Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0028754 (obesity)
 124,988 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Nonalcoholic steatotic hepatitis (NASH), the most prevalent form of progressive liver disease in the United States, is considered to be a manifestation of insulin resistance syndrome. There is increasing evidence that steatosis in NASH is a result of the pathology in fat metabolism occurring in obesity and insulin resistance. For steatosis to progress to necroinflammation and fibrosis, however, the theory of mitochondrial oxidative-stress induced cellular damage is receiving wide acceptance. Treatment approaches that address these etiologies are reviewed: betaine, magnesium, and vitamin E.
 ...
PMID:Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: relationship to insulin sensitivity and oxidative stress. Treatment approaches using vitamin E, magnesium, and betaine. 1219 81

Earlier and more frequent sexual activity and the significant risk of pregnancy have increased the need for contraception among young adolescent girls. The problem for the physician is to choose a contraceptive method which will not affect future fertility or the psychological and biological maturity of adolescents. Condoms, diaphragms, and spermicides are quite effective if used correctly; they have no deleterious side effects, and they provide protection against sexually transmitted diseases. They appear to be well-adapted to the sporadic sexual activity of adolescents. The efficacy of combined oral contraceptives (OCs) is also high. Side effects depend on the synthetic estrogen component and are dose dependent. Absolute contraindications to OC use in women of any age include thromboembolic disease, cerebral vascular accidents, severe cardiac or hepatic disorders, breast or genital cancer, pregnancy, undiagnosed genital bleeding, and pituitary adenoma. Relative contraindications include hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, history of hepatitis, migraines, epilepsy, asthma, renal insufficiency, cystic breast disease, and mammary fibroadenomas. Combined OCs do not seem to interfere with subsequent maturation of the hypothalamopituitary axis. The frequency of ovulatory cycles in adolescents who have discontinued pill use is the same as that in adolescents who have never used pills. However, estrogens accelerate the process of maturation in the bones, so combined OCs should never be prescribed for girls who have not terminated their growth. Minidose OCs containing 30-45 mcg of ethinyl estradiol aggravate the relative hyperestrogenism of adolescents and are associated with menstrual problems, functional ovarian cysts, and breast problems. They should only be prescribed for adolescents with regular sexual activity, no less than 3 years following menarche, with regular ovulatory menstrual cycles and no history of breast disorders. Otherwise, a standard-dose combined pill with 50 mcg EE should be selected. Continuous dose progestin minipills depend on peripheral effects such as modifications in the cervical mucus for their contraceptive effects. They are associated with frequent menstrual problems, functional ovarian cysts, and extrauterine pregnancies. They may be indicated for adolescents with regular sexual activity but with contraindications to combined OCs. Trimonthly injections of medroxyprogesterone acetate have major effects on endocrine metabolism and should be used only for adolescents with severe mental problems. IUD efficacy is high but they may be less well tolerated by adolescents than by older women and the risk of infection may be heightened. They should only be used for adolescents with absolute contraindications to use of hormonal contraceptives who have no history of genital infections.
 ...
PMID:[Choosing contraception for adolescents]. 1228 May 85

We assessed the cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in 116 stable liver transplant patients surviving for 5 years or more (median: 102 months). The prevalence of smokers was 29.3%, hypertension 49.1%, obesity 22.4%, hypercholesterolemia 34.5%, hypertriglyceridemia 11.2%, and hyperhomocysteinemia 57.8%. Diabetes was found in 21.5% of the patients, being more frequent in patients with hepatitis-C-virus infection (31.8% vs 15.3%; P=0.03). Patients on cyclosporine therapy had a higher prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and hyperhomocysteinemia than those treated with tacrolimus. Multivariate analysis showed only an association between cyclosporine therapy and cholesterol concentrations (odds ratio:1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.03; P=0.01). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia was lower at the time of the study than at 1 and 3 years after transplantation ( P<0.05), probably related to steroid withdrawal. Comparing 87 patients' CVRFs with the general Spanish population, we found that the age-gender standardized prevalence ratio was not different: smoking 1.46 (95% CI: 0.88-1.76), obesity 1.16 (95% CI: 0.60-1.44), hypertension 1.55 (95% CI: 0.98-1.81), and hypercholesterolemia 0.64 (95%CI: 0.35-1.90). We conclude that the prevalence of CVRFs in liver transplant patients after 5 years or more is lower that found in the first years after the transplantation, and no different from that found within the Spanish population.
 ...
PMID:Cardiovascular risk factors in 116 patients 5 years or more after liver transplantation. 1246 60

Orlistat (tetrahydrolipostatin) is a lipase inhibitor which is used, in conjunction with appropriate dietary control, for the treatment of obesity. It is generally deemed to be a safe drug, which mainly exerts a topical action on the stomach and small bowel, with negligible systemic absorption and oral bioavailability. Consequently, its adverse effects have largely been limited to relatively mild gastrointestinal disorders. However, there have been recent, published reports of non-fatal acute hepatitis and systemic hypertension associated with its use. The present case concerns a 62-year-old male who died from massive hepatocellular necrosis, consistent with drug-induced, fulminant hepatitis, associated with the use of oral orlistat, presumably administered at the recommended daily dose of 360 mg. It is postulated that this may represent a rare idiosyncratic reaction to the drug.
 ...
PMID:Massive hepatocellular [correction of hepatocullular] necrosis: was it caused by Orlistat? 1248 15

Orlistat(Xenical(R), Roche) is considered a safe and effective drug to treat obesity by reduced absorption of 30% digested fat. To date, no serious adverse effects affecting the liver have been published except a case of subacute hepatic failure leading to liver transplantation in a young women with moderate obesity treated with orlistat. We report a case of acute cholestatic hepatitis in a young woman with moderate obesity treated with orlistat: a 33-year-old female admitted for the evaluation of jaundice. Abdominal ultrasonography, ERCP, routine chemistry, viral markers, and a fine needle biopsy of liver were performed. Microscopic findings of the liver biopsy specimen were compatible with acute cholestatic hepatitis. After steroid therapy, liver function was improved.
 ...
PMID:[A case of acute cholestatic hepatitis associated with Orlistat]. 1249 90

The strategy in the choice of antipsychotic agent must take into account the hepatic tolerance according to non-negligible incidence of liver disorders among psychiatric population (presence of risk factors like alcoholism, drugs of abuse intake, polymedication including potentially hepatotoxic drugs.). More than 1 000 drugs have been listed as being responsible of hepatic side effects; 16% of these agents were neuropsychiatric drugs. Antidepressive drugs (tricyclic agents or SSRI), mood stabilizing agents and neuroleptic drugs have been implicated in biological or/and clinical hepatotoxicity. For these reasons, some psychotropic agents have been withdrawn of the pharmaceutical market like alpidem or medifoxamine. Atrium*, sometimes used to correct tremor induced by neuroleptic drugs, has been withdrawn recently, as well. Isolated elevations of hepatic enzymes occur frequently with phenothiazines drugs (frequency evaluated to 20%) but also with other classes of neuroleptic agents, as well. On the contrary, clinical hepatitis have been more rarely described with neuroleptic drugs like phenothiazine agents (0,1-1%) or with haloperidol (0,002%). The definition of hepatotoxicity is based on biological parameters (elevation of alkaline phosphatase enzyme, SGPT, SGOT and GGT) or on clinical abnormalities (hepatitis, jaundice.). Clinical hepatitis could be either cytolytic or cholestatic. Clinical diagnosis and the research of its origin may include many investigations like abdominal ultrasonogram and percutaneous liver biopsy. The present article describes the cases of hepatic disorders reported with AAD (Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs), which are available in France (amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone). This new pharmacological class of antipsychotic drugs has showed great interest to improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia and to reduce disabling side effects like dystonia. According to the bibliographic data available, the following points and information must be clinically taken into account. Frequency of hepatic troubles: according to the bibliographic data, AAD appeared generally well tolerated in most cases. The frequency of hepatic troubles remains in general very low or rare. The cases published were observed with clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone. Nevertheless, some authors have observed higher frequency of hepatic enzymes elevation with some AAD. In an investigation comparing hepatic tolerance of clozapine (n=167) versus haloperidol (n=71), 37,3% of clozapine treated patients showed a relevant SGPT increase versus 16,6% with haloperidol. Nature of the hepatic troubles: among the clinical observations, asymptomatic biological disorders of the hepatic function are generally described but cytolytic or cholestatic hepatitis were reported, as well. Symptomatic hepatic dysfunctions were, sometimes, associated with other disorders like convulsions, pneumonia or malignant syndrome. Thus, hepatic check-up may be relevant in case of significant side-effect outcome. Delay time before the hepatic episode: hepatic injuries generally occurred within the first weeks of treatment but this delay highly varied in the literature from 1 to 8 weeks, 12 days to 5 months, 1 day to 17 months for clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone, respectively. These delay times are very similar to those observed with other psychotropic drugs. Reversibility of the hepatic troubles and rechallenge of the responsible agent: all cases were reversible after the AAD withdrawal except with one patient (39 years old) treated by clozapine (350 mg/day) who developed a fulminant and irreversible hepatitis after 8 weeks of monotherapy. In most cases, the AAD was withdrawn after the hepatic episode according to the significant risk of irreversible alteration. Nevertheless, normalization of hepatic enzymes has been described despite AAD maintenance at the same dosage or after dosage reduction. Rechallenge of clozapine after a first episode was performed for three patients, only one redeveloped a new hepatic disorder. According to different authors, special care is required if maintenance or rechallenge of the agent is indispensable after a first episode of isolated hepatic enzyme elevation (i.e resistance or intolerance to other treatments). In this case, biological and clinical supervision has to be carefully scheduled, which demands a satisfactory compliance from the patient. On the contrary, in case of clinical hepatotoxicity, rechallenge or maintenance is absolutely inadvisable. Mechanism of the hepatic troubles: precise mechanisms of the hepatotoxicity remain unclear. Contrary to phenothiazine drugs, no information is available on the respective rule of the agents and their metabolites. Hypersensitivity syndrome or eosinophilia has been reported, suggesting a possible immuno-allergic mechanism. Presence of risk factors: risk factors have been retrieved, in some observations, like high daily dosage, high plasmatic concentration, age, alcoholism, obesity or antecedent of hepatic disorders like Gilbert syndrome. Special care is advisable with these patients. As hepatotoxicity has been observed after surdosage (or suicide attempt), a hepatic check-up has to be performed in these clinical situations. Co-medication with hepatotoxic drugs may increase the risk as it has been suggested. In many observations, co-medication made difficult the incrimination of the AAD in the hepatic disorders outcome. Monotherapy has the great advantage to make easier the withdrawal of the responsible agent and its substitution. As drugs of abuse like cocaine or ecstasy are notoriously responsible of hepatotoxicity, they represent a probable factor of risk. Moreover, their detection is fundamental during the clinical investigation. Conclusion - Diagnosis of toxic hepatitis is mainly based on the chronology between agent introduction and hepatic disorder onset but other causes must be excluded. Bibliographic data analysis greatly contributes to confirm toxic hepatitis diagnosis. Nevertheless, this article emphasized the limits of bibliographic review to compare drugs towards tolerance. Most of the bibliographic data were case-reports for which it was sometimes difficult to provide absolute evidence of the responsibility of the agent. Moreover, spontaneous notification to health national administration is rarely systematic, in particular with isolated elevation of hepatic enzymes, and even more rarely published in international reviews. Nevertheless, according to the present data available in the literature, systematic and regular hepatic survey does not seem necessary in absence of risk factors. As for other side effects, which may occur more or less rapidly, great advantages may be obtained from psycho-education programs associating the patients in order to detect the first symptoms. Because little long-term hepatic follow-up comparing AAD is available, controlled studies should be carried out to precise the frequency and the risk factors (covariables) to prevent hepatitis outcome.
 ...
PMID:[Hepatic tolerance of atypical antipsychotic drugs]. 1250 67

Hepatotoxicity is a serious complication in patients taking HAART. Coinfection with hepatitis viruses increases the risk of liver toxicity while taking antiretroviral therapy. Baseline transaminases should be checked before beginning antiretorviral therapy and all patients should be screened for pre-existing liver disease, most notably hepatitis B and C infections. Regular monitoring of transaminases is mandatory when commencing antiretroviral therapy. In patients with normal liver function, transaminases may be checked monthly after commencing HAART for the first 3 months. If stable this can be broadened to 3 month intervals. In patients with pre-existing liver disease monitoring should be performed more frequently (every 2 weeks) when initiating therapy. Once stable liver enzymes should be checked monthly. The less hepatotoxic drugs such as lamivudine and abacavir should be preferred in patients at high risk for hepatotoxicity. Risks include co-infection with hepatitis B and C viruses, a previous record of hepatotoxicity, cirrhosis, obesity and female gender. Minor enzyme elevations (< 5-fold upper normal limit) are generally safe to tolerate and usually resolve. Patients must be closely observed with regular liver function tests and a hypersensitivity type drug reaction should be excluded. The onset of clinical symptoms, elevated serum lactate or evidence of severe hepatic dysfunction (coagulopathy or elevation of ammonia levels) are suggestive of severe toxicity and HAART should be withheld. Treatment of suspected HAART related hepatotoxicity should first involve withdrawal of therapy. Hypersensitivity reactions may be treated with corticosteroids. Nucleoside-induced mitochondrial damage may improve with riboflavin or thiamine therapy.
 ...
PMID:Hepatotoxicity of antiretroviral therapy. 1287 6

The levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate (DHEA-S) peak in human in their twenties, then decrease gradually with age. The physiological importance of DHEA was not clear until recent research reports showing that DHEA has beneficial effects on preventing diabetes, malignancy, inflammation, osteoporosis, and collagen disease. We summarize our results concerning diabetes, hepatitis, and colon cancer. In 1982, Coleman et al. [Diabetes 31 (1982) 830] reported that DHEA decreased hyperglycemia in diabetic db/db mice, which become insulin resistant. We measured hepatic gluconeogenic enzymes in an attempt to elucidate the mechanical mechanism of DHEA action. The activity and gene expression of hepatic gluconeogenic enzyme such as glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) was increased in db/db mice despite hyperinsulinemia compared to control db/+m mice. DHEA, like troglitazone, decreased these levels in db/db mice. We also showed that DHEA improved the insulin resistance caused by aging or obesity using the glucose clamp technique in another animal model. In humans, the serum DHEA concentration was shown to be associated with hyperinsulinemia in diabetes. It also became clear that DHEA increased insulin secretion in old-aged db/db mice. DHEA increases not only insulin sensitivity due to the effects in the liver and muscle, but also insulin secretion. As an effect of DHEA on T-cell mediated hepatitis induced by concanavalin A (ConA), DHEA reduced hepatic injury by inhibiting several inflammatory mediators and apoptosis. As an effect of DHEA on carcinogenesis, DHEA would be a potential chemopreventative agent against colon cancer because it decreases the number of azoxymethane (AOM) induced aberrant crypt foci, which is a possible precursor to adenoma and cancer in a murine model.Thus, since DHEA has many beneficial effects experimentally, we should consider administration of DHEA in the future, and common mechanisms among these actions of DHEA should be elucidated in further studies.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of diabetes, hepatic injury, and colon cancer with dehydroepiandrosterone. 1294 37

Birth weight is a popular topic, because it is precisely recorded, a major determinant of infant survival, associated with infant mortality, and health outcomes later in life. Low birth weight (LBW) is a predisposing factor for metabolic abnormalities such as atherosclerosis, renal disease, non-insulin diabetes mellitus, asthma, low IQ, hypertension, obesity, psychological distress. They have all been reported to be more common among those who were small at birth. Due to lack of studies suggesting a linkage between LBW and diseases of liver; evidences, which support the hypothesis on the creation of a link between LBW, an indicator of unfavourable intrauterine environment, and liver diseases emerging in the adult life, and possible direct associations of LBW with liver diseases, e.g., hepatitis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatoblastoma, or hepatocellular carcinoma were discussed. The associations between LBW and hepatitis vaccination as well as paediatric parental nutrition were also noted.
 ...
PMID:Low birth weight: a possible risk factor also for liver diseases in adult life? 1367 7

Although histological hepatitis occurs in the majority of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected liver transplant recipients, the natural history is highly variable. Whereas progression to cirrhosis occurs in up to 30% after 3 to 7 years, the disease remains stable in another third of patients, in whom protocol liver biopsies might be avoided. However, there is recent concern that with prolonged follow-up, some patients with initial benign recurrence may develop a late-onset aggressive course. Aims of the study are to determine the incidence and factors associated with this event. Based on yearly protocol biopsies (median, five biopsies; range, three to seven biopsies), we evaluated the histological outcome of 57 HCV type 1b-infected transplant recipients with initial benign recurrence, defined as stable histological state (fibrosis stage F0 or F1) during the first 3 years posttransplantation. Severe late-onset liver damage is defined as progression to F3 or F4 in patients with previous benign recurrence. Potential predictors of this event include demographics, donor-related factors, liver enzyme levels at 1 and 3 (or baseline) years posttransplantation, activity grade and fibrosis stage at 1 and 3 years posttransplantation, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related variables occurring within the first 3 years posttransplantation (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity), use of some drugs (renin-angiotensin inhibitors, ursodeoxycholic acid), and the advent of any unusual event. The incidence of severe late-onset liver damage was 35% (n = 20). Twelve transplant recipients progressed to F3, whereas 8 transplant recipients progressed to F4. Sudden histological deterioration was observed on postoperative biopsy 5 in 12 patients; biopsy 6 or 7, in 7 patients; and biopsy 4, in 1 patient. Variables associated with this event in univariate analysis were fibrosis stage and activity grade (and its components) at baseline (P <.0001), recipient female gender (P =.04), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level at 1 year posttransplantation (P =.02), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and ALT levels at baseline (P =.008 and P =.005, respectively). By multivariate analysis, only one variable was retained in the model: fibrosis stage at baseline (relative risk, 11; 95% confidence interval, 3 to 41; P =.0007), whereas AST level almost reached statistical significance (P =.07). In conclusion, delayed HCV-related severe liver damage is not infrequent in transplant recipients with initial benign recurrence, occurring in approximately one third of them. The presence of some degree of fibrosis at baseline appears to predict this sudden change in the natural history of recurrent hepatitis C. Based on these findings, we recommend continuing protocol biopsies and evaluating potential antiviral therapy in transplant recipients with evidence of some fibrosis (even if it is only portal).
 ...
PMID:Delayed onset of severe hepatitis C-related liver damage following liver transplantation: a matter of concern? 1458 75


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>