Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Pyrazoloacridine (PZA, NSC366140, PD115934) is an acridine derivative currently undergoing clinical evaluation. In preclinical testing, PZA has shown selectivity for solid tumor cell lines, activity in hypoxic, noncycling, and multidrug-resistant cell lines, and synergy with cisplatin in a variety of lung cancer cell lines. In early phase I clinical studies PZA has shown modest activity in ovarian, cervical, and colon cancer. The purpose of the present study was threefold: to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of PZA (3-h infusion) and cisplatin administered with and without Filgrastim (G-CSF) (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) every 3 weeks in untreated or minimally pretreated patients, to describe and quantify the clinical toxicities of combination chemotherapy with PZA and cisplatin, and to evaluate the effects of drug sequencing on the toxicity profile and pharmacologic behavior of PZA. The starting doses in this dose-escalation trial were PZA 400 mg/m2 as a 3-h intravenous infusion and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 as a 1 mg/min intravenous infusion. The sequence of drugs was alternated with each successive course in each patient treated. Twenty-one patients with refractory solid tumors received 43 courses of therapy through four dose levels. Neutropenia was dose-limiting and defined the maximum tolerated dose of PZA 400 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 without G-CSF support. With G-CSF support, nausea and vomiting were dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated and recommended doses for further study of this combination are PZA 600 mg/m2 over 3 h and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF support. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that sequence does not impact on the pharmacokinetics of PZA when given in combination with cisplatin.
 ...
PMID:A phase I and pharmacologic study of pyrazoloacridine and cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer. 1279 32

The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, arm C versus arm A). Common adverse events associated with the combination treatment included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. Neutropenia was the major hematologic toxicity. Adverse events were similar in men and women and in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.
 ...
PMID:FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin. 1475 10

F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) is used extensively in oncology to diagnose, stage, and restage patients with various malignancies. Many patients treated for malignancies develop neutropenia secondary to marrow suppressive chemotherapy and are subsequently treated with synthetic hematopoietic growth factors (HGF), both granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients taking HGF can present a diagnostic challenge for those interpreting PET because they can demonstrate diffuse marrow uptake on FDG-PET scans, mimicking diffuse bone marrow metastases. It has not been reported whether bone marrow uptake is affected on PET scans in patients taking erythropoietin, the erythroid-specific cell-line stimulator. We report a case of extensive diffuse bone marrow uptake in a 77-year-old man with a history of colon cancer who began taking erythropoietin 3 weeks before his PET scan. This case demonstrates the need to consider erythropoietin in the differential diagnosis of possible etiologies causing diffuse bone marrow uptake on PET scans.
 ...
PMID:Diffuse bone marrow uptake on whole-body F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in a patient taking recombinant erythropoietin. 1516 84

The objective of this study was to define the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and response rate of a combination of two topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan, in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Eleven patients, the majority with previously progressive disease on 5-fluorouracil-based regimens, were enrolled onto a phase I/II dose escalation trial utilizing continuous infusion topotecan for 2 weeks and weekly irinotecan x 3 with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dosages of topotecan utilized included 0.2 and 0.25mg/m2/day. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 62 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus. Patients were followed for toxicity and response. The MTD of the combination of agents was found to be 0.25mg/m2/day for topotecan and 62 mg/m2 for irinotecan. The most common serious toxicities were diarrhea and nausea/vomiting. Only one patient experienced grade III neutropenia. There were no complete or partial responses. However, four patients had prolonged disease stabilization (SD) of up to 324 days and this group remained on protocol therapy for an average of 227 days (p=0.0005 versus patients not achieving SD). We concluded that the MTD for this combination of topoisomerase I inhibitors, given on this particular schedule, has been defined. This combination cannot be recommended as a first- or second-line therapy for patients with metastatic colon cancer based on the responses observed. However, approximately one-third of patients achieved prolonged disease stabilization. Topotecan with irinotecan may be useful as a palliative regimen for a subgroup of colon cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Combined topoisomerase I inhibition for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer. 1520 98

As capecitabine (Xeloda) is converted to 5-FU within tumours it can produce 5-FU-like side effects. However, diarrhoea, stomatitis, nausea, alopecia and neutropenia are significantly less frequent than with i.v. 5-FU. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is the only clinical adverse event occurring more often during capecitabine treatment. These findings in MCRC have also been confirmed in a large phase III trial in early stage colon cancer (X-Act adjuvant study) and phase II clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer. Because capecitabine is taken in the outpatient setting, the nurse and/or supervising clinician are responsible for educating patients how to use it correctly and on the nature/recognition/severity of adverse events. Patients need to be aware that temporary interruptions/dose modifications do not reduce the overall efficacy of capecitabine and will most likely lead to a resolution of side effects. Consequently, oncology nurses will be assuming a more significant and pivotal role in the efficient education and support of patients during home-based therapy with capecitabine.
 ...
PMID:Management of adverse events and other practical considerations in patients receiving capecitabine (Xeloda). 1534 79

A patient is a 35-year-old man. By a diagnosis of descending colon cancer, descending colon ablative operation and D1 lymph node dissection were performed on April 22, 2004. It was P3H0N1SE, Stage IV in perioperative findings. Abdominal CT showed peritoneal dissemination of 1.7 cm at the right under the abdominal wall wound and 1.2 cm in the rectovesical pouch on May 18, 2004. CPT-11 + TS-1 combination chemotherapy was started on June 22nd. In the five weeks of the combination chemotherapy, continuous infusion of CPT-11 (150 mg/body day 1 and 15) was twice administered, and oral administration of TS-1 (120 mg/body/day) was given for 3 weeks (day 1-21). Peritoneal dissemination disappeared after the two-course end, and we judged it as CR. Furthermore, we were certain that we obtained CR after the three course end. The adverse event was only neutropenia of grade 1. The fourth course was not administered, but recurrence has not been observed. Abdominal CT showed no recurrence on March 3, 2005 since the combination chemotherapy ended 6 months ago.
 ...
PMID:[A case of peritoneal dissemination disappeared by CPT-11 + TS-1 combination chemotherapy]. 1631 35

(1) The standard treatment for colon cancer is surgical excision, but without additional treatment nearly 50% of surgically treated patients die from relapse and metastatic disease progression. Adjuvant chemotherapy is designed to reduce the risk of post-surgical relapse. (2) The standard adjuvant chemotherapy is a combination of fluorouracil + folinic acid administered intravenously for 6 months (de Gramont protocol). (3) In patients with stage III disease (corresponding to Dukes stage C: lymph node involvement but no metastases), the 5-year survival rate after a 6-month course of fluorouracil + folinic acid is significantly higher than with placebo (63% versus 51%). The efficacy of this treatment has not been established in patients with stage II disease (no lymph node involvement or metastases), for whom the overall 5-year survival rate is about 80%. (4) In one trial a combination of oxaliplatin + fluorouracil + folinic acid (FOLFOX 4 protocol) failed to increase the overall 3-year survival rate more than the fluorouracil + folinic acid combination. It increased the event-free survival rate (72.2% versus 65.3%) but had more severe adverse effects, including: neuropathies (in about 12% of patients), neutropenia (41%), and gastrointestinal disturbances (5% to 10% of patients had nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea). (5) Capecitabine, a fluorouracil precursor, does not appear to be more effective than fluorouracil, but it does provide an alternative oral treatment with a slightly different profile of adverse effects (more frequent erythrodysesthesia, etc.). (6) In practice, adjuvant treatment with fluorouracil + folinic acid should be offered to patients with surgically treated stage-III colonic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer: lymph node involvement without metastases. 1676 2

We report the complete response for one year of a patient with simultaneous multiple lung metastases from colon cancer who was treated using a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and uracil/tegafur (UFT)/Leucovorin (LV) using a schedule reported overseas. A 61-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital and diagnosed with ascending colon cancer and simultaneous multiple lung metastases. The patient underwent a right hemicolectomy and was treated with CPT-11 (150 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and oral UFT and oral LV on days 1-14. This treatment cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. A CT examination after 4 cycles of chemotherapy revealed a partial response of multiple lung metastases, and the next examination after 6 cycles revealed a complete response. The adverse effects observed during this chemotherapy regimen were leucopenia (grade 1), neutropenia (grade 2), vomiting (grade 2) and hair loss (grade 1). The patient is now receiving her 22nd cycle of chemotherapy, and her multiple metastases have shown a complete response for one year. The CPT-11 and UFT/LV combination therapy was well tolerated and was covered by the national health insurance system in Japan. This treatment may enable prolonged survival and improve quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Complete response to CPT-11 and UFT/LV combination therapy in a case with simultaneous multiple lung metastases from colon cancer]. 1677 Jan 4

Among the several different combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed has shown encouraging therapeutic results and a fairly good toxicity profile. Here, we report on two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving this combination therapy, which leads to severe enterocolitis and neutropenia resulting in death in one patient. One patient was a 67-year-old woman suffering from an adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon with multiple liver metastases. The other patient was a 74-year-old woman with colon cancer, and metachronous multiple pulmonal and hepatic metastases. In both patients, palliative chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days. Both patients developed neutropenia in combination with severe enterocolitis after the fourth and the second chemotherapy cycle, respectively. Despite antibiotic treatment, diarrhea persisted in both patients for weeks. One patient died 17 days after hospital admission because of enteric sepsis with bleeding of the colonic mucosa and multiorgan failure. The other patient recovered completely and was discharged from hospital after 8 weeks. Severe enterocolitis, a hitherto infrequently recognized adverse event, which has been described in association with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin chemotherapy, may also occur with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin. Physicians should be aware of this rare, although potentially lethal, gastrointestinal toxicity.
 ...
PMID:Severe enteropathy associated with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin chemotherapy: report of two patients experiencing this rare, potentially lethal gastrointestinal adverse event. 1692 37

Irinotecan, a water-soluble, semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin, is a key component of first- and second-line treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC, the results of two prospective, multicenter phase III trials have shown that the combination of irinotecan with bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) can significantly prolong survival compared with 5FU/LV alone, with a manageable side effects profile. In addition, irinotecan-based regimens, with or without oxaliplatin, may improve resectability of metastases and further increase patient survival. Studies of irinotecan in the first-line setting in combination with newer agents, such as bevacizumab, have shown impressive overall survival. In the second-line setting, irinotecan has demonstrated efficacy superior to that of best supportive care. Initial studies of irinotecan plus bolus 5FU/LV, and the preliminary results from trials of irinotecan plus infusional 5FU/LV in the adjuvant setting, have been disappointing; however, for the largest trial, the Pan-European Trial in Adjuvant Colon Cancer, results with sufficient follow-up are pending. Irinotecan has an acceptable tolerability profile and is not associated with cumulative toxicities in patients with metastatic CRC; regimens containing irinotecan extend treatment duration and improve survival. New regimens and adjunctive therapies are being explored to reduce the incidence of common complications of irinotecan treatment, such as diarrhea and neutropenia.
 ...
PMID:Irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer. 1695 32


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>