Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Evidence of pre-emptive analgetic effect of opioid would offer great potential benefit to patients with postoperative pain, a better pain relief with less opioid. The aim of this double blind randomised trial was to study the effect of intramuscular morphine premedication on postoperative pain. Forty-one patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to four groups. Two groups received epidural morphine, 4 mg immediately after operation and 3 mg ten hours later, and two groups the same volume of saline. All patients had access to intravenous PCA-fentanyl. One epidural morphine and one epidural saline group (PreEpiMo and PreMo, respectively) received morphine, 0.14 mg/kg i.m. as premedication. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Respiration was monitored by means of pulseoximetry, arterial blood gas analysis and rate of breathing. Morphine premedication reduced postoperative pain in the immediate postoperative period in patients with epidural placebo (PreMo), but the effect was absent in patients with PreEpiMo. Epidural morphine (EpiMo) provided stable analgesia with reduced need of PCA-fentanyl. Two patients (10%) (one in EpiMo and one in PreEpiMo) developed respiratory depression requiring naloxone treatment. The dosage of epidural morphine used in this study was a likely explanation of this depression. Nausea, vomiting, itching and urinary retention were the most frequent side effects without significant differences between the groups. In conclusion, morphine premedication had a temporary rest effect on the postoperative pain. Epidural morphine provides a better analgesia than intravenous PCA-fentanyl.
...
PMID:Does morphine premedication influence the pain and consumption of postoperative analgesics after total knee arthroplasty? 890 63

Intermittent parenteral bolus doses of morphine are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. Morphine is typically given by intramuscular or intravenous injection but there are theoretical advantages for the subcutaneous route of administration. Fifty-nine patients entered a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study comparing intermittent intramuscular and subcutaneous morphine boluses. Patients received 0.15 mg/kg of morphine by subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. They were reviewed at the time of injection, after 15 minutes and each hour for four hours. The majority of patients indicated a strong preference for the subcutaneous route. There were no significant differences in pain scores, respiratory rate, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, sedation or nausea scores between intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of morphine. Postoperative analgesia by subcutaneous morphine bolus injection is as effective as intramuscular injection with a similar side-effect profile but with greater patient acceptance and less risk.
...
PMID:Morphine for postoperative analgesia. A comparison of intramuscular and subcutaneous routes of administration. 907 34

We analyzed data from 1233 Chinese patients of a wide age range who received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) intravenous morphine for postoperative pain relief, during the period of January 1992 to May 1995. The analgesic regimen was standardized as follows: PCA bolus 1 to 1.5 mg; lock-out interval 5 minutes; one-hour maximum dose 0.075 to 0.1 mg.kg-1 and background infusion 0 or 0.5 mg.h-1. Most patients underwent major surgery that was broadly subclassified according to the anatomical area involved. The median verbal numerical rating scales of pain (0 to 10) at rest and while coughing for the first, second and third 24 hours were 3.0/5.0, 1.5/4.0 and 0/3.0 respectively and the corresponding demand to delivery ratios were 2.8 +/- 2.9, 2.6 +/- 2.4 and 2.4 +/- 2.6. The overall morphine consumptions in 1004 of these Chinese patients were 27.5 +/- 16.8, 17.8 +/- 16.1 and 18.1 +/- 21.0 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 during the first 16, 17 to 41 and 42 to 66 postoperative hours respectively. These figures were the same as for Caucasian patients managed in the same institution. Morphine consumption was significant higher following thoracic, upper abdominal and spinal surgery. Also it was higher in patients younger than 65 years, males, cigarette smokers and those with ASA physical status I or II. The commonest side-effects were nausea (34.5%) and vomiting (18.2%). Bradypnoea and oxygen desaturation occurred in 0.5% and 1.6% respectively. All cases were promptly detected and managed with no adverse outcomes. Most patients were satisfied (76.7% ranked "good") with their postoperative analgesia. The commonest reasons for dissatisfaction were inadequate pain relief, nausea and reluctance to self-control analgesic administration. It is concluded that PCA with intravenous morphine is effective and safe as a routine postoperative technique for Chinese surgical patients.
...
PMID:The efficacy, applicability and side-effects of postoperative intravenous patient-controlled morphine analgesia: an audit of 1233 Chinese patients. 897 12

A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 66 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery to compare patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA) with continuous morphine infusion. Hourly assessment of pain (at rest and on movement) using a visual analogue scale (VAS), of respiratory rate, and level of sedation took place for the 24 h following extubation. The incidence of nausea was also recorded. Mean pain scores were calculated, and peak pain and sedation scores, together with lowest respiratory rates, were identified. Morphine consumption was measured at 24 h. No significant differences were found between the groups' scores for pain or sedation. The PCA group had significantly lower respiratory rates (P = 0.02) and a lower incidence of nausea (P = 0.008). The PCA group also consumed significantly more morphine (P = 0.0001). The study suggests a beneficial effect from PCA after cardiac surgery in reducing nausea, compared to NCA. It confirms nurse-controlled infusion analgesia as an effective form of pain relief in an intensive care and high-dependency setting.
...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia compared with nurse-controlled infusion analgesia after heart surgery. 928 73

The use of drug infusors is common in palliative care. Knowledge about the drugs being used and the handling of drug mixtures in insufficient and poorly documented. To clarify this practice, a questionnaire was sent to all departments of pain/anesthesiology and oncology, and to all home-care teams and palliative care units/hospices in Sweden (N = 156). The questions concerned specific qualities of the drug infusors and the different drugs and drug mixtures used by subcutaneous (s.c.) and intravenous (i.v.) administration. A total of 110 (70%) of the questionnaires were returned. A majority of the respondents reported the use of one or more of three different infusors. Morphine was used in 73% of all single drug infusions. Dosages ranged from 30 mg/24 hr to 5000 mg/24 hr. The most common drug mixture was morphine/haloperidol (22% of all drug mixtures). As many as three drugs were used in combination. The most frequent indication to switch from oral administration to parenteral administration was gastrointestinal disorders such as swallowing difficulties, nausea, vomiting, or bowel obstruction. In Sweden, there is extensive clinical experience administering opioids in infusors, but experience varies for different drug mixtures. There are few clinical and pharmacological investigations to support this practice and further studies are needed.
...
PMID:Drug infusors in palliative medicine: a Swedish inquiry. 965 35

The effectiveness of prochlorperazine buccal as an anti-emetic for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine following abdominal hysterectomy has been assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Forty-nine female patients participated with 26 allocated to the prochlorperazine buccal group and the remainder to the placebo group. Each received either placebo or prochlorperazine buccal 6 mg, in each case by the buccal route, 1 h prior to anaesthesia with further doses at 6, 18, 30 and 42 h, respectively. Symptom scores in respect of nausea, pain and sedation, the number without nausea, the number without vomiting and the requirement for rescue anti-emetic therapy were noted for each 4-h period during the 48-h study. Morphine utilization and taste associated with the study material were recorded. Data for 21 patients in the placebo group and 25 patients in the prochlorperazine buccal group were available for analysis. Patients in the prochlorperazine buccal group showed significantly lower mean nausea scores at 4-8 h (placebo group: mean nausea score 0.95; prochlorperazine buccal group: mean nausea score 0.36; P < 0.05) and at 16-20 h (placebo group: mean nausea score 1.24; prochlorperazine buccal group: mean nausea score 0.48; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the prochlorperazine buccal group showed significantly more patients without nausea at 4-8 h (placebo group: 11 patients out of 21; prochlorperazine buccal group: 20 patients out of 25; P < 0.05) and at 16-20 h (placebo group: nine patients out of 21; prochlorperazine buccal group: 18 patients out of 25; P < 0.05). The prochlorperazine buccal group showed a significantly higher number of patients rating the taste as unsatisfactory (placebo group: two patients out of 21; prochlorperazine buccal group: nine patients out of 25; P < 0.05). Intravenous droperidol is the current gold standard prophylactic anti-emetic in post-operative nausea and vomiting associated with intravenous patient controlled analgesia with morphine usage. This study has demonstrated a peri-operative prochlorperazine buccal regimen to be effective in post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in the use of intravenous patient controlled analgesia with morphine. Prochlorperazine buccal should be considered as an effective, inexpensive option for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting in post-operative intravenous patient controlled analgesia with morphine administration.
...
PMID:An assessment of prochlorperazine buccal for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine following abdominal hysterectomy. 1054 65

We have evaluated the morphine-sparing effect of rectal paracetamol during the first 24 h after abdominal hysterectomy in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. We studied 72 patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. morphine after a standardized anaesthetic, allocated randomly to receive rectal paracetamol 1.3 g, diclofenac 50 mg or placebo, after wound closure and at 8 and 16 h. Suppositories were blinded by the hospital pharmacy. Study violations excluded data from seven patients. Patient data, morphine doses during anaesthesia and recovery, and sedation and nausea scores were comparable. Mean morphine consumption during PCA was 35.0 (SD 20.4) mg, 32.7 (27.4) mg and 54.9 (28.3) mg in the paracetamol (n = 24), diclofenac (n = 20) and placebo (n = 21) groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Morphine sparing during PCA for paracetamol and diclofenac (36% vs 40% over 24 h) was significant from 4 h. Global scores of average pain over 24 h were lower after diclofenac compared with paracetamol (P < 0.01) and placebo (P = 0.08). We conclude that rectal paracetamol was an efficacious adjuvant analgesic after regular dosing.
...
PMID:Rectal paracetamol has a significant morphine-sparing effect after hysterectomy. 1106 32

The authors evaluated the ability of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), to enhance the analgesic potency of morphine. Fifteen volunteers participated in this double-blind crossover study. All received combinations of morphine or saline with either fluoxetine 30 mg or placebo. The authors used individual morphine pharmacokinetics to program an infusion pump to achieve plasma morphine levels of 15, 30, and 60 ng/ml. Analgesia during morphine infusion was assessed using a model of electrical tooth stimulation. Subjective side effects, measurements of end-tidal CO2, O2 saturation, pupil size, and testing of psychomotor performance were obtained. Plasma morphine concentrations were not affected by fluoxetine. In comparison to placebo, oral fluoxetine resulted in less sedation during morphine infusion and less nausea during morphine washout. Morphine-induced pruritus, psychomotor function, and respiratory depression were unaffected by fluoxetine. Acute administration of 30 mg oral fluoxetine augmented analgesia by approximately 3% to 8% and reduced morphine-associated nausea, mood reduction, and drowsiness.
...
PMID:Morphine-fluoxetine interactions in healthy volunteers: analgesia and side effects. 1107 15

Fourteen patients scheduled for orthopaedic knee reconstruction surgery were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind, randomized study in which they received alphadolone (25-500 mg, n = 9) or placebo (lactose, n = 5) given orally 1 h after operation. All the subjects received a standardized general anaesthetic and the same type of surgery followed by physiotherapy using a continuous passive movement machine. Morphine was administered intravenously after operation by patient-controlled analgesia. Verbal rating and visual analogue scores assessed pain experiences for 6 h. Orally administered alphadolone up to 500 mg caused no increase in sedation, respiratory depression, nausea or vomiting. The experiences of these side-effects were all rated as none, mild or moderate. Orally administered alphadolone caused statistically significant reductions in morphine use and simultaneous highly significant reductions in pain scores. We conclude that alphadolone is a useful analgesic in humans when given by the oral route.
...
PMID:Antinociceptive properties of neurosteroids IV: pilot study demonstrating the analgesic effects of alphadolone administered orally to humans. 1157 27

Modern strategies for preventing or controlling pain and anxiety demand a premedication for operations using local anesthesia and for those using sedation or general anesthesia. For optimal patient care, the premedication should be given orally and, with respect to the outpatient basis of the operations, should have a short recovery period. Midazolam, one of the most favored premedications for general anesthesia, has been recommended as a premedication for operations using local anesthesia as well. However, midazolam has only sedative-anxiolytic effects and does not reduce pain sensation, which should be mandatory for operations using local anesthesia. A further requirement is the maintenance of stable hemodynamics for the prevention of postoperative hematomas, especially in the face. For these reasons, another premedication meeting all requirements (anxiolysis, analgesia, and stable hemodynamics) was researched. A randomized, double-blind prospective study was performed from March of 1997 to June of 1998. Five groups totalling 150 patients were included in the study; each group contained 30 patients who had operations performed solely on the face. In the first four groups, the effect of midazolam (0.15 mg/kg(-1)), morphine (0.3 mg/kg(-1)), and clonidine (1.5 microg/kg(-1)) administered orally was compared with a placebo. The fifth group was the control group and received no premedication. To evaluate the effects of the premedications, a corresponding questionnaire was completed independently by the patient and surgeon. With regard to the anxiolytic or analgesic properties of the premedication, 61 percent of the patients preferred pain reduction to anxiety control, and 24 percent of patients preferred reduction of anxiety. The remainder insisted on a reduction of both properties (8 percent) or had no preference (7 percent). Reduction of anxiety was largest in the midazolam and the clonidine groups, but the difference was not significant. The least pain during the application of local anesthesia was experienced by the morphine group (37 percent) and the clonidine group (33 percent), in contrast to the midazolam group (60 percent) (p = 0.04). Morphine and clonidine met the requirements of pain reduction equally well. Nevertheless, considering the rate and intensity of adverse effects with respect to hemodynamic compromises, nausea, and emesis, clonidine is even better suited as an oral premedication for operations on the face using local anesthesia.
...
PMID:Oral premedication for operations on the face under local anesthesia: a placebo-controlled double-blind trial. 1236 91


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>

---