Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The low solubility of desflurane contributes to rapid emergence after outpatient anesthesia. Compared with isoflurane, recovery times to eye opening, response to verbal commands, and orientation to person, place, and time have been significantly shorter. Even when compared with the rapid, short-acting intravenous anesthetic propofol for induction and maintenance of outpatient anesthesia, desflurane displayed more favorable early recovery characteristics. Although patients receiving desflurane are less sedated in the early postoperative period than those receiving propofol, times to ambulation and discharge were similar. The direct "antiemetic" activity of propofol may have contributed to a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and emesis versus desflurane. Finally, the effects of desflurane, isoflurane, and propofol on postoperative psychomotor (e.g., Trieger test, choice reaction time) and cognitive (e.g., digit-symbol substitution test, critical flicker fusion test) function are remarkably similar. Given its favorable early recovery profile, desflurane would appear to be a useful alternative to both isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia. As desflurane is pungent and possesses respiratory irritant properties, propofol will likely remain the induction agent of choice in the outpatient setting. In conclusion, desflurane appears to have few adverse effects on recovery after ambulatory surgery, but nausea and emesis were lower with propofol. Desflurane's relative ease of administration versus propofol may be an important determinant of its future role in outpatient anesthesia.
 ...
PMID:Studies of desflurane in outpatient anesthesia. 152 40

This study was undertaken to compare desflurane with propofol anesthesia in outpatients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery. Data were combined from two institutions participating in a multicenter study. Ninety-one patients, ASA physical status I or II, were each randomly assigned to one of four groups. After administration of fentanyl (2 micrograms/kg) and d-tubocurarine (3 mg), intravenous propofol was administered to induce anesthesia in groups I and II and desflurane in groups III and IV. Maintenance was provided by desflurane/N2O in groups I and III, propofol/N2O in group II, and desflurane/O2 in group IV. Emergence and recovery variables, psychometric test results, and side effects were recorded by observers unaware of the experimental treatment. Patients in group II experienced less nausea than other groups (P = 0.002) despite this group having required more intraoperative fentanyl supplementation than groups III and IV (P = 0.01). Time to emergence, discharge, and psychometric test results were similar in all groups. Desflurane appears to be comparable with propofol as an outpatient anesthetic, facilitating rapid recovery and discharge home.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of desflurane with propofol in outpatients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery. 153 Jan 70

Desflurane's induction and recovery characteristics were compared to those of propofol-nitrous oxide in outpatients undergoing laparoscopic procedures. Ninety-two healthy patients were randomized to receive either: 1) propofol induction and propofol-nitrous oxide maintenance (control), 2) propofol induction and desflurane-nitrous oxide maintenance, 3) desflurane-nitrous oxide, or 4) desflurane alone for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Inhalation induction with desflurane-nitrous oxide was faster than with desflurane alone (100 +/- 35 vs. 124 +/- 43 s). Inhalation inductions were associated with a high incidence of apnea (17 and 26%), breath-holding (26 and 39%), and coughing (30 and 22%) in groups 3 and 4, respectively. The emergence time after discontinuation of desflurane in oxygen (4.5 +/- 2.1 min.) was significantly less than that after propofol-nitrous oxide (7.3 +/- 3.9 min.). However, times from arrival in the recovery room until the patients were judged fit for discharge were similar for all four treatment groups. Digit-symbol substitution test results and sedation visual analogue scores also were similar during the first 2 h in the recovery room. A lower incidence of moderate-to-severe nausea was reported in group 1 (15% vs. 52, 52, and 59% in groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively). In conclusion, induction of anesthesia with desflurane was rapid but is associated with a high incidence of airway irritation. Emergence and recovery profiles after maintenance of anesthesia with desflurane compared favorably to a propofol-nitrous oxide combination. However, propofol was associated with a lower incidence of nausea than was desflurane after outpatient anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery.
 ...
PMID:Use of desflurane for outpatient anesthesia. A comparison with propofol and nitrous oxide. 183 Apr 62

This study compared the costs of desflurane and propofol as maintenance anesthetic agents in outpatient surgery. Recovery time and related drug expenses were included in the cost comparison. Fifty-three ASA physical status I and II patients were randomly assigned to receive a maintenance anesthetic of either desflurane with 50% nitrous oxide or propofol with 50% nitrous oxide. All patients received a propofol induction and were administered narcotics, sedatives, muscle relaxants, reversal agents, and antiemetics as determined necessary by the anesthesia provider. The mean propofol cost was $31.88 +/- 14.44, whereas, the mean desflurane cost was $12.99 +/- 7.61 (P < .05). The mean cost of all medications, anesthetics, and ancillary agents included was $57.97 +/- 20.22 for the propofol group and $34.86 +/- 14.13 for the desflurane group (P < .05). Of the desflurane patients, 41% experienced nausea compared to 12% of the propofol patients (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the recovery times of the two groups. Desflurane was more cost-effective than propofol. Although desflurane patients experienced more nausea, this did not affect their discharge time.
 ...
PMID:Cost-effective anesthesia: desflurane versus propofol in outpatient surgery. 892 4

We evaluated the use of remifentanil administered as a component of an inhalation or of a Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) anesthetic technique during outpatient oral surgery. Sixty-three unpremedicated patients undergoing removal of four impacted third molars participated to this prospective, randomized study. Anesthesia was induced with Propofol and Rocuronium. Remifentanil 1 microgram.kg-1 i.v. was given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion reduced from 25% each time a tooth was removed (0.25-->0.0625 microgram.kg-1 min-1). Anesthesia was maintained with Desflurane (group D, n = 31) (end-tidal concentration 4-6%) or Propofol (group P, n = 32) (initial infusion TCI 8 micrograms.ml-1 reduced to 2-3 micrograms.ml-1 after intubation). Corticosteroids, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (Diclofenac) and a partial mu agonist drug (Tramadol) were administered i.v. during the procedure to prevent early postoperative pain. Recovery time, postoperative pain, recovery of cognition and nausea or vomiting were also evaluated during the first six postoperative hours. Overall mean systolic blood pressures and heart rate were similar in the two groups during surgery. Mean times to extubation and to recall of birth-date and room number were also similar. The quality of awakening was good in the two groups. Most patients complained of moderate pain or had no pain during the first six postoperative hours. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in both groups. No other side effect was observed. These data suggest that the association of Remifentanil, Methylprednisolone, Diclofenac and Tramadol is an useful technique in ambulatory oral surgery in two comparable anesthetic regimens.
 ...
PMID:Use of remifentanil in combination with desflurane or propofol for ambulatory oral surgery. 1153 10