Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Sixty patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones (ESWL) were randomly assigned to receive alfentanil either by infusion controlled by the attending anesthesiologist (standard treatment group, n = 31) or by analgesia controlled by the patient (PCA group, n = 29). Patients using PCA were allowed to self-administer 0.25 mg of alfentanil i.v. every minute as required. Data collected during treatment included the total dose of drug required, transcutaneous pCO2 values, verbal pain and sedation scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) patient satisfaction scores, and the incidence of nausea or vomiting. PCA patients used less alfentanil than the standard treatment group (PCA group: 12.8 micrograms/kg; standard treatment group: 44.3 micrograms/kg; mean values, P = 0.0001), tolerated significantly higher pain intensities and self-administered the narcotic only to moderate levels of pain but not to pronounced analgesia. Standard treatment patients reported lower levels of pain, were more sedated (P less than 0.05) and showed significantly higher transcutaneous pCO2 values. There was a trend towards a lower incidence of nausea or vomiting in PCA patients without reaching statistical significance. No significant difference with regard to patient satisfaction with pain relief could be demonstrated. Self-administered alfentanil during ESWL of gallbladder stones provided adequate analgesia with minimal side effects and high patient satisfaction. ESWL may represent a new and useful indication for PCA.
 ...
PMID:Patient controlled analgesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gallstones. 846 54

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) was studied during the early postoperative period. Subjects were 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (20 each having undergone abdominal or orthopedic operations). Whenever the patients required pain relief, piritramid demand doses of 2.0 mg were given via the hand-button of a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC). Hourly maximum dose was set to 15 mg with a pump refractory time of 1 minute between valid demands. A continuous low-dose piritramid infusion (0.24 mg/h) was additionally administered in order to prevent catheter obstruction. Duration of the PCA period was 19.7 +/- 6.5 hours (mean +/- SD). During this time, 17.1 +/- 13.8 demands per patient were recorded resulting in mean individual piritramid consumptions of 30.4 +/- 28.1 micrograms/kg/h. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and interindividual variability. Following abdominal surgery, slightly more piritramid was needed compared with orthopedic patients, although less pain relief was achieved in the former group. The same proved to be true for a comparison between the sexes, males requiring significantly more piritramide for less pain relief than females (p = 0.05). Over-all efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be excellent. Effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 73% of patients when compared with previously experienced conventional postoperative analgesia. Side effects (sweating, nausea, emesis) occurred in about 20% but were usually of minor intensity. No serious circulatory or respiratory problems were observed during the PCA period. Patient-controlled analgesia is discussed as a promising concept for the treatment of acute pain and for clinical pain research.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia with piritramid for the treatment of postoperative pain. 288 42

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) has been studied during the early postoperative period in 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (20 abdominal and 20 orthopaedic operations). Doses of 3.7 mg of the new agonist-antagonist opioid analgesic nalbuphine were available on demand, whenever the patients felt that pain relief was necessary, delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC) in response to use of a patient-controlled manual switch. The maximum dose/h was set at 28.2 mg, with a refractory time of 1 minute between successful demands. A continuous nalbuphine infusion (0.44 mg X h-1) was administered in addition in order to prevent obstruction of the catheter. The duration of the PCA period was 17.9 (0.4-28.0) h (median, range). During that time, 13.3 (1-45) demands per patient were recorded, resulting in median individual nalbuphine consumptions of 51.3 (8.1-1050.5) micrograms X kg-1 X h-1. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and inter-individual variability. Following abdominal surgery significantly more nalbuphine was needed compared to orthopaedic patients, but it resulted in poorer pain relief. There were no statistically significant differences in drug requirements or pain scores between the sexes. Overall efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be good. When compared with previous conventional postoperative analgesia, the effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 57% of patients. Side effects (nausea, sweating) occurred in about 10% of patients but were usually of minor intensity. No serious circulatory or respiratory problems were observed during the period of PCA. Patient-controlled analgesia is a promising technique for the treatment of acute pain and for clinical pain research.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine, a new narcotic agonist-antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative pain. 379 24

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) was studied during the early postoperative period. Subjects were 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (each 20 having undergone abdominal or orthopaedic operations). Pentazocine bolusses of each 8 mg were available via a hand-button whenever the patients felt pain relief necessary, and delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC). Hourly maximum dose was set to 60 mg with a pump refractory time of 1 min between valid demands. A continuous low-dose pentazocine infusion (1 mg/h) was additionally administered in order to prevent catheter obstruction. Duration of the PCA period was 20.3 +/- 5.9 h (mean, standard deviation). During this time, 20.0 +/- 12.7 demands per patient were recorded resulting in mean pentazocine consumption of 135.6 +/- 81.4 micrograms/kg/h. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and interindividual variability. There were no statistically significant differences with regard of pentazocine consumption or pain relief between abdominal and orthopaedic patients, nor could any be demonstrated between the sexes. Similarly, no clear differences were found after various anaesthetic techniques (neuroleptanalgesia, halothane or spinal anaesthesia). Over-all efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be excellent. Effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 68% of patients when compared with previously experienced conventional postoperative analgesia. Side effects (nausea, emesis, sweating) occurred in about 10-18% but were usually of minor intensity. Circulatory or respiratory problems were not observed during the PCA period. Patient-controlled analgesia is discussed as a promising concept for the treatment of acute pain and clinical pain research.
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative on-demand analgesia with pentazocine (Fortral)]. 409 11

This is a retrospective study covering the ten-year period 1984-1993. Single shot spinal morphine (ITM) is compared with PCA nalbuphine for postoperative pain relief in children having abdominal or thoracic procedures. The records of 52 patients meeting selection criteria were examined. Nursing and physician notations were reviewed for hourly pain assessments, evidence of associated complications, respiratory depression, nausea and or vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention. ITM provided significantly better pain relief (2.2 h in pain) during the first 24 h postoperatively than PCA nalbuphine (9.2 h in pain). With the exception of urinary retention which was significantly more frequent following ITM (58.6%) compared to PCA nalbuphine (8.7%), narcotic related complications were not different between the two groups. No difference in duration of hospital stay or ICU stay could be demonstrated. We conclude that ITM provides better pain relief, without more serious complications, than PCA nalbuphine. We recommend it as a safe, effective technique to treat postoperative pain in children following thoracic or upper abdominal procedures.
 ...
PMID:Intrathecal morphine (ITM) for postoperative pain control in children: a comparison with nalbuphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA). 748 38

This prospective, randomised, double-blind study compared PCA fentanyl with PCA morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Following a standardised general anaesthetic, 37 women were allocated to receive either fentanyl (n = 18) or morphine (n = 19). The PCA was commenced after the women had been made comfortable in the postanaesthetic recovery room with the appropriate opioid solution (mean dose required = fentanyl 375 micrograms or morphine 16 mg). Initial PCA settings were bolus 1 ml (fentanyl 25 micrograms or morphine 1 mg), lockout time ten minutes, and no background infusion. Both analgesic solutions provided effective analgesia for a mean of 37 hr with high levels of patient satisfaction, and there were no differences in VAS scores for pain and patient satisfaction, or for side effects (nausea, itch, and sleepiness) between fentanyl or morphine. However, more patients in the fentanyl group required supplementary boluses or alterations to the PCA settings (13/18 vs 4/19: P = 0.005), and one patient was removed from the study due to inadequate analgesia. We conclude that fentanyl is not recommended for routine PCA use following Caesarean section.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia: a comparison of fentanyl with morphine. 788 83

Patient controlled analgesia improves titration of analgesic drugs, minimizing individual pharmacodynamic differences between patients, during the postoperative period. We describe the efficacy and the safety of intravenous PCA, based on the follow-up of 300 patients, recovering from upper and lower abdominal surgery. Successful use of PCA requires the choice of two important parameters: the PCA bolus and the lock-out period. In our experience, we only prescribed morphine, with a PCA bolus of 0.5 or 1 mg and a lock-out period of 5 or 10 minutes. Nurses were educated to change the syringes and to assess analgesia and the respiratory function. Patients were mostly hospitalized in surgical wards and only 16% of patients were treated in an intensive care unit. Patient's acceptance proved to be excellent and only 4 patients were not satisfied with PCA therapy. The incidence of respiratory depression was low (0.02%) and only one patient required naloxone. The side effects were dysphoria, nausea, pruritus and urinary retention; their incidence was low.
 ...
PMID:[Patient-controlled analgesia and postoperative pain]. 808 35

Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, we have investigated, in 40 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, the effect of oral clonidine 300 micrograms, 1 h before and 12 h after surgery on postoperative morphine requirements (evaluated by PCA). During the 24 h of the study, pain scores measured every 6 h did not differ significantly. Morphine requirements tended to be reduced in the clonidine group but the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences also in mean arterial pressure, ventilatory frequency and the incidence of pruritus and nausea. Heart rate was significantly lower until 18 h after surgery and sedation was significantly more pronounced in patients receiving clonidine. We cannot recommend routine oral administration of clonidine before surgery to improve postoperative analgesia.
 ...
PMID:Addition of oral clonidine to postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. morphine. 819 4

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 23 patients who had undergone Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl compared with a single dose of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Group A (n = 11) received epidural fentanyl 100 micrograms intraoperatively then self-administered a maximum of two epidural fentanyl boluses 50 micrograms (10 micrograms.ml-1) with a lockout period of five minutes for a maximum of two doses per hour. Group B (n = 11) received a single bolus of epidural morphine 3 mg (0.5 mg.ml-1) intraoperatively and received the same instructions as Group A but had their PCA devices filled with 0.9% NaCl. Patients were assessed up to 24 hr for pain, satisfaction with pain relief, nausea and pruritus using visual analogue scales (VAS). The treatments for inadequate analgesia, nausea and pruritus as well as time to first independent ambulation were recorded. The ventilatory response to carbon dioxide challenge was measured at four and eight hours. Pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and the use of supplemental analgesics were similar in both groups. The mean 24 hr dose of epidural fentanyl used by group A patients was 680 micrograms. Pruritus was less common in Group A patients at the 8 and 24 hr observation periods (P < 0.0125). Both groups experienced the same degree of nausea and clinically unimportant respiratory depression. We conclude that PCEA with fentanyl provides analgesia equal to a single dose of epidural morphine and may be suitable for patients who have experienced considerable pruritus after epidural morphine administration.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia. 851 20

The use of patient-controlled analgesia with alfentanil (PCA-alfentanil) as a form of pain relief for dressing procedures in patients during the acute phase of their burn injuries was investigated. Five ASA 1 and 2 patients with 10-30 per cent total body surface area (TBSA) thermal burns, had PCA-alfentanil for their dressing procedures after standard fluid resuscitation. One patient who did not receive a loading dose and a background infusion of alfentanil had unsatisfactory pain relief. Four patients had good pain relief after a loading dose of IV alfentanil 1 mg followed by a continuous background infusion of 200-800 micrograms/h. Demand dose ranged from 200 to 400 micrograms and lockout time ranged from 1 to 3 min. The total dose of alfentanil delivered ranged from 0.8 to 4.48 mg and duration of the dressings ranged from 30 to 60 min. All patients were mildly sedated, calm, communicative and cooperative during dressing procedures. None of them experienced hypotension or respiratory depression. One patient experienced nausea but no vomiting, no other adverse effects of alfentanil were noted. From the pilot study, PCA-alfentanil may be an effective form of pain relief for dressing procedures in patients during their acute phase of burn injuries. The optimal PCA-alfentanil setting has yet to be determined.
 ...
PMID:Use of patient-controlled analgesia with alfentanil for burns dressing procedures: a preliminary report of five patients. 872 67


1 2 3 4 Next >>