Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy and safety of a new benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, were assessed in a double-blind multicenter study. Flumazenil (mean dose, 0.76 mg) or placebo (mean dose, 8.9 ml) was administered intravenously to 130 and 67 patients, respectively, who had been given diazepam in conjunction with an opioid (fentanyl, meperidine, or morphine) for the induction and maintenance of intravenous conscious sedation for diagnostic or therapeutic surgical procedures. The group assessable for efficacy comprised 122 patients treated with flumazenil and 64 patients given placebo. After 5 minutes, 80/115 (70%) flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 21/63 (33%) placebo-treated patients, were completely awake and alert, as indicated by a score of 5 on the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale. Ninety-five percent of patients in each group who attained a score of 5 at the 5-minute assessment showed no loss of alertness throughout the 180-minute assessment period. Flumazenil-treated patients also performed significantly better on the Finger-to-Nose Test and the recall of pictures shown at the 5-minute assessment. Flumazenil was well tolerated, with no serious adverse effects reported. Thirty-nine (30%) of flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 17 (25%) of placebo-treated patients had one or more drug-related adverse experiences. The most common adverse effects were nausea and vomiting in the flumazenil group and nausea and injection-site pain in the placebo group. Flumazenil was found to promptly reverse sedation induced by diazepam in the presence of opioids.
 ...
PMID:Reversal of central benzodiazepine effects by flumazenil after intravenous conscious sedation with diazepam and opioids: report of a double-blind multicenter study. The Flumazenil in Intravenous Conscious Sedation with Diazepam Multicenter Study Group II. 128 98

A double-blind clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, in 146 hospitalized patients, who had had general anesthesia induced by midazolam and a long-acting opioid. Ninety-eight patients received flumazenil and 48 received placebo. Administered postoperatively at a mean intravenous dose of 0.84 mg (range: 0.2 mg to 1 mg), flumazenil reversed benzodiazepine-induced sedation to a greater extent than did placebo. At 5 minutes posttreatment, 61 (76%) of 80 flumazenil-treated patients and 7 (18%) of 40 placebo-treated patients had attained a score of 4 or 5 on the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, indicating that they were drowsy or fully awake and alert. This level of arousal was maintained for the full 180-minute posttreatment assessment period in 79% of flumazenil-treated patients. Between-group differences in mean change from baseline in level of alertness were statistically significant (P < 0.01) until 60 minutes posttreatment, when the spontaneous recovery of placebo-treated patients resulted in declining intergroup differences. The global efficacy rating (based on the physician's general impression of the effectiveness of the reversal of sedation 5 minutes after test drug administration) was good or excellent in 64 (80%) of the 80 flumazenil-treated patients and 5 (13%) of the 40 placebo-treated patients evaluated. Flumazenil, compared with placebo, was not associated with an increased frequency of operative-site pain, and no serious adverse effects of this benzodiazepine antagonist were reported. The most frequent adverse experiences in both treatment groups were nausea, shivering, and operative-site pain. Vomiting, dizziness, and injection-site reactions were also reported in > or = 5% of patients treated with flumazenil.
 ...
PMID:Reversal of the central effects of midazolam by intravenous flumazenil after general anesthesia and use of a long-acting opioid in hospitalized patients: report of a multicenter double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Hospitalized Patients Study Group II. 128

In a US double-blind, multicenter study, flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, administered postoperatively in a mean intravenous dose of 0.67 mg (range, 0.2 to 1 mg), was superior to placebo in reversing sedation and other central nervous system effects of benzodiazepines in outpatients recovering from general anesthesia induced by midazolam, fentanyl or sufentanil, and nitrous oxide. Within 5 minutes after administration of flumazenil, sedation was reversed in 94% (87 of 93) of flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 13% (6 of 46) of placebo-treated patients. The criterion response (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score of 4 or 5) that was achieved at 5 minutes was maintained in 79 (93%) of 85 patients throughout the 180-minute observation period. Psychomotor performance, measured by the Finger-to-Nose Test, was rated as normal at 5 minutes posttreatment for 77% (71 of 92) of flumazenil-treated patients, and 4% (2 of 46) of placebo-treated patients. The reversal of amnesia, as determined by the Picture Recall Test was less consistent. Patients given flumazenil did not experience more pain at the operative site or require more analgesic medication than did those given placebo. Nausea (flumazenil 24%; placebo 15%), dizziness (flumazenil 12%; placebo 2%), and vomiting (flumazenil 10%; placebo 9%) were the most frequent adverse effects in each group. In conclusion, flumazenil provided prompt arousal from benzodiazepine-induced sedation and was well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Reversal of the central effects of midazolam by intravenous flumazenil after general anesthesia in outpatients: a multicenter double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Outpatients Study Group I. 128 2

Drugs that block norepinephrine reuptake offer promise as opioid potentiators, because norepinephrine mediates opioid analgesia but not side effects such as sedation or nausea. In a two-by-two factorial design, we randomized 62 inpatients with pain following major surgery to receive either desipramine, 50 mg by mouth, or placebo at 6 a.m. on the first day after surgery. At their first request of pain medication after 8 a.m., they were given intravenous morphine, either 0.033 mg/kg or 0.10 mg/kg. Pain relief and side effects were assessed for 4 hr; peak relief on the visual analog scale (VAS) was the primary outcome variable. Pain relief, side effect scores, and time to remedication were significantly greater with the higher dose than with the lower dose of morphine, verifying assay sensitivity, but desipramine pretreatment did not significantly enhance morphine analgesia. The mean increase in peak VAS relief score after desipramine pretreatment, relative to placebo, was 6%; the 95% confidence interval for this estimate ranged from a 21% reduction to a 34% increase in pain relief. These results differ from a previous report that 1 week of pretreatment with desipramine, 75 mg per day, potentiated postoperative morphine analgesia. We conclude that if desipramine potentiation of opioid analgesia occurs in humans, its demonstration may require higher doses or chronic treatment.
J Pain Symptom Manage 1992 Nov
PMID:Effects of a single oral dose of desipramine on postoperative morphine analgesia. 128 7

Fifteen patients were treated in a Phase I study of intracarotid carboplatin (200-400 mg/m2) in 5% dextrose and water infused over 15 to 30 minutes through a transfemoral catheter with a 0.2-micron inline filter. This study was done because intravenous carboplatin has less neurotoxicity than cisplatin and is active against brain tumors. Eleven men and four women ranging in age from 37 to 72 years (median, 59 years) were treated. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 in 3, 2 in 4, and 3-4 in 8 patients. Eight patients had one to three previous chemotherapy regimens; previous radiotherapy had failed in 13 patients. The response of patients in the Phase I study follows: glioblastoma, 6 failed; not evaluated because of early death from pulmonary embolus, 1; recurrent Grade II and III glioma, 1 stable (minor response with neurologic improvement) and 2 failed; malignant oligodendroglioma, 1 failed; brain metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer, 1 partial remission, 1 stable (minor response), and 1 failed; brain metastases from unknown primary, 1 stable (minor response with neurological improvement). Median survival was 9 weeks. Nausea was mild to moderate. One patient had granulocytopenia, and 2 had thrombocytopenia (mild). At 200 mg/m2 (2 patients), 1 had a focal seizure. At 300 mg/m2 (9 patients), 2 with abnormally small arteries had severe pain early in the treatment and posttreatment ipsilateral conjunctival edema, decreased vision, and cerebral edema (with partially reversible increased hemiparesis); 1 other had mild decrease in ipsilateral vision and 1 had transient aphasia on removal of the catheter (possibly the result of a vascular spasm).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of intracarotid administration of carboplatin. 131 64

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 100 mg oral sumatriptan, given as a dispersible tablet, was compared with that of 900 mg oral aspirin plus 10 mg oral metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine. A total of 358 patients treated up to three migraine attacks within 3 months, recording clinical information on a diary card. In attack 1, headache relief after 2 h, defined as a reduction in severity from severe or moderate pain to mild or no pain, was recorded in 56% (74/133) of patients who took sumatriptan and 45% (62/138) of patients who took aspirin plus metoclopramide (p = 0.078). This analysis of the primary efficacy end point was not statistically significant. However, for attacks 2 and 3 (secondary end points), headache relief was achieved in 58 versus 36% of patients (p = 0.001) and 65 versus 34% of patients (p less than 0.001), respectively. Relief from nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia was similar in both treatment groups. Rescue medication was required by fewer patients treated with sumatriptan than by those who received aspirin plus metoclopramide (attack 1, 34 versus 56%, p less than 0.001; attack 2, 32 versus 51%, p = 0.001, and attack 3, 35 versus 54%, p = 0.001). Sumatriptan also produced a faster improvement and resolution of migraine attacks. Comparing the sumatriptan and aspirin plus metoclopramide treatment groups, complete resolution of the attack occurred within 6 h in 32 versus 19% (attack 1), 35 versus 23% (attack 2) and 32 versus 20% of patients (attack 3).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A study to compare oral sumatriptan with oral aspirin plus oral metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine. The Oral Sumatriptan and Aspirin plus Metoclopramide Comparative Study Group. 131 94

Sumatriptan, a specific serotonin1-like receptor agonist, was studied in the acute treatment of migraine. Two hundred forty-two adult migraineurs participated in a randomized, double-blind study in which one dose of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, or 8 mg of subcutaneous sumatriptan succinate was evaluated in sequential ascending fashion. At each dose level, a placebo group was included. Efficacy was defined as reduction of moderate or severe pain to mild or no pain, without the use of rescue medication. Headache relief rates showed an approximate dose-response relationship and at 1 hour were as follows: placebo, 24%; 1 mg, 43%; 2 mg, 57%; 3 mg, 57%; 4 mg, 50%; 6 mg, 73%; and 8 mg, 80%. Relief of nausea and improvement in clinical disability were also approximately dose related. Adverse events were dose related; the most common types were injection site reactions and tingling. The 6-mg dose was as effective as the 8-mg dose but was associated with fewer adverse effects and so is optimal.
 ...
PMID:Dose ranging efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. US Sumatriptan Research Group. 133 81

Postoperative discomfort following cholecystectomy has diminished considerably since laparoscopic surgery was introduced. This study assessed the degree of postoperative pain and nausea when, during the operation, the trocar sites had been infiltrated with bupivacaine and antiemetics (ondansetron) had been administered. Postoperative pain intensity was moderate as 20% of the patients were managed without any opiates postoperatively and 88% did not require any opiates after discharge from the recovery room. Postoperative nausea and vomiting is known to be a problem that occasionally has been reported to delay discharge from the hospital. A single dose of ondansetron at the end of the operation seems to reduce postoperative nausea effectively. Two-thirds of the patients had no complaints of nausea, and the majority of the remainder experienced only mild and transitory nausea. We recommend that stab-wound sites be infiltrated with local anesthetics and that antiemetics be administered at the end of the operation.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative pain and nausea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 134 50

A 75-year-old black man came to the emergency room because of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and distension and obstipation. An abdominal radiograph revealed a sigmoid volvulus. This was nonoperatively reduced in the emergency room. Following a mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation, the patient underwent elective exploration. We report, for the first time, operative treatment of sigmoid volvulus with a laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy and primary anastomosis. Because of dense fibrous scarring of the sigmoid mesentery produced by chronic mesosigmoiditis, the redundant sigmoid was exteriorized and resected extracorporeally. A stapled, side-to-side, functional end-to-end anastomosis was constructed. The patient experienced little postoperative pain and virtually no postoperative ileus. We believe that laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection may offer distinct advantages for the treatment of the typically elderly, debilitated patient in whom sigmoid volvulus develops. Furthermore, because of the characteristic mesosigmoiditis associated with sigmoid volvulus, we suspect that exteriorization and extracorporeal resection may prove the easiest and most rapid laparoscopic approach to this disease.
 ...
PMID:Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for sigmoid volvulus. 134 64

The syndrome "urgency of lienal origin" during a pregnancy consists of two syndromes--violent spontaneous pain in the left hypochondrium or in the epigastrium, shortly followed by haemorrhagic shock. Occasionally some other symptoms are present--nausea, vomiting, powerless prolonged labor, innervation of the phrenic nerve. The cases of spontaneous spleen rupture as well as ruptures of splenic vein or artery also assessing to this syndrome. Mean maternal mortality is over 70%. The authors present two cases: the first one--a case of spontaneously ruptured splenic artery aneurysm, the second one--of splenic rupture. The first of two cases came of successful for both mother and baby. This is the sixth similar case described in literature till 1978. The second case presented--a spontaneous lienal rupture, is very rare. The favourable prognosis is entirely determined by prompt diagnosis.
 ...
PMID:[The "splenic emergency syndrome" during pregnancy (a report of 2 cases)]. 134 49


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>