, sex distribution, symptoms, and treatment outcome in each group. We also reviewed coccyx AP and lateral views of plain radiological film and measured the number of coccyx segments and the intercoccygeal angle in each group. The intercoccygeal angle devised by the authors was defined as the angle between the first and last segment of the coccyx. We also checked the intercoccygeal angle in a normal control group, which consisted of 18 women and 2 men, to observe the reference value of the intercoccygeal angle. The outcome of treatment was assessed by a visual analogue scale based on the pain score. Statistical analysis was done with Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test. Group 1 consisted of 1 male and 18 female patients, while group 2 consisted of 2 male and 11 female patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia groups in terms of age (38.7 years versus 36.5 years), male/female sex ratio (1/18 versus 2/11), and the number of coccyx segments (2.9 versus 2.7). There were significant differences between the traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia groups in terms of the pain score (pain on sitting: 82 versus 47, pain on defecation: 39 versus 87), the intercoccygeal angle (47.9 degree versus 72.2 degrees), and the satisfactory outcome of conservative treatment (47.4% versus 92.3%). The reference value of the intercoccygeal angle in the normal control group was 52.3 degrees, which was significantly different from that of the idiopathic group. In conclusion, the intercoccygeal angle of the idiopathic coccygodynia group was greater than that of the traumatic group and normal control group. Based on the results of this study, the increased intercoccygeal angle can be considered a possible cause of idiopathic coccygodynia. The intercoccygeal angle was a useful radiological measurement to evaluate the forward angulation deformity of the coccyx.
 ...
PMID:Clinical and radiological differences between traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia. 1041 31

This retrospective study reports the results of our 5-year experience in the diagnosis and treatment of rectal prolapse with fecal incontinence by the abdominal (laparotomy or laparoscopy) and perineal approaches. Twenty-five patients (group A; 22 women and 3 men; mean age 57.3 years; range 22-76 years) were operated on by the abdominal approach and ten (group B; 8 women and 2 men; mean age 68.9 years; range 58-84 years) by the perineal approach. All patients were evaluated by clinical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, pancolonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography preparatory to surgery. In patients of group A, we performed an abdominal rectopexy in 19 cases (7 by laparoscopy) and in the remaining 6 cases, a sigmoid resection-rectopexy (3 of which were by laparoscopy). All patients of group B were treated by a perineal operation using Delorme's mucosectomy in 4 cases and Altemeier's rectosigmoidectomy with total perineoplasty in 6 cases. The mean follow-up was 38.8 months in group A and 25.7 months in group B. The postoperative complication rate was 8% (two cases) in group A, whereas no significant complications occurred in group B. Dyschezia and fecal incontinence improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.05 in group A and P < 0.005 in group B), whereas anoperineal pain was not significantly reduced. At 1-year follow-up, the recurrences rates were 8% in group A and 30% in group B. Rectopexy or resection-rectopexy proved to be a safe and effective procedure for external prolapse, without a discernible difference between the laparotomic and laparoscopic techniques. In selected cases, the perineal approach gives good results regarding fecal incontinence without complications, even if in these patients, the likelihood of recurrence is high.
 ...
PMID:Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse: results of abdominal and perineal approaches. 1041 38

The aim of the study was to report our results of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with pelvic pain after failed conservative treatment. From 1992 to August 1998 we treated 111 patients (40 males, 71 females, ages 46 +/- 16 years) with chronic pelvic pain. All patients with causal treatment were excluded from this study. Pelvic floor training, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and intrarectal or intravaginal electrostimulation were applied and sacral nerve stimulation was used for therapy-resistant pain. The outcome of conservative treatment and sacral nerve stimulation (VAS <3/10; >50% pain relief) was related to symptoms of voiding dysfunction and dyschezia, and urodynamic proof of dysfunctional voiding, not to the pain localization or treatment modality. Outcome was inversely related to neuropathic pain. When conservative treatment failed, a test stimulation of the S3 root was effective in 16/26 patients, and 11 patients were implanted successfully with a follow-up of 36 +/- 8 months. So far no late failures have been seen. A longer test stimulation is needed in patients with pelvic pain because of a higher incidence of initial false positive tests. Our conclusion is that sacral nerve stimulation is effective in the treatment of therapy-resistant pelvic pain syndromes linked to pelvic floor dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:The pain cycle: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic pain syndromes. 1129 36


1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>