Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Meropenem was used in the treatment of 14 infectious complications in 11 patients including 8 with acute myeloid leukemia due to the cytostatic therapy, 1 with chronic myeloid leukemia, 1 with aplastic anemia and 1 with acute intermittent porphyria. At the moment of the meropenem use critical neutropenia (less than 500 granulocytes per 1 ml) in 11 cases (79 per cent) was stated. The drug was administered as intravenous infusions in a dose of 1 g every 8 hours for 4 to 41 days (the median of 11 days). 9 out of the 14 infectious complications were cured (the body temperature normalized and all the inflammation foci were eliminated), among them 6 out of 8 pyocyanic sepsis. Eradication of gram-negative bacteria was observed in 8 out of 10 cultures of the biological materials. No toxic complications or electrolytic disorders due to the drug use were recorded. The drug tolerance was good.
 ...
PMID:[Use of meropenem in patients with neutropenia]. 953 29

Infections remain the major cause of morbidity and mortality among neutropenic cancer patients. The current study addresses the question whether monotherapy with the new broad-spectrum carbapenem meropenem exhibits efficacy comparable to that of the standard combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. Seventy-one patients with hematological malignancies (55%) or solid tumors (45%), neutropenia < 500/microliter, and fever > 38.5 degrees C were randomly assigned to either meropenem (1 g every 8 h) or ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) and amikacin (15 mg/kg/day) intravenously. Meropenem (n = 34) and ceftazidime/amikacin (n = 37) were equivalent with respect to the clinical response at 72 h (62% versus 68%) (p > 0.05) and at the end of unmodified therapy (59% versus 62%). Gram-positive bacteremia responded poorly in the meropenem and ceftazidime/amikacin group (29% versus 25%), whereas all gram-negative bacteremias responded except for one in the meropenem group caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All patients survived to 72 h. One patient in each group died of gram-positive sepsis resistant to study medication. No significant side effects occurred in any regimen. This study suggests that meropenem monotherapy might be as effective as combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.
 ...
PMID:Meropenem monotherapy versus combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. 954 Jul 61

Meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin, currently the only available carbapenem agents in Europe and the United States, are characterised by a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and stability to beta-lactamase-mediated resistance mechanisms. A guide to the use of carbapenems in clinical practice is presented; the role of carbapenems in the treatment of several types of serious bacterial infection and an up-to-date account of their clinical efficacy and safety profiles are discussed. The good clinical efficacy and favourable safety profiles of the carbapenems make them valuable as initial empirical therapy in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis of unknown origin, post-operative peritonitis, paediatric meningitis, and febrile neutropenia. However, to maintain superior efficacy, the carbapenems should be used appropriately for definitive therapy.
 ...
PMID:Carbapenems in clinical practice: a guide to their use in serious infection. 1022 11

Meropenem is a parenteral carbapenem that has been used clinically since 1994. Since the first review of its safety profile in 1995, the patient database has increased substantially. This new safety analysis includes data from 46 clinical trials in hospitalized patients with serious bacterial infections. The additional data comprise patients with lower respiratory tract and intra-abdominal infections, septicaemia and meningitis, and cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, and represents a group of more severely ill patients compared with the earlier review. In total, 4872 patients with 5026 meropenem treatment exposures were compared with 4642 patients treated with comparator agents (4752 exposures). Meropenem was administered most often by intravenous injection at 1g or 500 mg every 8 h. Meropenem-related adverse events most frequently reported were diarrhoea (2.3%), rash (1.4%), nausea/vomiting (1.4%) and injection site inflammation (1.1%). The most commonly reported meropenem-related laboratory adverse events were thrombocytosis (1.6%) and increased hepatic enzymes (1.5-4.3%). In meropenem-treated patients with meningitis, the incidence of seizures was low and none were drug related. In patients with infections other than meningitis, the incidence of seizures considered by the investigators to be related to meropenem was 0.08%. In general, the safety profile of meropenem was similar to that of the comparator agents. Withdrawals and deaths were similarly infrequent in the meropenem, cephalosporin and imipenem-cilastatin groups. Increased doses of meropenem were not associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. Meropenem was well tolerated in all patients, including children and patients with neutropenia. This new analysis supports the previous findings that meropenem has a favourable and acceptable safety profile.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of meropenem: a review of nearly 5,000 patients treated with meropenem. 1038 Dec 10

Eighty three patients with neutropenia and cancer were randomised to receive either 1 g meropenem tds or amikacin 15 mg/kg single dose daily plus ceftazidime 2 g tds. No prophylactic antibiotics were allowed before entry to the trial. Seventy seven patients were available for analysis. Infection was microbiologically or clinically documented in 53 episodes (69%). The overall success rate without adjustment was 49% in monotherapy, 37.5% in the combination group. These rates were increased to 65% and 56%, respectively when secondary infection episodes requiring a different class of chemotherapy were taken into account. Median duration for defervescence was 3 days in successfully treated patients in both groups. Only minor reversible side effects were noted in both treatment arms. Meropenem monotherapy seemed as effective and safe as amikacin plus ceftazidime for the empirical treatment of neutropenic cancer patients with fever.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of meropenem with amikacin plus ceftazidime in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia: a prospective randomised multicentre trial in patients without previous prophylactic antibiotics. Meropenem Study Group of Turkey. 1056

The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) is a global, multicentre surveillance study that compares the activity of meropenem in centres that are prescribers with that of imipenem, ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. Of the 46 centres (intensive care units, cystic fibrosis units, neutropenia units and general wards) contributing to this study, 29 were in Europe, 14 in the Americas and three in the Middle East and Asia. The results for the most common isolates obtained in the first year of the study from these three regions show that meropenem has a broad spectrum of activity and potency in these centres, with 89% of the 6890 strains tested having an MIC 4 mg/L. The overall susceptibility was lower for the comparator antibiotics. There was evidence in all regions of strains producing beta-lactamases and other resistance mechanisms against the other beta-lactams tested, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Future years' results from this surveillance study will show whether meropenem will continue to exhibit such activity.
 ...
PMID:MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection): a global overview. 1096 59

The activity of meropenem and five comparators has been studied against 7886 isolates from 29 centres in 10 European countries from 1997 to 1999 as part of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) surveillance study. Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates from intensive care units (ICUs), neutropenia centres, cystic fibrosis (CF) centres and general wards were investigated in Belgium (1 year), Czech Republic (2 years), Germany (3 years), Italy (3 years), Poland (2 years), Russia (2 years), Sweden (2 years), Switzerland (1 year), Turkey (1 year) and UK (3 years). Resistance to quinolones and aminoglycosides was observed, as was resistance to the cephalosporins and penicillins via extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC beta-lactamases. Meropenem showed good activity against the pathogens tested, particularly in CF and neutropenia centres, over the 3 year period. The overall order of potency of the six antimicrobial agents tested was: meropenem > imipenem > piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin > ceftazidime > gentamicin. No increase in resistance to the carbapenems, to date, has been detected in any of the European centres included in this study.
 ...
PMID:MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection) results from Europe: comparison of antibiotic susceptibilities between countries and centre types. 1096 61

The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) is a global, multicentre surveillance study that compares the activity of meropenem in centres that are prescribers with that of imipenem, ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. Of the 46 centres (intensive care units, cystic fibrosis units, neutropenia units and general wards) contributing to this study, 29 were in Europe, 14 in the Americas and three in the Middle East and Asia. The results for the most common isolates obtained in the first year of the study from these three regions show that meropenem has a broad spectrum of activity and potency in these centres, with 89% of the 6890 strains tested having an MIC < or = 4 mg/L. The overall susceptibility was lower for the comparator antibiotics. There was evidence in all regions of strains producing beta-lactamases and other resistance mechanisms against the other beta-lactams tested, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Future years' results from this surveillance study will show whether meropenem will continue to exhibit such activity.
 ...
PMID:MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection): a global overview. 1106 45

The activity of meropenem and five comparators has been studied against 7886 isolates from 29 centres in 10 European countries from 1997 to 1999 as part of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) surveillance study. Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates from intensive care units (ICUs), neutropenia centres, cystic fibrosis (CF) centres and general wards were investigated in Belgium (1 year), Czech Republic (2 years), Germany (3 years), Italy (3 years), Poland (2 years), Russia (2 years), Sweden (2 years), Switzerland (1 year), Turkey (1 year) and UK (3 years). Resistance to quinolones and aminoglycosides was observed, as was resistance to the cephalosporins and penicillins via extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC beta-lactamases. Meropenem showed good activity against the pathogens tested, particularly in CF and neutropenia centres, over the 3 year period. The overall order of potency of the six antimicrobial agents tested was: meropenem > imipenem > piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin > ceftazidime > gentamicin. No increase in resistance to the carbapenems, to date, has been detected in any of the European centres included in this study.
 ...
PMID:MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection) results from Europe: comparison of antibiotic susceptibilities between countries and centre types. MYSTIC Study Group (European centres only). 1106 47

The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program is a longitudinal global antimicrobial surveillance study that compares the activity of meropenem and comparator antimicrobial agents against pathogens isolated from intensive care, neutropenic or cystic fibrosis patients, and general wards. Data from the different European MYSTIC Program units (1997-2000) showed that the most prevalent isolates tested overall were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA; in accordance with study design methicillin-resistant S. aureus was not tested), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. In all the unit types, E. coli (approximately 20% having an extended spectrum beta-lactamase phenotype) and MSSA were highly susceptible to meropenem (97-99% susceptibility). Isolates of MSSA showed lower levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (61-77% susceptibility) in both cystic fibrosis and neutropenia patients, and particularly high levels of resistance to ceftazidime (38% susceptibility) in cystic fibrosis units. Ciprofloxacin (54% susceptibility) and gentamicin (46% susceptibility) demonstrated low levels of activity against P. aeruginosa (frequently encountered in cystic fibrosis units). Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa in all the unit types. Carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam have sustained > 90% susceptibility rates overall against the most frequently isolated pathogens. The analysis of specific units that house patients with a high-risk of contracting antimicrobial-resistant pathogens remains very important for the optimal selection of empiric regimens.
 ...
PMID:Unit differences in pathogen occurrence arising from the MYSTIC program European database (1997-2000). 1177 58


1 2 3 Next >>