Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Twenty-two patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with single-agent etoposide 50 mg/m2/d by mouth for 21 consecutive days. Eleven patients had received previous chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) or etoposide (CAE) or both (CAVE). Four of the latter patients also received salvage treatment with cisplatin and etoposide (EP). Nine patients had been treated with EP as induction therapy, while two patients had received high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin (HDCEP). Altogether, 18 patients had received previous intravenous etoposide. The median time off chemotherapy was 4.5 months (range, 1 to 28.9 months). Ten patients (45.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27% to 65%) achieved a complete or partial response. Responses were most common in patients who had responded to previous chemotherapy and who had not received any treatment in the 90 days before initiation of oral etoposide. Median response duration was 4 months (range, 1.5 to 9.5 months) and median survival was 3.5+ months (range, 1.0 to 15+ months). Leukocyte and platelet nadirs were 1,800/microL and 160,000/microL, respectively, during cycle 1 of treatment and occurred between days 21 and 28. Overall, total leukocyte count decreased to less than 1,000/microL during 10 of 56 cycles (18%). Five patients required six hospitalizations for neutropenia and fever. There were two toxic deaths due to sepsis. Platelet counts less than 50,000/microL occurred in 14 cycles (25%). Alopecia developed in all patients; gastrointestinal toxicity was uncommon. This schedule of etoposide administration warrants further study in combination with other active agents in previously untreated patients with SCLC.
 ...
PMID:Prolonged administration of oral etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. 217 May 89

Mucositis, the inflammation and necrosis of mucosal membranes, is a serious and debilitating consequence of many cancer therapies. We were interested in the potential role of filgrastim (recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, r-metHuG-CSF) in the reduction of mucositis. Patients with newly diagnosed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with CAE chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide) and placebo or filgrastim. If patients had an episode of febrile neutropenia, they received unblinded filgrastim in subsequent CAE cycles. Oral mucositis was considered to have occurred if a patient reported any clinical sign or symptom of oral mucositis with or without oral candidiasis. Oral mucositis was analyzed using the unadjusted chi-square test, and time to first episode of mucositis was analyzed using the stratified log-rank test as well as the Cox proportional hazards regression model. During cycle 1, placebo-treated patients had more episodes of mucositis (47%) compared with those patients randomized to filgrastim (28%). Across all cycles of treatment, 70% of placebo-treated patients experienced mucositis, compared with 53% of patients randomized to filgrastim. A significant reduction in the incidence of chemotherapy-related oral mucositis occurred across multiple cycles of treatment in patients treated with filgrastim.
 ...
PMID:Reduction of oral mucositis by filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in patients receiving chemotherapy. 1085 Mar 81

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in a phase I study conducted to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of combined liposomal doxorubicin (CAE) and gemcitabine (GEM) in relapsed ovarian cancer patients. A total of 82 courses are evaluable, with a median number of three cycles administered per patient (range 2-8). GEM was administered on days 1 and 8 by 30-min intravenous infusion immediately after CAE given by 60-min intravenous infusion on day 1; cycles were repeated every 21 days. The starting doses were CAE 20 mg/m(2) and GEM 600 mg/m(2). Following dose levels were 20/800; 20/1,000; 30/800; 30/1,000; 35/800, and 35/1,000 for CAE and GEM, respectively. The MTD was reached at dose level 5, with febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as dose-limiting toxicities. After the MTD, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was administered in 15% of cycles. Non-hematological toxicity was mild and manageable. All patients are so far evaluable for response. Among them, 5 partial responses (21.7%; 95% confidence interval, CI: 4.9-38.5), 5 disease stabilizations (21.7%, 95% CI: 4.9-38.5) and 13 progressions (56.6%, 95% CI: 36.4-76.8) have been registered. These results warrant further research in a phase II study.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin in relapsed ovarian cancer. 1191 95