Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Human recombinant colony-stimulating factors may be used to treat or prevent neutropenia caused by marrow toxic chemotherapeutic agents administered to patients with cancer. Despite their common clinical use, little is known about the potential adverse effects that these cytokines may have on the growth of malignant cells. Indeed, several in vitro reports have indicated that colony-stimulating factors may act as stimulating growth factors in some human malignancies. To evaluate these effects in ovarian cancer, we investigated the possible growth effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF/Filgrastim) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors (GM-CSF/Sargramostim) on four established ovarian cancer cell lines, as well as five primary ovarian cancer cultures over a wide range of pharmacologic doses. Cell viability was measured by an ATP bioluminescence assay and expressed as a percentage of untreated control cultures. G-CSF showed no growth-stimulating effects in any of the four established cell lines tested. In the OVCAR-3 cell line, a decrease in growth (> 10%) was seen at 10, 100, and 1000 ng/ml after 5 days of continuous treatment. In the same cell line, GM-CSF caused an increase (> 10%) in growth at the same doses. However, these changes did not demonstrate statistical significance in a dose-dependent fashion. In the five primary cultures treated with G-CSF, only one demonstrated statistically significant increases in growth in a dose-dependent manner. GM-CSF treatment had no significant growth alterations in these same five primary cultures. These results would suggest that colony-stimulating factors may act as growth factors in some but not all ovarian cancer cells. Further investigations into the receptor status of ovarian cancer cells for these cytokines are underway to clarify this issue.
...
PMID:In vitro growth effects of colony-stimulating factors in ovarian cancer. 751 21

Haemopoietic growth factors (HGFs) are being administered to patients with neutropenic fever; however, little is known about the endogenous HGF response in these patients. Specific assays were used to study four HGFs, granulocyte (G-) CSF, granulocyte-macrophage (GM-) CSF, macrophage (M-) CSF and interleukin (IL-) 6 levels in the blood of patients with neutropenic fever (46 episodes). For comparison, levels were also measured in three control populations: normals (20), afebrile neutropenic (14), and bacteraemic but not neutropenic patients (20). In febrile patients, levels of G-CSF (median, range) (0.46, < 0.10-142 ng/ml). IL-6 (0.054, 0.005-24.3 ng/ml) and M-CSF (18.5, 9.9-79.1 ng/ml) were elevated compared with afebrile subjects (< 0.10, < 0.10-1.62 ng/ml). (0.008, 0.002-0.024 ng/ml) and (6.45, < 5.0-31.3 ng/ml) respectively. GM-CSF was not elevated (< 0.02, < 0.02-8.0 ng/ml) compared with afebrile subjects (0.021, < 0.02-0.20 ng/ml). Variables significantly associated (P < 0.05) with elevated cytokine levels were determined by multiple regression analyses. Factors associated with G-CSF elevation were fever, neutropenia, pathogen type and raised bilirubin and creatinine. In contrast, neutropenia was not associated with IL-6 elevation although there was an association between IL-6 elevation and fever, Gram-negative and fungal infections and raised creatinine and bilirubin. M-CSF elevation was associated with fever, renal impairment and known pathogen. Elevated G-CSF and IL-6 levels normalized rapidly (hours-days) with the resolution of infection, whereas M-CSF concentrations remained elevated for up to 10 d. Cytokine levels remained elevated in septic neutropenic patients who did not recover. In summary, G-CSF, IL-6 and M-CSF levels were significantly elevated in sepsis. In contrast, GM-CSF levels were not elevated. These studies should assist the development of therapeutic strategies using HGFs in the treatment of sepsis.
...
PMID:Endogenous haemopoietic growth factors in neutropenia and infection. 751 65

Antibodies to mature blood neutrophils and to bone marrow myeloid cells have been described in the sera of some patients with apparent autoimmune neutropenia. To further explore the prevalence and specificities of antibodies to myeloid precursor cells, we evaluated sera from 148 patients with suspected autoimmune neutropenia for the presence of antibodies to neutrophils, to cultured myeloid cell lines, and to highly purified bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells. Using an immunofluorescence flow cytometric assay, we identified IgG antibodies in 42 (28%) of these sera that bound specifically to K562 cells, a multilineage cell line originally derived from a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Twenty-two (15%) of the sera also contained IgG antibodies that bound specifically to the primitive myelomonocytic leukemia cell line KG1a. Twenty-five (17%) of the sera had IgG antibodies to myeloid cell lines in the absence of antibodies to mature neutrophils. There was a trend toward more severe neutropenia in patients with antibodies to K562 cells, without antineutrophil antibodies. In further studies, antibodies from 12 sera bound to mononuclear CD34+ cells that had been purified from normal human bone marrow by an immunomagnetic separation procedure. Moreover, two of these sera suppressed the growth of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) in methylcellulose cultures. The presence of antibodies to primitive hematopoietic cells in the sera of some patients with suspected immune neutropenia suggests that these antibodies may have a role in the pathogenesis of the neutropenia observed.
...
PMID:Antibodies to myeloid precursor cells in autoimmune neutropenia. 751 22

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment has been shown to increase average neutrophil counts substantially in patients with childhood-onset cyclic neutropenia (or "cyclic hematopoiesis"), but not to eliminate the cyclic oscillations of neutrophil counts or those of other blood elements (monocytes, platelets, eosinophils, and reticulocytes) that are characteristic of this hematopoietic disorder. Indeed, oscillations of neutrophil counts are amplified during G-CSF treatment. We have compared the effects of recombinant granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF) with those of G-CSF in three patients with this disease (2 men and 1 woman, 17, 30, and 32 years of age). These patients were treated with GM-CSF (2.1 micrograms/kg/day, subcutaneously) for 6 weeks, preceded and followed by 6 to 13 weeks of detailed observation to document changes in the cyclic oscillations of blood neutrophils and other blood elements; two of the patients were subsequently treated with G-CSF (5.0 micrograms/kg/d, subcutaneously) and observed for comparable periods of time. Unlike G-CSF treatment, which increased average neutrophil counts more than 20-fold, GM-CSF increased neutrophil counts only modestly, from 1.6- to 3.9-fold, although eosinophilia of varying prominence was induced in each patient. However, at the same time, GM-CSF treatment dampened or eliminated the multilineage oscillations of circulating blood elements (neutrophils, monocytes, platelets, and/or reticulocytes) in each of the patients. In contrast, G-CSF treatment of the same patients markedly amplified the oscillations of neutrophil counts and caused the cycling of other blood elements (monocytes in particular) to become more distinct. These findings support the conclusion that the distinctive cycling of blood cell production in childhood-onset cyclic neutropenia results from abnormalities in the coordinate regulation of both GM-CSF-responsive, multipotential progenitor cells and G-CSF-responsive, lineage-restricted, neutrophil progenitors.
...
PMID:Contrasting effects of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and granulocyte CSF treatment on the cycling of blood elements in childhood-onset cyclic neutropenia. 751 79

Hematopoietic growth factors have been shown to be effective in reducing the period of neutropenia after autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Initial concerns over potential aggravation of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and increase in the incidence of relapse in patients with myeloid leukemias influenced the number of studies using hematopoietic growth factors after allogeneic BMT. We report the experience with 50 patients treated at a single institution using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after allogeneic sibling (n = 30) and matched unrelated (n = 20) BMT. The time to an absolute neutrophil count > or = 500/microL was significantly faster in patients who received G-CSF and cyclosporine and prednisone for GVHD prophylaxis when compared with historical control patients receiving the same GVHD prophylaxis (10 v 13 days, P < .01). A similar accelerated myeloid engraftment was observed for those patients who received the addition of methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis when compared with historical control patients receiving the same GVHD prophylaxis regimen (16 v 19 days, P < .05). The median time to engraftment for patients receiving a matched unrelated BMT and G-CSF was 17 days (range 13 to 26). We did not observe any increase in GVHD or early mortality in the matched related sibling BMT. The incidence of acute GVHD in the matched unrelated BMT recipients was also low at 21%; however, 9 patients (45%) died within 100 days of the date of BMT, similar to the experience reported with granulocyte-macrophage CSF. This study confirms the efficacy of G-CSF in accelerating myeloid engraftment after allogeneic matched sibling BMT. The higher early mortality associated with patients receiving matched unrelated BMT suggests that randomized controlled trials using G-CSF after allogeneic BMT should be performed.
...
PMID:Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. 752 Jul 82

The antiviral nucleoside analogue ganciclovir has demonstrated in vitro activity against human cytomegalovirus and effectively treats infection caused by this organism in various immunocompromised patient groups. The drug prolongs time to progression in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related cytomegalovirus retinitis although life-long maintenance therapy is required. Direct comparisons between ganciclovir and foscarnet in this indication are few; nevertheless, the 2 drugs appear to have equal therapeutic efficacy in treating cytomegalovirus retinitis although results from 1 study in this indication suggest that foscarnet has an advantage in terms of patient survival. AIDS-related gastrointestinal and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary cytomegalovirus infection also respond to treatment with ganciclovir; maintenance therapy does not appear to be required in these latter 2 indications. Ganciclovir is also useful against cytomegalovirus infection in organ transplant recipients. The drug is most effective when given prophylactically or as early treatment for asymptomatic infection in bone marrow transplant recipients; treatment of established infection is less effective in this patient group. However, established infection in solid organ transplant recipients appears to respond to treatment with ganciclovir. The most common adverse event during ganciclovir therapy is haematological toxicity but this appears to be readily reversible on discontinuation of the drug. In addition, coadministration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) has been shown to prevent ganciclovir-associated neutropenia. Thus, ganciclovir is a valuable treatment for cytomegalovirus infection in patients with AIDS and in organ transplant recipients. Further studies comparing ganciclovir and foscarnet-ideally incorporating the use of G-CSF or GM-CSF to prevent ganciclovir-associated neutropenia and assessing survival as 1 endpoint--should further clarify the relative role of ganciclovir as treatment or prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection.
...
PMID:Ganciclovir. An update of its therapeutic use in cytomegalovirus infection. 752 63

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of G-CSF given after salvage chemotherapy on the mobilisation of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in pretreated patients. Seven patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were treated with methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, etoposide and dexamethasone. G-CSF was given at a dose of 3.8-7.2 micrograms/kg (1-2 ampoules) daily by subcutaneous injection from the onset of neutropenia (< 1.0 x 10(9)/L). A median of 3 leukaphereses was performed when the white cell count was recovering. The median number of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells (GM-CFC) collected was 99 x 10(4)/kg per leucapheresis (range 19-800) or 260 x 10(4)/kg in total per patient (110-1800). Six patients underwent myeloablative chemotherapy with PBPC rescue. No autologous bone marrow or growth factors post-PBPC infusion were administered. The median duration of severe neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) was 8.5 days (range 5-10) and to recovery of neutrophils post-PBPC infusion was 11.5 days (10-15). Severe thrombocytopenia (< 20 x 10(9)/L) was present for 4 days (range 1-5) and the median number of days post-infusion to platelet-transfusion independence was 9 (6-12). In conclusion, G-CSF combined with chemotherapy mobilised large numbers of PBPC for subsequent autotransplantation in pretreated patients with NHL. A single leukapheresis procedure may be sufficient following this protocol.
...
PMID:Combined chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilise large numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells in pretreated patients. 753 59

Colony-stimulating activity (CSA) was measured by the production of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (GM-CFU) from normal donor bone marrow in the plasma of 29 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after intensive treatment with high-dose melphalan (HDM) with or without autologous bone marrow rescue (ABMR). Although patients who received ABMR had an earlier recovery of circulating neutrophils compared with those who received HDM alone, the time at which CSA reached a maximum was similar in both groups (10 to 11 days) after therapy. The decline in CSA correlated with the recovery of the neutrophil count. In plasma from patients who received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), in addition to an autograft, CSA reached a maximum earlier (7 days). Furthermore, neutrophil recovery was earlier in these patients. Platelet recovery was not increased by rhG-CSF. The time at which CSA was maximum in four patients who were undergoing intensive therapy for the second time occurred 9 days after treatment with HDM. Although the period without neutrophils was longer in three (of four) patients who survived long term, one patient who received rhG-CSF had a shorter period of neutropenia than the two who had not had the cytokine. G-CSF was detected in plasma from seven of seven patients but not at all times after treatment. In plasma samples that contained G-CSF, colony numbers were increased by recombinant interleukin-4 (rIL-4) in vitro. Neither IL-3 nor GM-CSF was detected in plasma; however, antibody to GM-CSF reduced CSA in all samples after intensive therapy. The data suggest that CSA is a consistent physiologic response to intensive therapy, even in previously treated patients, but that hematologic recovery is dependent on the availability of viable progenitor cells.
...
PMID:G-CSF is a major component of colony-stimulating activity (CSA) in the plasma of patients with multiple myeloma after treatment with high-dose melphalan (HDM). 753 16

It was the objective of the study to characterize CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells from peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) in a group of 24 cancer patients. After cytotoxic chemotherapy, R-metHu granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (R-metHuG-CSF; filgrastim, 300 micrograms daily, subcutaneously) was given to shorten the time of neutropenia as well as to increase the rebound of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for harvesting. The proportion of CD34+ cells in the leukapheresis products (LPs) was 1.4-fold greater than in BM samples that were obtained at the same day (LP: median, 1.4% v BM: median, 1.0%, P < .01). Two- and three-color immunofluorescence showed that blood-derived CD34+ cells comprised a greater proportion of a particular early progenitor cell than CD34+ cells of bone marrow. Blood-derived progenitor cells tended to have a higher mean fluorescence intensity of CD34 and expressed significantly lower levels of HLA-DR (mean fluorescence intensity of HLA-DR: 442.6 +/- 44.9 [LP] v 661.5 +/- 64.6 [BM], mean +/- SEM, P < .01). Furthermore, the blood-derived CD34+ cells comprised a 1.7-fold greater proportion of Thy-1+ cells (LP: median, 24.4% v BM: median, 14.4%, P < .001) and expressed significantly less c-kit (LP: median, 20.5% v BM: median, 31.0%, P < .01). Three-color analysis showed that high levels of Thy-1 expression were restricted to CD34+/HLA-DRdim or CD34+/HLA-DR- cells confirming the early developmental stage of this progenitor cell subset. The proportion of CD34+/CD45RA(bright) cells representing late colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) was smaller in LPs compared with BM (P < .05). For an examination of BM CD34+ cells before the mobilization chemotherapy, samples of 16 patients were available. The mean proportion of c-kit expressing CD34+ cells in the bone marrow during G-CSF-stimulated reconstitution decreased 1.8-fold compared with baseline values. There was no difference in the proportion of BM-derived CD34+/Thy-1+ cells and CD34+/CD45RA+ cells between steady-state hematopoiesis and G-CSF-supported recovery. Our data suggest that during G-CSF-enhanced recovery, CD34+ cells in the PB are enriched with more primitive progenitor cells to evenly replenish the BM after the chemotherapy-related cytotoxic damage.
...
PMID:Blood-derived autografts collected during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-enhanced recovery are enriched with early Thy-1+ hematopoietic progenitor cells. 753 95

Delay in hematologic recovery after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) can extend and amplify the risks of infection and hemorrhage, compromise patients' survival, and increase the duration and cost of hospitalization. Because current studies suggest that granulocyte-macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor (CSF) may potentiate the sensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to G-CSF, we performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing GM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2/d x 14 days) versus sequential GM-CSF x 7 days followed by G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days) as treatment for primary or secondary graft failure after BMT. Eligibility criteria included failure to achieve a white blood cell (WBC) count > or = 100/microL by day +21 or > or = 300/microL by day +28, no absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 200/microL by day +28, or secondary sustained neutropenia after initial engraftment. Forty-seven patients were enrolled: 23 received GM-CSF (10 unrelated, 8 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous), and 24 received GM-CSF followed by G-CSF (12 unrelated, 7 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous). For patients receiving GM-CSF alone, neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 500/microL) occurred between 2 and 61 days (median, 8 days) after therapy, while those receiving GM-CSF+G-CSF recovered at a similar rate of 1 to 36 days (median, 6 days; P = .39). Recovery to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence was slow, occurring 6 to 250 days (median, 35 days) after enrollment with no significant difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 30 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF; median, 42 days; P = .24). Similarly, platelet transfusion independence was delayed until 4 to 249 days (median, 32 days) after enrollment, with no difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 28 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF: median, 42 days; P = .38). Recovery times were not different between patients with unrelated donors and those with related donors or autologous transplant recipients. Survival at 100 days after enrollment was superior after treatment with GM-CSF alone. Only 1 of 23 patients treated with GM-CSF died versus 7 of 24 treated with GM-CSF+G-CSF who died 16 to 84 days (median, 38 days) after enrollment, yielding Kaplan-Meier 100-day survival estimates of 96% +/- 8% for GM-CSF versus 71% +/- 18% for GM-CSF+G-CSF (P = .026). These data suggest that sequential growth factor therapy with GM-CSF followed by G-CSF offers no advantage over GM-CSF alone in accelerating trilineage hematopoiesis or preventing lethal complications in patients with poor graft function after BMT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Hematopoietic growth factors for graft failure after bone marrow transplantation: a randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus sequential GM-CSF plus granulocyte-CSF. 754 62


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>