Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In the present double-blind placebo-controlled study the effect of cisapride on functional dyspepsia was evaluated in patients with and without histological gastritis. Patients with functional dyspepsia and whose symptoms persisted after a 2 week run-in period with antacid treatment were randomized to receive cisapride (10 mg) or matching placebo three times daily for 4 weeks. Symptoms of epigastric pain, bloating, nausea, belching, early satiety and heartburn were graded on a four-point scale based on patients' feedback and diary card recording. A global response was also formulated by the investigators. One hundred and four patients entered the study and 76 completed the trial, comprising 36 patients with histological gastritis and 40 patients without gastritis. Symptom scores in both gastritis and non-gastritis groups were significantly improved by both cisapride and placebo; however, the improvement was not statistically different between the two treatment groups. Cisapride produced a good or better global response in 58% of subjects with histological gastritis and in 53% of subjects without gastritis compared with 47% and 52%, respectively, of patients on placebo; this difference was not statistically significant. Gastric histology did not influence the effect of cisapride on the symptoms of functional dyspepsia.
 ...
PMID:Effect of cisapride on functional dyspepsia in patients with and without histological gastritis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. 907 16

Cisapride is a substituted benzamide with gastrointestinal prokinetic effects presumed to be due to the enhancement of the physiological release of acetylcholine at the myenteric plexus. In a multicentre study, 189 patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) received single-blind placebo treatment for two weeks. A total of 123 patients with no or minimal response to placebo and epigastric pain of at least moderate severity and frequency were randomly assigned to one of the three parallel double-blind treatments for six weeks: cisapride 10 mg tid, cisapride 20 mg tid or placebo. The severity and frequency of individual symptoms (epigastric pain, heartburn, nausea, vomiting anorexia, postprandial discomfort, regurgitation, lower abdominal pain, bloating and constipation) were assessed on a four- and five-point categorical scale, respectively, by the investigator at three on treatment visits and by patients in a daily diary. Analysis of investigator and patient assessments for differences in symptom severity x frequency composite scores among the three treatment groups showed no statistically significant differences for individual symptoms or symptom clusters. As assessed by the investigator, and compared with baseline, cisapride 20 mg tid significantly (P < 0.05) improved epigastric pain, bloating and early satiety as well as improved the total symptom cluster. Investigator evaluation of the five most severe and frequent symptoms for each patient showed statistically significant improvement in each treatment group. For patient diary assessments, statistically significant within-treatment improvement of the total symptom cluster, the five most severe symptoms cluster, bloating and early satiety was observed for both cisapride 20 mg and placebo, whereas epigastric pain significantly (P < 0.05) improved in all three treatment groups. Investigator evaluation of global response (good+excellent) rate at the end of the six week treatment period was 38% for cisapride 20 mg, 47% for cisapride 10 mg and 33% for placebo. No statistically significant difference in this parameter among treatments was noted. Cisapride was well tolerated at both doses with a side effect profile comparable with that of placebo. It is concluded that in this double-blind multicentre study with a single-blind two-week placebo run in phase, cisapride 10 mg tid and 20 mg tid were not effective compared with placebo in improving symptoms in NUD patients. This study re-emphasizes the good prognosis of patients with NUD, with 14% of patients improving in the two-week placebo run-in phase and a further 33% improving in the next six weeks while on placebo. Within-treatment analysis of investigator assessments showed improvement for cisapride 20 mg tid suggesting a trend of efficacy at this dose.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind randomized study of cisapride in the treatment of nonulcer dyspepsia. The Canadian Cisapride Nud Study Group. 911 11

The HT4-agonist Cisapride (CIS) and the peripheral D2-antagonist Domperidone (DOMP) have distinct prokinetic actions. We compared their clinical efficacy in 127 dyspeptic patients. Patients with upper abdominal complaints of > 1 month duration, who had a normal UGE were allocated to the REFLUX-group (RG), (predominance of heartburn, acid regurgitation or retrosternal pain) or if devoid of this specific symptomatology to the DYSPEPSIA-group (DG) In a double-blind randomised fashion and allocated to 10 mg CIS or 20 mg DOMP qid (RG) or tid (DG) for 1 month and followed-up for further 2 months. In RG (N = 43, p < 0.05) the response rates were clearly in favour of CIS, but not in DG (N = 84). In RG DOMP was more effective against nausea. The benefit of both therapies was largely maintained in the follow-up period. Cisapride and domperidone were effective in the treatment of dyspepsia. Cisapride was more effective than domperidone in the REFLUX-Group.
 ...
PMID:Study with two prokinetics in functional dyspepsia and GORD: domperidone vs. cisapride. 922 23

There is a growing body of pathophysiological evidence that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is caused by disordered motility and not acid hypersecretion. The key factor in the pathogenesis of GERD is disordered function of the lower esophageal sphincter. Other factors include delayed gastric emptying and decreased peristalsis in the body of the esophagus. The principal symptoms of GERD are heartburn and regurgitation. Studies have demonstrated that up to 50% of patients may have other symptoms of dysmotility including epigastric discomfort or fullness, nausea and early satiety. The use of a prokinetic agent in such patients seems logical. Given its proven superior efficacy over domperidone and metaclopramide in treating GERD, cisapride has become the prokinetic drug of choice for the acute management and maintenance therapy of GERD. In the acute management of GERD, cisapride is superior to placebo and has the same efficacy as H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in several clinical trials. It is also effective in maintenance therapy for GERD. These studies are reviewed. Cisapride (10 mg qid or 20 mg bid) is effective in the acute treatment of mild to moderate GERD, particularly in patients with heartburn associated with other symptoms of dysmotility, and particularly in patients with heartburn associated with gastroparesis. Combination therapy with an H2RA may be considered if symptoms (particularly dysmotility symptoms) persist with H2RA alone. In severe GERD that is not responsive to conventional doses of a proton pump inhibitor, cotherapy with cisapride or increasing the dose of the proton pump inhibitor are the two therapeutic options to consider. Cisapride 20 mg at bedtime is effective maintenance therapy for patients with mild to moderate GERD.
 ...
PMID:Prokinetic therapy in gastroesophageal reflux disease. 934 80

Management of delayed emesis (DE) remains unsatisfactory, and only 50% of the patients achieve complete protection. Cisapride is a strong prokinetic gastrointestinal drug that could have a role in the prevention of DE. We enrolled 31 adult naive outpatients who were scheduled to receive cisplatin chemotherapy at doses of > or = 75 mg/m2. All patients received the same prophylactic treatment for acute emesis (20 mg dexamethasone and 8 mg ondansetron i.v.) and, as preventive therapy for DE, oral cisapride, 10 mg every 8 h on days 2-4, combined with dexamethasone i.m., 8 mg twice daily on days 2 and 3, and 4 mg twice daily on day 4. All patients were evaluable for activity. Complete protection from acute vomiting was 80.7%, from nausea 71% and from nausea/vomiting 64.5%. The overall protection from DE (days 2-4) was 74.1% for vomiting, 64.5% for nausea and 58% for nausea/vomiting. In our study the combination of cisapride and dexamethasone was effective, giving 58% of complete protection from DE, and it is therefore worthy of further studies.
 ...
PMID:Cisapride and dexamethasone in the prevention of delayed emesis after cisplatin administration. 1114 45

Dyspepsia, defined as pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen, affects an estimated 25% of the U.S. population each year; accounts for up to 5% of all visits to primary care physicians, and generates over $1.3 billion in prescription drug costs annually. In the majority of patients evaluated, no clear cause of symptoms can be identified, and the condition is termed functional or nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD). The pathophysiology of NUD remains unclear, but disturbances in gastrointestinal motility or sensation are often found. Clinically, NUD can be subdivided into dysmotility-like (in which discomfort, fullness, bloating, early satiety, or nausea [but not pain] predominate) or ulcer-like (in which epigastric pain is predominant). In ulcer-like NUD, antisecretory therapy is useful, but in dysmotility-like NUD, acid suppression is not superior to placebo. Cisapride accelerates gastric emptying and enhances gastric accommodation but probably does not blunt perception. Although cisapride relieves symptoms of dyspepsia without the adverse central nervous system effects often associated with metoclopramide, its cardiac toxicity has led to disuse. Antidepressants are of uncertain efficacy but are widely used. New prokinetics and other enteric neuromodulating agents are being tested in NUD and are likely to find an important place in clinical practice in the future.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic options in nonulcer dyspepsia. 1127 71

Diabetic gastroparesis is a common and debilitating condition affecting millions of patients with diabetes mellitus worldwide. Although gastroparesis in diabetes has been known clinically for more than 50 years, treatment options remain very limited. Until recently, the scientific literature has offered few clues regarding the precise aetiology of gastric dysfunction in diabetes.Up to 50% of patients with diabetes may experience postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and bloating secondary to gastric dysfunction. There is no clear association between length of disease and the onset of delayed gastric emptying. Gastroparesis affects both type 1 (insulin dependent) and type 2 (non- insulin dependent) forms of diabetes. Diagnosis requires identifying the proper symptom complex, while excluding other entities (peptic ulcer disease, rheumatological diseases, medication effects). The diagnosis of gastroparesis may be confirmed by demonstrating gastric emptying delay during a 4-hour scintigraphic study. Treatment options are limited and rely on dietary modifications, judicious use of available pharmacological agents, and occasionally surgical or endoscopic placement of gastrostomies or jejunostomies. Gastric pacing offers promise for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis but awaits further investigation. Current pharmacological agents for treating gastroparesis include metoclopramide, erythromycin, cisapride (only available via a company-sponsored programme) and domperidone (not US FDA approved). All of these drugs act as promotility agents that increase the number or the intensity of gastric contractions. These medications are not uniformly effective and all have adverse effects that limit their use. Cisapride has been removed from the open market as a result of over 200 reported cases of cardiac toxicity attributed to its use. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of clinical studies that clearly define the efficacy of these agents in diabetic gastroparesis and there are no studies that compare these drugs to each other. The molecular pathophysiology of diabetic gastroparesis is unknown, limiting the development of rational therapies. New studies, primarily in animals, point to a defect in the enteric nervous system as a major molecular cause of abnormal gastric motility in diabetes. This defect is characterised by a loss of nitric oxide signals from nerves to muscles in the gut resulting in delayed gastric emptying. Novel therapies designed to augment nitric oxide signalling are being studied.
 ...
PMID:Current concepts in diabetic gastroparesis. 1282 60


<< Previous 1 2