Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0028754 (obesity)
 124,988 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Our aim was to analyze the predictive value of a variety of preoperative risk factors on operative outcomes. We reviewed all colorectal resections performed in a single hospital between January 1985 and May 1990. Nine hundred seventy-two resections were performed on 825 patients. We studied 17 preoperative risk factors generated from various medical risk categories. Using the multivariate discriminant function analysis, we calculated that 11 of the 17 risks were of significance in predicting outcomes (all with P less than or equal to 0.031). These factors included emergent operation, age greater than or equal to 75 years, congestive heart failure (CHF), prior abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy, corticosteroid use, albumin less than 2.7 g/dl, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), previous myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes, cirrhosis, and renal insufficiency. The classification function generated by the discriminant analysis was used to categorize patients into one of four risk groups depending on their "risk score." The index used to develop each patient's "risk score" ranged from six points for an emergency operation to one point for diabetes. The mortality rates for the various risk groups were as follows: Group 1, zero to four points, 1 percent; Group 2, five to eight points, 10 percent; Group 3, 9 to 13 points, 19 percent; Group 4, greater than 13 points, 33 percent. In contrast to previous reports, we showed that age greater than or equal to 75 years alone is not a major preoperative risk factor but, rather, acts as a modifier for the other predictors of postoperative complications. We then assessed clinical questions concerning specific preoperative risks, such as steroid use, obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, COPD, and prior laparotomy, and their associated specific postoperative complications and have developed prevention strategies based on these findings. Through the use of the risk index, we also were able to assess an individual patient's operative risk more accurately.
Dis Colon Rectum 1992 Feb
PMID:Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections. 173 12

Perianal hidradenitis suppurativa, a chronic recurrent inflammatory disease of apocrine glands, adjacent anal canal skin, and soft tissues, is characteristically ignored and misdiagnosed. A retrospective analysis of 43 patients with perianal hidradenitis suppurativa was performed; 40 patients (93 percent) were male and 3 (7 percent) were female, with a median age at presentation of 29 years. Symptoms, including pain, swelling, purulent discharge, and pruritus, had been present for a median of six years. Diagnoses at the time of presentation included pilonidal disease (28 percent), anal fistula (37 percent), and perirectal abscess (16 percent). Associated medical conditions included diabetes (12 percent) and obesity (12 percent), and 70 percent of the patients were smokers. Once the correct diagnosis was established, 72 percent of patients had wide local excision with healing by secondary intention, and 28 percent of patients had incision and drainage or limited local excision. Although 67 percent of the patients had recurrence of disease after initial treatment, wide excision was more successful in preventing recurrence. Skin grafting failed uniformly, and colostomy was rarely necessary. Despite its relatively common occurrence, perianal hidradenitis suppurativa is infrequently diagnosed correctly and recurs in many patients despite appropriate surgical treatment, making the disease a source of frustration for surgeon and patient alike.
Dis Colon Rectum 1990 Sep
PMID:Perianal hidradenitis suppurativa. The Lahey Clinic experience. 239 Sep 7

This multicenter, prospective, randomized trial of short-term antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery was designed to compare the efficacy of a single dose of cefotetan vs. multiple doses of cefoxitin. Of the 403 evaluable patients, 206 received cefoxitin (1 gm intravenously at the beginning of surgery and after 3, 6, and 12 hours, group A) and 197 cefotetan (2 gm intravenously at the beginning of surgery, group B). The two groups of patients were similar in respect to age, sex, obesity, preoperative weight loss, diabetes, type of disease, type, and mean duration of surgery. The abdominal wound infection rate was 11.2 percent in group A and 9.1 percent in group B (difference not significant). The number of patients with infections at nonsurgical sites (respiratory and urinary tract, phlebitis, and septicemia) was significantly greater in group A than in group B (17 vs. 9.1 percent, P less than .05). The mean postoperative hospital stay was similar in both the cefoxitin and cefotetan groups (15.1 vs. 15.9 days). Both regimens were inadequate in preventing infections in the presence of severe contamination of the operative field.
Dis Colon Rectum 1989 Feb
PMID:Single-dose cefotetan vs. multiple-dose cefoxitin--antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. 264 8

Anastomotic stenosis is a poorly understood and underexamined complication of gastrointestinal surgery, reportedly most frequent in the coloproctostomy. In order to better define this problem, a questionnaire was sent to members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons regarding patients with gastrointestinal anastomotic stenosis. A total of 123 patients with intestinal anastomotic stenosis were analyzed. Eighty-two anastomoses were stapled and 41 were handsewn. Nearly all stenoses occurred in the distal bowel (70 rectal, 23 sigmoid colon). Preoperative risk factors identified were obesity (28 patients) and abscess (12 patients). Incomplete "doughnuts" were noted in 12 patients. Postoperative anastomotic leaks (15 patients), pelvic infection (13 patients), and postoperative radiation (7 patients) were believed to be contributing factors. Dilatation, using a variety of techniques, was the sole treatment for 65 patients, however, intra-abdominal surgery was necessary in 34 patients. Large intestinal anastomotic stenosis probably occurs most commonly following coloproctostomy (both with handsewn and stapled anastomoses). Dilatation alone resulted in adequate treatment in most patients in the study. Major surgery was required to correct this problem in a significant number of patients (28 percent) in this series. The true incidence of anastomotic stenosis in colorectal surgery is unknown and warrants further study.
Dis Colon Rectum 1989 Sep
PMID:Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. 266 22

Two hundred thirty two patients with rectal cancer at or below the peritoneal reflection, who underwent extended systematic lymphadenectomy, especially lateral node dissection, were reviewed with respect to survival rate, degree of surgical technique, and mode of recurrence. On the basis of the extent of lateral node spread, two types of lateral node dissection were performed, consisting of preservation of internal iliac vessels (conventional) and en bloc excision of these vessels (extended). The overall disease-free five-year survival rate was 69.4 percent in all patients--75.8 percent for those who underwent extended resection and 67.4 percent for those who underwent conventional resection an excellent survival rate of 49 percent of patients with lateral node metastasis was obtained. The analysis was carried out with regard to prognostic factors such as number of node metastases, obesity index, mode of recurrence, etc. We would recommend that systemic lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection be performed for advanced rectal cancer at or below the peritoneal reflection.
Dis Colon Rectum 1989 Apr
PMID:Significance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection. 278 76

We hypothesize that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is associated with colorectal cancer given its association with insulin, diabetes, obesity, and inflammation. In this study, we evaluated the association between colorectal cancer and specific tumor mutations and the Pro12Ala (P12A) PPARgamma polymorphism. We also evaluated interactions between the PPARgamma gene and other insulin-related genes and use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Data were available from 1,577 cases of colon cancer that were matched to 1,971 population-based controls and 794 cases of rectal cancer that were matched to 1,001 population-based controls. Colon tumors from the case subjects were evaluated for p53 and Ki-ras mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI). Insulin-related genes evaluated were the Bsm1, polyA, and Fok1 polymorphisms of the VDR gene; the G972R IRS1 polymorphism; the G1057D IRS2 polymorphism; the 19CA repeat polymorphism of the IGF1 gene; and the -200A>C IGFBP3 polymorphism. The odds ratio (OR) between the PA/AA genotypes and proximal tumors was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.69-1.01); for distal tumors was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.83-1.21); and for rectal tumors was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.86-1.25). Evaluation of specific types of tumor mutations showed that colon cancer cases with the PA or AA genotypes were less likely to have p53 tumor mutations (OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99), specifically transition mutations (OR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.56-0.97). Colon cancer cases also were less likely to have a tumor with MSI if they had the PA or AA PPARgamma genotype (OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-0.98); differences in Ki-ras mutations were not seen in colon tumors by PPARgamma genotype. Those who did not take ibuprofen-type drugs and had the PA or AA genotypes were at a significantly greater risk of rectal cancer (OR 2.11; 95% CI: 1.52-2.92; p interaction 0.03) than people with the PP genotype regardless of ibuprofen-type drug use. There was a significant interaction between the -200A>C IGFBP3 polymorphism and the Pro12Ala PPARgamma polymorphism and risk of colon cancer (p for interaction = 0.02) with individuals being at significantly lower risk if they had both the CC IGFBP3 genotype and the PA/AA PPARgamma genotype. For rectal cancer there was a significant interaction between the Bsm1/polyA polymorphisms (p = 0.001) of the VDR gene and the PA/AA Pro12Ala PPARgamma polymorphism with the highest risk group being those with both the PA/AA Pro12Ala PPARgamma and the BB/SS VDR genotypes. These data suggest that PPARgamma may be associated with many aspects of colorectal cancer including insulin- and inflammation-related mechanisms.
 ...
PMID:PPARgamma and colon and rectal cancer: associations with specific tumor mutations, aspirin, ibuprofen and insulin-related genes (United States). 1648 31

Peptide YY (PYY) is secreted as a 36 amino acid, straight chain polypeptide, and is found in greatest concentrations in the terminal ileum, colon and rectum. After secretion, dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) cleaves the N-terminal Tyrosine-Proline residues from PYY(1-36), producing PYY(3-36). PYY(1-36) acts at all four human Y receptors, Y1, Y2, Y4 and Y5, while PYY(336) is a specific Y2 receptor agonist. PYY participates in the regulation of appetite and weight balance through hypothalamic-based mechanisms. PYY(1-36) stimulates appetite and weight gain through Y1 and Y5 receptors. PYY(3-36) suppresses appetite and stimulates weight loss through Y2 receptors. GI diseases that cause malabsorption increase both basal and meal-stimulated PYY levels. In contrast, obesity decreases both basal and meal-stimulated PYY levels. Mutations in the human PYY and Y2 receptor genes may contribute to the development of obesity. Small bowel resection elevates PYY levels in humans. Colon resections increase PYY levels in animal models but not in man. PYY changes following bariatric operations are incompletely studied. Vertical banded gastroplasty, open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and jejunoileal bypass significantly elevate basal and meal-stimulated PYY levels. In dogs with Pavlov pouches, Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy (duodenal switch) increases PYY levels compared to Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. DPP-IV activity is increased in obese individuals and remains increased after biliopancreatic diversion. Thus, diseases or operations which cause malabsorption, elevate basal and meal-stimulated PYY levels. Bariatric operations also increase basal and meal-stimulated PYY levels. This suggests that the combination of increased PYY levels and elevated levels of DPP-IV observed after bariatric operations may generate increased circulating levels of PYY(3-36), leading to hypothalamic-mediated suppression of appetite and promotion of weight loss through Y2 receptor mediated mechanisms.
 ...
PMID:Peptide YY(1-36) and peptide YY(3-36): Part II. Changes after gastrointestinal surgery and bariatric surgery. 1675 46

Colorectal cancer causes significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. The incidence of colorectal cancer can be reduced with increasing efforts directed at mass screening of average-risk adults 50 years and older. Currently, fecal occult blood test and flexible sigmoidoscopy have the highest levels of evidence to support their use for colorectal cancer screening. Colonoscopy does not have a proven colorectal cancer mortality benefit, but it does have the greatest single-test accuracy, and it is the final test in the pathway to evaluate and treat patients with other abnormal screening tests. Double-contrast barium enema has sparse data of effectiveness. Computed tomographic colonography, fecal DNA testing, and Pillcam Colon are promising tests that need further study before they can be recommended for widespread screening. Routine screening should continue until 75 years of age. There is good evidence that fiber and antioxidants are not effective for primary prevention of colorectal cancer; they should not be recommended for chemoprevention. There is good evidence that aspirin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are effective for decreasing the risk of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, but increased risks, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, limit their usefulness. There is fair evidence that obesity is associated with colorectal cancer. Additional studies are needed on decreased fat intake and red meat consumption, and the use of calcium, vitamin D, and statins before these can be recommended for primary prevention of colorectal cancer.
 ...
PMID:Colorectal cancer: a summary of the evidence for screening and prevention. 2043 20

Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy in men and women and accounts for 10% of all cancer deaths. The primary risk factor for colorectal cancer is advancing age, but other factors also play a role in its development, including genetic predisposition, smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, and high-fat, low-fiber diet. Colon cancer survival is primarily related to the stage of disease at diagnosis. The main screening tests for colon cancer are fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. The pre-operative evaluation should include a complete blood count, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), colonoscopy, and chest radiograph. Other preoperative evaluations are patient specific or of unproven benefit. The operative procedure should include a bowel preparation, parenteral antibiotics, and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. The procedure performed must be tailored to the location of the colon cancer but should include complete, en bloc resection of the cancer and its lymphatic drainage, including locally invaded structures. The bowel margins of resection should be at least 5 cm from the tumor to minimize anastomotic recurrences. Laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to be as safe and effective as open colectomy for the treatment of colon cancer. The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy is feasible but has not yet been proved clinically useful. Surveillance after surgery for colon cancer is necessary to monitor for metastatic disease or local recurrence. Several groups have made surveillance recommendations including office visits, colonoscopy, and CEA monitoring.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2005 Aug
PMID:Preoperative evaluation and oncologic principles of colon cancer surgery. 2001 Dec 99

Perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection (APR) is a common occurrence. Risk factors such as operative technique, preoperative radiation therapy, and indication for surgery (i.e., rectal cancer, anal cancer, or inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]) are strong predictors of these complications. Patient risk factors include diabetes, obesity, and smoking. Intraoperative perineal wound management has evolved from open wound packing to primary closure with closed suctioned transabdominal pelvic drains. Wide excision is used to gain local control in cancer patients, and coupled with the increased use of pelvic radiation therapy, we have experienced increased challenges with primary closure of the perineal wound. Tissue transfer techniques such as omental pedicle flaps, and vertical rectus abdominis and gracilis muscle or myocutaneous flaps are being used to reconstruct large perineal defects and decrease the incidence of perineal wound complications. Wound failure is frequently managed by wet to dry dressing changes, but can result in prolonged hospital stay, hospital readmission, home nursing wound care needs, and the expenditure of significant medical costs. Adjuvant therapies to conservative wound care have been suggested, but evidence is still lacking. The use of the vacuum-assisted closure device has shown promise in chronic soft tissue wounds; however, experience is lacking, and is likely due to the difficulty in application techniques.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008 Feb
PMID:Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection. 2001


1 2 3 Next >>