Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0028754 (obesity)
 124,988 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Sleep apnea syndrome is a condition characterized by recurrent interruption of breathing during sleep. Triad of symptoms for the disease are insomnia, daytime sleepiness and snoring. Recently, the patients complained of these symptoms have progressively increased. And so serious attention has been given to investigate the entity of this new clinical syndrome in medical and dental aspects. Three types of sleep apnea are classified; central, obstructive and mixed type. Most of patients identified this syndrome include obstructive or mixed types of sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea has been presumed to have close relationships with obesity, micrognathia, retrognathia, tonsillary hypertrophy, tongue hypertrophy and so on. This study was designed to evaluate the characteristics of the dentofacial morphology in the obstructive, included mixed, sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) patients. The samples consisted of 25 adult male patients (average age of 48 years 2 months) with OSA as diagnosed by the division of respiratory disease, department of internal medicine, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital. One lateral radiographic cephalogram with the teeth in occlusion and the recording of somatic measurements, body weight and height, were obtained for each patient at visiting our orthodontic clinic. On the lateral cephalograms of whole samples, 10 angular and 6 linear measurements were carried out. Simultaneously, the body mass index (BMI) was assessed for each patient. Based on the cephalometric and somatometric measurements, the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea was discussed in association with the obesity and dentofacial morphology. Results were summarized as follows: 1. The body mass index (kg/m2) ranged between 21.0 to 45.7, with a mean value of 31.0 for OSA patients. Of whom, 3 patients were mildly obese (25 or more of BMI) and 12 patients severely obese (exceeding 30 of BMI). 2. Compared with normal control samples, the means of cephalometric variables of whole samples showed the tendency of micrognathia, large gonial angle, protruded maxilla and large cranial base. 3. By principal component analysis, it was revealed that the components for the shape and position of the mandible were of more importance in OSA patients than controls. 4. Discriminatory analysis clarified significant differences in dentofacial morphology between 12 obese and 13 non-obese patients. 5. The dentofacial morphology in non-obese patients were characterized by retrognathia, micrognathia, large gonial angle and small maxilla. In accordance with previous reports, the patients with OSA were presented the tendency of obesity and micrognathia. Furthermore it was revealed that particularly in non-obese OSA patients the morphological abnormalities might be the major contributor to the pathogenesis of sleep apnea.
 ...
PMID:[Dentofacial morphology of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients]. 264 Sep 22

A well-resourced, comprehensive, population-based set of strategies is needed to attenuate and eventually reverse the current trends of increasing obesity prevalence now apparent in most countries. The Epidemiological Triad (host, vector, environment) has proven to be a robust model for other epidemics and is applied to obesity. Host-based strategies are primarily educational and these tend to be most effective among people with higher incomes and higher educational attainment. The main vectors for a high-energy intake are energy-dense foods and drinks and large portion sizes and, for low energy expenditure, machines that promote physical inactivity. Vector-based strategies that alter food formulation can have a significant impact, particularly through influencing common, high-volume foods. The increasingly 'obesogenic' environments are probably the main driving forces for the obesity epidemic. There are many environmental strategies that can influence the physical, economic, policy or socio-cultural environments, but the evidence base for these potentially powerful interventions is small. Children should be the priority population for interventions, and improving the general socio-economic conditions for disadvantaged, marginalized or poor population sectors is also a central strategy for obesity prevention. The key settings for interventions are schools, homes, neighbourhoods, primary health care services and communities. The key macroenvironments for interventions are the transport and infrastructure sector, the media and the food sector.
 ...
PMID:Preventive strategies against weight gain and obesity. 1245 74