Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Standard treatment of locally advanced laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, and some oropharyngeal cancers includes total laryngectomy. In an attempt to preserve the larynx through induction chemotherapy, we conducted two consecutive phase II studies. From March 1986 to February 1991, 64 patients with advanced untreated but resectable head and neck cancer who would require total laryngectomy were enrolled on one of two cisplatin-based induction regimens: cisplatin-bleomycin-5-fluorouracil (PBF) in 31 patients and cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (PF) in 33; all received definitive radiotherapy. Surgery was reserved for patients who achieved less than a partial response to chemotherapy and patients with residual or recurrent disease after sequential chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Overall complete plus partial response rates to both cisplatin-based regimens were comparable. The combined PF and PBF overall response rates were 75% for laryngeal cancer, 78% for hypopharyngeal cancer, and 75% for oropharyngeal cancer. Complete response rates after radiotherapy were 88%, 83%, and 50%, respectively. Neutropenia (< 1,000 cells/mm3) was the most common hematologic toxic effect: it occurred in 44% of patients who received PF and 16% of those who received PBF. Grade > or = 3 mucositis occurred in 50% of patients who received PF and 4% who received PBF. The data suggest that laryngeal preservation was feasible in all three primary-site subgroups. With follow-up of 15+ to 54+ months, 44% of patients with laryngeal cancer, 28% with hypopharyngeal cancer, and 22% with oropharyngeal cancer are alive with laryngeal preservation. The overall 2-year survival rates for patients with cancer of the larynx, hypopharynx, and oropharynx were 71%, 46%, and 38%, respectively.
 ...
PMID:Laryngeal preservation by induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. 751 Feb 76

The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of giving concomitant radiotherapy and 3 cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) in locally advanced inoperable oropharyngeal cancer. From March 1990 to September 1993, 27 male patients (mean age 55 years) were included in this study. 3 patients (11%) were T2N0, 19 (70%) T3 (T3N0: n = 9, T3N1: n = 1, T3N2: n = 5, T3N3: n = 4), and 5 (19%) T4 (T4N0: n = 1, T4N1: n = 1, T4N2: n = 2, T4N3: n = 1). All patients received conventional radiotherapy delivering 70 Gy in 35 fractions and 52 days, and three cycles of chemotherapy starting on day 1, 21 and 42 with CDDP 20 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 day 1 to day 4, and MMC 10 mg/m2 day 1. With a mean follow-up of 34 months (17-59), 10 patients (37%) were alive and free of disease. Among the 17 other patients, 8 died of cancer. Crude locoregional control rate was 78%, and probability of local control at 1 and 2 years was 85 and 80%, respectively. One- and 2-year survival rates were 48 and 31%, respectively, for both overall and disease-free survival. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 22 patients (81%); enteral feeding was necessary for 63%; mean weight loss was 5.7 kg. Grade > 2 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 patients (41%), grade > 2 neutropenia in 8 patients (29%), grade > 2 anaemia in 4 patients (15%). Febrile neutropenia or aplasia occurred in 5 patients (19%). 2 patients (7%) died during treatment of haematological or infectious complications related to the treatment. Another patient died 1 month after treatment with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and septicaemia. In conclusion, a high complete response rate has been achieved with this concomitant chemo- and radiotherapy, but with severe digestive and haematological toxicity. Addition of MMC to 5-FU and CDDP might have been responsible for this increased toxicity. This therapeutic combination is therefore not routinely feasible.
 ...
PMID:Enhanced acute toxicity in oropharynx carcinoma treated with radiotherapy and concomitant cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. 898 78

Periodontal infection may exacerbate during cancer therapy and may result in oral pain and infection, and systemic infection, which may cause morbidity and can lead to mortality in neutropenic cancer patients. Periodontal disease in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation therapy may lead to acute and chronic complications. The literature was reviewed by a search of Medline of the National Library of Medicine. The search was conducted to identify publications assessing periodontal disease in cancer patients. In addition, a review of papers referenced in the retrieved papers was conducted to identify additional publications for review. Periodontal disease should be assessed and managed prior to medical treatment of cancer for those with oropharyngeal cancer, and for patients in whom neutropenia may develop during treatment. Pretreatment assessment and management, and maintenance of oral hygiene have been shown to be effective in preventing oral and systemic complications during treatment. A complete oral and periodontal examination is appropriate for all patients planned to receive head and neck radiation therapy and those to be treated with medical protocols that are anticipated to result in neutropenia. Oral and periodontal care must continue following cancer therapy, and requires that the health care provider have an understanding of the malignant disease, oral manifestations of the disease, medical management of the disease, and of the oral complications that may develop.
 ...
PMID:Periodontal disease and periodontal management in patients with cancer. 1159 70

We carried out this study to clarify the treatment outcomes and problems associated with induction chemotherapy (using taxotere, cisplatin and 5-FU [TPF therapy]) and chemoradiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. The data of 44 patients receiving their initial treatment for oropharyngeal cancer (including 2, 9 and 33 patients with stage II, stage III and stage IV disease, respectively, and 31, 8 and 3 patients with side wall, front wall and upper wall (soft palate and uvula) involvement) were examined. Of the 44 patients, 33 received induction chemotherapy and 11 received chemoradiotherapy. The feasibility, incidence of neutropenia, response rate, and 3 year disease-specific survival rate in the induction chemotherapy group vs. chemoradiotherapy group were 70%, 88%, 82% and 73%, respectively, vs. 63%, 91%, 82% and 55%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the 3-year disease-specific survival rate was seen between the p16-positive and p16-negative patients in the induction chemotherapy group: while the rate was 100% in the p16-positive patients, it was only 51% in the p16-negative patients (p=0.004). Of the patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy, 3 developed mandibular osteomyelitis, which was considered as one of the important problems associated with this therapy.
 ...
PMID:[Retrospective Study of Induction Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer]. 2672 22