Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This randomised, single-blind, parallel-group study was carried out in 48 French pneumology centres to compare the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron and an alizapride plus methylprednisolone (ALI/MPS) combination in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. A total of 220 patients were recruited of whom 209 were evaluable (100 on ondansetron and 109 on ALI/MPS). Thirty minutes before cisplatin, patients received either ondansetron (8 mg i.v.) or alizapride (4 mg/kg i.v.) combined with methylprednisolone (500 mg i.v.). The ondansetron and alizapride injections were repeated 4 and 8 h later. Thereafter, patients received oral ondansetron (8 mg) or alizapride (50 mg) 3 times daily for 5 days. Ondansetron was significantly superior to ALI/MPS in the control of acute emesis (p less than 0.001); 88/100 (88%) of ondansetron, and 69/109 (63%) of ALI/MPS patients experienced less than 3 emetic episodes. Similarly, ondansetron was superior to ALI/MPS for the control of acute nausea (visual analogue scale at 24 h; 13 vs. 22 mm respectively, p = 0.0012). The superiority of ondansetron over days 2-6 was not as great as that over the first 24 h, although there was a trend in favour of ondansetron. More patients treated with ondansetron wished to take the same anti-emetic treatment again (83% for ondansetron vs. 56% for ALI/MPS, p less than 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. This study shows that ondansetron is superior to a benzamide-corticosteroid combination in the control of acute cisplatin-induced emesis.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of ondansetron with alizapride plus methylprednisolone in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. The French Pneumology Group for the Ondansetron Study. 138 30

It is unclear whether behavioral depression and suppression of food intake by cholecystokinin (CCK) is contributed to by aversive gastrointestinal effects such as nausea. In the present study we examined the effect of a new antiemetic agent, ondansetron, a specific antagonist of 5-HT3 receptors, on suppression of variable-interval self-stimulation by the CCK analogue caerulein. Responding by rats for brain-stimulation reward is especially sensitive to CCK, and provides a convenient means of investigating this question. Caerulein (30 micrograms/kg, s.c.), injected alone, was followed by a profound (ca. 80%) reduction in the rate of self-stimulation, lasting about 30 min. Ondansetron (1.0-1000 micrograms/kg, s.c.) injected on its own had no effect on self-stimulation rate, and a 100-micrograms/kg dose did not lessen the depressant action of caerulein. The behavioural depressant effects of CCK are thus unlikely to depend on brain mechanisms for nausea and vomiting involving 5-HT3 receptors.
 ...
PMID:Effect of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron on hypothalamic self-stimulation in rats and its interaction with the CCK analogue caerulein. 140 94

In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of ondansetron injection in nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, we carried out a double-blind placebo controlled comparative study in patients receiving high-single dose (50 mg/m2 or more) of cisplatin. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or saline injection was given intravenously at 15 min. before administration of cisplatin. If anti-emetic effect of the test drug was insufficient, an additional dose of 4mg of ondansetron was given intravenously, as the rescue medication. Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in anti-emetic effect (p < 0.001). Efficacy rates were 66.7% (22/33 cases) in ondansetron and 20.0% (6/30 cases) in placebo groups. Seven and 21 cases required rescue medication with 4 mg single intravenous dose of ondansetron due to insufficiency of anti-emetic effect, in ondansetron group and placebo group, respectively. Thus the number of patients who required rescue medication was obviously greater in placebo group than that in ondansetron group. The rates of inhibitory effect of rescue medication on nausea and emesis were 14.3% (1/7 cases) in ondansetron group and 61.9% (13/21 cases) in placebo group. Side effects were observed in 1 case (eruption) in ondansetron group and in 2 cases (headache, diarrhoea; 1 case each) in placebo group. Furthermore, fever developed in 1 case in placebo group after the rescue medication. Elevation of total bilirubin value was observed in 2 cases in ondansetron group and 1 case in placebo group, however, these changes were mild and did not pose noteworthy clinical problem. From these results, ondansetron was shown to possess an excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by highly emetogenic anti-cancer drugs, such as cisplatin, and to have no problem in safety, and thus it was considered to be a useful anti-emetic agent.
 ...
PMID:[Anti-emetic effect and safety of single dose of ondansetron injection in double-blind comparison study with placebo]. 141 13

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has already been reported to have a marked effect to alleviate or prevent nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, after its intravenous administration. The present study was planned to examine the usefulness of its tablet form, which was prepared for the convenient use in outpatients receiving chemotherapy. In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect and safety of ondansetron 4 mg tablet, this study was conducted in double-blind comparison versus placebo in patients receiving cisplatin at a single dose of 50mg/m2 or higher. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or placebo (lactose tablet) was administered orally once at 2 hrs prior to administration of cisplatin. If any satisfactory anti-emetic effects were not obtained, 4 mg of ondansetron injection was given once intravenously as a rescue medication. The inhibitory effect on nausea and vomiting was assessed in 4 grades as "excellent", "good", "fair" and "poor" based on severity of nausea and number of vomiting that occurred during the first 24hrs after administration of cisplatin. When rescue medication was conducted, the case was assessed as "poor". Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in inhibition of nausea and vomiting, in which efficacy rates (excellent+good) of ondansetron and placebo groups were 58.1% (25/43 cases) and 16.7% (7/42 cases), respectively. Number of cases requiring rescue medication with ondansetron injection was obviously greater in placebo group (31 cases) than that in ondansetron group (12 cases). In those patients given ondansetron injection as the rescue medication, satisfactory effects were obtained in 5 cases in ondansetron group and in 18 cases in placebo group. Although side effects including chest itching (ondansetron group), headache and dull headache (placebo group) were observed after the rescue medication with ondansetron injection, these symptoms were not severe and disappeared after 1-2 days. As mentioned above, ondansetron tablet was shown to possess excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by high dose of cisplatin and to have no problem in safety. Hence ondansetron was proven to be clinically very useful anti-emetic.
 ...
PMID:[Anti-emetic effect and safety of ondansetron tablet in double-blind comparison with placebo]. 141 14

Nausea and vomiting are frequent and severe side-effects of cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and are ranked by patients as one of the worst consequences of such therapy. Ondansetron prevents emesis by blocking the 5-HT3 receptors associated with the vomiting reflex. It has been studied in patients receiving highly emetogenic (cisplatin) chemotherapy, less emetogenic (non-cisplatin) chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In all studies in these indications, ondansetron was found to be superior to metoclopramide in the control of nausea and emesis over the first 24 h following treatment, when these side-effects are normally most severe. Ondansetron has also been shown to be effective in children and the elderly in the control of cytotoxic-induced emesis. Additional studies have demonstrated that a single intravenous dose of ondansetron (8 mg or 32 mg) is as effective as a continuous infusion schedule, and an 8 mg twice-daily oral schedule is as effective as an 8 mg three times daily oral schedule.
 ...
PMID:Experience with ondansetron in chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis. 142 21

The efficacy and safety of prophylactic intravenous ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting was investigated in a randomized, stratified, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison study of 580 ASA physical class I and II female outpatients undergoing gynaecological surgery and receiving general anaesthesia. Patients received either ondansetron 1, 4 or 8 mg, or placebo i.v. immediately prior to a standardized technique for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. All patients were intubated and received nitrous oxide and a narcotic. All doses of ondansetron were significantly more effective than placebo in preventing emesis over the 24 h postoperative period. Ondansetron significantly decreased nausea and emesis scores over 24 h postoperatively without causing sedation. No changes in laboratory parameters (haematology, blood chemistry, and liver enzymes) or vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate) were observed. Headache and dizziness were the most common side-effects; however, their incidence was the same as with placebo. Ondansetron was generally well tolerated, as evidenced by an adverse event, laboratory safety, and vital sign profile similar to placebo. Ondansetron 4 mg was found to be the optimal prophylactic i.v. dose for female outpatients over the entire 24 h postoperative period. Higher doses may offer an added benefit in some patients, such as those with a history of nausea and vomiting following general anaesthesia.
 ...
PMID:Prophylactic intravenous ondansetron in female outpatients undergoing gynaecological surgery: a multicentre dose-comparison study. 142 25

Ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg, given intravenously (IV) every 4 hours for three doses, has replaced metoclopramide as standard antiemetic therapy for patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Several clinical observations suggested that ondansetron may be effective when given in a single dose: (1) demonstration of efficacy over a wide dose range, (2) similar efficacy with dosing intervals of 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours, and (3) efficacy of single-dose regimens with high-dose metoclopramide and other 5-hydroxytryptamine3 antagonists. In this study, patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive one of three ondansetron dosing regimens: ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg IV every 4 hours x 3 (standard schedule), ondansetron 32 mg IV x 1, or ondansetron 8 mg IV x 1. All patients were chemotherapy naive, at least 18 years of age, Karnofsky performance status > or = 60%, and inpatients. The number of emetic episodes, nausea, and food intake were measured during the 24 hours following cisplatin administration. Six hundred eighteen evaluable patients were randomized to the three ondansetron treatment groups; 301 received moderate-dose cisplatin (50 to 70 mg/m2) and 317 received high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2). Patients in both cisplatin groups receiving ondansetron 32 mg had a higher complete response rate, lower failure rate, fewer total emetic episodes, less nausea, and more food intake than did patients receiving ondansetron 8 mg. In addition, the 32-mg schedule was superior to the standard three-dose schedule in that it had a lower failure rate and higher food intake and was equivalent to the standard regimen in all other comparisons. All three schedules were well tolerated. Ondansetron 32 mg given prior to cisplatin is superior to a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective, if not superior to, the standard three-dose schedule (0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours). On the basis of these data, ondansetron 32 mg should be considered standard therapy in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy and should be the schedule with which new antiemetics and alternate dosing schedules are compared.
 ...
PMID:Single-dose ondansetron for the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: efficacy results. 148 76

Vomiting and nausea are the most distressing side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. With standard antiemetic regimens (e.g. metoclopramide based combinations) sufficient antiemetic control is achieved in 50-70% of cisplatin treated patients. Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3-receptor antagonist has shown efficacy in cisplatin-induced emesis. In the present study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ondansetron in cisplatin pretreated patients who had suffered from severe emesis in spite of antiemetic prophylaxis. Complete antiemetic control was reached in 43.5% on the day of treatment and in 27.2% of the patients regarding a worst day analysis. 25% of the patients suffered from severe cisplatin-induced emesis (greater than 5 emetic episodes per 24 h). We try to characterise risk-factors for cisplatin-induced emesis by performing a multivariate analysis. Sex, cisplatin dose, and combination therapy with cisplatin plus anthracyclines seem to be independent risk-factors for vomiting on day 1 and on worst day. Delayed emesis occurred less often when sufficient antiemetic protection from acute vomiting had been obtained. Female sex, cisplatin dose and recurrent disease seem to influence the probability for occurrence of delayed vomiting.
 ...
PMID:Course, patterns, and risk-factors for chemotherapy-induced emesis in cisplatin-pretreated patients: a study with ondansetron. 153 50

Ondansetron is a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3-receptor antagonist which has shown activity in the prevention of cytotoxic-induced emesis. Preliminary non-randomized studies also indicated efficacy in preventing sickness following radiotherapy. The present study was therefore undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of ondansetron (8 mg tds orally) and metoclopramide (10 mg tds orally) in preventing sickness after single-exposure radiotherapy treatments of 8-10 Gy to the upper abdomen. Of 82 evaluable patients 38 received ondansetron and 44 metoclopramide. On the first day after irradiation vomiting or retching was prevented in all but one of the patients on ondansetron whereas metoclopramide achieved complete control of these symptoms in only 46% of subjects (P less than 0.001). Similarly nausea was significantly better controlled by ondansetron in the first 24 hours after treatment (P = 0.001). Complete or major control of vomiting or retching was maintained for 92%-100% of patients on ondansetron during the five days of the study period. In the metoclopramide group the proportion of patients with equivalent control improved from 70% on day 1 to 95 on day 5. Both drugs were well-tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Results of a randomized, double-blind comparative study of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting following high-dose upper abdominal irradiation. 170 12

Ondansetron, a serotonin antagonist, is effective in controlling the emesis associated with cancer chemotherapy; however, emesis in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin is poorly controlled by ondansetron alone. Dexamethasone is an effective antiemetic with no known interaction with serotonin receptors and was thus chosen for study in combination with ondansetron. 31 patients (30 male, 1 female; median age 28.5 years, range 18-49) receiving a 4-day course of a chemotherapy regimen containing cisplatin (100-120 mg/m2) for metastatic germ-cell tumours were entered in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing oral ondansetron plus placebo with oral ondansetron plus dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis. Ondansetron (8 mg every 8 h) was given to all patients for 8 days from the start of chemotherapy. Patients were given 8 mg of dexamethasone or placebo every 8 h starting 2 h before cisplatin (on day 4) and continuing for six doses (ie, for 2 days only). A second course of chemotherapy began 14 days after the start of the first, during which patients crossed over to the alternative antiemetic regimen. Results were available from 27 patients. In the 24-48 h after cisplatin 78% of patients taking ondansetron plus dexamethasone reported complete or major control of emesis compared with 30% of those taking ondansetron plus placebo (p = 0.001). Cross-over analysis showed a significant advantage for ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the control of nausea (p = 0.013) and emesis (p less than 0.001) over the 8-day study. 24 of 26 patients expressed a preference for the combination therapy (p less than 0.001). Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is effective antiemetic prophylaxis for high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy, has few side effects, and is active when given orally.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. 168 Dec 89


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>