Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Chemoradiation is standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, local and distant relapse rates remain high. It has been postulated that the addition of consolidation chemotherapy might further decrease the systemic relapse rate. We performed this phase II study to evaluate the toxicities and activity of two cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered prior to and following thoracic radiation in patients with locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC. From April to December 1997, 25 patients were entered on study. Twenty-three patients were eligible and received paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 h followed by carboplatin at an AUC (6) on days 1 and 22. Radiation consisted of 60 Gy given over 6 weeks beginning on day 43. Patients with non-progressive disease received two additional cycles of consolidation carboplatin and paclitaxel. Four of 23 patients progressed during induction chemotherapy. There were seven PR's and 11 had SD after induction chemotherapy. Following radiation, the response changed to 11 PR, four SD, and three had progressive disease. Of the 15 patients eligible to receive consolidation chemotherapy, three were excluded due to a poor performance status. Twelve patients were treated with consolidation chemotherapy with further improvement in two patients (SD to PR, PR to CR). All 12 patients who received consolidation chemotherapy developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, including three patients with neutropenic fever. The overall response rate was 52.1%. The median survival, 1-, and 2-year survival was 10.5 months, 45, and 17%, respectively. In conclusion, consolidation chemotherapy was associated with significant hematologic toxicity without an obvious improvement in survival in comparison to other studies utilizing chemoradiation alone.
 ...
PMID:Carboplatin plus paclitaxel and sequential radiation followed by consolidation carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated locally advanced NSCLC. A Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) phase II study. 1236 98

All of the third-generation chemotherapeutic agents reviewed in this article are independently active against NSCLC, although the agents differ significantly in their cellular and molecular mechanisms of cytotoxicity. All have also been shown to potentiate radiation effects, and thus are promising in exerting further cytotoxicity when used in combination chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Although the toxicity to normal tissue varies among these agents when used alone, phase I/II clinical results consistently demonstrated higher risk and severity of esophagitis and pneumonitis when these agents were administered concurrently with thoracic radiation. These results were consistent with the radiosensitization properties of all these agents. Nonetheless, most chemoradiation combinations have been made feasible through careful phase I studies that establish safe doses of these agents given concurrently with radiation. Indeed, phase I outcomes consistently have demonstrated the need for dose reduction compared with doses applied in the stage IV, metastatic disease setting (see Tables 1 and 2). There have been many different dose schedules in phase I/II studies for stage III NSCLC, and most have yielded improved response rates with these agents. For all these agents discussed, multiagent chemoradiation increased toxicity when compared with single agent chemoradiation, particularly in the risk of neutropenia, and the tumor response rates were no better than single-agent chemoradiation. Most studies have not reached an adequate interval for survival endpoint to assess the impact on survival using multiagent chemoradiation. A few earlier studies using paclitaxel chemoradiation, in fact, showed that the significant improvement in tumor response rate resulted in only a small gain in survival outcome. Despite much preclinical research conducted with these agents, the optimal sequence and dose of drug and the optimal schedule for combining the two modalities remain unknown. Optimal sequencing of the chemoradiation regimens may improve distant disease control and primary tumor control, as was seen in studies that administered both full-dose induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation at reduced drug dose and in studies that administered consolidative, full-dose chemotherapy after chemoradiation. Strategically altering the treatment schedule may also enhance the radiosensitizing effects while keeping toxicity low, such as was seen in the pulsed low-dose paclitaxel chemoradiation reported by Chen et al . This pulsed low-dose schedule resulted in superior tumor response (100%) and durable primary tumor control while keeping the toxicity low. Other methods to minimize normal tissue injury and to deliver higher radiation doses, such as conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy that excludes nontarget tissues from the radiation field, are under investigation. Marks and colleagues were able to deliver radiation to 80 Gy using accelerated hyperfractionation radiation after induction chemotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is expected to revolutionize the targeting of tumor and exclusion of normal tissues from the high-dose radiation volume in the future. Integrating biologic response modifiers, radioprotectors, and molecular targeting strategies also are being investigated. It remains unclear which agent among the third-generation drugs performs better for combination chemoradiation. The CALGB 9431 study reported by Vokes et al provided some preliminary information, in that it was a randomized phase II study of a three-arm comparison of cisplatin-containing, two-drug combination chemoradiation with one of the third-generation agents. Although direct statistical comparison between the treatment arms was not valid for a phase II setting, such an analysis did indeed reveal similar overall response rates for these three arms. Chemoradiation using third-generation chemotherapeutic agents has improved local tumor response rates, with enhanced radiation toxicity such as esophagitis and pneumonitis. The challenge of targeting distant disease control for locally advanced NSCLC continues.
 ...
PMID:Radiation and third-generation chemotherapy. 1500 81

We assess the effect of chemoradiation therapy for four cases of advanced rectal cancer. The radiation therapy consisted of 40-50 Gy delivered in fraction of 2 Gy/day. A treatment of 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/body) with l-leucovorin (100 mg/body) intravenously once a week, or oral S-1 (100 mg/day/body) for four weeks, was given during radiation therapy. Efficacy for primary carcinoma was evaluated as partial response in all four cases. We performed a curative operation in two cases. Histological efficacy for primary tumors was diagnosed as Grade 2 and Grade 3. Grade 3 adverse effect for neutropenia occurred in one patient, and Grade 3 adverse effect for appetite loss occurred in 2 patients. All cases survived without a recurrence for a period of 4 months-5 years and 3 months. Chemoradiation therapy was safe and an effective treatment prior to curative operation for advanced rectal cancer which invaded the pelvic organ.
 ...
PMID:[Assessment of chemoradiation therapy for advanced rectal cancer invaded the pelvic organ]. 2003 47