Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027627 (metastases)
 103,950 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We analysed 78 carcinomas of the lung for allelic losses on chromosome 10q. The tumours were of different stage and grade and comprised 22 small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLC), 40 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 11 adenocarcinomas, four large-cell carcinomas and one carcinoid. They were investigated by six polymorphic markers located between 10q21 and 10qter. We observed a high incidence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in SCLC (91%) and metastatic SCC (56%). Non-metastatic SCC showed deletions in three cases (14%) and no LOH was found in the other types of non-small-cell lung cancer. The statistical analysis indicated that the presence of LOH correlated significantly with advanced tumour stages in the entire collective and in particular within the SCLC and SCC subgroups. For SCC, a positive association was found between LOH and metastases formation, while in SCLC the number of non-metastatic tumours was too small for a final conclusion. Whereas SCLC was frequently characterized by multiple allelic losses, suggesting the deletion of the entire chromosomal arm, SCC showed interstitial imbalances. A high incidence of allelic loss was observed between the markers D10S677 and D10S1223. The analysis of five informative cases suggested the presence of two non-overlapping regions between the loci D10S677/D10S1237 and D10S1213/D10S1223. In SCLC, we did not find mutations in the putative tumour-suppressor gene MXI1. The data indicate that LOH on chromosome 10q is associated with tumour progression in SCC and SCLC. Thus it may become a useful genetic marker in the assessment of the malignant potential of these tumour types.
 ...
PMID:Allelic loss on chromosome 10q in human lung cancer: association with tumour progression and metastatic phenotype. 946 Sep 98

Microdissection genotyping was performed on 16 cases of melanoma, including two cutaneous and one lymph node metastases. Three benign nevi were used as controls. Where possible, tumor was microdissected at several sites. Genotyping involved assessment of loss of heterozygosity [LOH]), which was accomplished using a panel of nine polymorphic tetranucleotide microsatellites. Polymerase chain reaction was performed on the normal tissue sample to establish microsatellite heterozygous status. Informative markers were then tested on microdissected lesional tissue and scored for the presence and extent of allelic imbalance (AI). Microsatellite informativeness varied from 33% to 66%. Benign nevi were without AI. All invasive melanomas manifested acquired allelic loss, which involved 75% or 100% of the markers shown to be informative for each subject. Eleven of 13 (84%) primary melanomas demonstrated intratumoral heterogeneity of AI consistent with development of tumor subclones with differing genotypic profiles within thin as well as thick melanomas. Although a consistent pattern did not emerge among the markers, LOH of 9p21 (D9S254) occurred in 60% (9/15) of the cases followed by 40% of cases displaying LOH of 1p34, p53, 10q (MXI1), and 10q23 (D10S520) and 25% with 5q21 (D5S 592) abnormalities. A third of the cases including the metastatic foci demonstrated two different patterns of AI affecting alternative alleles of the same genomic marker within different parts of the melanoma. Two melanomas in situ did not display LOH of any markers in the informative cases although the in situ component in the invasive tumors had allelic losses that were in part similar to the invasive areas. The results of this study support the expanded use of microdissection genotyping and explore other markers to define the unique mutational profile for malignant melanoma that may complement other histologic characteristics of melanoma.
 ...
PMID:Genotypic analysis of primary and metastatic cutaneous melanoma. 1255 Jul 56

Melanoma development and progression is thought to be the result of a multi-step accumulation of genetic damage, with loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 9p (MTS1) frequently described. In addition, chromosome 10q allelic loss has been reported, implicating the tumor suppressor gene PTEN/MMAC1 on 10q23.3. The MXI1 gene at 10q24-25 is another candidate tumor suppressor that has only rarely been studied in melanomas, with conflicting results. We used microdissection-based genotyping to investigate 29 melanomas from 20 patients for loss of heterozygosity in intragenic and flanking microsatellite markers for this latter gene. Concurrently, the MTS1 gene was similarly studied using two flanking microsatellites. Fifty-four percent (15 of 28) of the informative cases showed loss of heterozygosity for one or both MXI1 markers, as compared with 67% (16 of 24) of the informative cases for MTS1. MXI1 allelic loss was seen more frequently in recurrent/metastatic tumors (59%), as compared with in primary (33%) lesions. Eighty percent of the primary tumors showed loss of heterozygosity for MTS1, as well as 63% of recurrent/metastatic ones. We studied more than one tumor in eight patients, with those from three patients showing discordant genetic patterns. One patient showed a metastatic tumor with allelic loss for MXI1 that was not identified in the primary melanoma or a local recurrence. The other two patients showed clonal heterogeneity in MXI1 at synchronous and metachronous metastatic foci. These findings support MXI1 as a putative tumor suppressor gene involved in conventional melanoma progression. Genetic heterogeneity seen in different metastases from the same primary suggests a nonlinear pattern of chromosomal damage, with the development of multiple clones within the primary tumor, each acquiring its own metastatic potential.
 ...
PMID:Loss of heterozygosity in the MXI1 gene is a frequent occurrence in melanoma. 1455 81

Few studies have addressed the expression profiles associated with progression of pancreatic cancer to advanced disease. Towards this end, we performed expression profiling of a series of normal pancreas, pancreatitis and cancer tissues representing early stage resected pancreatic cancers (stages pT2/T3), late stage unresectable cancers (stage pT4) and matched metastases to a variety of organ sites. Microarray data was analyzed using linear modeling of microarray data (LIMMA), and differentially expressed genes were subjected to Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). While robust differences were found in primary cancers as compared to normal pancreatic tissues, no differences were found between primary cancers and metastases, whether using matched or unmatched samples. When resected pancreatic cancers were specifically compared to advanced pancreatic cancers, significant differences in gene expression were found associated with growth at the primary site. These differentially expressed genes were most prominent in gene classes that related to MAPK and Wnt pathway, metabolism, immune regulation, cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions within the infiltrating carcinoma. One candidate upregulated gene (MXI1) was validated as having increased expression in advanced stage (T4) carcinomas by real-time PCR (p<0.05) and immunolabeling (p<0.003). We conclude that in addition to the robust changes in expression that accompany pancreatic carcinogenesis additional specific changes occur in association with growth at the primary site. By contrast, metastatic spread is not accompanied by reproducible changes in gene expression. These findings add to our understanding of pancreatic cancer and offer new topics for investigation into the aggressive nature of this deadly tumor type.
 ...
PMID:Gene expression profiles associated with advanced pancreatic cancer. 1878 21