Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is the most common cause of indigestion in the community, and is usually chronic. Typical symptoms are recurrent retrosternal burning (heartburn) and regurgitation of sour or bitter fluid. In patients with typical symptoms and no alarm symptoms (pain on swallowing, dysphagia, weight loss or anaemia), treatment may be instituted without investigation. Patients with alarm symptoms and those who respond poorly or relapse after initial treatment require investigation (endoscopy and possibly pH monitoring). About 60% of reflux sufferers have no evidence of mucosal injury; their management aims to relieve symptoms. About 40% of reflux sufferers have oesophagitis and/or complications such as Barrett's oesophagus or oesophageal stricture at endoscopy. Drug therapy consists of H2-receptor antagonists, cisapride or proton-pump inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. 986 14

Nissen fundoplication is now the most common antireflux operation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. This study is a report on the laparoscopically performed floppy Nissen procedure. Two hundred consecutive patients were analyzed (84 women, 116 men, mean age 49 years, mean duration of symptoms 5 years) after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between 1992 and 1996. The main indications for surgery were daily heartburn, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation demanding continuous medical therapy. Eight patients (4%) had esophageal stricture, and 21 (11%) had Barrett's esophagus with intestinal metaplasia. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry before and 3 months after the operation. In addition, a questionnaire was completed an average of 2.2 years (range 1.0-4.6) after the operation. The results of the study were as follows: mortality was zero, and the morbidity rate was 5%. The mean hospital stay was 3.8 +/- 2.8 days, and sick leave was 14.3 +/- 10.4 days. Postoperatively, esophagitis was healed or significantly improved in all but 4 patients (98%), and 24-h pH and lower esophageal sphincter pressure were normal. After 2 years, 87% of the patients had Visick scores of I-II. It is concluded that laparoscopic floppy Nissen fundoplication provides an efficient and safe alternative for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
 ...
PMID:Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a prospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients. 986 9

Since Helicobacter pylori (Hp) was first isolated in 1983, much work has been carried out on the pathogenic effects of this organism. Hp infection is common in humans and currently is the most important etiologic agent in the development of chronic active gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcers, carcinoma and Malt-lymphoma of the stomach. Moreover Hp infection has also been associated with various extradigestive diseases. At present, a role of Hp infection in dyspepsia is discussed. Dyspepsia is defined by persistence of pain, burning or discomfort localised to the upper abdomen; some authors include in dyspepsia symptoms such as belching, bloating, alitosis, nausea, postprandial repletion, vomiting and regurgitation. In absence of any underlying pathologies, such as peptic ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux, pancreatitis, biliary tract disease or others, dyspepsia is defined as functional or idiopathic dyspepsia. Functional dyspepsia may be distinct in ulcer, reflux or dysmotility-like dyspepsia and unspecified dyspepsia. Hp infection is common in dyspeptic patients and a role of this bacterium has been postulated mostly in ulcer-like dyspepsia. Mechanisms by when Hp induces dyspeptic symptoms are uncertain; bacterial cytotoxins, phlogosis mediators, activity of chronic gastritis Helicobacter-related and host immune response probably play an important role in pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. However, dyspepsia is not present only in infected patients; therefore other pathogenic factors may be implicated in expression of dyspeptic symptoms in uninfected subjects, such as gastric dysmotility, modifications of gastric output or altered visceral sensibility, psychological factors, gastroesophageal reflux and irritable bowel.
 ...
PMID:[Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori]. 1036 46

Esophageal diverticula are best classified by their anatomic location: pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's diverticula), midthoracic, and epiphrenic. Most diverticula result from esophageal motility disorders. Although some patients are asymptomatic and diverticula are incidental findings, most patients are symptomatic. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and pain are common complaints, however, symptoms are often nonspecific and may be the result of an associated esophageal motility disorder. Contrast radiography is the prime diagnostic tool; evaluation of the diverticulum, associated esophageal abnormalities, and complications are assessed by a barium esophogram. Esophagoscopy adds little to the evaluation of the diverticulum but may be indicated in the assessment of other esophageal abnormalities. Motility studies, which may be difficult or hazardous to perform, are of little use in the diagnosis and treatment of Zenker's diverticula. Manometric evaluation of midthoracic or epiphrenic diverticula usually show an associated motility disorder and may influence treatment decisions.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal diverticula: patient assessment. 1053 74

Symptoms related to fungal esophagitis were studied in patients with alcoholic liver disease who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Data of 517 patients were studied retrospectively (group I) and 100 alcoholic liver disease patients, that were successively admitted to hospital, were enrolled in the prospective part (group II). Out of the 41 cases with fungal esophagitis found in group I, data of 38 could be evaluated. In group II 13 of the 93 evaluable patients had fungal esophagitis; according to Kodsi's grading 10 patients had grade 1., one patient grade 2. and two patients grade 2-3. oesophagitis. There was no case with grade 4. esophagitis. The rate of symptoms among the 51 patients with fungal esophagitis was: anorexia 23 (45.0%), abdominal pain 22 (43.1%), vomiting 17 (33.3%), nausea 15 (29.4%), occult gastrointestinal bleeding 12 (23.5%), weight loss 9 (17.6%), melena 7 (13.7%), bloating 6 (11.7%), acidic regurgitation 3 (5.8%), haematemesis 2 (3.9%), thoracic pain 2 (3.9%), singultus 1 (1.9%), odynophagia 0 and dysphagia 0. In 7 patients (13.7%) none of the studied symptoms could be identified. Despite the relatively high frequency of symptom free fungal esophagitis reported in the literature, the total lack of odynophagia and dysphagia in our patient group was remarkable. In the lack of deglutition disorders the other symptoms do not raise the suspicion of esophagitis. The diagnosis in such cases can be established only by endoscopy.
 ...
PMID:[Symptoms of fungal esophagitis in alcoholic liver disease]. 1094 8

Today, it is difficult to set a correct definition and diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The attempt to define it on the basis of "typical" symptoms, like heartburn and regurgitation, or "atypical" symptoms, like chronic cough, asthma, hoarseness and thoracic pain, or on the basis of endoscopic esophagitis presents notable difficulties. Moreover, the problem of a correct definition is tightly tied up to the ability to set a correct and early diagnosis. There are many diagnostics tools, but none of them is the golden standard. Today, the trend is to emphasize the role of the 24-hour pH-monitoring in diagnosing the reflux in those symptomatic patients with no visible esophagitis. However, its limit is to underline only the acid, not the duodenogastric alkaline reflux, which is also very important in the genesis of the inflammatory esophageal lesions. The esophageal manometry, however, evaluates only the mechanical state of the lower esophageal sphincter and the peristaltic function of the esophageal body but does not provide any direct information about the exposure of the esophagus to the gastric juice. The aim of this study is to analyze the problems concerning the definition and the diagnosis of the gastroesophageal reflux disease with particular attention to the practical implications on the common surgical practice, and to review some solutions reported in the literature for the difficult clinical approach to the patient with this pathology.
 ...
PMID:[Difficulties in defining and diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux: practical implications in surgery]. 1121 72

Epidemiological studies have shown that the prevalence of dental erosion in children varies widely between 2 and 57%. Changes seen in dental erosion range from removal of surface characteristics to extensive loss of tooth tissue with pulp exposure and abscess formation. Symptoms of dental erosion range from sensitivity to severe pain associated with pulp exposure. The etiology of dental erosion is dependent on the presence of extrinsic or intrinsic acid in the oral environment. Extrinsic sources of acids in children include frequent consumption of acidic foods and drinks, and acidic medications. Regurgitation of gastric contents into the mouth, as occurs in gastroesophageal reflux, is the most common source of intrinsic acid in children. A multitude of factors may modify the erosion process, such as saliva, oral hygiene practices, and presence or absence of fluoride. When dental erosion is diagnosed, it is important to investigate and identify the acid source, and to determine if the process is ongoing. The aim of treatment is to eliminate the cause of acid exposure, and to minimize the effects of acid exposure where it is not possible to remove the acid source. Restoration of the dentition involves stainless steel crowns to restore lost vertical dimension, and composite resin for esthetics.
 ...
PMID:Dental erosion in children: a literature review. 1124 29

Dental caries is a highly prevalent chronic disease and its consequences cause a lot of pain and suffering. Sugars, particularly sucrose, are the most important dietary aetiological cause of caries. Both the frequency of consumption and total amount of sugars is important in the aetiology of caries. The evidence establishing sugars as an aetiological factor in dental caries is overwhelming. The foundation of this lies in the multiplicity of studies rather than the power of any one. That statement by the British Nutrition Foundation's Task Force on Oral Health, Diet and Other Factors, sums up the relationship between sugars and caries in Europe. There is no evidence that sugars naturally incorporated in the cellular structure of foods (intrinsic sugars) or lactose in milk or milk products (milk sugars) have adverse effects on health. Foods rich in starch, without the addition of sugars, play a small role in coronal dental caries. The intake of extrinsic sugars beyond four times a day leads to an increase risk of dental caries. The current dose-response relationship between caries and extrinsic sugars suggests that the sugars levels above 60 g/person/day for teenagers and adults increases the rate of caries. For pre-school and young children the intakes should be proportional to those for teenagers; about 30 g/person/day for pre-school children. Fluoride, particularly in toothpastes, is a very important preventive agent against dental caries. Toothbrushing without fluorides has little effect on caries. As additional fluoride to that currently available in toothpaste does not appear to be benefiting the teeth of the majority of people, the main strategy to further reduce the levels of caries, is reducing the frequency of sugars intakes in the diet. Dental erosion rates are considered to be increasing. The aetiology is acids in foods and drinks and to a much lesser extent from regurgitation.
 ...
PMID:Dietary effects on dental diseases. 1168 51

Although the standard operation for early cancer of gastric cardia is proximal gastrectomy followed by jejunal interposition, we recently reported a simple and useful technique for proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. The operative procedures included resection of the proximal two-thirds of the stomach, followed by anastomosis between the esophagus and gastric tube, using a circular stapler (Proximate ILS 25; Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH, USA). The gastric tube was about 20 cm long and 4 cm wide. The patient a 76-year-old man had no reflux symptoms such as heartburn, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation. Endoscopy showed no evidence of reflux esophagitis, including mucosal redness, erosion, and ulceration. Ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring indicated that the pH of the lower esophagus was between 6 and 8 when the patient was upright and between 5 and 7 when he was in the supine position. There were nine reflux episodes during the day, and no reflux episode while he was asleep. The duration of each reflux episode was less than 1 min, and the total reflux time was 1 min in the 12-h day (0.1%). These data indicate that reconstruction by gastric tube may prevent esophageal reflux in patients who have undergone proximal gastrectomy for early cancer of the gastric cardia.
 ...
PMID:Gastric tube reconstruction prevented esophageal reflux after proximal gastrectomy. 1195 47

Although the standard operation for early cancer of gastric cardia is proximal gastrectomy followed by jejunal interposition, we recently reported a simple and useful technique for proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. The operative procedures included resection of the proximal two-thirds of the stomach, followed by anastomosis between the esophagus and gastric tube, using a circular stapler (Proximate ILS 25; Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH, USA). The gastric tube was about 20 cm long and 4 cm wide. The patient a 76-year-old man had no reflux symptoms such as heartburn, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation. Endoscopy showed no evidence of reflux esophagitis, including mucosal redness, erosion, and ulceration. Ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring indicated that the pH of the lower esophagus was between 6 and 8 when the patient was upright and between 5 and 7 when he was in the supine position. There were nine reflux episodes during the day, and no reflux episode while he was asleep. The duration of each reflux episode was less than 1 min, and the total reflux time was 1 min in the 12-h day (0.1%). These data indicate that reconstruction by gastric tube may prevent esophageal reflux in patients who have undergone proximal gastrectomy for early cancer of the gastric cardia.
 ...
PMID:Long-term survival after perforation of advanced gastric cancer: Case report and review of the literature. 1195 48


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>