Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

During a 4-year period a 28-year-old female had 4 episodes of eosinophilia of over 10,000/mu 1; these episodes were associated with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. On one occasion, she had ascites and pleural effusion which contained numerous mature eosinophils. On each occasion, these attacks disappeared within several weeks without any specific treatment. A diagnosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis was made. A plasma sample obtained during the eosinophilia generated in vitro eosinophilic colonies when added to granulocyte/macrophage-progenitor (CFU-GM) cultures without exogenous growth factors. Colony formation was inhibited by anti-interleukin-5 (IL-5) antibody but not by antibodies toward IL-3, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or GM-CSF. A high plasma interleukin-5 (IL-5) level was noted when measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, while IL-3, G-CSF, and GM-CSF were undetectable. During remission the plasma gave negative results both for colony formation and IL-5 level. These results indicate that the eosinophilia of this disease is mediated by IL-5.
 ...
PMID:Interleukin-5 in eosinophilic gastroenteritis. 138 Feb 4

Patients may be intolerant of zidovudine for several reasons, the most prominent being hematologic toxicity. In vitro studies demonstrate that zidovudine is toxic to the myeloid and erythroid precursors in the bone marrow; at concentrations of zidovudine near those associated with the optimal antiviral effect in vitro, the proliferative capability of these progenitor cells is reduced 50%-70%. The clinical manifestations of anemia and leukopenia generally are time- and dose-dependent. Strategies for alleviating the hematologic toxicity of zidovudine include the use of hematopoietic growth factors, such as erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Myopathy, a recently recognized toxic effect of zidovudine, also appears to be time-dependent. Patients often complain of muscle weakness and discomfort and exhibit an associated elevation in creatine phosphokinase level; dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy generally is required. Some patients have experienced high fever, nausea, and vomiting; however, these effects are unusual and of unclear etiology. The substantial proportion of patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex receiving zidovudine who experience hematologic or muscular toxicity may benefit from treatment with new antiviral agents, such as dideoxyinosine, with toxicity profiles different from that of zidovudine.
 ...
PMID:Zidovudine intolerance. 220 Oct 71

Treatment results of advanced soft tissue sarcomas are still suboptimal. To evaluate the clinical effects of a combination therapy (FADIP) with Adriamycin (ADM), ifosfamide (IFO), cisplatin (DDP) plus continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (FU) as a synergistic factor for alkylating agents, a phase II study was initiated in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas of different histological subtypes. Fifty-six previously untreated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas of different histological subtypes (24 females, 31 males, median age 51.3 years, median Karnofsky performance status 80%) were included in this study. Treatment consisted of ADM 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, IFO 4,000 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, mesna 800 mg/m2 i.v. 3 x with 8-hour intervals on day 1 starting with IFO administration, FU 500 mg/m2 i.v. as 24-hour infusion on days 1 + 2, DDP 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2. This regimen was repeated every 4 weeks for at least 2 cycles. Major WHO grade III/IV hematological toxicity was observed in 35/56 patients. One toxic death due to severe neutropenia and fungal pneumonia occurred. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered in 8/35 neutropenic patients. Time to recovery was significantly reduced and no infectious complication was observed. WHO grade III/IV toxic diarrhea was observed in 8 patients requiring intravenous fluid replacement. WHO grade III/IV nausea occurred in 11 patients, 9/11 responded to symptomatic treatment with ondansetron alone. The overall response rate was 30.3%. The median duration of response (complete/partial response, CR/PR) was 18.1 months, the median progression-free interval was 4.5 months. The median survival time of all patients was 11.8 months, and 18.1 months in responding patients (CR/PR). Tumor-related pain was effectively reduced in 15/31 patients under treatment. FADIP produces comparable response rates to other standard treatment regimens in soft tissue sarcomas. Prolonged duration of response and median survival may be due to the use of continuous infusion of FU as a synergistic factor to alkylating agents. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is effective in reducing the otherwise observed high rate of WHO grade III/IV hematological toxicity with severe neutropenia.
 ...
PMID:Combination of 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin in metastatic adult soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II study. 857 Jan 33

A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine (VNB), mitomycin C (MMC), and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer. Between October 1992 and July 1994, 55 patients entered this trial. Nine patients had locally advanced disease and 46 had distant metastases, including 14 who had received previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 9) or without anthracyclines (n = 5). Therapy consisted of VNB 40-50 mg m(-2) diluted in 250 ml saline infused over 30 min every 3 weeks, and MMC 15 mg m(-2) administered by intravenous bolus injection every 6 weeks. G-CSF was given at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously from days 2 to 7 following each cytotoxic drug administration. Treatment was continued in case of response or stable disease for a total of six courses. The overall response rate was 73% for all 55 patients (95% confidence interval, 59-84%), including 12 (22%) complete response (CR) and 28 (51%) partial response (PR); 13 patients (24%) had stable disease (SD), and only two (4%) progressed. All nine patients with locally advanced disease were rated responsive (two pCR, seven PR) and underwent surgery with curative intent. Eight out of nine remain disease free after a median observation period of 18 months (range, 13.5-28 months). Among the 32 previously untreated patients with metastatic disease, nine (28%) achieved CR, 15 PR (47%), seven SD (22%) and one PD (3%). Second-line chemotherapy with this regimen resulted in 7/14 (50%) objective remissions (one CR, six PR), six had SD and one PD. The median time to progression was 12 months (range, 2-24+ months) in previously untreated patients with disseminated disease, and 6.0 months (range, 2-22 months) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 20 months, 24 patients with distant metastases are still alive with disease; median survival has not been reached yet. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression: six (11%) and ten patients (18%) had World Health Organization grade 3, and eight (14%) and nine patients (16%) had grade 4 leucopenia and granulocytopenia respectively. Severe (WHO grade 3) non-haematological toxicities included nausea/vomiting in 7%, constipation in 9%, peripheral neuropathy in 5%, infectious episodes in 7%, phlebitis due to drug extravasation in 5%, alopecia in 9%, and acute reversible pulmonary toxicity in 11%. Our data suggest that vinorelbine, mitomycin C plus G-CSF has an excellent anti-tumour activity in advanced breast cancer, probably superior to most other available combination chemotherapy regimens. This combination does not seem to present significant cross-resistance with previous CMF or anthracycline regimens. Apart from reversible, acute pulmonary toxicity, a rare adverse reaction that had previously been described for VNB, as well as the combination of natural vinca alkaloids with mitomycin C, and few episodes of grade 3 neurotoxicity (all of which occurred at the initial 50 mg m(-2) VNB dose level), the tolerance of this regimen seems acceptable and justifies further evaluation in front-line and salvage therapy of advanced breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Effective treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine, mitomycin C plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. 893 53

Recently, a randomized study conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG 111) demonstrated that, given by a 24-hour infusion, the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is superior to combination cisplatin/cyclophosphamide in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. This combination, however, necessitates hospitalization. Combination paclitaxel/carboplatin would be expected to induce fewer nonhematologic side effects but may be more myelotoxic. Thus, we started a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the maximal tolerated dose of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion in combination with carboplatin, both drugs administered every 21 days. The paclitaxel dose was escalated by increments of 25 mg/m2, starting at 135 mg/m2 (level 1), 160 mg/m2 (level 2), 185 mg/m2 (level 3), and 210 mg/m2 (level 4). Carboplatin was administered to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve of 5, using the Calvert formula For study levels 5 and 6, the carboplatin dose was targeted at area under the concentration-time curves of 6 and 7.5, respectively, and was combined with a fixed paclitaxel dose of 185 mg/m2. Thirty previously untreated patients with stage IIC to IV ovarian cancer were enrolled. Nonhematologic toxicity, including nausea/vomiting and arthralgia/myalgia, was mild. Across all dose levels, a total of 16 patients developed peripheral neurotoxicity (World Health Organization grades 1 and 2). At dose level 5, one patient experienced reversible grade 4 neurotoxicity. Neutropenia was the principal dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. During 33 (31%) of 106 courses, World Health Organization grade 4 neutropenia was observed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was required in only 7.6% of courses. Thrombocytopenia was less than that expected when carboplatin is given alone. Clinical responses were observed in eight of 14 patients, for an overall response rate of 57%. The combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel was found to be an active regimen. This trial demonstrates that carboplatin dosed by the Calvert equation and 3-hour paclitaxel can be combined safely at full therapeutic doses for six or more courses in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
 ...
PMID:Paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a phase I trial. 904 30

We evaluated the effects of various schedules of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) reinfusion, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming, and CD34+ enrichment on hematopoietic recovery in 88 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin 250 mg/m2, etoposide 60 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/kg. PBSC (> or = 7.5 x 10(8) nucleated cells/kg) were collected following priming with G-CSF and were either immediately cryopreserved (48 patients; cohorts A and B) or were first processed for CD34+ enrichment (40 patients; cohorts C and D). Patients in cohorts A and C received PBSC on day 0; patients in cohorts B and D received 25% of their nucleated cells on day -2 and 75% on day 0 (split reinfusion). Patients in cohorts A, B, and C were primed with G-CSF 10 micrograms/kg, subcutaneously (SC), once a day; patients in cohort D were primed with 5 micrograms/kg G-CSF, SC, twice daily (bid). Bid administration of G-CSF yielded 2.3 to 4.7 x higher numbers of CD34+ cells in the PBSC product than the same total dose given once a day (P = .002). Reinfusion of 25% of unselected PBSC on day -2 (median, 2.26 x 10(8)/kg nucleated cells [range, 1.7 to 3.3 x 10(8)/kg]) with the remaining cells reinfused on day 0 resulted in earlier granulocyte recovery to > or = 500/microL when compared with reinfusion of all stem cells on day 0 (group B, median of 8 days [range, 7 to 11] v group A, 10 days [range, 8 to 11], P = .0003); no schedule-dependent difference was noted in reaching platelet independence (group B, 11.5 days [range, 5 to 21]; group A, 12 days [range, 8 to 24], P = not significant). Split schedule reinfusion of CD34(+)-selected PBSC did not accelerate granulocyte recovery. In groups D and C, the median number of days to granulocyte recovery was 12 (range, 8 to 22) and 11.5 (range, 9 to 13); patients became platelet independent by day 15 (range, 6 to 22) and 14 (range, 12 to 23), respectively. CD34(+)-selected PBSC rescue decreased the incidence of postreinfusion nausea, emesis, and oxygen desaturation in comparison to unselected PBSC reinfusion (P < or = .005 for each). Hematopoietic recovery may be accelerated by earlier reinfusion of approximately 2.26 x 10(8)/kg unselected nucleated cells. Earlier recovery may be triggered by components other than the progenitors included in the CD34+ cell population. Sustained hematopoietic recovery can also be achieved with CD34(+)-selected PBSC alone. Dosing of G-CSF on a bid schedule generates higher CD34+ cell yield in the leukapheresis product. Whether even earlier "sacrificial" reinfusion of approximately 2 x 10(8)/kg unselected nucleated cells concomitant with the administration of high-dose chemotherapy would reduce the duration of absolute granulocytopenia further while initiating sustained long-term hematopoietic recovery will require further investigation.
 ...
PMID:Effect of CD34+ selection and various schedules of stem cell reinfusion and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer. 905 32

Preliminary results of this ongoing phase II study of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus epirubicin administered as first-line treatment to women with metastatic breast cancer indicate encouraging response rates and no severe toxicity. Among the 57 patients admitted to this study, 52% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy (85% with cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil), 46% had received radiotherapy, and 30% had received both forms of therapy; 63% of patients were postmenopausal, mainly with poorly differentiated tumors, and 80% presented with > or = 2 metastatic sites. Epirubicin 60 mg/m2 was administered intravenously as a 1-hour infusion followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 infused over 3 hours. Standard premedication was given. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was not used. Neutropenia was evident in 72% of cycles but was not severe. Instances of anemia and thrombocytopenia were rare. Alopecia was universal. All nonhematologic toxicity observed was mild or moderate (peripheral neuropathy, myalgia, nausea, vomiting World Health Organization toxicity grade < 2). At this time, 41 patients are currently evaluable for response, complete and partial remission are evident in seven and 21 patients, respectively. The overall response rate so far is 68%. An additional 12 patients show evidence of stable disease, and one has shown disease progression. Paclitaxel is considered a promising new drug in the adjuvant treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Combining it with epirubicin allows safe administration with no evidence of severe cardiotoxicity. The incidence of adverse cardiac events was much lower than that observed with combinations of paclitaxel and doxorubicin.
 ...
PMID:Preliminary results of a phase II study of epirubicin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 907 34

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) with standard doses of cisplatin and etoposide for patients with untreated, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Secondary objectives were to determine the toxicities, response rate, response duration, and overall survival in this cohort. Twenty-four patients were enrolled into four dose levels. All patients received a fixed dose of cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1. The first group received etoposide 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 100 mg orally on days 2 and 3, while all subsequent groups received etoposide 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 160 mg/m2 orally on days 2 and 3. The paclitaxel starting dose was 135 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours and escalated to 175 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not given prophylactically, but was allowed in subsequent cycles according to American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. Nineteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and 18 patients were evaluable for response. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 18 of 19 patients (95%), but febrile neutropenia was uncommon and developed in four of 19 patients (21%). Dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy was observed at a paclitaxel dose of 200 mg/m2. Grade 4 nausea/vomiting and diarrhea were also noted at this dose level. Four patients had complete responses (22%) and 13 patients had partial responses (72%). The overall response rate was 94%, with a median survival of 11 months and a 2-year survival rate of 19%. This three-drug combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin and etoposide is highly active with acceptable toxicity. Neurotoxicity was dose limiting at 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Neutropenia was frequent but was not associated with significant morbidity. The recommended doses for future clinical trials are paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours on day 1 with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and etoposide 80/160 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and orally on days 2 and 3. Growth factor support should be used according to American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines.
 ...
PMID:A phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in small cell lung cancer. 933 Nov 40

The French Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO) conducted a multicenter phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of this combination in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer. Patients with progressive ovarian carcinoma during or after platinum-based chemotherapy received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours followed by intravenous carboplatin over 30 minutes every 4 weeks. The dose of carboplatin was calculated using a projected area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL x min. Of the 50 patients entered, 50 were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for response. There were eight complete and 10 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 43% (95% confidence interval, 28% to 56%). Overall response rates in platinum refractory patients and in those with early (> or = 3 and < 12 months) and late (> or = 12 months) relapse was 28%, 33%, and 71%, respectively. Median response duration, progression-free survival, and overall survivals were 8, 6, and 14 months, respectively. The most frequent and severe toxicity was myelosuppression. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 30% and 23% of cycles, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered in 6%. Only one case of neutropenic fever was observed. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 3% and 1% of cycles, respectively. Alopecia and moderate nausea or vomiting were frequent. Transitory peripheral neuropathy was present in 45% of patients but was severe in only one patient. One early death was observed due to progressive disease and possibly to therapy. The combination of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion and carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 is an effective therapy in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and may be administered safely to outpatients who relapse after one or two lines of chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of the combination paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with previously treated advanced ovarian carcinoma: a multicenter French Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens phase II study. 934 19

The combination of cyclophosphamide (CY) and etoposide is synergistic, spares bone marrow stem cells and can be given repeatedly in high doses without stem cell support. Thirteen patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 8) or Hodgkin's disease (n = 5), received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Median age was 32 years (24-52). Male to female ratio was 10:3. All the patients were in advanced-stage. Karnofsky score prior to HDC was 60% (range 40-90). Six patients showed primary refractoriness and 7 had resistant relapse. HDC consisted of CY 1,500 mg/m2/day and etoposide 300 mg/m2/day, both for 4 days. rhG-CSF was started 24 h after the last dose of chemotherapy as a continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.01 mg/kg/day and stopped when the leukocyte count reached 1 x 10(9)/1 on 3 consecutive days. Overall, 69% (9/13) of patients responded to HDC. Four achieved CR and 5 achieved PR. Two of the patients showed disease progression. The other 2 died during the early period of HDC. Neutrophil and platelet recovery after HDC were 8 (6-16) and 10 (4-14) days, respectively. The major nonhematological toxicities were nausea-vomiting (100%) and diarrhea (61%). The median follow-up was 204 (7-600) days. Two patients relapsed 48 and 185 days after HDC. Eight patients are still alive, 7 progression free. The progression-free survival is 220 (40-285) days. In conclusion, HDC + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), without stem cell support seems to be promising in refractory or resistant relapse lymphoma patients bringing the need for randomized studies to show the cost effectiveness of HDC + G-CSF compared to HDC + autologous stem cell support.
 ...
PMID:Use of high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the salvage of refractory or resistant-relapse lymphoma patients without stem cell support. 935 43


1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>