Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027947 (neutropenia)
 17,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage of ticlopidine are reviewed. Ticlopidine appears to inhibit platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate. Ticlopidine hydrochloride is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, and maximum antiplatelet effects occur one to three hours after the dose. In multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials, ticlopidine was more effective than aspirin or placebo in preventing stroke, myocardial infarction, or death caused by vascular events. Ticlopidine was more effective than aspirin in preventing recurrent transient ischemic attacks after six months of therapy. Ticlopidine has also been used to prevent occlusion and improve patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts, to prevent ischemic ulcers in patients with chronic arterial occlusive disease, and to slow the progression of diabetic microangiopathy. The most serious adverse effect, neutropenia, occurred in about 1% of patients. The most frequently reported adverse effects are diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramps. Ticlopidine is indicated for reducing the risk of thrombotic stroke in patients who have experienced a minor stroke, transient ischemic attack, or completed thrombotic stroke. The recommended dosage is 500 mg/day in two divided doses taken with food. Ticlopidine is an alternative agent for the primary and secondary prevention of stroke. Because of the risk of neutropenia and agranulocytosis and the high cost of therapy, ticlopidine should be reserved for patients who are intolerant of or lack benefit from aspirin.
 ...
PMID:Ticlopidine: a new platelet aggregation inhibitor. 161 11

From 1986 to 1991, 13 patients at Northwestern Memorial Hospital were entered onto a pilot study designed to test the feasibility of treating children with medulloblastoma (11 patients) or primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the cerebral hemispheres (2 patients) with hyperfractionated craniospinal radiotherapy (HFxRT). Follow-up times ranged from 10 to 96 months with a median of 53 months. The patients were prospectively divided among three treatment arms depending on prior treatment history, if any, and degree of surgical resection. The 3 patients in group I had undergone gross total resection of the primary site, receiving 64.8 Gy to the primary site and 31.2 Gy directed to the craniospinal axis (CSA). Of these 3 patients, patient 1 had residual disease in the thoracic spine at T-10. The 8 patients in group II, who had gross residual disease remaining at the primary site, received 72 Gy to the primary site and 34 Gy to the CSA. Five of these eight patients in group II also received 8-in-1 chemotherapy. The 2 patients in group III had already failed chemotherapy and were then treated with 60 Gy to the primary site and 26 Gy to the CSA. Of the 11 patients in groups I and II, 7 of the 11 (64%) have never recurred. Two of the three group-I patients have not recurred, and 5 of the 7 group-II patients have not recurred. In addition, patient 7 (group II) remains alive after salvage with bone marrow transplant, following a local failure bordering the tentorium. Unfortunately, neither of the group-III patients could be salvaged with HFxRT. Acute/subacute toxicities included 7 cases of external auditory canal or skin desquamation, 2 cases of postradiation somnolence, and 1 case each of poor wound healing and neutropenia. Chronic toxicities included hypothyroidism in 2 patients and growth problems in 2 patients. Neuropsychologic complications affected only the 3 youngest patients in the study. Three patients developed neurologic sequelae attributed to radiation, including 1 with progressive urinary incontinence, 1 who developed a transient ischemic attack, and 1 who became progressively ataxic. Our research, although based on a small number of patients, suggests that hyperfractionated radiation therapy to craniospinal access is feasible and that the survival results are favorable. This treatment strategy should be further explored in a phase-III randomized trial.
 ...
PMID:Hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation in medulloblastoma. 887 59

Ticlopidine and clopidogrel achieve antiplatelet effects by inhibiting the binding of adenosine 5'-disphosphate to its platelet receptor. Ticlopidine was first shown to decrease major events compared with placebo or aspirin in patients with stroke or recent transient ischemic attack. Randomized studies in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting have shown that ticlopidine reduces the risk for subacute stent thrombosis compared with warfarin-based regimens. Smaller studies have also shown this drug to have benefit during follow-up in patients with unstable angina, peripheral arterial disease, saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts, and diabetic retinopathy. Clopidogrel was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the reduction of ischemic events in patients with recent myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease (incidence, 5.32% per year compared with 5.83% per year for aspirin; P = 0.043) with no added risk for neutropenia. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin, as well as the utility of clopidogrel in other patient populations and in stenting, requires further study. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel seem to have beneficial effects compared with aspirin (the current standard) in a broad range of patients. These observations highlight the importance of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease.
 ...
PMID:The antiplatelet effects of ticlopidine and clopidogrel. 973 68

In patients with TIA or ischemic stroke of noncardiac origin antiplatelet drugs are able to decrease the risk of stroke by 11-15%, and the risk of stroke, MI, and vascular death by 15-22%, but not mortality. Low doses of aspirin (50-325 mg) are as effective as high doses and cause less gastrointestinal side effects. Severe bleeding complications are not dose-dependent. The combination of aspirin with slow release dipyridamole is superior to aspirin alone for stroke prevention. Ticlopidine is superior to aspirin but has slightly more serious adverse effects (neutropenia). It will be replaced by clopidgrel which has a better safety profile. Anticoagulation with an INR between 3.0 and 4.5 is too dangerous. Whether anticoagulation with lower INR is safe and effective is not yet known.
 ...
PMID:Stroke prevention: anti-platelet and anti-thrombolytic therapy. 1075 30

Although T-lineage large granular lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia has been described for over 20 years, many patients with this neoplasm go unrecognized. Chief among the difficulties in diagnosing this entity is that the morphologic features are nonspecific and that it is difficult to distinguish it from reactive processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the histologic and immunophenotypic appearance of T-LGL leukemia in the peripheral blood and bone marrow, and to determine what features may suggest that ancillary studies such as flow cytometric and molecular analysis should be pursued to make a definitive diagnosis. We took a multidisciplinary approach by using morphology, immunoperoxidase staining, flow cytometric analysis, and molecular studies on 9 cases of T-lineage LGL leukemia. Our findings indicate that T-lineage LGL leukemia typically infiltrates the marrow diffusely. Most cases show a hypercellular marrow with an increase in myeloid precursors relative to the mature cells (i.e., an inversion of the myeloid maturation pyramid) and a decreased myeloid:erythroid ratio. Neutropenia without a left shift is usually seen in the peripheral blood. The tumor cells are usually CD3+, CD8+, CD57+, and TIA-1+. Most notably, the number of CD3+ T cells per high-power field is markedly elevated in T-LGL leukemia compared with normal, reactive, and pathologic marrows with neutropenia (mean values, 559 cells/mm(2) v. 7/mm(2), 11/mm(2), and 263/mm(2), respectively, P<.01). Moreover, CD57 staining also shows an increase in positive cells in T-LGL cases in comparison with normal, reactive, and pathologic marrows with neutropenia. Taken together, these findings indicate immunoperoxidase findings may be a useful tool to identify cases that should proceed to molecular or flow cytometric analysis.
 ...
PMID:Utility of immunohistochemistry in bone marrow evaluation of T-lineage large granular lymphocyte leukemia. 1107 Jan 20

Aspirin inhibits platelet activation by irreversibly inhibiting platelet cyclooxygenase and thromboxane production, and reduces the odds of serious vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death) by about one quarter in a range of patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis at high risk of a subsequent event. The adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticlopidine are significantly more effective than aspirin in high-risk vascular patients, further reducing the odds of serious vascular events by about 10% (95% CI 2-19%) over the benefit provided by aspirin. The ADP receptor antagonists are also associated with a significant 30% reduction in the odds of gastrointestinal haemorrhage (odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.86). Ticlopidine increases the odds of skin rash and of diarrhoea by more than twofold compared with aspirin, whereas clopidogrel is associated with a one-third increase in the odds of rash and of diarrhoea. Only ticlopidine increases the odds of neutropenia compared with aspirin. There is no clear evidence as yet for the benefit of dipyridamole or an oral GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist as single antiplatelet agents in atherothrombotic patients. Amongst high vascular risk patients, the combination of low-dose aspirin and high-dose dipyridamole is associated with about a 10% (95% CI 0-20%) reduction in the odds of a serious vascular event. Most of this reduction is due to a 23% reduction in non-fatal stroke. The size of this estimate continues to be investigated in an ongoing study of patients with transient ischaemic attack and stroke. The combined use of aspirin and ticlopidine is markedly superior to heparin, warfarin and aspirin for reducing thrombotic complications after coronary artery stenting. Clopidogrel plus aspirin has been shown to be safer than aspirin and ticlopidine in coronary stenting, and is now under long-term evaluation in unstable angina, and other conditions in which patients are at high risk of atherothrombotic events.
 ...
PMID:Current oral antiplatelet agents to prevent atherothrombosis. 1131 17

In patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke of noncardiac origin, antiplatelet drugs are able to decrease the risk of stroke by 11% to 15%, and decrease the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and vascular death by 15% to 22%. Aspirin leads to a moderate but significant reduction of stroke, MI, and vascular death in patients with TIA and ischemic stroke. Low doses are as effective as high doses, but are better tolerated in term of gastrointestinal side effects. The recommended aspirin dose, therefore, is between 50 and 325 mg. Bleeding complications are not dose-dependent, and also occur with the lowest doses. The combination of aspirin (25 mg twice daily) with slow release dipyridamole (200 mg twice daily) is superior compared with aspirin alone for stroke prevention. Ticlopidine is effective in secondary stroke prevention in patients with TIA and stroke. For some endpoints, it is superior to aspirin. Due to its side effect profile (neutropenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura ), ticlopidine should be given to patients who are intolerant of aspirin. Prospective trials have not indicated whether ticlopidine is suggested for patients who have recurrent cerebrovascular events while on aspirin. Clopidogrel has a better safety profile than ticlopidine. Although not investigated in patients with TIA, clopidogrel should also be effective in these patients assuming the same pathophysiology than in patients with stroke. Clopidogrel is second-line treatment in patients intolerant for aspirin, and first-line treatment for patients with stroke and peripheral arterial disease or MI. A frequent clinical problem is patients who are already on aspirin because of coronary heart disease or a prior cerebral ischemic event, and then suffer a first or recurrent TIA or stroke. No single clinical trial has investigated this problem. Therefore, recommendations are not evidence-based. Possible strategies include the following: continue aspirin, add dipyridamole, add clopidogrel, switch to ticlopidine or clopidogrel, or switch to anticoagulation with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0. The combination of low-dose warfarin and aspirin was never studied in the secondary prevention of stroke. In patients with a cardiac source of embolism, anticoagulation is recommended with an INR of 2.0 to 3.0. At the present time, anticoagulation with an INR between 3.0 and 4.5 can not be recommended for patients with noncardiac TIA or stroke. Anticoagulation with an INR between 3.0 and 4.5 carries a high bleeding risk. Whether anticoagulation with lower INR is safe and effective is not yet known. Treatment of vascular risk factors should also be performed in secondary stroke prevention.
 ...
PMID:Antithrombotic Secondary Prevention After Stroke. 1148 59

In patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke of noncardiac origin, antiplatelet drugs are able to decrease the risk of stroke by 11% to 15%, and decrease the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and vascular death by 15% to 22%. Aspirin leads to a moderate but significant reduction of stroke, MI, and vascular death in patients with TIA and ischemic stroke. Low doses are as effective as high doses, but are better tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal side effects. The recommended aspirin dose, therefore, is between 50 and 325 mg. Bleeding complications are not dose-dependent, and also occur with the lowest doses. The combination of aspirin (25 mg twice daily) with slow-release dipyridamole (200 mg twice daily) is superior compared with aspirin alone for stroke prevention. Ticlopidine is effective in secondary stroke prevention in patients with TIA and stroke. For some end points, it is superior to aspirin. Due to its side-effect profile (neutropenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura ), ticlopidine should be given to patients who are intolerant of aspirin. Prospective trials have not indicated whether ticlopidine is suggested for patients who have recurrent cerebrovascular events while on aspirin. Clopidogrel has a better safety profile than ticlopidine. Although not investigated in patients with TIA, clopidogrel should also be effective in these patients assuming the same pathophysiology than in patients with stroke. Clopidogrel is second-line treatment in patients intolerant for aspirin, and first-line treatment for patients with stroke and peripheral arterial disease or MI. A frequent clinical problem is patients who are already on aspirin because of coronary heart disease or a prior cerebral ischemic event, and then suffer a first or recurrent TIA or stroke. No single clinical trial has investigated this problem. Therefore, recommendations are not evidence-based. Possible strategies include the following: continue aspirin, add dipyridamole, add clopidogrel, switch to ticlopidine or clopidogrel, or switch to anticoagulation with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0. The combination of low-dose warfarin and aspirin was never studied in the secondary prevention of stroke. In patients with a cardiac source of embolism, anticoagulation is recommended with an INR of 2.0 to 3.0. At the present time, anticoagulation with an INR between 3.0 and 4.5 cannot be recommended for patients with noncardiac TIA or stroke. Anticoagulation with an INR between 3.0 and 4.5 carries a high bleeding risk. Whether anticoagulation with lower INR is safe and effective is not yet known. Treatment of vascular risk factors should also be performed in secondary stroke prevention.
 ...
PMID:Antithrombotic Secondary Prevention After Stroke. 1219 15

Patients experiencing stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk for recurrent (secondary) strokes, which comprise 29% of all strokes in the United States. Current recommendations for prevention of secondary stroke from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) call for the broad use of platelet antiaggregation (antiplatelet) agents for patients with a history of noncardioembolic stroke or TIA. Five agents--aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, extended-release dipyridamole (ER-DP), and triflusal--have demonstrated efficacy in large-scale clinical studies in the prevention of recurrent vascular events and/or stroke in patients with a history of stroke. The results of the following studies are reviewed and compared: the Swedish Aspirin Low-Dose Trial (SALT), the United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack (UK-TIA) Aspirin Trial, Dutch Transient Ischemic Attack (Dutch TIA) study (aspirin), the Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS), the Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study (TASS), the African American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS) (ticlopidine), the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Recurrent Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial, the Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients study (MATCH) (clopidogrel), the second European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS2) (aspirin plus ER-DP), and the Triflusal versus Aspirin in Cerebral Infarction Prevention (TACIP) study. In comparative monotherapy studies of patients with previous stroke, ticlopidine demonstrates statistically significant improved efficacy over aspirin, and clopidogrel demonstrates nonsignificant slight improvement over aspirin for the prevention of ischemic cardiac and cerebrovascular events; however, the adverse event profile of ticlopidine (including rash, diarrhea, and neutropenia) will probably limit its long-term use. Among combination approaches, only aspirin plus ER-DP has demonstrated statistically significant, clinically meaningful additive benefit over monotherapy with each agent. Clopidogrel plus aspirin did not significantly improve preventive efficacy and increased the risk of serious side effects, including life-threatening bleeding episodes. The 15,500-patient PRoFESS (the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes) study, with results expected in 2008, will directly compare aspirin plus ER-DP with clopidogrel monotherapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and should provide statistically robust estimates of comparative efficacy for the development of improved recommendations.
 ...
PMID:Review of antiplatelet therapy in secondary prevention of cerebrovascular events: a need for direct comparisons between antiplatelet agents. 1621 Dec 3

(1) For patients with acute coronary syndromes who have undergone percutaneous angioplasty and stenting, the best-assessed treatment for preventing relapses is a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel; (2) Prasugrel, an antiplatelet drug belonging the same chemical class as clopidogrel, is authorized in the EU for use in this indication; (3) Clinical evaluation is based on a randomized double-blind trial comparing prasugrel + aspirin versus clopidogrel + aspirin in 13 608 patients with acute coronary syndromes, half of whom were treated for at least 15 months. Prasugrel did not reduce overall mortality (about 3%) or the incidence of non-fatal stroke after 15 months (1% of patients). The only advantage reported with prasugrel was a significant reduction in the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (7.3% versus 9.5%); (4) In this trial, bleeding events, excluding those related to revascularisation procedures, were more frequent in the prasugrel group than in the clopidogrel group (2.4% versus 1.8%). Haemorrhages associated with revascularisation were also significantly more numerous with prasugrel (11.3% and 3.6%); (5) Subgroup analyses suggest that the risk-benefit balance of prasugrel is unfavourable in patients weighing less than 60 kg, patients over 75 years of age, and patients with a history of transient ischaemic attack or stroke; (6) The trial comparing prasugrel versus clopidogrel, as well as some animal studies, raise the possibility that prasugrel might increase the risk of cancer. In the main trial, prasugrel caused fewer cases of neutropenia than clopidogrel, but more cases of respiratory failure, hypotension and atrial flutter were observed; (7) In practice, for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with angioplasty and stenting, the risk-benefit balance of prasugrel, used in combination with aspirin, appears to be no better than that of clopidogrel + aspirin.
 ...
PMID:Prasugrel: new drug. After angioplasty and stenting: continue to use aspirin + clopidogrel. 1987 80


1 2 Next >>