Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (
pain
)
261,466
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The O-demethylation of codeine (methylmorphine) into morphine is mediated by the polymorphic
cytochrome P450
DB1 (P450 IID6). By means of in vitro screening in human liver microsomes we have studied the effect on codeine bioactivation of several drugs used as analgesics or as adjuvants for
pain
control. In microsomes from an extensive metabolizer subject, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and NSAIDs (acetylsalicylic acid, diclofenac, indomethacin, piroxicam, and pirprofen), benzodiazepines (chlordiazepoxide, clonazepam, diazepam, flunitrazepam, and midazolam), and anticonvulsants (carbamazepine and phenytoin) did not alter the reaction. There was marked inhibition of in vitro morphine production by neuroleptics (chlorpromazine, haloperidol, levomepromazine, and thioridazine), metoclopramide, and tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine, imipramine, and nortriptyline). Enzyme kinetics showed competitive inhibition by neuroleptics (chlorpromazine Ki = 0.5 microM) and antidepressants (clomipramine Ki = 6.8 microM), which are substrates of the polymorphic monooxygenase. Due to the low affinity of codeine for P450 DB1 (Km = 100-200 microM), its bioactivation in extensive metabolizers, and thus its analgesic efficacy, is liable to vary greatly when it is combined with any drug that has a high affinity for the polymorphic isozyme.
...
PMID:In vitro forecasting of drugs that may interfere with codeine bioactivation. 142 9
Capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide) is a primary pungent and irritating principle present in chilies and red peppers which are widely used as spices. Because of its selective effects on the functions of a defined subpopulation of sensory neurons, capsaicin is currently used as a versatile tool for the study of
pain
mechanisms and also for pharmacotherapy to treat several
pain
disorders. Considering the frequent consumption of capsaicin as a food additive and its current medicinal use, correct assessment of hazardous effects of this compound is important. Mutagenic and carcinogenic activities of capsaicin and chili extracts have been studied, but results are conflicting. Mammalian metabolism of capsaicin has been also reported. Capsaicin appears to interact with xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, particularly microsomal
cytochrome P450
-dependent monooxygenases which are involved in activation as well as detoxification of various chemical carcinogens and mutagens. Recent studies have shown that hepatic cytochrome P450 2E1 catalyzes the conversion of capsaicin to reactive species such as the phenoxy radical intermediate capable of covalently binding to the active site of the enzyme as well as tissue macromolecules. While covalent modification of protein and nucleic acids leads to toxicity including necrosis, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis, suicidal inhibition of microsomal
cytochrome P450
may prohibit further activation of capsaicin and also of other toxic xenobiotics. Results from recent studies indicate that capsaicin possesses the chemoprotective activity against some chemical carcinogens and mutagens.
...
PMID:Capsaicin, a double-edged sword: toxicity, metabolism, and chemopreventive potential. 774 93
Flurbiprofen is a chiral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used in the treatment of
pain
or inflammation. The primary routes of biotransformation for (R)- and (S)-flurbiprofen are oxidation (presumably
cytochrome P450
) and conjugation. To date, the specific
cytochrome P450
(P450) involved in the oxidative metabolism of this compound (specifically 4'-hydroxylation) has not been elucidated. Experiments were conducted to characterize the kinetic parameters (Km and Vmax) for the 4'-hydroxylation of (R)- and (S)-flurbiprofen in human liver microsomes, to determine if enantiomeric interactions occur when both enantiomers are present, and to identify the specific P450 form(s) involved in this reaction. In human liver microsomes, the Km and Vmax (mean +/- SD) for (R)-4'-hydroxy-flurbiprofen formation were 3.1 +/- 0.8 microM and 305 +/- 168 pmol.min-1.mg protein)-1, respectively. In comparison, the Km and Vmax (mean +/- SD) for (S)-4'-hydroxy-flurbiprofen formation were 1.9 +/- 0.4 microM and 343 +/- 196 pmol.min-1.mg protein-1, respectively. Enantiomeric interaction studies revealed a decrease in Km and Vmax for both enantiomers and an apparent loss of stereoselectivity. Racemic-warfarin, tolbutamide, alpha-naphthoflavone and erythromycin were studied as potential inhibitors of this process. The estimated Ki values for the inhibition of (R)- and (S)-4'-hydroxy-flurbiprofen formation by racemic-warfarin were 2.2 and 4.7 microM. This reaction was also inhibited by tolbutamide. In contrast, erythromycin and alpha-naphthoflavone had no appreciable effect on 4'-hydroxy-flurbiprofen formation. cDNA-expression of individual forms was used to determine which P450 was involved in 4'-hydroxy-flurbiprofen formation. P450 2C9 and an allelic variant (R144C) readily catalyzed the formation of 4'-hydroxy-flurbiprofen. P450 1A2 was also active albeit with a turnover rate 1/140th that of P450 2C9R144C (P450s 2C8, 2E1 and 3A4 were not active toward either enantiomer). The results of these studies indicate that the enantiomers of flurbiprofen may exhibit stereoselectivity with respect to enzyme affinity but have roughly equal maximum formation velocities. Additionally, these two enantiomers may compete for the enzyme resulting in lower maximum velocities for both enantiomers. Finally, of those P450 forms examined, only P450 2C9 and an allelic variant catalyzed the 4'-hydroxylation of both (R)- and (S)-flurbiprofen.
...
PMID:Role of cytochrome P450 2C9 and an allelic variant in the 4'-hydroxylation of (R)- and (S)-flurbiprofen. 776 8
Pantoprazole is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor which, at the therapeutic dose of 40mg, effectively reduces gastric acid secretion. In controlled clinical trials, pantoprazole (40mg once daily) has proved superior to ranitidine (300mg once daily or 150mg twice daily) and equivalent to omeprazole (20mg once daily) in the short term (< or = 8 weeks) treatment of acute peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing proceeded significantly faster with pantoprazole than with ranitidine, and at similar rates with pantoprazole and omeprazole. The time course of gastric ulcer
pain
relief was similar with pantoprazole, ranitidine and omeprazole, whereas duodenal ulcer
pain
was alleviated more rapidly with pantoprazole than ranitidine. Pantoprazole (40mg once daily) showed superior efficacy to famotidine (40mg once daily) in ulcer healing and
pain
relief after 2 weeks in patients with duodenal ulcer in a large multicentre nonblinded study. In mild to moderate acute reflux oesophagitis, significantly greater healing was obtained with pantoprazole than with ranitidine and famotidine, whereas similar healing rates were seen with pantoprazole and omeprazole. Pantoprazole showed a significant advantage over ranitidine in relieving symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation. Reflux symptoms were similarly alleviated by pantoprazole and omeprazole. Preliminary results indicate that triple therapy with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and either metronidazole or tinidazole is effective in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated disease; however, these findings require confirmation in large well-controlled studies. Pantoprazole appears to be well tolerated during short term oral administration, with diarrhoea (1.5%), headache (1.3%), dizziness (0.7%), pruritus (0.5%) and skin rash (0.4%) representing the most frequent adverse events. The drug has lower affinity than omeprazole or lansoprazole for hepatic
cytochrome P450
and shows no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions at therapeutic doses with a wide range of drug substrates for this isoenzyme system. In conclusion, pantoprazole is superior to ranitidine and as effective as omeprazole in the short term treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis, has shown efficacy when combined with antibacterial agents in H. pylori eradication, is apparently well tolerated and offers the potential advantage of minimal risk of drug interaction.
...
PMID:Pantoprazole. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders. 888 82
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been established as the new "gold standard" for traditional acid-inhibitory treatment of the so called "peptic" diseases. Due to the high antisecretory and ulcer-healing potency of omeprazole, no major improvements of the efficacy in ulcer healing and
pain
relief can be expected. Pantoprazole, as a further development in PPIs, is characterized by improved pharmacokinetic behavior as well as by higher tissue selectivity and binding specificity and by a very low potential to interact with the
cytochrome P450
enzyme system. These characteristics may provide the basis for a low potential for side effects and for a more favorable interaction profile, although the clinical relevance of these potential advantages remains to be proven. Reflux esophagitis will also remain a domain for the traditional use of PPIs in the future. However, in the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers, the acid inhibitory potential of PPIs will be used mainly to facilitate the eradication of H. pylori.
...
PMID:Proton pump inhibitory therapy: then and now. 911 49
Current practice predicates the use of multiple drug combinations in the treatment of neuropathic
pain
. These combinations may be required because of multiple
pain
symptoms directly arising from neuropathic pathology, other symptoms attributable to the chronicity and severity of the patient's
pain
or conditions unrelated to their
pain
. A fear exists that combination drug use or the addition of a new drug to a therapeutic regimen may lead to increased drug toxicity or decreased efficacy. Many of the drug interactions of significance to neuropathic
pain
physicians involve the cytochromes P450 2D6 and 3A3/4 isoenzymes. Drug interactions should be more predictable based on the knowledge of which compounds induce, inhibit or are metabolized by specific
cytochrome P450
enzymes. Mechanisms of induction or inhibition of biotransformation via the P450 hepatic enzyme system are discussed and various inducers, inhibitors and substrates relating to neuropathic
pain
pharmacotherapy are listed.
Pain
1997 Oct
PMID:Drug interactions in human neuropathic pain pharmacotherapy. 941 51
Antiretrovirals from three drug classes, nucleoside analogs, nonnucleoside analogs, and protease inhibitors, can be combined to achieve viral suppression. The nonnucleoside analog nevirapine is an inducer of
cytochrome P450
3A4 liver metabolism and has interactions with protease inhibitors and oral contraceptives. Methadone has two roles in human immunodeficiency viral infection:
pain
management and treatment of opioid abuse. A drug-drug interaction may result in decreased methadone blood levels when administered with nevirapine. A patient experienced methadone withdrawal symptoms when combining these agents.
...
PMID:Methadone withdrawal when starting an antiretroviral regimen including nevirapine. 1021 21
The safety and tolerability of quinupristin/dalfopristin were assessed in both comparative and non-comparative trials (2298 quinupristin/dalfopristin-treated patients). In comparative clinical trials, the most frequent systemic adverse events related to quinupristin/dalfopristin were nausea (4.6%), diarrhoea (2.7%), vomiting (2.7%) and skin rash (2.5%). The comparator group showed similar rates, except that nausea was significantly more common (7.2%; P = 0.01). In non-comparative trials, arthralgia and myalgia were reported most frequently but were reversible upon treatment discontinuation. The renal, inner ear, cardiovascular and central nervous systems were not implicated as significant target organs for toxicity. The most frequent local adverse events related to infusion of quinupristin/dalfopristin were inflammation,
pain
, oedema, infusion site reaction and thrombophlebitis. Results of laboratory tests while on therapy were comparable for quinupristin/dalfopristin and comparator groups, except that increases in conjugated bilirubin of >5 x the upper limit of normal were reported in 5.5% of quinupristin/dalfopristin recipients; increases in total bilirubin of >5 x the upper limit of normal occurred in 1.5%. Comparator recipients more frequently had increases in alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase. Quinupristin/dalfopristin inhibits the
cytochrome P450
3A4-mediated metabolism of drugs including midazolam, nifedipine, terfenadine and cyclosporin. Therefore, plasma drug monitoring and/or dosage reduction of these agents is prudent. Concomitant administration of drugs that can prolong the electrocardiographic QTc interval should be avoided. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is visually and chemically compatible with commonly used drugs of various classes, but it is not compatible with sodium chloride solution and certain other drugs, including some antimicrobials. Therefore, when prescribing quinupristin/dalfopristin, clinicians should be aware of the potential for peripheral venous intolerance, arthralgias and myalgias, increases in conjugated bilirubin, interactions with drugs metabolized by the
cytochrome P450
3A4 isoenzyme and certain physico-chemical incompatibilities. However, multiple studies have shown that the safety and tolerability of quinupristin/dalfopristin are generally favourable, and that it provides clear benefits to ill patients with severe gram-positive infections.
...
PMID:Safety and tolerability of quinupristin/dalfopristin: administration guidelines. 1051 96
5-HT3-receptor antagonists are potent and highly selective competitive inhibitors of the 5-HT3-receptor with negligible affinity for other receptors. They are rapidly absorbed and penetrate the blood-brain barrier easily. 5-HT3-receptor antagonists are metabolized by diverse subtypes of the
cytochrome P450
-system, metabolites are excreted mainly in urine. Half-lifes in healthy subjects vary from 3-4 hours (ondansetron, granisetron) to 7-10 hours (tropisetron, hydrodolasetron). 5-HT3-receptor antagonists do not modify any aspect of normal behaviour in animals or induce remarkable changes of physiological functions in healthy subjects. They are well tolerated over wide dose ranges, most common side effects in clinical use are headache and obstipation. Clinical efficacy was first established in chemotherapy-induced emesis. In this indication, 5-HT3-receptor antagonists set a new standard regarding efficacy and tolerability. Further established indications are radiotherapy-induced and post-operative emesis. Antiemetic efficacy results from a simultaneous action at peripheral and central 5-HT3-receptors. Other peripheral actions include reduction of secretion and diarrhea caused by increased intestinal serotonin content (e.g. in carcinoid syndrome), a limited antiarrhythmic activity and a reduction of experimentally induced
pain
. CNS effects comprise anxiolysis, attenuation of age-associated memory impairment, reduction of alcohol consumption in moderate alcohol abuse and an antipsychotic effect in patients with parkinson psychosis. In migraine, 5-HT3-receptor antagonists show moderate efficacy, as well. Repeatedly demonstrated efficacy of 5-HT3-receptor antagonists in patients suffering from fibromyalgia raises the question for the mechanism of action involved. Ligand binding at the 5-HT3-receptor causes manifold effects on other neurotransmitter and neuropeptide systems. In particular, 5-HT3-receptor antagonists diminish serotonin-induced release of substance P from C-fibers and prevent unmasking of NK2-receptors in the presence of serotonin. These observations possibly provide an approach for the causal explanation of favourable treatment results with 5-HT3-receptor antagonists in fibromyalgia.
...
PMID:Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. 1102 30
I believe there are four essential elements in the management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): to establish a good physician-patient relationship; to educate patients about their condition; to emphasize the excellent prognosis and benign nature of the illness; and to employ therapeutic interventions centering on dietary modifications, pharmacotherapy, and behavioral strategies tailored to the individual. Initially, I establish the diagnosis, exclude organic causes, educate patients about the disease, establish realistic expectations and consistent limits, and involve patients in disease management. I find it critical to determine why the patient is seeking assistance (eg, cancer phobia, disability, interpersonal distress, or exacerbation of symptoms). Most patients can be treated by their primary care physician. However, specialty consultations may be needed to reinforce management strategies, perform additional diagnostic tests, or institute specialized treatment. Psychological co-morbidities do not cause symptoms but do affect how patients respond to them and influence health care-seeking behavior. I find that these issues are best explored over a series of visits when the physician-patient relationship has been established. It can be helpful to have patients fill out a self-administered test to identify psychological co-morbidities. I often use these tests as a basis for extended inquiries into this area, resulting in the initiation of appropriate therapies. I encourage patients to keep a 2-week diary of food intake and gastrointestinal symptoms. In this way, patients become actively involved in management of their disease, and I may be able to obtain information from the diary that will be valuable in making treatment decisions. I do not believe that diagnostic studies for food intolerances are cost-effective or particularly helpful; however, exclusion diets may be beneficial. I introduce fiber supplements gradually and monitor them for tolerance and palatability. Synthetic fiber is often better-tolerated than natural fiber, but must be individualized. In my experience, excessive fiber supplementation often is counterproductive, as abdominal cramps and bloating may worsen. Antidiarrheal agents are very effective when used correctly, preferably in divided doses. I use them in patients in anticipation of diarrhea and especially in those who fear symptoms when engaged in activities outside the home. I encourage patients to make decisions as to when and how much to use. However, almost always, a morning dose before breakfast is used (loperamide, 2 to 6 mg) and, perhaps again later in the day when symptoms of diarrhea are prominent. I prefer antispasmodics to be used intermittently in response to periods of increased abdominal pain, cramps, and urgency. For patients with daily symptoms, especially after meals, agents such as dicyclomine before meals are useful. For patients with infrequent but severe episodes of unpredictable
pain
, sublingual hyoscyamine often produces rapid relief and instills confidence. In general, I recommend that oral antispasmodics be used for a limited period of time rather than indefinitely, and generally for periods of time when symptoms are prominent. For chronic visceral
pain
syndromes, I recommend small doses of tricyclic antidepressants. These agents are especially effective in diarrhea-predominant patients with disturbed sleep patterns but may be unacceptable to patients with constipation. I educate patients that side effects occur early and benefits may not be apparent for 3 to 4 weeks. I consider using SSRIs in low doses in patients with constipation-predominant IBS; cisapride, 10 to 20 mg three times per day, also may be beneficial. When taken with drugs that inhibit
cytochrome P450
, cisapride has been associated with serious cardiac arrhythmias caused by QT prolongation, including ventricular arrhythmias and torsades de pointes. These drugs include the azole fungicides; erythromycin, clarithromycin, and troleandomycin; some antidepressants; HIV protease inhibitors; and others. In patients with IBS with mild to moderate co-morbid depression, I have found that the use of SSRIs such as paroxetine, fluoxetine, or sertraline may be beneficial. It is important to tell patients that anxiety and disturbed sleep may occur during the first 10 days and benefits may not occur for 3 to 4 weeks. I prescribe a small amount of a short-acting benzodiazepine such as alprazolam, 0.5 mg two times per day, to control these symptoms. For generalized anxiety without depression, buspirone or clonazepam may be useful. I have found that patients who also have associated panic disorder may benefit from a benzodiazepine, tricyclic antidepressant, or an SSRI. However, these patients are best managed in conjunction with a psychiatrist or psychologist. I consider the use of alternative therapies in patients who fail to respond to conventional measures and who are receptive to alternative strategies. These include general relaxation techniques such as biofeedback and hypnosis therapies.
...
PMID:Irritable Bowel Syndrome. 1109 67
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>