Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

After stratification for extent of small cell lung cancer, 109 patients were randomized to receive cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and VP-16-213 [CAVP16 (regimen I)] or to receive CAVP16 to maximum response (minimum of three courses) and then chemotherapy with CCNU, methotrexate, vincristine, and procarbazine (COMP) alternating with CAVP16 (regimen II). A group of patients who achieved complete remission were randomized to receive whole-brain irradiation or to have observation only. Of the 44 patients with limited disease, 28 (64%) achieved a complete remission and 11 (26%) achieved a partial remission. Of the 65 patients with extensive disease, 26 (40%) achieved a complete remission and 28 (46%) achieved a partial remission. There were no significant differences between the regimens in response or survival. The projected median survival times are 14 and 10 months for limited and extensive disease, respectively. Nearly 30% of patients with limited disease will be 2-year, disease-free survivors. Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive cranial irradiation or observation only; none of the 15 irradiated patients developed cerebral metastases, but five of 14 randomized to observation relapsed in the brain (P = 0.02). One patient died with necropsy evidence of only intracranial disease. The principal hematologic toxic effect was leukopenia. There were 31 febrile episodes (21 infectious) during neutropenia and four toxic deaths. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Cranial irradiation in patients who achieve complete remission delays or reduces the incidence of CNS metastases. Although alternating chemotherapy is not beneficial, combination chemotherapy with CAVP16 alone is highly effective treatment modality for small cell.
 ...
PMID:Combination chemotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the lung: continuous versus alternating non-cross-resistant combinations. 627 87

The University of Colorado Cancer Center is conducting a phase I study of the three-drug PET combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in patients with advanced (stage IV or IIIB with pleural effusion) small cell lung cancer. The primary study goal was to define the maximally tolerated doses given on an outpatient basis. Secondary goals were to determine toxicities, response rate, response duration, and survival. Paclitaxel was given as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion prior to cisplatin and etoposide. The starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 day I, cisplatin 80 mg/m2 IV day I, and etoposide 50 mg/m2 IV day I, and 100 mg/m2 orally days 2 and 3, every 3 weeks. In the second group, the etoposide was increased to 80 mg/m2 IV day I and 160 mg/m2 orally days 2 and 3. In the third group, paclitaxel was increased to 175 mg/m2 IV day I. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not given on the first cycle, but was given on subsequent cycles if grade 4 neutropenia developed. So far, 13 patients have been entered on the study; all are evaluable for toxicity and nine are evaluable for response. The major toxicity was neutropenia, with no other grade 4 toxicities observed. All patients received the full six cycles of therapy. Thus far, partial responses have been observed in four patients (44%) and complete responses in five patients (56%), for an overall response rate of 100%. This ongoing study has shown that full doses of each of these three active drugs can be administered safely on an outpatient basis. The encouraging early results should lead to a multicenter phase II evaluation of the PET combination.
 ...
PMID:A phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in small cell lung cancer: a University of Colorado Cancer Center study. 748 62

The objective of the study was to estimate the net impact on health resource utilisation of using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Cost minimisation of the study medication in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in teaching institutions and affiliated community hospitals participating in a clinical trial. 68 patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide chemotherapy were randomised to blinded placebo or filgrastim study medication at three or 14 clinical trials sites. The patients received daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim or placebo, initiated 24 h after chemotherapy and continued until the neutrophil count exceeded 10,000 x 10(6)/l after the time of the expected nadir. Differences in total charges, costs and Medicare payments between treatment groups were the main outcomes measured. Compared to placebo patients, filgrastim-treated patients had significantly fewer and less resource-intensive hospitalisations. After accounting for filgrastim purchase and administration, the charge model predicts overall savings from filgrastim use in a clinical setting in which the risk of febrile neutropenia is high for patients not receiving filgrastim. The Medicare and cost models predict only a partial recapture of the cost of filgrastim therapy. The health care resources impact of filgrastim was sensitive to the risk of hospitalisation with febrile neutropenia, and to the perspective chosen for measuring resource utilisation (charges, costs or Medicare payments). The adjunctive use of filgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy leads to partial or complete recapture of the cost of purchasing and administering the product.
 ...
PMID:The impact of therapy with filgrastim (recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) on the health care costs associated with cancer chemotherapy. 750 27

A dose escalation study of teniposide (VM-26) plus cisplatin (CDDP) was carried out using recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in 46 previously untreated patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The dose of CDDP was 80 mg/m2/day intravenously (i.v.) (day 1) and VM-26 was escalated from 60 mg/m2/day to 80, 100 and 120 mg/m2/day i.v. x 5 days for four cycles. The dose of rhG-CSF was 90 micrograms/m2/day subcutaneously for 13 days. The feasibility of the regimen at the starting dose level of VM-26 with or without rhG-CSF was initially examined in 10 patients chosen through random allocation. WHO grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 17% (three out of 18 courses) of patients in the rhG-CSF group and in 63% (12 out of 19 courses) of the control group (P < 0.01). The number of patients with febrile episodes (> 38 degrees C) over the four courses of chemotherapy was 1 in the rhG-CSF group and 4 in the control group. According to these results, all 36 patients received rhG-CSF in the dose escalation stage. The incidence of WHO grade 4 neutropenia at the dose levels of 60, 80, 100 and 120 mg/m2/day of VM-26 was 66, 57, 76 and 85%, respectively (P > 0.1). The incidence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia was 19, 31, 18 and 46%, respectively (P > 0.1). The overall response rate was 100% in patients with limited stage SCLC and 83% in patients with extensive stage SCLC. The actual administered VM-26 dose per week at the dose level of 100 mg/m2/day was 1.6-fold higher than the planned starting dose (60 mg/m2/day) per week. At the dose level of 120 mg/m2/day, 50% of patients developed WHO grade 4 leucopenia, which lasted longer than 1 week and 67% of the patients had WHO grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea. At this same dose, all patients had at least one febrile episode (> 38 degrees C), and 1 patient died of cerebral bleeding with severe thrombocytopenia. The median survival time of all patients was 451 days (411 days, extensive disease; 497 days, limited disease). VM-26 plus CDDP with rhG-CSF was active in previously untreated patients with SCLC. The recommended dose of VM-26 in combination with CDDP for a phase II study is 100 mg/m2/day for 5 days with rhG-CSF support.
 ...
PMID:A study of dose escalation of teniposide (VM-26) plus cisplatin (CDDP) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer. 751 56

From July 1987 to July 1988, 35 patients with non small cell lung cancer, stage IV, were included in a phase II trial (GLOT NPC 87/01). The treatment was as follows: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1, vindesin 3 mg/m2 day 1, mitomycin 6 mg/m2 day 2, and bleomycin 15 mg/day, day 1 + 2 by continuous infusion. The evaluation for response was assessed after three courses of chemotherapy. The results were poor: an objective response was observed in three patients: three partial responses and no complete response. Because of tumor progression (18 patients) or toxicity (three patients), 21 patients did not complete the three cycles of chemotherapy. The median survival rate was 100 days. Toxicity was mild: grade III neutropenia occurred in one patient, grade IV thrombocytopenia was also observed in one patient. We conclude that this treatment has only a poor efficacy in stage IV non small cell lung cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Results of a combination of platinum-vindesin-ametycin-bleomycin (CEMB) in the treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancers]. 751 30

Paclitaxel is a new anticancer agent with a novel mechanism of action. It promotes polymerisation of tubulin dimers to form microtubules and stabilises microtubules by preventing depolymerisation. In noncomparative trials, continuous infusion of paclitaxel 110 to 300 mg/m2 over 3 to 96 hours every 3 to 4 weeks produced a complete or partial response in 16 to 48% of patients with ovarian cancer and 25 to 61.5% of patients with metastatic breast cancer, many of whom were refractory to treatment with cisplatin or doxorubicin, respectively. 23 to 100% of patients with ovarian cancer achieved complete or partial responses with paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, altretamine and/or doxorubicin. Similarly, response rates of 30 to 100% were observed with paclitaxel plus doxorubicin, cisplatin, mitoxantrone and/or cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Comparative trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer showed paclitaxel therapy to produce greater response rates than treatment with parenteral hydroxyurea (71 vs 0%) or cyclophosphamide (when both agents were combined with cisplatin) [79 vs 63%]. Paclitaxel was also more effective than mitomycin in 50 patients with previously untreated breast cancer (partial response in 20 vs 4% of patients). Paclitaxel therapy also produced promising results in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, malignant melanoma, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), germ cell cancer, urothelial cancer, oesophageal cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma, and was successfully combined with cisplatin, carboplatin and/or etoposide in patients with NSCLC, SCLC or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Hypersensitivity reactions were initially a concern with administration of paclitaxel, although current dosage regimens have reduced the incidence of these events to less than 5%. The major dose-limiting adverse effects of paclitaxel are leucopenia (neutropenia) and peripheral neuropathy. Other haematological toxicity was generally mild. Cardiac toxicity was reported in small numbers of patients and most patients developed total alopecia. Several aspects of paclitaxel use remain to be clarified, including the optimal treatment schedule and infusion time, confirmation of the tolerability profile and efficacy of combination regimens in an expanded range of malignancies. Long term follow-up of paclitaxel recipients will also allow the effects of the drug on patient survival to be determined. Nevertheless, paclitaxel is a promising addition to the current therapies available, with significant activity reported in patients with advanced ovarian or breast cancer or other types of tumors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Paclitaxel. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of cancer. 753 Jun 32

This study was conducted to test the feasibility of reducing the interval between cycles of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide (ACE) chemotherapy to 2 weeks, thereby increasing dose intensity, by adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the duration of neutropenia following a cycle. 20 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were prescribed six cycles of 2-weekly ACE, with G-CSF on the intermediate days. 3 patients died during the treatment period and a further 5 had ACE terminated, 3 for toxicity and 2 for progressive disease. Of the 71 intervals between cycles, 42 (59%) were of the prescribed 14 days, 9 (13%) of 15-20 days, 15 (21%) of 21 days and five (7%) longer, but during the first four cycles, 36 (77%) of 47 intervals were of 14 days. The main reason for delay was haematological toxicity. All 20 patients experienced WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, but at 2 weeks after a cycle only 3 had grade 4 and 1 grade 3. 17 patients required blood transfusion and 12 platelet transfusion. The only potentially serious adverse reaction to G-CSF was an episode of rash with facial oedema. Adding G-CSF allows ACE chemotherapy to be intensified by reducing the interval between cycles.
 ...
PMID:The feasibility of using glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to increase the planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. 753 33

A phase I study was conducted to define the maximally tolerated dose and toxicity profile of the ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (ICE-T) regimen in advanced lung cancer. This chemotherapy program uses paclitaxel given as a 24-hour continuous infusion in conjunction with full-dose ICE chemotherapy with growth factor support. The dosage of paclitaxel was escalated from 75 to 225 mg/m2. Thirty-four patients have been accrued to date onto this study. Because hematologic dose-limiting toxicity was defined in terms of neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia exceeding 7 days' duration, no patient demonstrated what was defined by the protocol as dose-limiting toxicity. Nonetheless, substantial hematologic toxicity was observed. Overall, 26% had fever and neutropenia, 56% had grade 4 neutropenia, and 26% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In all cases, hematologic toxicity was short term and reversible. While grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression was frequently observed, it was not dose related (in terms of paclitaxel dosage). Nonhematologic toxicity also was not dose related and, with only a few exceptions, was not clinically significant. Among 27 patients evaluable for response, 41% achieved an objective response, including 15% with a complete response. All of five patients with small cell lung cancer responded (including two with a complete response). Among 22 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 27% achieved an objective response (also including two with a complete response). The results of this study suggest that with growth factor support, it is possible to safely administer full-dose, single-agent paclitaxel in conjunction with full-dose ICE chemotherapy. We will soon be initiating a phase II study of the ICE-T regimen using paclitaxel at 225 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous infusion in advanced lung cancer. We will also conduct a phase I study of ICE-T, with paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour continuous infusion.
 ...
PMID:A phase I study of ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer. 754 29

Camptothecin is a natural product derived from the Oriental tree Camptotheca acuminata which has shown activity in a number of experimental tumors. Its clinical development was halted in the early-70s owing to its unpredictable and formidable toxicities. Two water-soluble camptothecin analogs have been synthesized recently and are currently in clinical trials: topotecan and CPT-11. Camptothecin and its derivatives are unique in that they represent the only family of topoisomerase I inhibitors. Topoisomerase I is a nuclear enzyme which modulates the topological structure of DNA by making transient single-stranded breaks. Pre-clinical studies have shown that CPT-11 and topotecan possess high and broad antitumor activity against a variety of experimental tumors including both non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer. Lack of cross-resistance with most classical anticancer agents has been also demonstrated. Phase I studies have identified neutropenia to be the dose-limiting toxicity for topotecan while, for CPT-11, either neutropenia or diarrhoea were dose-limiting. Maximum Tolerated Doses (MTD) of both agents are greatly dependent upon the schedule used. A Phase II Japanese study of CPT-11 in advanced untreated NSCLC has been recently published. Given at the dose of 100 mg/m2 as a 90-min infusion, CPT-11 produced a 32% objective response rate out of 72 assessable untreated patients. Similar studies are in progress with topotecan. The same Japanese group has completed Phase I-II studies on the combination of CPT-11 with cisplatin. The optimal dose of CPT-11, which can be safely combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m2, was found to be 60 mg/m2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Camptothecin analogues in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. 755 27

In scheduling chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), chemotherapy can be given pre-radiotherapy or concurrently as a single agent or in combination. Optimal scheduling has yet to be established. Optimal pre-radiotherapy for NSCLC requires further development but cisplatin with vinblastine, vindesine, etoposide or navelbine appear the best currently available. A number of new drugs show potential for enhancing radiation effects. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been tested in a number of experimental tumours in cell culture. In these systems cisplatin, carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C and other agents appear to improve cell kill compared to chemotherapy alone. Mouse xenograft models allow the study of various concurrent drug and radiation schedules including the effect of radiation with cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel and gemcitabine. In these systems, cisplatin in divided doses shows optimal enhancement with fractionated radiotherapy. There are a number of drug candidates for concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy programs. Clinical studies in head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, small cell lung cancer and NSCLC show promising results with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cisplatin given daily with radiotherapy improved survival in NSCLC compared to cisplatin given weekly with radiotherapy or to radiotherapy alone. To study the toxicity of radiation and concurrent carboplatin, we have studied 170 patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC in a 4-arm randomized trial. An analysis of the first 100 patients entered revealed significantly more neutropenia (P < 0.0001) and thrombocytopenia (P < 0.004) with the combined modality arms. Esophagitis was worse on all three experimental arms but was significantly more prolonged with accelerated radiotherapy arms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Scheduling of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 755 50


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>