Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The combination of capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), or XELOX, is an effective and safe approach to the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, with the potential advantage of convenience over standard combination regimens. In a large multicenter phase II trial for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (N = 96), first-line treatment with oral capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days and oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 by 2-hour infusion on day 1 every 21 days produced objective response in 55% of patients and stable disease (greater than 3 months) in a further 32%. Preliminary data indicate a median progression-free survival of 7.6 months (with 14% of patients still having not progressed) and median survival of over 16 months (with 59% of patients still alive); the 1-year survival rate was 72%. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was relatively infrequent; in particular, grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurred in just 3% of patients and severe neutropenia in only 6%. Treatment delivery was highly successful, with a median of 10 cycles being administered (range: 1-23 cycles). Both efficacy and safety outcomes with the XELOX combination compare well with those observed with infusional fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) in first-line treatment for advanced disease. However, 3-weekly XELOX requires less time in hospital and is simpler than the 2-weekly standard FOLFOX4 regimen. Phase III trials comparing XELOX with infusional 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin are ongoing.
...
PMID:Can capecitabine replace 5-FU/leucovorin in combination with oxaliplatin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer? 1252 Jun 36

5-Fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used in patients with advanced gastric cancer, but results with such therapy are fairly modest. Evaluation of newer agents is therefore required in this disease. Paclitaxel has shown promising activity as a single agent in gastric cancer. In vitro, paclitaxel exhibits sequence-dependent synergy with platinum compounds against gastric cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Twenty-seven patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer were enrolled on the study from April 1996 to July 2000. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m intravenously during 3 hours followed by carboplatin at projected area under the curve 5 mg x h x ml (as per the Calvert formula). Twenty-six patients were assessable for toxicity, and 25 patients were assessable for objective response. Nine of the 27 enrolled patients had a major response for an objective response rate of 33% (95% CI 0.17-0.54) by intention-to-treat analysis. The median response duration was 4.9 months (95% CI 2.8-7.3), and median survival was 7.5 months. The 1-year survival rate was 23%. One hundred seventeen courses were administered with a median of four courses per patient administered. The major toxicity was neutropenia, with grade III to IV neutropenia observed in 9 patients (33%) and neutropenic fever in only 1 patient. Grade III peripheral neuropathy developed in two patients, and grade III myalgia and grade III fatigue developed in one patient each. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is a highly tolerable, regimen with activity comparable to that of other regimens in advanced gastric cancer. This regimen needs to be further evaluated in combination with other agents and as a component of multimodality therapy in gastric cancer.
...
PMID:Phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. 1257 22

The purpose of the study was to assess response rate, clinical outcome, organ/function preservation and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and, when necessary, limited surgery. The study was a phase II non-randomized trial. Induction chemotherapy consisted of 6 weekly doses of carboplatin at AUC of 2 and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) (1 h) followed by 5 cycles of docetaxel 25 mg/m(2)/day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) c.i. days 1-5, hydroxyurea 500 mg orally every 12 h for 11 and concomitant twice daily radiation therapy at 150 cGy/fraction given every other week per 5 cycles (TFHX), for a total radiation dose of 75 Gy. 13 cis-retinoic acid was administered for chemoprevention and systematic prophylaxis of mucositis with systemic amifostine and local GM-CSF was administered to all patients during TFHX. Conservative surgical resection was reserved to patients with no optimal response (PR > or =70%), whereas radical surgery was performed as salvage treatment. Thirteen patients (mean age 54.9 years, range 44-62; 12/13 site oropharynx, all stage IV) were enrolled: 31% of patients had ECOG performance status (PS) 0 and 69% had PS 1. Response to induction chemotherapy was analyzed in 12 patients: 2/12 (16.7%) achieved a partial response (PR) for an overall response (ORR) of 16.7%, 10/12 (83.3%) achieved stable disease (SD). TFHX was administered to 7 patients: 2 patients (28.6%) had complete remission (CR), 1 patient (14.3%) had PR for an ORR of 42.9%, 3 patients (42.8%) had SD and 1 patient (14.3%) had PD. At the completion of TFHX, 1 patient underwent local therapy. The toxicity was mild and consisted in: grade 3/4 neutropenia (7.7%), anemia (23.1%), diarrhea (15.4%), mucositis (7.7%), neurotoxicity (7.7%) during induction chemotherapy. During TFHX only 42.8% of grade 3/4 mucositis was observed. All patients spared organ/function. In conclusion, this regimen has been found feasible for its acceptable toxicity, particularly mucositis. However, the overall response rate and the data on survival were not satisfactory.
...
PMID:Six-week induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation therapy in stage IV head and neck cancer: a phase II study with organ-sparing purposes. 1268 55

Ras oncogenes (K-, H- and N-ras) are known to be involved in signal transduction pathways regulating cell growth and differentiation in many human cancers. These proteins are synthesized as a cytosolic precursor that ultimately localizes to the inner plasma membrane. This process is initiated by the attachment of a farnesyl moiety to the protein and is catalysed by the farnesyl transferase. Since activated (mutated) ras oncogenes have been shown to be essential for the malignant phenotype in many tumors, farnesyl transferase inhibitors (FTIs) have emerged as a novel class of antineoplastic agents. Four FTIs are currently in clinical trials. Two of these agents, R-115777 and SCH-66336, are orally active heterocyclic compounds and already in phase II/III studies. Preliminary results of R-115777 or SCH-66336 in combination with gemcitabine or 5-FU/FA in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinomas have been reported. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, nausea, diarrhea and fatigue. The recommended doses for phase II studies were 200 mg R-115777 or 2 x 200 mg SCH-66336. Durable objective partial responses were noted in several patients. Furthermore, the FTIs were found to be well tolerated. Ongoing phase III studies in patients with advanced pancreatic cancers will determine the extent of clinical activity and whether these agents can be used as single agents for the treatment of pancreatic carcinomas or have to be used in combination with other cytostatic drugs. In addition, it remains to be clarified whether FTIs may sensitize drug-resistant cancers following conventional chemotherapy.
...
PMID:Farnesyltransferase inhibitors--a novel approach in the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinomas. 1282 Mar 5

In a previous study of prevalidation, a standard operating procedure (SOP) for two independent in vitro tests (human and mouse) had been developed, to evaluate the potential hematotoxicity of xenobiotics from their direct and the adverse effects on granulocyte-macrophages (CFU-GM). A predictive model to calculate the human maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was set up, by adjusting a mouse-derived MTD for the differential interspecies sensitivity. In this paper, we describe an international blind trial designed to apply this model to the clinical neutropenia, by testing 20 drugs, including 14 antineoplastics (Cytosar-U, 5-Fluorouracil, Myleran, Thioguanine, Fludarabine, Bleomycin, Methotrexate, Gemcitabine, Carmustine, Etoposide, Teniposide, Cytoxan, Taxol, Adriamycin); two antivirals (Retrovir, Zovirax,); three drugs for other therapeutic indications (Cyclosporin, Thorazine, Indocin); and one pesticide (Lindane). The results confirmed that the SOP developed generates reproducible IC90 values with both human and murine GM-CFU. For 10 drugs (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Etoposide, Fludarabine, 5-Fluorouracil, Myleran, Taxol, Teniposide, Thioguanine, and Thorazine), IC90 values were found within the range of the actual drug doses tested (defined as the actual IC90). For the other 10 drugs (Carmustine, Cyclosporin, Cytosar-U, Cytoxan, Gemcitabine, Indocin, Lindane, Methotrexate, Retrovir, and Zovirax) extrapolation on the regression curve out of the range of the actual doses tested was required to derive IC90 values (extrapolated IC90). The model correctly predicted the human MTD for 10 drugs out of 10 that had "actual IC90 values" and 7 drugs out of 10 for those having only an extrapolated IC90. Two of the incorrect predictions (Gemcitabine and Zovirax) were within 6-fold of the correct MTD, instead of the 4-fold range required by the model, whereas the prediction with Cytosar-U was approximately 10-fold in error. A possible explanation for the failure in the prediction of these three drugs, which are pyrimidine analogs, is discussed. We concluded that our model correctly predicted the human MTD for 20 drugs out of 23, since the other three drugs (Topotecan, PZA, and Flavopiridol) were tested in the prevalidation study. The high percentage of predicitivity (87%), as well as the reproducibility of the SOP testing, confirm that the model can be considered scientifically validated in this study, suggesting promising applications to other areas of research in developing validated hematotoxicological in vitro methods.
...
PMID:Application of the CFU-GM assay to predict acute drug-induced neutropenia: an international blind trial to validate a prediction model for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of myelosuppressive xenobiotics. 1288 91

In the first phase of this study 34 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have been treated either with gemcitabine/cisplatin or gemcitabine/5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin combination. (Gemzar: 900 mg/m2, Cisplatin: 20 mg/m2, 5-FU: 750 mg/m2). Treatments were continued till tumor progression. There was no difference observed between the two protocols in the clinical response rates (PR=65%). On the other hand, a significant difference was found between the two protocols regarding the side effects. In the case of gemcitabine/5-FU neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia (as well as nausea and vomiting) were much less frequent compared to gemcitabine/cisplatin combination. Based on these data the efficacy of gemcitabine/5-FU combination was evaluated in 99 stage III, T1-4, N1 and stage IV, T1-4, N0-1, M1 pancreatic cancer patients throughout 364 treatment cycles. OR was achieved in 10% while stable disease in 52% of the cases. The average survival period was 8.33 months while the time to progression was 5.75 months. Based on these data we recommend gemcitabine/5-FU/leucovorin combination for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
...
PMID:[Experience with the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer in Hungary]. 1297 69

Irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) is one of the new generation of chemotherapeutic agents that has activity in advanced colorectal cancer. It has antitumor efficacy as a single agent, and also has been combined with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (IFL) to treat these patients. Randomized studies have confirmed the superiority of IFL to 5-FU and leucovorin alone with regard to patient survival, time to progression, and tumor response rate. The optimal schedule for combining these agents remains uncertain, but in the United States, the schedule of IFL weekly for 4 consecutive weeks repeated every 6 weeks, according to the schedule reported by Saltz et al, has been widely used, although with some toxicity (especially myelosuppression and diarrhea). In an attempt to improve the tolerability of IFL, some have advocated modifying the schedule of IFL to weekly for 2 weeks, with repeated cycles every 21 days. Twenty-three patients with advanced colorectal cancer have been treated on this schedule at a single institution. Therapy was well tolerated, with 35% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 neutropenia, two of whom had episodes of febrile neutropenia, and 9% with grade 3/4 diarrhea. The median relative dose intensity of irinotecan administered in the first 18 patients treated with this regimen was 94%. These data support the hypothesis that modifying the schedule of administration of IFL improves the tolerability and ability to deliver the regimen, but must be confirmed by randomized prospective studies, which may also attempt to evaluate the role of bolus 5-FU in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
...
PMID:Improving the toxicity of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin: a 21-day schedule. 1456 47

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel (T), cisplatin (P), fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin has been reported to have major activity against squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) administered as a 4-day (TPFL4) or 5-day (TPFL5) regimen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a modified TPFL regimen (m-TPFL) for locally advanced SCCHN, consisting of a modified dosage with docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU and l-leucovorin (l-LV) designed for Japanese patients. Organ preservation of the primary tumor site was also assessed. Thirty-four Japanese patients with locally advanced SCCHN were eligible. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion at 48 mg/m2 on day 1; cisplatin, 24 mg/m2/day; 5-FU, 560 mg/m2/day and l-LV, 125 mg/body/day were delivered on days 1-4 by continuous i.v. infusion. This regimen was administered every 28 days. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) after induction chemotherapy underwent radiation therapy alone. Ninety-one cycles were administered. The main hematological toxicity was neutropenia, classified as grade III or IV in 18.7% of cycles. The most common non-hematologic toxicities included anorexia, stomatitis and alopecia. The clinical overall response rate to m-TPFL was 88.2%, with 58.8% CRs and 29.4% partial responses. After definitive locoregional therapy, 25 of 34 patients were disease-free with preserved primary tumor site anatomy. Overall and progression-free survival rates at the 2-year follow-up are 92.8 and 75.3%, respectively. Our m-TPFL regimen designed for Japanese patients yielded excellent response rates with an acceptable toxicity profile in good-performance-status patients.
...
PMID:Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil and l-leucovorin for locally advanced head and neck cancers: a modified regimen for Japanese patients. 1459 74

The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, arm C versus arm A). Common adverse events associated with the combination treatment included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. Neutropenia was the major hematologic toxicity. Adverse events were similar in men and women and in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.
...
PMID:FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin. 1475 10

Colorectal cancers (CRC) express the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R), a type I transmembrane receptor with tyrosine kinase activity. EGF-R signaling inhibition is a promising target for cancer therapy. ZD1839 (Iressa, AstraZeneca) and OSI-774 (Tarceva, Roche) are small molecular weight molecules with selective and reversible tyrosine kinase inhibition properties directed to EGF-R. Orally administered, these molecules induce sustained tumor stabilizations in previously treated metastatic CRC patients. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities are fatigue, diarrhea and acne-like follicular rash. The addition in the clinic of 5-FU, lOHP or CPT-11 to ZD1839 or OSI-774 does not seem to increase the own toxicity of each cytotoxic agents. Cetuximab (Erbitux, Merck) is an intravenously administered humanized monoclonal antibody which bind with high affinity with the extracellular domain of the EGF-R. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities are diarrhea, fatigue, nausea and cutaneous toxicity (allergic or acne-like follicular rashes, folliculitis). Most, if not all of these adverse events are mild. Partial responses were observed with cetuximab either alone (RR: 10%) or in combination with CPT-11 (RR: 22%) in patients with CPT-11 refractory advanced CRC which expressed EGF-R. The combination of cetuximab to folinic acid, 5-FU and CPT-11 seems tolerable at the cost of a slight increase of severe diarrhea and neutropenia. Finally, the promising activity of these EGF-R inhibitors has to be confirmed throughout randomized studies.
...
PMID:[Inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor and colorectal cancer]. 1476 44


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>

---