Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Choosing a measure instrument for a study raises the question of whether instruments designed for the same purpose produce the same results. We investigated this question for two instruments designed to measure subjective quality of life (QOL) in cancer clinical trials: the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) and the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core module (QLQ-C30). These were administered concurrently to 98 cancer patients. Four patient groups were defined: (1) well, no chemotherapy (n = 23); (2) adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24); (3) stable disease, active chemotherapy (n = 24); (4) progressive disease (n = 27). Both instruments have global, role, social, emotional, pain, and nausea scales; QLQ-C30 also assesses physical function, cognitive function, and fatigue, while FLIC assesses hardship. Correlation analysis indicated convergent validity for the global, role, emotional, pain and nausea dimensions, but not the social dimension. Both instruments indicated that groups 1 and 2 had better QOL than group 4 in at least one dimension. However, different dimension-specific results meant that qualitatively different conclusions would have been drawn if either instrument had been used singly: FLIC indicated that group 1 had better role function that group 4 and suffered less hardship and that group 1 suffered less nausea than group 3, while the QLQ-C30 data indicated that group 2 had better physical function than group 4. The only consistent result was for pain: both instruments indicated group 4 had more pain than either groups 1 or 2. Thus the choice of QOL instrument for use in a particular trial will affect both the results and conclusions. It is important, therefore, to consider carefully which instrument is most likely to detect important differences relevant to the patients' lives in that setting.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of two quality-of-life questionnaires for cancer clinical trials: the functional living index--cancer (FLIC) and the quality of life questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30). 859 7

The purpose was to measure the effects of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV) on health-related quality of life (HQL) in patients receiving either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The study sample consisted of 832 chemotherapy-naive patients with cancer who received either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy as part of multicenter trials of new antiemetics. The patients completed the self-report European Organization for Research and Cancer (EORTC) core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) before chemotherapy (baseline) and 1 week (day 8) and 2-4 weeks after chemotherapy. They also completed a self-report nausea and vomiting (NV) diary for 5-7 days after chemotherapy. To determine the effects of PCNV on HQL, the change in scores between the baseline and day 8 HQL assessments was calculated for each domain and symptom in the QLQ-C30 and compared in four subgroups of patients: those with both nausea and vomiting, those with nausea but no vomiting, those with no nausea but with vomiting, and those with neither nausea nor vomiting. The group with both nausea and vomiting showed statistically significantly worse physical, cognitive and social functioning, global quality of life, fatigue, anorexia, insomnia and dyspnea as compared to the group with neither nausea nor vomiting (0.0001 < P < 0.05). Patients with only nausea but no vomiting tended to have less worsening in functioning and symptoms than those having both nausea and vomiting. Increased severity of vomiting (> 2 episodes) was associated with worsening of only global quality of life and anorexia as compared with 1-2 episodes of vomiting (0.0001 < P < 0.01). By 2-4 weeks after chemotherapy all HQL scores had either returned to their baseline levels or were better than baseline. PCNV adversely affects several quality-of-life domains, but patients with only nausea experience less disruption than do those with both nausea and vomiting. Patients with 1-2 episodes of vomiting experience almost the same degree of disruption of HQL as do patients with more than 2 episodes of vomiting.
 ...
PMID:Effect of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on health-related quality of life. The Quality of Life and Symptom Control Committees of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. 925 27

The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV) after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with cancer being treated in a routine clinical practice setting. The European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) was administered on day 2 and day 6 following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy to 119 patients with a variety of cancers. Patients kept daily diaries to record the occurrence and severity of nausea and vomiting. The QLQ-C30 questions were modified, for this study only, to assess the impact of nausea and vomiting on HRQOL in patients who experienced nausea and/or vomiting during the six days following chemotherapy. Those patients who experienced either nausea or vomiting experienced a decrease in HRQOL from prechemotherapy levels on six functioning and five symptom scales at day 2, and on four functioning and four symptom scales on day 6. Comparison of mean scores between the unmodified QLQ-30 and the nausea and vomiting versions demonstrated that the HRQOL rating attributed to nausea and vomiting accounted for much, but not all, of the deterioration in HRQOL scores in patients who experienced these symptoms. It can be concluded that patients who experience PCNV experience a significant negative impact on their HRQOL and that this impact can be attributed in large part to their experience of nausea and vomiting. However, since not all of the deterioration is attributable to these symptoms, other reasons for some of the decrease in HRQOL must also be identified in future studies.
 ...
PMID:The impact of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on quality of life after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. 969 8

This study was conducted to assess long-term Quality of Life (QOL) in patients treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for anal carcinomas. Patients with a maximum age of 80 years, and who were alive at least 3 years following completion of treatment with a functioning anal sphincter and without active disease, were selected for this study. Of 52 such patients identified, 41 (79%) were evaluable. There were 35 females and six males with a median age of 71 years (55-80). The median follow-up interval was 116 months (range 37-218). QOL was assessed using two self-rating questionnaires developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: one for cancer-specific QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) and one for site-specific QOL (EORTC QLQ-CR38). For the function scales a higher score represents a higher level of functioning (100 being the best score), whereas for the symptom scales a higher score indicates a higher level of symptomatology/problems (0 being the best score). For the QLQ-C30, the functional scale scores ranged from 71 (global quality of life) to 85 (role function) and the symptom scale scores from 6 (nausea-vomiting) to 28 (diarrhoea). For the QLQ-CR38 module the functional scale scores ranged from 13 (sexual functioning) to 74 (body image) and for the symptom scale scores from 5 (weight loss) to 66 (sexual dysfunction in males). None of the functional and symptom scale scores seemed to be better in patients with longer follow-up. In patients treated with sphincter conservation for anal carcinomas, long-term QOL as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 appears to be acceptable, with the exception of diarrhoea and perhaps sexual function. Moreover, the subset of patients who presented with severe complications and/or anal dysfunction showed poorer scores in most scales.
 ...
PMID:Assessment of long-term quality of life in patients with anal carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. 1040 4

The efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as an outpatient salvage treatment for patients with metastasized colorectal cancer was retrospectively analyzed in one center. Tumor progression had occurred for the majority of patients during two regimens (n = 11) otherwise during one (n = 1) regimen of prior 5-FU-based chemotherapy, which had been applied in a standardized sequential fashion. As third-line therapy oxaliplatin was infused intravenously over 2 h at a dose of 60 mg/m2 prior to a 2-h infusion of FA (500 mg/m2). 5-FU (2,600 mg/m2) was subsequently given over 24 h. A favorable response was observed in 9/12 (75%) of the heavily pretreated patients, including partial remissions in 3/12, minor responses in 2/12 and stable disease in 4/12 patients. The median progression free time was 23 weeks (interquartile range i. r. 0-28) for all patients, the median survival time from start of third-line therapy 55 weeks (i. r. 40-86). The median survival time from the beginning of first-line palliative chemotherapy was 34 months (i. r. 25-45 months). The highest toxicity was WHO grade III and was observed in six patients: Nausea (2), diarrhea (3), vomiting (2) and peripheral neuropathy (1). The quality of life was not adversely affected by the oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA-regimen as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Thus, the results show the efficiency and low toxicity of oxaliplatin/high-dose 5-FU/FA as palliative third-line therapy of patients with metastasized colorectal cancer and emphasize that sequential palliative chemotherapy may lead to extended survival of these patients.
 ...
PMID:Weekly oxaliplatin, high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as palliative third-line therapy of advanced colorectal carcinoma. 1072 Nov 70

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of two alternative chemotherapy regimes on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with advanced breast cancer. In a multicentre trial, 283 patients were randomised to receive either docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Initial compliance in the QoL study was 96% and the overall compliance 82%. QoL data were available for 245 patients (T 130 and 115 MF). Both treatment groups showed some improvement in emotional functioning during treatment, with a significant difference favouring the MF group at treatment cycles 5 and 6. In the T group, the scores on the other functional scales remained stable throughout the first six cycles. There were significant differences favouring the MF group on the social functioning scale at treatment cycle 6 and on the Global QoL scale at treatment cycles 5 and 6. On most symptom and single-item scales there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. However, at baseline, the T patients reported more appetite loss, at treatment cycles 2-4, the MF patients reported more nausea/vomiting, and at treatment cycle 6, the T patients reported more symptoms of fatigue, dyspnoea and insomnia. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the mean change scores of the functional and symptom scales. Interindividual variance was, however, larger in the T group. Differences in QoL between the two treatment groups were minor. Hence, given the expectancy of comparable QoL outcomes, the choice of treatment should be made on the basis of the expected clinical effect.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving either docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. A multicentre randomised phase III trial by the Scandinavian breast group. 1089 55

The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life (QL) of patients treated with single-agent paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. 331 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomised, with 294 eligible for analysis. Patients completed both the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) with six additional items, at baseline and after the third, fifth and seventh cycles of chemotherapy. A significant difference in progression-free survival in favour of doxorubicin caused a bias in the data with differences in expected completion rates of questionnaires beyond cycle three. Therefore, statistical comparisons were performed only for the first three cycles. Baseline compliance was 64% and 61% for the QLQ-C30 and RSCL questionnaires, respectively. Doxorubicin was associated with significantly more nausea/vomiting (P=0.001), loss of appetite (P=0.010) and a greater burden of disease and treatment (P=0.044), but with less bone pain (P=0.042) and rash (P=0.045) than paclitaxel. Both treatments were associated with improved emotional function and reduction in psychological distress at cycle 3. Longitudinal data suggested that doxorubicin was associated with less pain, specifically bone pain. Doxorubicin was more active but may have had more side-effects during the first three cycles. Long-term QL outcomes could not be assessed.
 ...
PMID:Randomised trial of paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: quality of life evaluation using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Rotterdam symptom checklist. 1093 Jul 96

The aim of the project was to identify clinical and quality of life (QL) factors that together predict survival and response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Potential prognostic factors were studied in 187 women with baseline QL data from a trial of paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy. Demographic and clinical factors studied were age, performance status, dominant site of disease and preceding disease-free interval (DFI). Factors from the EORTC QLQ-C30 were all function scales, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, loss of appetite and global QL. The proportional hazards regression model with stratification for treatment, and the logistic regression model adjusting for treatment arm were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of survival and response to treatment, respectively. For survival, multiple sites of visceral disease, pain, global QL and fatigue were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis. The final multivariate model predicted poor survival with multiple sites of visceral disease (P=0.003), DFI </=2 years (P=0.026) and pain (P=0.003). For response, age, dyspnoea, fatigue and global QL were significant predictive factors in the univariate analysis. The final multivariate model for response selected DFI (P=0.009), multiple sites of visceral disease (P=0.037) and dyspnoea (P=<0.001) using forward selection, but model instability was indicated by the inclusion of fatigue and emotional function in the final model when backward selection was used. In addition to known clinical factors, patient-assessed QL variables appear to be prognostic for survival and response to chemotherapy in women with advanced breast cancer. However, identification of prognostic factors from responses to questionnaires may be unstable, and their reliability and clinical utility should be tested prospectively.
 ...
PMID:Identification and interpretation of clinical and quality of life prognostic factors for survival and response to treatment in first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. 1093 Jul 97

To investigate the effects of morphine on cancer patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL), we prospectively studied 40 cancer patients with moderate or severe pain despite treatment with "weak" opioids. The patients were titrated to pain relief using immediate-release (IR) morphine and then switched to slow-release (SR) morphine in the same daily dosages. HRQL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality-of-life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) before the start of morphine (baseline), after stabilization with IR-morphine, and 3 days after start of SR-morphine. The mean titrated daily morphine dosage was 97 mg (range, 60-180). The EORTC QLQ-C30 global health score increased after IR morphine titration (baseline score 40, IR morphine period score 49), but a significant difference from baseline did not persist during the SR morphine period (score 44). The other functional HRQL scores showed no significant fluctuations. After start of IR morphine, two of the HRQL symptom scores increased, nausea/vomiting and constipation, but these changes also did not persist during the SR morphine period. Intensity of pain was associated with a lower level of function and higher intensity of symptoms, but only with relatively small (not higher than 0.44) correlation coefficients. Compared to normative data from the general population, physical function, role function, social function, and global health were impaired in the study patients. The patients also suffered more fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, and constipation. In conclusion, in cancer patients with reduced HRQL, the start of morphine therapy had no major influence on aspects of HRQL other than pain.
 ...
PMID:Effects on cancer patients' health-related quality of life after the start of morphine therapy. 1094 65

The effect of interferon on the health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma was assessed in two trials carried out by the Nordic Myeloma Study (Group (NMSG). In both trials, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, supplemented with 11 items relating to interferon toxicity, was used. The first was a randomized controlled trial (NMSG 4/90) evaluating the addition of interferon alpha-2b to melphalan and prednisone during induction, maintenance and relapse. During the first 12 months, patients on interferon reported more chills, fever, fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss and dry skin than the control patients, and a slight reduction of global health and quality of life. From 12 months onward there were no significant differences in any score between the two groups. In a later trial (NMSG 5/94) evaluating the effect of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support in patients under 60 years of age with newly diagnosed myeloma, interferon was used as maintenance. During the maintenance phase, symptom and toxicity scores were not significantly different from those in control patients under 60 years of age in the previous trial. Thus, interferon appeared to be well tolerated after high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support.
 ...
PMID:Health-related quality of life and patients' perceptions in interferon-treated multiple myeloma patients. Nordic Myeloma Study Group. 1114 38


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>