Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027627 (metastases)
 103,950 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Quality of life issues remain at the forefront for individuals with life-threatening disease, such as metastatic cancer. The pain of metastatic bone cancer can severely hamper an individual's quality of life. Percutaneous vertebroplasty offers a minimally invasive way to reinforce bony elements, provide substantial improvement in pain control, allow for mobilization, and overall improve quality of life in these patients.
 ...
PMID:Metastatic compression fractures--vertebroplasty for pain control. 1278 21

Bone cancer is common and difficult to treat. Current bone-targeted therapies include radiation and bisphosphonates. Both treatments can provide pain relief, but neither has been shown to prolong survival. Because bisphosphonates are osteoclast-targeted therapies, they do not exhibit significant tumor-killing properties in humans. Often, patients with asymptomatic skeletal metastases are treated with observation. New treatments are needed for patients known to have bone metastases and those who are at high risk for having bone metastases develop. Enzyme prodrug gene therapy treatment strategies currently are being explored for their potential benefit in designing novel therapies for bone cancer.
 ...
PMID:Metastatic bone disease: future directions. 1460 May 97

Tumors including sarcomas and breast, prostate, and lung carcinomas frequently grow in or metastasize to the skeleton where they can induce significant bone remodeling and cancer pain. To define products that are released from tumors that are involved in the generation and maintenance of bone cancer pain, we focus here on endothelin-1 (ET-1) and endothelin receptors as several tumors including human prostate and breast have been shown to express high levels of ETs and the application of ETs to peripheral nerves can induce pain. Here we show that in a murine osteolytic 2472 sarcoma model of bone cancer pain, the 2472 sarcoma cells express high levels of ET-1, but express low or undetectable levels of endothelin A (ETAR) or B (ETBR) receptors whereas a subpopulation of sensory neurons express the ETAR and non-myelinating Schwann cells express the ETBR. Acute (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or chronic (10 mg/kg/day, p.o.) administration of the ETAR selective antagonist ABT-627 significantly attenuated ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer pain and chronic administration of ABT-627 reduced several neurochemical indices of peripheral and central sensitization without influencing tumor growth or bone destruction. In contrast, acute treatment (30 mg/kg, i.p.) with the ETBR selective antagonist, A-192621 increased several measures of ongoing and movement evoked pain. As tumor expression and release of ET-1 has been shown to be regulated by the local environment, location specific expression and release of ET-1 by tumor cells may provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie the heterogeneity of bone cancer pain that is frequently observed in humans with multiple skeletal metastases.
 ...
PMID:Endothelin and the tumorigenic component of bone cancer pain. 1520 37

Although bone cancer pain can be severe and is relatively common, as it frequently arises from metastases from breast, prostate, and lung tumours, very little is known about the basic mechanisms that generate and maintain this chronic pain. To begin to define the mechanisms that give rise to bone cancer pain, we have developed mouse and rat models using the intramedullary injection and containment of tumour cells into the femur. These tumour cells induced bone remodelling as well as ongoing and movement evoked pain behaviours similar to that found in patients with bone cancer pain. In addition there is a significant reorganization of the spinal cord that received sensory input from the cancerous bone and this reorganization generated a neurochemical signature of bone cancer pain that is both dramatic and significantly different from that observed in mouse and rat models of chronic neuropathic or inflammatory pain. These models have provided insight into the mechanisms that drive cancer pain and have begun to allow the development of mechanism-based therapies. Together these advances should reduce tumour-induced pain and suffering and significantly improve the quality of life of cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Mechanisms that generate and maintain bone cancer pain. 1528 53

Rubitecan [Orathecin, 9-nitrocamptothecin, 9NC, RFS 2000] is a topoisomerase I inhibitor extracted from the bark and leaves of the Camptotheca acuminata tree, which is native to China. Rubitecan is an oral compound being developed for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and other solid tumours by SuperGen. One of the major benefits of rubitecan is that it can be administered in an outpatient setting, so patients can be treated in their homes. Rubitecan was isolated by the Stehlin Foundation in the US. SuperGen is currently awaiting regulatory approval in the US and the EU for rubitecan in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. At the BIO-2004 conference, SuperGen announced it is seeking a partner for rubitecan for territories outside the US. SuperGen acquired exclusive worldwide rights to rubitecan from the Stehlin Foundation in 1997 except in Mexico, Canada, Spain, Japan, the UK, France, Italy and Germany. SuperGen has also received approval from the US FDA to use its own manufactured rubitecan in clinical trials. SuperGen and the Stehlin Foundation have an 8-year research agreement that secures global rights to other camptothecins and additional anticancer compounds for the former. In December 1999, SuperGen and Abbott signed a worldwide sales and marketing agreement for rubitecan. Under the terms of the agreement, Abbott had exclusive distribution and promotion rights for rubitecan outside the US, and co-promotion rights with SuperGen within the US. In return, Abbott made an initial equity investment in SuperGen. SuperGen and Abbott Laboratories ended their collaboration agreement in February 2002 by mutual consent with SuperGen stating that the dissolution of the agreement was based on commercial motivation rather than anything to do with rubitecan's safety or efficacy. Abbott no longer has rights or obligations to purchase shares of SuperGen stock or an option to purchase up to 49% of the company. For its part, SuperGen will no longer receive milestone payments worth up to $US57 million. SuperGen has formed a clinical and business alliance with US Oncology (created by the merger between American Oncology Resources and Physician Reliance Network in the US), and will collaborate on clinical trials of rubitecan. SuperGen believes that this relationship will increase the patient population available for trials and enable it to market the drug directly to Oncologists. SuperGen and Capital Research and Management Company have completed a $US16.6 million private placement transaction that will enable future funding for the rubitecan programme as well as other oncology programmes. In July 2004, SuperGen's European subsidiary, EuroGen Pharmaceuticals, submitted a Marketing Authorisation Application for rubitecan in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The application will be reviewed under the EMEA Centralised Procedure. In June 2003, the EMEA granted SuperGen orphan drug status for rubitecan for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The US FDA has also granted orphan drug status for rubitecan in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and fast-track status for rubitecan for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer that is resistant or refractory to chemotherapy. SuperGen has conducted three phase III pivotal trials in patients with pancreatic cancer. A phase III randomised trial in chemotherapy-naive patients was conducted at 132 centres throughout the US. The trial enrolled approximately 994 patients who were randomised to receive rubitecan or gemcitabine. Enrollment was completed in October 2001. Another phase III trial has compared rubitecan with the most appropriate chemotherapy in chemotherapy-resistant patients. Enrollment of over 400 patients at 200 medical centres across the US was completed in June 2001. Results from the trial were presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO-2003) [Chicago, US; 31 May - 3 June 2003], after they had been compiled, analysed and submitted to the FDA. The results of the study showed that rubitecan could not help all chemotherapy-resistant patients, but could increase survival in those that do respond. The other phase III pivotal trial was conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer who had failed treatment with gemcitabine. This trial completed enrollment in October 2001, and had enrolled approximately 448 patients. SuperGen is conducting phase II trials of rubitecan in patients with solid tumours in the UK, Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark. Each trial will enroll 100-150 patients with various tumour types, including colorectal, lung, breast, gastric, prostate, cervical and head and neck cancers. Phase I/II trials are underway to investigate rubitecan as a radiosensitiser in patients with lung cancer, and phase II trials in patients with breast cancer are also being conducted. A phase II study in ovarian cancer patients is also being conducted. Results from an ongoing phase II study in cancer patients have shown that rubitecan was effective against chordomas, a rare type of bone cancer. Phase II studies are also underway in haematological malignancies including myelodysplastic syndrome (preleukaemia) and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. In February 2000, SuperGen announced that its IND submission for rubitecan had been approved by the Therapeutics Products Programme of Canada. The company stated that it intended to begin clinical trials in Canada in the near future. In February 2004, SuperGen announced an offering of shares of its common stock to finance the commercialisation of rubitecan capsules. In July 2003, SuperGen was granted a US patent covering combination therapies with chemotherapeutic anthracycline agents and structural modifications that may one day lead to next-generation rubitecan compounds. In December 2002, SuperGen was granted US patent No. 6,482,830, covering its polymorphic formulations of rubitecan. The patent also covers a class of polymorphs that are similar to the one at the centre of rubitecan. In addition, SuperGen was also issued US patent No. 6,485,514 in December 2002, covering the local delivery of rubitecan via stents and/or catheters to sites of proliferating cells. Stent- or catheter-delivered rubitecan may be beneficial in certain types of cardiac procedures, such as ablation or angioplasty, as well as for direct injection into a certain number of solid tumours. SuperGen is also developing an inhaled, liposomal formulation of rubitecan. It acquired the worldwide rights to this formulation from the Clayton Foundation in December 1999. Inhaled rubitecan is in clinical trials in the US for the treatment of lung cancer and pulmonary metastatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Rubitecan: 9-NC, 9-Nitro-20(S)-camptothecin, 9-nitro-camptothecin, 9-nitrocamptothecin, RFS 2000, RFS2000. 1535 30

Although bone cancer pain can be severe and is relatively common, as it frequently arises from metastases from breast, prostate and lung tumours, relatively little is known about the basic mechanisms that generate and maintain this chronic pain. To begin to define the mechanisms that give rise to bone cancer pain, we developed a mouse model using the intramedullary injection and containment of osteolytic sarcoma cells into the mouse femur. These tumour cells induced bone destruction as well as ongoing and movement evoked pain behaviours similar to that found in patients with bone cancer pain. In addition, there was a significant neurochemical reorganization of sensory neurons that innervate the tumour bearing bone as well as in the spinal cord segments that received sensory input from the cancerous bone. This reorganization generated a neurochemical signature of bone cancer pain that was different from that observed in mouse models of chronic neuropathic or inflammatory pain. These data suggest that there is an inflammatory, neuropathic and tumorigenic component to bone cancer pain. Therefore defining when and how these different components drive bone cancer pain may allow the development of more selective analgesic agents to treat this chronic pain state.
 ...
PMID:A mechanism-based understanding of bone cancer pain. 1546 52

Cancer-induced bone diseases are common and can have a devastating impact at the end of life. One of the most difficult sequelae of cancer is metastases to the skeleton, an event that results in bone destruction and bone cancer pain. Bone cancer pain is usually progressive as the disease advances, and is particularly difficult to treat. Recently, experimental models of bone cancer pain have been developed and have provided seminal insight in understanding the pathophysiology of bone cancer pain. Animal models of bone cancer provided the finding that bone destruction (osteolysis) is associated with pain, and it has been determined that cancer-induced osteolysis is mediated by osteoclasts. Having established that RANK ligand contributed to cancer-induced osteoclastogenesis, it was determined that disruption of the RANKL-RANK axis with OPG inhibited tumor-induced osteoclastogenesis and decreased bone cancer pain.
 ...
PMID:Bone cancer pain and the role of RANKL/OPG. 1561 97

The potential targeting of therapeutic bisphosphonate conjugates to bone metastatic lesions was evaluated in vivo in mice. A bisphosphonate conjugate with 5-fluorouracil was synthesized as a potential chemotherapy agent, and a bisphosphonate conjugate with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) was prepared as a potential carrier of cytotoxic radionuclides. The compounds are hypothesized to be able to deliver either high doses of radiation or a high concentration of chemotherapy agents at sites of increased osteoclastic activity in patients with bony metastases while exhibiting minimal toxicity to normal tissues. Tissue distribution studies with the 99mTc-labeled bisphosphonate conjugates with DTPA and 5-fluorouracil showed rapid blood clearance and excretion of unbound activity, clearance from most tissues, and substantial retention of the bisphosphonates in bone. For the DTPA conjugate, activity in the bone represents 13.6% of the total injected dose at 8 hours following injection, representing 54.3% of the total whole-body activity at this time period. Under the same conditions, the 5-fluorouracil conjugate showed a 17.1% bone uptake at 60.2% of the whole-body activity. This normal bone uptake predicts that high concentrations of conjugates are expected to be achieved at sites of bone metastatic disease. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy studies with these compounds in animal models of metastatic bone cancer are underway.
 ...
PMID:Preclinical investigations of drug and radionuclide conjugates of bisphosphonates for the treatment of metastatic bone cancer. 1565 Apr 56

The most common cancers, such as those affecting the breast, prostate, and lung have a strong predilection to metastasize to bone. Bone metastasis frequently results in pain, pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression. Pain can have a devastating effect on the quality of life in advanced cancer patients and is a serious complication of cancer. Although significant advances are being made in cancer treatment and diagnosis, the basic neurobiology of bone cancer pain is poorly understood. New insights into the mechanisms that induce cancer pain now are coming from animal models. Chemicals derived from tumor cells, inflammatory cells, and cells derived from bone appear to be involved simultaneously in driving this frequently difficult-to-control pain state. Understanding the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of bone cancer pain will improve both our ability to provide mechanism-based therapies and the quality of life of cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Pathophysiology of bone cancer pain. 1572 43

Bone is the most common site of chronic pain in patients with metastatic cancer. What remains unclear are the mechanisms that generate this pain and why bone cancer pain can be so severe and refractory to treatment with opioids. Here we show that following injection and confinement of NCTC 2472 osteolytic tumor cells within the mouse femur, tumor cells sensitize and injure the unmyelinated and myelinated sensory fibers that innervate the marrow and mineralized bone. This tumor-induced injury of sensory nerve fibers is accompanied by an increase in ongoing and movement-evoked pain behaviors, an upregulation of activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) and galanin by sensory neurons that innervate the tumor-bearing femur, upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and hypertrophy of satellite cells surrounding sensory neuron cell bodies within the ipsilateral dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and macrophage infiltration of the DRG ipsilateral to the tumor-bearing femur. Similar neurochemical changes have been described following peripheral nerve injury and in other non-cancerous neuropathic pain states. Chronic treatment with gabapentin did not influence tumor growth, tumor-induced bone destruction or the tumor-induced neurochemical reorganization that occurs in sensory neurons or the spinal cord, but it did attenuate both ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer-related pain behaviors. These results suggest that even when the tumor is confined within the bone, a component of bone cancer pain is due to tumor-induced injury to primary afferent nerve fibers that innervate the tumor-bearing bone. Tumor-derived, inflammatory, and neuropathic mechanisms may therefore be simultaneously driving this chronic pain state.
 ...
PMID:Tumor-induced injury of primary afferent sensory nerve fibers in bone cancer pain. 1581 67


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>