Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The comparative effects of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl were evaluated in 136 healthy female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopic procedures according to a randomized, double-blind protocol. Patients received ketorolac (60 mg) or dezocine (6 mg) or fentanyl (100 micrograms, control group) before the start of the operation. A standardized general anesthetic technique consisting of midazolam (2 mg), fentanyl (50 micrograms), and propofol (2 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia followed by propofol (120 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), vecuronium (1-2 mg), and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen for maintenance of anesthesia, was used. In the postanesthesia care unit, 61% of patients in the fentanyl group received analgesic drugs for persistent pain, compared with 34% and 25% in the ketorolac and dezocine groups, respectively. Similarly, less postoperative fentanyl (mean +/- SD) was required in the ketorolac (22 +/- 33 micrograms) and dezocine (18 +/- 35 micrograms) groups, compared with the fentanyl (58 +/- 71 micrograms) group. However, 52% of the patients receiving dezocine required antinausea therapy in the postanesthesia care unit, compared with 20% and 18% in the fentanyl and ketorolac groups, respectively. Finally, recovery times were significantly shorter in the ketorolac (vs dezocine) group. Although both ketorolac and dezocine were effective alternatives to fentanyl when administered during outpatient laparoscopy, dezocine was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative nausea and a delayed discharge time compared with ketorolac.
 ...
PMID:Comparative effects of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl as adjuvants during outpatient anesthesia. 832 67

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is the commonest single cause of fatal poisoning in the U.K. (Broome & Pearson, 1988). The clinical features are numerous and include headache, fatigue, dizziness, confusion, memory loss, paraesthesia, chest pain, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhoea as well as coma, convulsions and death. Without adequate treatment many patients develop neuropsychiatric sequelae including headaches, irritability, memory loss, confusion and personality changes. The diagnosis of CO poisoning is often suggested only by circumstances surrounding the victim, and remains a challenge to the A&E department. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) is internationally accepted as the most powerful form of treatment in severe cases (Drug & Therapeutics Bulletin, 1988; Lowe-Ponsford & Henry, 1989). However, in the U.K. treatment with HBO is often not considered due to lack of hyperbaric facilities (Meredith & Vale, 1988; Anand et al., 1988), and due to inadequate awareness on the part of hospital staff. We report a case of a patient deeply unconscious as a result of CO poisoning, in which serial treatments with HBO over a period of 14 days, produced dramatic results.
 ...
PMID:Management of the moribund carbon monoxide victim. 811 Mar 42

The reported incidence of emetic symptoms in surgical patients varies from 8-92%. Intractable postoperative nausea and vomiting remains one of the most unpleasant side-effects experienced by patients postoperatively, both in ambulatory and non-ambulatory care, and has potential risks for severe postoperative complications. Multiple factors are associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting: age, gender, pre-existing disease, premedication, operative procedure, anaesthetic and analgesic drugs, anaesthetic procedure, and postoperative symptoms. Prophylactic use of anti-emetic premedication is not currently routine practice because not all patients are at serious risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and currently available anti-emetics carry undesirable side-effects. However, anti-emetic prophylaxis is very valuable for patients at increased risk. If symptoms do develop in the recovery room, several factors need to be considered in order for anti-emetic treatment to be successful. Adequate hydration and pain control should be ensured, tight-fitting oxygen masks avoided, and patients should be encouraged to take slow, deep breaths to decrease the sensation of nausea. To avoid side-effects, anti-emetics should be administered in minimally effective doses. If the administration of anti-emetics is initially unsuccessful, it may be useful to try a combination of anti-emetic drugs with different mechanisms of action.
 ...
PMID:Incidence and aetiology of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 142 22

This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of oral ondansetron, a new 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. It included 60 patients, randomly assigned to two groups, and receiving orally, 1 h before induction of anaesthesia, either 8 mg of ondansetron (n = 29) or a placebo (n = 30). One patient was excluded. The same anaesthetic protocol, consisting of 3 to 5 micrograms.kg-1 of fentanyl, 4 to 6 mg.kg-1 of thiopentone, and 0.5 mg.kg-1 of atracurium, was used in all. Anaesthesia was maintained with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen with 0.8 to 1% endtidal concentration of isoflurane and additional boluses of 0.1 mg of fentanyl as required. The incidence and intensity of nausea, graded mild, moderate or severe, and the incidence of vomiting were recorded postoperatively. During the first twelve hours after surgery, 40% of patients in the placebo group had nausea (16.7% mild, 20% moderate and 6.7% severe), and 50% vomited. In the ondansetron group, nausea and vomiting occurred in 13.8% and 20.4% of patients respectively. The 4 patients in the latter group complained of major nausea. The differences between the groups were statistically significant: p = 0.025 for nausea and p = 0.042 for vomiting. It is concluded that oral ondansetron, 8 mg taken orally 1 h before surgery, significantly reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting during the first twelve postoperative hours. As it is easy to use and has no side-effects, it might be of interest in day-case surgery patients, despite its high cost.
 ...
PMID:[Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by ondansetron]. 147 80

Acetazolamide is a useful prophylactic for acute mountain sickness causing marked reduction in headache, nausea, vomiting, weakness, etc. Improvements correlate with increased arterial oxygen concentrations, reduction in proteinuria and peripheral oedema and other objective measures of acute mountain sickness. Evidence that Acetazolamide is beneficial for pulmonary oedema or cerebral oedema is scanty because of the lower frequency of these severe forms of mountain sickness. Dexamethasone, used prophylactically, also reduces the symptoms of acute mountain sickness partly due to its euphoric effect. Use of Acetazolamide as a treatment for established acute mountain sickness has been investigated. Large doses of Acetazolamide increase arterial oxygen levels over a few hours and this leads to a reduction of symptoms but data is limited and faster acting carbonic anhydrides inhibitors such as Methazolamide may be preferable in an emergency situation. There is no comparison of the effectiveness of Acetazolamide with other drugs used for treating acute mountain sickness such as steroids and calcium channel blocking drugs. Also, there is no data on drug combinations which could have additive effects and thereby be more beneficial than individual drugs.
 ...
PMID:Acetazolamide and high altitude diseases. 148 96

When human divers and experimental animals are exposed to high pressure of helium-oxygen mixture, they develop the high pressure neurological syndrome, characterized by nausea, vertigo, tremor, myoclonus, EEG modifications and convulsions. Free-moving rats were stereotaxically implanted in the anterior caudate nucleus with a microdialysis probe to measure dopamine, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid levels during different phases of a simulated dive up to 5.1 MPa. Compression was found to cause an increase in extracellular dopamine and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid concentrations, but not in homovanillic acid. This represents a specific effect of high pressure on the dopaminergic pathway. Recent findings on D2 autoreceptors, showing a decrease in receptor affinity under pressure, allow us to conclude that pressure increases dopamine synthesis through a direct action on D2 autoreceptors.
 ...
PMID:Effects of high pressure on striatal dopamine release in freely moving rats: a microdialysis study. 149 92

Several studies comparing retrobulbar block (RB) and general anaesthesia (GA) for cataract surgery in the elderly have been published. Most of them were retrospective. Our prospective study was designed in order to determine the benefits or disadvantages using RB or GA. Arterial blood gases (ABG) and cardiovascular stability were explored in high-risk patients undergoing elective unilateral cataract extraction. METHODS. Forty patients over 65 years of age and with other co-existing diseases (ASA III-IV) were allocated randomly to receive either GA or RB. No premedication was given to either group of patients. On arrival in the anaesthetic room, a radial artery was cannulated for collection of blood samples and direct monitoring of the blood pressure. Pulse oximetry and ECG were continuously monitored in all patients, the end-expiratory CO2 (F(eexCO2)) only in the GA group. GA was induced with vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg and thiopentone 5 mg/kg; the lungs were ventilated with 100% oxygen. After intubation of the trachea controlled mechanical ventilation was continued with N2O/O2 (55:45) and enflurane 1%-2%. Only enflurane concentrations were varied to correct changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) if these exceeded +/- 20%. Respiratory frequency and tidal volume were kept constant until completion of surgery. The patients were extubated when they were able to ventilate more than 5 1/min (pressure support 10 cmH2O; PEEP 5 cmH2O). After extubation no O2 was given. In the RB group neural block was undertaken with prilocaine 2% (3 ml) as a retrobulbar injection and prilocaine 1% (5 ml) to block the facial innervation of the orbicularis muscle (Van Lint, O'Brien). Oxygen 3 1/min was administered by nasal tube during the operation. Nine arterial samples for blood gas analysis were collected: (1) control; (2) before operation; (3) 5 min after beginning the operation; (4) 15 min after beginning the operation and before i.v. administration of 500 mg acetazolamide over 5 min; (5) after acetazolamide; (6 and 7) 10 and 20 min after acetazolamide; and (8 and 9) 15 and 30 min after operation (RB) or extubation (GA). RESULTS. The patient demography, including duration of anaesthesia and operation, was similar in both groups (Table 1). Four patients in the GA group (2 needed O2 after extubation because of hypoxaemia) and 2 in the RB group were excluded. No significant differences were seen in base excess (BE) and standard bicarbonate (SHCO3). Arterial O2 tension, arterial O2 saturation, and pulse-oximetric O2 saturation were higher in the RB group intra- and postoperatively (Figs. 1, 3, 4). Arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2) was significantly higher in the GA group during the pre- and postoperative period (Fig. 2), but not during the operation. The PaCO2- F(eexCO2) gradient ranged between 5 and 9 mmHg. Administration of acetazolamide did not influence this gradient by regressive analysis. The postoperative outcome of the patients was comparable in both groups. Nausea or vomiting did not occur. MAP was significantly higher in the RB group during the operation. No significant differences were seen in the pre- and postoperative period. Heart rate in the GA group was higher only after extubation, but was within physiological limits. DISCUSSION. Despite the differing results between the two groups, our study showed no important advantage related to either RB or GA. Changes in ABG, MAP, and heart rate during the investigation period were within physiological limits in elderly patients. Intravenous acetazolamide did not influence ABG in a significant manner. With regard to the preference of each patient, we recommend both RB and GA for cataract surgery in high-risk patients on the assumption of sufficient preoperative treatment of co-existing diseases. In conclusion, cardiovascular and ABG stability were maintained during both anaesthetic techniques.
 ...
PMID:[General anesthesia vs. retrobulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery. A randomized comparison of patients at risk]. 152 60

This study was undertaken to determine the dosages, treatment times and side effects of ketamine HCI with and without two benzodiazepines when used for sedation on a group of precooperative children at the UCLA Children's Dental Center. Ketamine was evaluated when used alone, and in conjunction with two benzodiazepines, diazepam or a new water-soluble midazolam. An anti-muscarinic, atropine or glycopyrrolate, and nitrous oxide-oxygen were included in all sedations. Mean treatment times were increased significantly when ketamine and a benzodiazepine were used in combination. Additionally, mean ketamine dosages were decreased significantly when ketamine was utilized in combination with a benzodiazepine. All children tolerated the sedation well and there were no severe adverse reactions. Side effects included nausea, vomiting, and a rise in post-operative temperatures.
 ...
PMID:Clinical evaluation of the effects of ketamine sedation on pediatric dental patients. 152 83

We studied 114 female patients (ASA 1 or 2) who were within 20% of ideal body weight and who were scheduled to undergo gynaecological laparoscopy which required supplementation with an opioid (groups IA and PA), or dental procedures which did not require opioid supplementation (groups IO and PO). A computerised package of psychomotor tests was performed before surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 and all patients received atracurium 0.3 mg.kg-1 and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Patients in group IA received isoflurane 1% (inspired), and alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1 as a bolus and 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 as an infusion. Patients in group PA received propofol 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 as an infusion, decreasing to 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 after 15 min, together with alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1. Patients in groups IO and PO received isoflurane and propofol in the regimens described for groups IA and PA, but without alfentanil. Recovery was assessed by a blinded observer who recorded times to awakening (eye opening) and orientation (giving date of birth), and who repeated the psychomotor tests at 1, 3 and 5 h. Linear analogue scales of mood, nausea and pain were obtained and other side effects were noted in the succeeding 48 h. A matched control group of 25 females (who were not anaesthetised) underwent psychomotor testing on four occasions in order to assess the 'learning effect' of repeated recovery testing. The analysis of recovery tests did not assume a normal distribution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Recovery characteristics using isoflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia: a double-blind controlled trial. 837 80

Mental and psychomotor abilities are impaired to varying degrees after general anaesthesia. This has important implications for the time over which patients are monitored in the recovery room and for the discharge of outpatients after day surgery. The present study was undertaken to compare recovery and mental and psychomotor skills in the first 60 min following general anaesthesia with isoflurane, midazolam/alfentanil and propofol. METHODS. A total of 45 patients undergoing microsurgical lumbar nucleotomy were randomized to three study groups. Group 1 (n = 15): anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone and maintained with isoflurane; group 2 (n = 15): anaesthesia was induced with midazolam and maintained with alfentanil; group 3 (n = 15): anaesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol. Vecuronium was used for muscle relaxation and the lungs were ventilated with a mixture of 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The following were checked 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after extubation: choice reaction times and critical flicker fusion for psychomotor testing; the maze test and a modification of the ball-bearing test for discrimination of motor and mental activities; and short- and long-term memory. RESULTS. Immediate recovery did not differ in the three different groups. In all patients psychomotor function was impaired compared with baseline for more than 60 min after general anaesthesia. However, impairment was significantly less pronounced after propofol, and recovery to preanaesthesia values was faster following propofol than after midazolam/alfentanil, and slowest after isoflurane-anaesthesia (Figs. 1, 2). The flicker fusion frequency, a very sensitive parameter for the persisting effects of anaesthetics, was significantly higher following propofol anaesthesia and remained so throughout the entire study period (Fig. 3). By 30 min after extubation, short-term memory was already normal in patients who had undergone propofol anaesthesia, and a statistically significant difference from the midazolam/alfentanil and isoflurane anaesthesia groups was obvious throughout the entire study period. However, no differences in long-term memory were found. At 30 min after propofol anaesthesia all patients were able to perform the ball-bearing test, as against 13 patients following midazolam/alfentanil and 10 patients following isoflurane (Table 3). The maze test was mostly impaired after midazolam/alfentanil anaesthesia. Patients who underwent isoflurane anaesthesia needed the same time for the maze test at 60 min afterwards propofol patients needed after 30 min (Table 2). Side effects, e.g., nausea, vomiting, and double vision, were observed significantly more often in groups 1 and 2 (Table 4). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. The results indicate that in operations of approximately 90 min duration the return of motor and mental abilities is faster following propofol anaesthesia. At 30 min after extubation following propofol anaesthesia patients had test results that allow their transfer from the recovery room, while it took 60 min for patients in the two other groups to reach the same levels of motor and mental function. This is important for the duration of monitoring in the recovery room and, especially, for day case anaesthesia.
 ...
PMID:[Cognitive and psychomotor performance following isoflurane, midazolam/alfentanil and propofol anesthesia. A comparative study]. 159 May 75


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>