Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A prospective, randomized trial comparing monotherapy with high-dose ciprofloxacin versus a standard combination regimen of azlocillin and netilmicin in the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients was performed. One hundred and forty-six patient episodes were randomized, but ten (seven ciprofloxacin and three azlocillin/netilmicin) were considered unevaluable for efficacy, and three episodes were withdrawn due to incorrect randomization or non-neutropenia. Of the remaining 133 episodes, infections resolved without modification of therapy in 25/66 (38%) versus 28/67 (42%) of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin treated groups respectively (P = 0.72). Considering all randomized episodes, therapy was modified in 46/73 (63%) episodes with ciprofloxacin and 39/70 (56%) with azlocillin/netilmicin (P = 0.40). Of 73 patient episodes randomized to ciprofloxacin, 25 (34%) received oral follow-on therapy after a median of three days of intravenous therapy. Infections were microbiologically documented in 31/73 (42%) ciprofloxacin and 32/70 (46%) azlocillin/netilmicin, of which 8/27 (30%) and 14/31 (45%) of evaluable episodes resolved without modification of therapy respectively (P = 0.28). Gram-positive organisms accounted for 78% of all organisms cultured with 36% coagulase-negative staphylococci. Bacteriological eradication was recorded in 18/24 (75%) and 26/29 (90%) evaluable patient episodes treated with ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin respectively (P = 0.27). Superinfections were seen in 14% of episodes in both groups, and subsequent infections in 12% ciprofloxacin and 14% azlocillin/netilmicin treated patients. Two patients (one ciprofloxacin and one azlocillin/netilmicin) died within 48 h of randomization, and a further 13 patients (four ciprofloxacin and nine azlocillin/netilmicin) died before resolution of neutropenia. Adverse events were recorded in 9% and 15% of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin treated patients respectively, with skin rash (five ciprofloxacin and four azlocillin/netilmicin), nephrotoxicity (two azlocillin/netilmicin), abnormal liver function tests (two azlocillin/netilmicin), ototoxicity (one azlocillin/netilmicin) and nausea (one ciprofloxacin) being the major events recorded. It was concluded that monotherapy with ciprofloxacin at this dosage is a safe alternative to combination therapy with azlocillin/netilmicin, and has the advantages of twice daily administration, iv and oral presentations, no cross allergy in beta-lactam-hypersensitive patients, and no nephro- or oto-toxicity.
 ...
PMID:A randomized trial of high-dose ciprofloxacin versus azlocillin and netilmicin in the empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients. 139 29

This study developed further clinical experience in using a single agent ("monotherapy") as empirical treatment for neutropenic patients with fever, and compared the safety and toxicity of two candidate agents, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin. A prospective, randomized, single-center efficacy and safety comparison was conducted of intravenous ciprofloxacin, 200 mg every 12 hours, and ceftazidime, 2 g every eight hours, as initial empirical therapy in neutropenic patients with fever. Regimens were modified as necessary, guided by laboratory results and/or the clinical condition. Response was evaluated at 72 hours and at the end of the neutropenia. Toxicity was evaluated by regular clinical examination and laboratory investigations. A total of 43 patients with 51 febrile neutropenic episodes were enrolled into the study and randomly assigned to one of the two regimens. Five episodes were excluded from evaluation of efficacy because of protocol violations, leaving 46 evaluable episodes (21 ciprofloxacin, 25 ceftazidime). The two groups were well matched for risk factors for infection. There were no differences between the two groups in response rates either at 72 hours or at the end of neutropenia, although in the vast majority of patients some modification of the initial therapy was required. No patients died of uncontrolled bacterial infection. Superinfection with gram-positive cocci (often streptococci) was seen primarily in bone marrow transplant recipients who had been randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin. This study demonstrated that, in certain circumstances, a single antibiotic can be used successfully as initial empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. In this study, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin were generally of equal efficacy, but there appeared to be an increased incidence of streptococcal superinfection in bone marrow transplant recipients who received ciprofloxacin.
 ...
PMID:A prospective, randomized comparison of ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin as initial empiric therapy in neutropenic patients with fever. 268 28

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, the efficacy of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin was compared with that of a standard regimen of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the initial empiric treatment of fever in neutropenic cancer patients. In addition, the efficacy of early conversion from intravenous therapy to orally administered ciprofloxacin was compared with that of continued ceftazidime plus amikacin. Seventy-one oncology patients with 79 episodes of fever and neutropenia were randomly assigned to receive initial empiric antibiotic therapy with either intravenously administered ciprofloxacin and azlocillin followed by orally administered ciprofloxacin (regimen 1, 25 episodes); ceftazidime and amikacin (regimen 2, 30 episodes); or ceftazidime and amikacin followed by oral ciprofloxacin (regimen 3, 24 episodes). Microbiologically documented infections were the cause of fever in 10 (40 percent), seven (23 percent), and nine (38 percent) episodes in regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively, including six, five, and four episodes of bacteremia. Patient survival was 90 to 92 percent in each regimen; however, some modification of antimicrobial therapy occurred in 65, 44, and 41 percent of surviving patients in regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The rate of clearance of initial bacteremia was 67 percent (four of six) in regimen 1, 100 percent (five of five) in regimen 2 and 50 percent (two of four) in regimen 3. Patients in regimens 1 and 3 were able to convert to orally administered ciprofloxacin in 32 (65 percent) of 49 episodes after a mean of six days of intravenous therapy. Superinfections occurred in 24, 10, and 12 percent of patients receiving regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and occurred similarly for patients receiving orally administered ciprofloxacin, 12 percent (four of 32), and intravenous therapy, 17 percent (eight of 47). Parenteral ciprofloxacin was generally well tolerated. One (4 percent) of 25 patients receiving regimen 1 experienced oto- or nephrotoxicity, compared with eight (15 percent) of 54 patients receiving regimens 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.15), including three patients who required premature termination of aminoglycoside therapy. Our data suggest that the combination of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin is an effective alternative to ceftazidime and amikacin for the initial empiric therapy of febrile neutropenic patients, is generally well tolerated, and avoids the oto- and nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycoside use. In addition, a majority of patients could change to orally administered ciprofloxacin alone after six days of parenteral therapy.
 ...
PMID:Multicenter, randomized trial of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. 268 29

Clinical trial results have been analysed from 2607 patients (2953 infections, of which 38% were severe) treated with ceftazidime alone and from 466 patients (507 infections - 24% severe) treated with one or more comparative antibiotics. Of 235 staphylococcal infections (all sites) treated with ceftazidime alone 84% cleared and 16% relapsed or failed; of 28 infections treated with other antibiotics, 82% cleared and 18% relapsed or failed. Of 541 pseudomonas infections (all sites) treated with ceftazidime 60% cleared and 40% relapsed or failed; of 76 infections treated with other agents 43% cleared and 57% relapsed or failed. Adverse events were seen in 8.9% of the 2,607 ceftazidime treated and in 8.2% of the 466 patients treated with other agents and included local and gastrointestinal intolerance and hypersensitivity reactions. Changes in laboratory tests included eosinophilia, Coombs' positivity and liver enzyme increases. Superinfection occurred in 2.5% of patients treated with ceftazidime and in 5.2% of patients treated with other antibiotics. Deaths from all causes during or shortly after treatment were reported in 3.3% of the 2607 ceftazidime-treated and in 5.8% of the 466 patients treated with other agents. Factors, including neutropenia, influencing these differences are analysed.
 ...
PMID:Ceftazidime: aspects of efficacy and tolerance. 635 51

To identify the risk factors and attributable mortality associated with superinfections in febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies, we prospectively evaluated 333 episodes of fever and neutropenia by means of univariate and multivariate analyses. Superinfection was defined as any infection either occurring during antibiotic therapy or developing within 1 week after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Of 333 episodes, 46 (13.8%) were defined as superinfection; these episodes occurred in 46 patients. The risk factors for superinfection in the multivariate analysis were longer duration of profound neutropenia (P < .0001), lack of use of quinolones as prophylaxis (P < .0001), presence of a central venous catheter (P = .02), and persistence of fever after 3 days of antibiotic therapy (P = .02). The crude mortality rate among patients with superinfection was 48%, and the attributable mortality rate was 24% (95% confidence interval, 3%-45%). Identifying risk factors for superinfections in neutropenic patients might allow clinical practices to reduce the negative impact of this complication.
 ...
PMID:Risk factors and attributable mortality associated with superinfections in neutropenic patients with cancer. 914 30