Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Morphine is a powerful pain reliever, but also a potent inducer of tolerance and dependence. The development of opiate tolerance occurs on continued use of the drug such that the amount of drug required to elicit pain relief must be increased to compensate for diminished responsiveness. In many systems, decreased responsiveness to agonists has been correlated with the desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors. In vitro evidence indicates that this process involves phosphorylation of G-protein-coupled receptors and subsequent binding of regulatory proteins called beta-arrestins. Using a knockout mouse lacking beta-arrestin-2 (beta arr2-/-), we have assessed the contribution of desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor to the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance and the subsequent onset of physical dependence. Here we show that in mice lacking beta-arrestin-2, desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor does not occur after chronic morphine treatment, and that these animals fail to develop antinociceptive tolerance. However, the deletion of beta-arrestin-2 does not prevent the chronic morphine-induced up-regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity, a cellular marker of dependence, and the mutant mice still become physically dependent on the drug.
 ...
PMID:Mu-opioid receptor desensitization by beta-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence. 1113 73

The development of morphine tolerance and sciatic nerve injury-induced allodynia after functional knockdown of spinal opioid receptors using antisense oligonucleotides targeting beta-arrestin was investigated. Ineffectiveness of morphine in neuropathic pain suggests an implication of the same mechanism in these two processes. The development of morphine tolerance (10 microg intrathecally (i.th.), every 12 h) was significantly inhibited in rats, which received i.th. beta-arrestin antisenses (2 nM). Acute and chronic (6 days) i.th. administration of antisenses antagonized the allodynia in the rat model of neuropathic pain. Our results demonstrated that i.th. administration of beta-arrestin antisenses delayed development of tolerance to morphine and nerve injury-induced cold allodynia, which suggest that both of the investigated phenomena may be mediated by a similar mechanism, e.g. receptor desensitization. Moreover, the antisense oligonucleotides targeting beta-arrestin may constitute a new approach to the therapy of neuropathic pain.
 ...
PMID:Knockdown of spinal opioid receptors by antisense targeting beta-arrestin reduces morphine tolerance and allodynia in rat. 1204 33

Morphine induces antinociception by activating mu opioid receptors (muORs) in spinal and supraspinal regions of the CNS. (Beta)arrestin-2 (beta)arr2), a G-protein-coupled receptor-regulating protein, regulates the muOR in vivo. We have shown previously that mice lacking (beta)arr2 experience enhanced morphine-induced analgesia and do not become tolerant to morphine as determined in the hot-plate test, a paradigm that primarily assesses supraspinal pain responsiveness. To determine the general applicability of the (beta)arr2-muOR interaction in other neuronal systems, we have, in the present study, tested (beta)arr2 knock-out ((beta)arr2-KO) mice using the warm water tail-immersion paradigm, which primarily assesses spinal reflexes to painful thermal stimuli. In this test, the (beta)arr2-KO mice have greater basal nociceptive thresholds and markedly enhanced sensitivity to morphine. Interestingly, however, after a delayed onset, they do ultimately develop morphine tolerance, although to a lesser degree than the wild-type (WT) controls. In the (beta)arr2-KO but not WT mice, morphine tolerance can be completely reversed with a low dose of the classical protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor chelerythrine. These findings provide in vivo evidence that the muOR is differentially regulated in diverse regions of the CNS. Furthermore, although (beta)arr2 appears to be the most prominent and proximal determinant of muOR desensitization and morphine tolerance, in the absence of this mechanism, the contributions of a PKC-dependent regulatory system become readily apparent.
 ...
PMID:Differential mechanisms of morphine antinociceptive tolerance revealed in (beta)arrestin-2 knock-out mice. 1245 Nov 49

The reinforcing and psychomotor effects of morphine involve opiate stimulation of the dopaminergic system via activation of mu-opioid receptors (muOR). Both mu-opioid and dopamine receptors are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family of proteins. GPCRs are known to undergo desensitization involving phosphorylation of the receptor and the subsequent binding of beta(arrestins), which prevents further receptor-G-protein coupling. Mice lacking beta(arrestin)-2 (beta(arr2)) display enhanced sensitivity to morphine in tests of pain perception attributable to impaired desensitization of muOR. However, whether abrogating muOR desensitization affects the reinforcing and psychomotor properties of morphine has remained unexplored. In the present study, we examined this question by assessing the effects of morphine and cocaine on locomotor activity, behavioral sensitization, conditioned place preference, and striatal dopamine release in beta(arr2) knock-out (beta(arr2)-KO) mice and their wild-type (WT) controls. Cocaine treatment resulted in very similar neurochemical and behavioral responses between the genotypes. However, in the beta(arr2)-KO mice, morphine induced more pronounced increases in striatal extracellular dopamine than in WT mice. Moreover, the rewarding properties of morphine in the conditioned place preference test were greater in the beta(arr2)-KO mice when compared with the WT mice. Thus, beta(arr2) appears to play a more important role in the dopaminergic effects mediated by morphine than those induced by cocaine.
 ...
PMID:Enhanced rewarding properties of morphine, but not cocaine, in beta(arrestin)-2 knock-out mice. 1461 85

PARs (protease-activated receptors) are a family of four G-protein-coupled receptors for proteases from the circulation, inflammatory cells and epithelial tissues. This report focuses on PAR(2), which plays an important role in inflammation and pain. Pancreatic (trypsin I and II) and extrapancreatic (trypsin IV) trypsins, mast cell tryptase and coagulation factors VIIa and Xa cleave and activate PAR(2). Proteases cleave PAR(2) to expose a tethered ligand that binds to the cleaved receptor. Despite this irreversible activation, PAR(2) signalling is attenuated by beta-arrestin-mediated desensitization and endocytosis, and by lysosomal targeting and degradation, which requires ubiquitination of PAR(2). beta-Arrestins also act as scaffolds for the assembly of multi-protein signalling complexes that determine the location and function of activated mitogen-activated protein kinases. Observations of PAR(2)-deficient mice support a role for PAR(2) in inflammation, and many of the effects of PAR(2) activators promote inflammation. Inflammation is mediated in part by activation of PAR(2) in the peripheral nervous system, which results in neurogenic inflammation and hyperalgesia.
 ...
PMID:Protease-activated receptor 2: activation, signalling and function. 1464 Oct 24

One of the major problems associated with the chronic use of morphine is tolerance. Repeated uses of morphine to relieve pain often cause patients to develop increasing resistance to the effects of the drugs, so that progressively higher doses are required to achieve the same analgesic effects. Acquired tolerance is thought to be different from dependence or addiction, but molecular mechanism underlying the development of tolerance is still unclear. Tolerance has been explained by desensitization of opioid receptor signaling and loss of functional receptors in the cell surface. The classical hypothesis was that phosphorylation and arrestin binding resulted in uncoupling of the receptor from G proteins, and reduced agonist efficacy. The receptor internalization would then result in fewer functional receptors at the cell surface. These events would cause so-called signaling desensitization. However, recent molecular biological studies have led researchers to revise the classical view of tolerance from observations that morphine does not always promote efficient receptor internalization. Among several key processes, the sequestration and subsequent internalization of the opioid receptor may play an important role for morphine tolerance. In fact, recent studies have suggested that receptor internalization can reduce tolerance. In addition, activation of the NMDA subtype of the glutamate receptor has been suggested as an anti-opioid system in the development of morphine tolerance. In this review, we focus on recent research progress on the morphine tolerance, and molecular biological and clinical approaches to resolve morphine tolerance.
 ...
PMID:[Molecular mechanism of morphine tolerance and biological approaches to resolve tolerance]. 1519 32

Opioids are widely used as analgesics in clinical pain management for decades. However, opioid tolerance is a serious problem which limits their usefulness. The mechanisms of opioid tolerance are complex which involve many regulatory factors. Glutamate is an important extracellular neurotransmitter which activates glutamate receptor and induces a series of signal transduction to regulate the development of opioid tolerance. Previous studies have indicated an involvement of NMDA receptors in the development of beta-opioid tolerance and associated abnormal pain sensitivity. Many NMDA receptor antagonists had been demonstrated to regulate morphine tolerance development. In the NMDA-mediated intracellular mechanisms of opioid tolerance, protein kinase C (PKC) modulates beta-opioid receptor activation. Besides, the opioid receptor desensitization involves phosphorylation of receptors and subsequent binds to beta-arrestin. In knockout mice, lacking beta-arrestin-2, desensitization of beta-opioid receptor did not occur after chronic morphine treatment, and these animals also failed to develop antinociceptive tolerance. Moreover, morphine tolerance can be completely reversed with a low dose of the classical PKC inhibitor chelerythrine in the beta-arrestin-2 knock-out, but not wild-type mice. These findings indicate that, in the absence of beta-arrestin-2, contributions of PKC-dependent regulatory system would become apparent. In summary, PKC is regulated by NMDA receptors to affect the development of opioid tolerance, beta-arrestin-2 also influences PKC-induced opioid receptor desensitization. PKC may play an important role to coordinate these factors which regulate opioid tolerance.
 ...
PMID:Opioid tolerance: is there a dialogue between glutamate and beta-arrestin? 1534 5

G protein-coupled receptor desensitization and trafficking are important regulators of opioid receptor signaling that can dictate overall drug responsiveness in vivo. Furthermore, different mu-opioid receptor (muOR) ligands can lead to varying degrees of receptor regulation, presumably because of distinct structural conformations conferred by agonist binding. For example, morphine binding produces a muOR with low affinity for beta-arrestin proteins and limited receptor internalization, whereas enkephalin analogs promote robust trafficking of both beta-arrestins and the receptors. Here, we evaluate muOR trafficking in response to activation by a novel mu-selective agonist derived from the naturally occurring plant product, salvinorin A. It is interesting that this compound, termed herkinorin, does not promote the recruitment of beta-arrestin-2 to the muOR and does not lead to receptor internalization. Moreover, whereas G protein-coupled receptor kinase overexpression can promote morphine-induced beta-arrestin interactions and muOR internalization, such manipulations do not promote herkinorin-induced trafficking. Studies in mice have shown that beta-arrestin-2 plays an important role in the development of morphine-induced tolerance, constipation, and respiratory depression. Therefore, drugs that can activate the receptor without recruiting the arrestins may be a promising step in the development of opiate analgesics that distinguish between agonist activity and receptor regulation and may ultimately lead to therapeutics designed to provide pain relief without the adverse side effects normally associated with the opiate narcotics.
 ...
PMID:An opioid agonist that does not induce mu-opioid receptor--arrestin interactions or receptor internalization. 1709 Jul 5

Tolerance to peripheral antinociception after chronic exposure to systemic morphine was assessed in mice with chronic CFA-inflammation; cross-tolerance to locally administered mu, delta and kappa-opioid agonists and levels of beta-arrestins in the injured paw, were also evaluated. Tolerance was induced by the subcutaneous implantation of a 75 mg morphine-pellet, and antinociception evaluated with the Randall-Selitto test, 5 min after the subplantar injection of morphine, fentanyl, buprenorphine, DPDPE, U-50488H or CRF. Experiments were performed in the absence and presence of CFA-inflammation, in animals implanted with a morphine or placebo pellet. Beta-arrestin protein levels were determined by western blot. In mice without inflammation, subplantar opioids did not induce antinociception, while during CFA-inflammation, all drugs generated dose-response curves with an order of potency of: U-50488H < DPDPE < morphine < buprenorphine < fentanyl << CRF. During CFA-inflammation plus morphine-pellet, the potency of fentanyl decreased 1.25 times, while that of DPDPE, U-50488H and CRF diminished approximately 2.5-4.3 times. For each drug, the ratio between the ED(50)'s in tolerant and naive animals, was significantly higher than 1 (except for buprenorphine and fentanyl), demonstrating partial cross-tolerance to systemic morphine. Inflammation induced a twofold increase in beta-arrestin expression (p<0.01), and the levels decreased after acute morphine exposure (p<0.05). Tolerance did not alter beta-arrestins, but partially prevented the increase induced by inflammation. The results suggest that peripheral beta-arrestins could facilitate peripheral OR-desensitization and tolerance development. Clinically, the experiments could be useful to establish the effectiveness of local opioid administration in patients with musculoskeletal pain, chronically receiving morphine analgesia.
 ...
PMID:Tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of peripherally administered opioids. Expression of beta-arrestins. 1902 93

The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)) and CB(2) cannabinoid receptors, associated with drugs of abuse, may provide a means to treat pain, mood, and addiction disorders affecting widespread segments of society. Whether the orphan G-protein coupled receptor GPR55 is also a cannabinoid receptor remains unclear as a result of conflicting pharmacological studies. GPR55 has been reported to be activated by exogenous and endogenous cannabinoid compounds but surprisingly also by the endogenous non-cannabinoid mediator lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI). We examined the effects of a representative panel of cannabinoid ligands and LPI on GPR55 using a beta-arrestin-green fluorescent protein biosensor as a direct readout of agonist-mediated receptor activation. Our data demonstrate that AM251 and SR141716A (rimonabant), which are cannabinoid antagonists, and the lipid LPI, which is not a cannabinoid receptor ligand, are GPR55 agonists. They possess comparable efficacy in inducing beta-arrestin trafficking and, moreover, activate the G-protein-dependent signaling of protein kinase CbetaII. Conversely, the potent synthetic cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 acts as a GPR55 antagonist/partial agonist. CP55,940 blocks GPR55 internalization, the formation of beta-arrestin GPR55 complexes, and the phosphorylation of ERK1/2; CP55,940 produces only a slight amount of protein kinase CbetaII membrane recruitment but does not stimulate membrane remodeling like LPI, AM251, or rimonabant. Our studies provide a paradigm for measuring the responsiveness of GPR55 to a variety of ligand scaffolds comprising cannabinoid and novel compounds and suggest that at best GPR55 is an atypical cannabinoid responder. The activation of GPR55 by rimonabant may be responsible for some of the off-target effects that led to its removal as a potential obesity therapy.
 ...
PMID:Atypical responsiveness of the orphan receptor GPR55 to cannabinoid ligands. 1972 26


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>