Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027819 (neuroblastoma)
 27,800 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Teniposide and etoposide are third-generation semi-synthetic derivatives of epipodophyllotoxin. Following the initial clinical introduction of teniposide in the 1970s, investigations focused almost exclusively on its analogue, etoposide, because of its formulation, which was felt to have advantages in addition to oral administration. Despite consistently inadequate dosing and scheduling, early phase I and II trial results with teniposide were promising, and current trends encourage a second look. The substantial antitumor activity of teniposide is comparable with that of etoposide, and clinical interest was rekindled when it was shown to have considerable activity against small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In view of the inadequacy of early trials and the premature cessation of clinical study, it is recommended that teniposide be reevaluated for its activity against malignant lymphomas, Hodgkin's disease, leukemias, and SCLC, against all of which its early results were encouraging. In addition, consideration should be given to its activity against brain tumors, neuroblastomas and other childhood solid tumors, and ovarian cancer; its potential value against gastric, hepatocellular, breast, and bladder cancers also should be investigated. Other areas that warrant further study include elucidation of the exact mechanism of action of teniposide, its role in both single- and multiple-agent chemotherapeutic regimens, and resolution of its optimal dose and schedule. Finally, it is suggested that with new routes of administration and improved formulations, teniposide may be expected to play a significant role in the treatment of malignant lymphomas, SCLC, and pediatric lymphocytic leukemia and neuroblastoma.
 ...
PMID:Teniposide in adult solid tumors: a historical perspective. 141 38

Teniposide (VM-26) is an effective anticancer drug usually administered as a short infusion in doses of 150 to 165 mg/m2. The objectives of the trial reported here were to evaluate clinical responses and assess pharmacokinetic parameters as a determinant of outcome when VM-26 was administered as a 72-hour continuous infusion (CI) with doses escalated from 300 to 750 mg/m2 per course. Twenty-eight patients with recurrent leukemia, lymphoma, or neuroblastoma received 53 courses of CI VM-26 and 16 had measurable responses. There were two partial remissions and one stable disease among seven neuroblastoma patients and 13 of 21 leukemia/lymphoma patients had oncolytic responses (greater than or equal to 75% decrease in circulating blasts). Toxicity included moderate to severe mucositis and myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined during 35 courses administered to 23 patients were highly variable. Clearance (CI) ranged between 3.7 and 43.8 ml/min/m2, resulting in VM-26 plasma concentrations from 2.8 to 30.6 mg/L across all dose levels. The interpatient pharmacokinetic variability reflected in CI and VM-26 steady state concentrations (Css), obscured any dose-response relationship. However, when pharmacokinetic parameters for responding and nonresponding patients were compared, statistically significant relationships were observed. For responders, the mean Css was 15.2 mg/L and mean CI was 12.1 mL/min/m2; for nonresponders, mean Css was 6.2 mg/L (P less than .01) and mean CI was 21.3 mL/min/m2 (P less than .05). Thus, patients with higher CI and lower Css were less likely to respond. Clinical responses occurred in ten of ten patients with Css greater than 12 mg/L, and only five of 13 patients with Css less than 12 mg/L (P less than .01). In this study, interpatient pharmacokinetic variability yielded a four- to sixfold difference in intensity of systemic exposure (Css) within the same dose level, which was an important determinant of clinical response. These data indicate that achieving a VM-26 target concentration for individual patients could ensure an increased intensity of systemic exposure in patients with a high CI and improve the likelihood of effective therapy.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial. 359 7