Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial was done to compare the efficacy and safety of a serotonin receptor antagonist--ondansetron--and dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of acute and delayed emesis and nausea induced by moderately emetogenic non-platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. Patients were treated as outpatients and received intravenous ondansetron 4 mg or dexamethasone 8 mg before chemotherapy and oral maintenance (ondansetron 4 mg every 6 h and dexamethasone reducing from 4 mg to 1 mg 6-hourly between days 1 and 5) for 5 days. 112 patients were treated (38 men, 73 women, 1 with no gender recorded; age range 30-73 years) and 100 were evaluable for cross-over analysis. Patients taking ondansetron or dexamethasone reported no significant difference in complete and major control of acute (83% vs 79%, p = 0.46) or delayed (82% vs 88%, p = 0.214) emesis (vomiting plus retches). Significantly more patients on dexamethasone (87%) than on ondansetron (72%) reported control of delayed nausea (days 2-5) (p = 0.003). Both drugs were well tolerated with no significant difference in the number of adverse events, and this is reflected by similar patient preference for ondansetron (40%) and dexamethasone (30%) (p = 0.244). Both drugs offer adequate out-patient control of chemotherapy-induced emesis; however, dexamethasone has an advantage in the control of delayed nausea, and also in terms of cost and resource allocation.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of dexamethasone and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. 168 Dec 89

Tropisetron (Navoban, Sandoz Pharma Ltd., Basel, Switzerland), a selective antagonist of the serotonin receptor (5-HT3) dosed once-daily at 0.2 mg/kg (with a maximum of 5 mg daily), was evaluated in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in 131 children with a median age of 5 years (age 10 weeks to 21 years). Acute lymphocytic leukemia was the most common malignancy (49%). Most children (82%) had received cytotoxic chemotherapy before enrollment. Patients received tropisetron during one or more courses of chemotherapy (455 courses in total). Tropisetron was administered slowly intravenously as a single dose before the start of chemotherapy on day 1 and intravenously or by mouth the subsequent days as a single daily dose (median treatment duration: 5 days). Response to tropisetron per 24 hour period on the first 5 days of each chemotherapy course was graded as complete (absence of both nausea and vomiting), partial (one to four vomits and/or less than 5 hours of nausea), or failure. Overall complete response on day 1 was observed in 305 out of 455 chemotherapy courses (67%). The patients receiving intravenous chemotherapy (N = 92) had a 70% complete response rate and a 26% partial response rate on day 1, both for course 1 and course 2. The percentage of complete responders increased the subsequent days of the course. Emesis after day 1 was observed primarily during courses with the most emetogenic chemotherapy. No side-effects of tropisetron other than a single case of diarrhoea were documented in this study.
 ...
PMID:Tropisetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in 131 children receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. 902 27

This is the first double-blind clinical trial in a homogenous group of patients to compare the recommended dosing schedules of ondansetron and granisetron in the control of prolonged emesis after cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (48% CMF, 35% EC) for breast cancer. A total of 514 patients were recruited. Of the 488 patients included in the intent-to-treat analyses, 167 were randomised to group A [8 mg ondansetron intravenously (i.v.) + placebo by mouth (p.o.) before chemotherapy + 8 mg ondansetron p.o. twice daily (b.d.) until day 5], 155 to group B (placebo i,.v. + 8 mg ondansetron p.o. before chemotherapy + 8 mg ondansetron p.o. b.d. until day 5) and 166 to group C (3 mg granisetron i.v. + placebo p.o. before chemotherapy + placebo p.o. b.d. until day 5). On study day 1, the groups were comparable with respect to the proportion of patients experiencing up to 2 emetic episodes (group A: 89%; B: 86%; C: 91%) and in the severity of nausea (no nausea; group A: 51%; B: 55%; C: 54%). Over the 5-day study period significantly more patients were rescued or withdrawn due to lack of response after the granisetron regimen (26%) than after the i.v. + p.o. ondansetron regimen (11%; p < 0.001). Since there was no difference in these parameters on day 1, this reflects differences on days 2-5 and was also reflected in the all-oral ondansetron group over this period (group B: 12%; C: 22% on days 2-5). A significant difference in the severity of nausea after i.v. and p.o. ondansetron compared with granisetron was also observed over the 5-day study period (p = 0.009). This was reflected in a numerical difference in favour of the all-p.o. ondansetron regimen compared with the granisetron regimen (no nausea; group A: 33%; B: 34%; C: 25%). Again these differences reflected differences in nausea control on days 2-5, since no differences were observed on day 1. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for prognostic factors also revealed a significant difference (p = 0.011) in favour of the i.v. + ondansetron group compared with the granisetron group when complete plus major response was compared over days 2-5. No significant differences in the safety profiles of the three treatment groups were observed. There were no severe or unexpected drug-related adverse events and as is well established for the serotonin receptor antagonists, mild constipation (mean 8%) and mild headache (mean 8%) were most commonly reported.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis in out-patients: a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study. Emesis Study Group for Ondansetron and Granisetron in Breast Cancer Patients. 771 4

One hundred and thirty-one children with a median age of 5 years were administered Navoban (tropisetron), a selective antagonist of the serotonin receptor (5-HT3), dosed once daily at 0.2 mg/kg (with a maximum of 5 mg daily) in a study aimed at evaluating the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by anti-cancer chemotherapy. The most common malignancy (in 49% of patients) was acute lymphocytic leukaemia. Patients received Navoban during one or more courses of emetogenic chemotherapy for a total of 455 courses administered intravenously or intravenously and intrathecally (IV + IT). Most patients (89%) had already received cytotoxic chemotherapy before enrollment for the trial. On Day 1, Navoban was administered slowly and intravenously as a single dose before the start of chemotherapy, or by mouth as a single daily dose on subsequent days (median treatment duration = 5 days). On the first 5 days of each course of chemotherapy, response to Navoban per 24-hour period was graded as: complete (absence of both nausea and vomiting), partial (1-4 vomits and/or less than 5 hours of nausea), or failure (more than 4 vomits and/or at least 5 hours of nausea). Ninety-six per cent of the intravenous chemotherapy group and 97% of the IV + IT chemotherapy group had a complete (70% and 55% respectively) or partial (26% and 42% respectively) response during the first 24-hour period of the first course in which Navoban was used. The second and subsequent courses yielded similar percentages. Delayed emesis was observed mainly during those courses employing the most emetogenic chemotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Control of nausea and vomiting by Navoban (tropisetron) in 131 children receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. 774 70

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147EF), a new serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist was administered to 164 cancer patients naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, in single, rising doses of 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mg i.v. 15 minutes prior to an infusion of cisplatin. The severity of nausea and number of episodes of emesis were recorded during the 24-hour period following cisplatin administration. There were significant differences between the dose groups, sex, and naive and non-naive patients. There were also significant dolasetron dose-dependent differences for no emesis (p = .01), less than 3 emetic episodes (p = .01), time-to-onset of nausea (p = .04), and time-to-onset of emesis (p = .003). The severity of symptoms was greater for females, for patients with previous chemotherapy, and with shorter duration of cisplatin infusion. Adjustment for these variables and the study center reduced the associations between the dose of dolasetron mesylate and the outcome variables. The principal adverse events were headache (11%) and diarrhea (6%). Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated; a single dose of 40 or 50 mg controlled acute nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy in the majority, in particular in chemotherapy-naive and male patients. In conclusion, 50 mg and a larger dose merit study in controlled trials with stratification for sex and previous chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Acute antiemetic efficacy and safety of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 antagonist, in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. European Dolasetron Study Group. 814 Nov 14

The field of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation has been expanded recently as a treatment for solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Severe emesis remains one of the main extramedullary side-effects of high-dose regimens during the first week of treatment. Traditional antiemetics such as chlorpromazine, diazepam, and phenothiazines are extensively used but are unable to control emesis. The new antiemetic ondansetron, a serotonin receptor (5HT3) antagonist appears to be superior to these drugs for cisplatin-induced emesis. The study we present here is an attempt to control emesis following high-dose regimens, during bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation, with ondansetron. To our knowledge no other paper has reported the efficacy of this antiemetic in such group of patients. A total of 29 patients who received highly emetogenic polychemotherapy as conditioning regimens for bone marrow transplantation were treated with ondansetron, which was given as an 8-mg i.v. short infusion prior the initiation of treatment and every 6 h thereafter for 3 days, and an 8-mg dose every 8 h for 5 additional days. All the patients had previously been treated with chemotherapy and were evaluable for response and toxicity. Complete and major protection of vomiting on day 1 was achieved by 76% of the patients, 58% on day 2 and 52% on day 3. Nausea was absent or mild in 79% of patients on day 1, 45% on day 2 and 41% on day 3.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A phase II study of ondansetron as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving high-dose polychemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. 852 Aug 76

The object of the study was to determine whether dexamethasone improved the efficacy of the serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist granisetron in controlling acute (within 24 h) emesis in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy and to ascertain whether continuation of granisetron after 24 h reduces the occurrence of delayed emesis. This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, three-arm study was conducted at 21 medical centres. A group of 292 nausea- and emesis-free patients with cancer, who had never had chemotherapy and were scheduled to receive at least 50 mg/m2 cisplatin, were given 3 mg granisetron i.v. in a 15-min infusion with or without 10 mg dexamethasone i.v. completed 5 min prior to high-dose cisplatin and 1 mg granisetron p.o. at +6 h and +12 h. Primary study end-points were control of emesis and nausea. Patients completed a self-report diary every 6 h for the first 24 h. At the end of the 24-h period, the patients who received dexamethasone had a significantly higher complete protection rate from emesis (64% compared to 39%) than those who received no steroid. Similarly, the dexamethasone-treated group had a significantly higher complete plus partial (0-2 emetic episodes) protection rate (84% compared to 64%). This study shows that dexamethasone markedly enhances the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron for acute-onset emesis in high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Dexamethasone improves the efficacy of granisetron in the first 24 h following high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. 852 Aug 77

The serotonin 5-HT3 receptor is unique among the seven serotonin receptor "families" that have been recognized so far. It functions not as a G-protein coupled but as a direct ion channel gated receptor. Because of the varied neural functions linked to this receptor, intensive research interest has developed in recent years about its basic and clinical pharmacology, which are summarized in this review. Some new agonists and many new antagonists have been developed. These agents have a useful role as selective pharmacologic research probes, and some of them can be used therapeutically as potent and selective anti-nausea and antiemetic drugs, particularly in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy treatment or general anesthesia procedures. Potential applications of these agents include the treatment of some behavioral disorders in mental disease, drug addiction, and certain types of pain syndromes.
 ...
PMID:5-HT3 receptors: pharmacologic and therapeutic aspects. 878 44

The introduction of serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonists has improved the control of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapy, but they seem to have little or no effect on delayed symptoms. Corticosteroids are known to reduce both acute and delayed nausea and vomiting. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that a single high dose of dexamethasone (20 mg), a long-acting corticosteroid, given after cisplatin and in addition to ondansetron (8 mg three times a day), would enhance the control of both acute and delayed nausea and vomiting. A group of 104 chemotherapy-naive ovarian cancer patients, scheduled for at least three cycles of combination chemotherapy including cisplatin (50 mg/m2), were randomly allocated to receive either dexamethasone or placebo in addition to ondansetron. Two-thirds of the patients received doxorubin and melphalan on the day before cisplatin and 1/3 received doxorubicin immediately before cisplatin. Unexpectedly we found, in all three chemotherapy cycles, that patients receiving dexamethasone suffered from more delayed nausea and vomiting than patients receiving placebo. In patients with no acute nausea or vomiting, the boomerang effect of dexamethasone could be seen on the first day after chemotherapy. In a follow-up study on 5 patients not included in the randomized trial, dexamethasone induced a pronounced reduction in urinary cortisol excretion on the day after chemotherapy with a return to normal excretion on day 2. It is concluded that a single high dose of dexamethasone does not seem appropriate for controlling delayed nausea and vomiting.
 ...
PMID:Single high-dose dexamethasone improves the effect of ondansetron on acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting but impairs the control of delayed symptoms. 896 75

The potent serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonists are new highly selective agents for the prevention and control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting that have been shown to be comparable to or more effective than traditional metoclopramide regimens. This study was designed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of dolasetron and metoclopramide in chemotherapy-naive and non-naive cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of single i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate salt (1.2 or 1.8 mg/kg) and metoclopramide (7 mg/kg) in 226 patients for the prevention of acute emesis and nausea associated with the administration of high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin. Efficacy and safety were evaluated for 24 h. Complete responses were achieved by 57%, 48%, and 35% of patients given dolasetron mesilate 1.8 mg/kg (P = 0.0009 vs metoclopramide), dolasetron mesilate 1.2 mg/kg (P = 0.0058 vs metoclopramide), and metoclopramide, respectively. Overall, dolasetron was significantly more effective than metoclopramide for time to first emetic episode, nausea, patient satisfaction, and investigator global assessment of efficacy. Males, chemotherapy-naive patients, and alcoholics had higher response rates. Dolasetron was well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate headache most commonly reported. Twelve percent of patients receiving metoclopramide reported extrapyramidal symptoms compared with 0% of patients receiving dolasetron. In conclusion, dolasetron mesilate was effective for the prevention of CINV with high-dose cisplatin. Single i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate were more effective than 7 mg/kg metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. In addition, 1.8 mg/kg dolasetron mesilate consistently produced the highest response rates and appears to be the most effective dose for further clinical development.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, multicentre comparison of intravenous dolasetron mesilate and metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. 901 Sep 86


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>