Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Lorazepam, a new benzodiazepine, was compared with morphine for premedication. Ten patients received morphine 10 mg/70 kg i.m. and 10 received lorazepam 4 mg/70 kg i.m. Respiratory effects were assessed from the change in slope (S) and intercept (B) of the carbon dioxide response line, using a development of Read's rebreathing method. Morphine depressed S by 47% (P less than 0.01), but after lorazepam S increased by 27% (P less than 0.05), neither drug altering B significantly. In two volunteers lorazepam was assessed by both the rebreathing and the steady-state methods; after lorazepam S was smaller by the steady-state than by the rebreathing technique. The findings for lorazepam are consistent with the known effects of sleep on carbon dioxide sensitivity. Amnesia lasting 4-8 h occurred in all patients who received lorazepam so that pain and nausea during this period were not recalled, but no patient who received morphine experienced amnesia. We conclude that lorazepam merits further study, particularly where sedation without respiratory depression is needed, as in obstetrics, and where amnesia for uncomfortable procedures is required.
 ...
PMID:Respiratory effects and amnesia after premedication with morphine or lorazepam. 1 25

At the beginning, the way intrathecal morphine was used for postoperative pain relief was quite unfortunate, because the doses derived from experience with morphine-tolerant cancer patients were considerably too high and respiratory depression occurred frequently. Subsequent dose-finding studies showed that the doses of morphine used initially could be reduced by a factor of ten without loss of the analgesic effect and with a marked reduction in side-effects. No respiratory depression has been reported when doses below 0.1 mg morphine are used. METHOD. In this prospective study the effect of 0.06 to 0.08 mg intrathecal morphine, mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anesthesia, was investigated in surgical patients aged 21 to 81 years, ASA grade I or II, scheduled for orthopaedic operations or herniorraphies. Thirty unpremedicated patients were enrolled in the study and were, after informed consent, randomly allocated to a control group without morphine or to a morphine group. The analgesic effect was assessed by the time interval between the administration of the spinal anaesthesia and the first demand for an analgesic medication. The mood state was evaluated with the adjective checklist of Janke and Debus 6 h after the spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the control group half of the patients asked for an analgesic medication within 275 min (median) after the spinal anaesthesia, and all patients within 420 min, whereas in the morphine group half of the patients asked for an analgesic within 1170 min (median). Seven patients had not required an analgesic at the termination of the observation period 20 h after the spinal anaesthesia. The mood status showed no difference between the two groups, in particular, no dizziness or drowsiness after morphine. There was no difference in the incidence of side-effects such as nausea or urinary retention between the two groups. Pruritus was not reported spontaneously but was found upon questioning in five patients. It was in no case disturbing. CONCLUSIONS. Morphine (0.06 to 0.08 mg) mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia provided for an analgesia of more than 20 h duration in half of the patients. This technique is safe, simple, reliable and virtually free of side-effects. No particular supervision due to the administration of intrathecal morphine is necessary in this dose range if systemic opiates are avoided. If the analgesia is unsatisfactory, a non-opioid analgesic is recommended.
 ...
PMID:[Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain]. 146 57

The cause of postanesthesia shaking (PS) is unknown. PS develops spontaneously and unpredictably in up to 67% of patients emerging from general anesthesia, and it continues for minutes to hours when not treated with medications or radiant heat lamps. The purposes of this study were to (1) examine whether butorphanol tartrate (Stadol; Anaquest, Madison, WI/Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Evansville, IN), meperidine (Demerol; Winthrop, NY, NY), and morphine are differentially effective in suppressing PS, (2) compare PS suppression by sex, and (3) determine time to PS development. PS, measured on a 0 to 3 visual scale, developed in 120 of 533 patients (23%). Medication treatment was initiated for 66 of 120 patients by PACU nurses following standard policies and procedures for intravenous doses of 1 mg butorphanol (n = 12), 15 to 30 mg meperidine (n = 18; n = 23), or 2 to 4 mg morphine (n = 13). Treatment effect was measured in units on a 0 to 2 visual scale. By t test, butorphanol is more effective within 2 minutes than meperidine for suppressing shaking alone (P less than .02) or shaking among patients also complaining of pain (P less than .02). Morphine does not relieve shaking. The chi 2 test indicates women suppress PS more rapidly than men (P less than .01), and PS develops within 5 minutes of PACU arrival (P less than .001). Findings suggest that butorphanol is an alternative PS treatment to meperidine, since it relieves shaking within 2 to 5 minutes without producing nausea, vomiting, or recurrence of shaking.
 ...
PMID:Butorphanol tartrate (Stadol) relieves postanesthesia shaking more effectively than meperidine (Demerol) or morphine. 157

Persistent severe cancer pain should be treated with opioid drugs, principally morphine. It can be administered orally, rectally and parenterally. Morphine is metabolised in the liver mainly to glucuronides, of which morphine-6-glucuronide is a powerful analgesic. Oral morphine should be administered regularly and in individualized doses. The use of morphine is frequently accompanied by adverse effects such as constipation, nausea, vomiting and sedation. Management of these is critical for successful pain treatment. Although alternatives are available none has any clear advantage over morphine in cancer pain, and should be reserved for special situations. Oral morphine is successful in more than 90% of cancer pain patients. Slow release morphine sulphate tablets (MS Contin) are often the best choice. For the few patients who need parenteral medication, continuous subcutaneous morphine sulphate infusion is generally the most suitable. Some pains are morphine resistant, especially those due to nerve injury. In these cases pain is best treated with tricyclic antidepressants and/or anticonvulsants.
 ...
PMID:Oral opioids in the treatment of cancer pain. 166 Jan 7

Treatment of different types of pain Type A: 1. Diflunisal 500 mg b.i.d./naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. or another NSAID. Satisfactory effect: Continue Partial effect: Continue, but add step 2 No effect: Proceed to step 2 2. Morphine. Conventional tablets/mixture or slow release morphine. Dosage as described above. Nausea is treated with haloperidol 1-5 mg at night. Some patients do better t.i.d. 3. Glucocorticosteroid, as described above 4. Epidural morphine/local anaesthetic Type B: 1. Amitriptyline. Starting dose: 10 mg at night. Increase by 10 mg every other night until the patient has pain relief or experiences unacceptable side effects 2. Nerve blocks, if possible 3. Glucocorticosteroids 4. Strong opioids 5. Epidural opioids/local anaesthetics Type C: 1. Carbamazepine in increasing doses to 200-400 mg t.i.d. 2. Proceed as described for type B Type D: 1. Urinary colic: flavoxolate (Urispadol) 200-400 mg t.i.d. or emepronium bromide (Cetiprin) 200-400 mg t.i.d. 2. Opioids perorally 3. Epidural local anaesthetic (sympathetic block)/opioids.
 ...
PMID:Carcinoma of the prostate. Treatment of pain. 176 76

Morphine, meperidine and ketobemidone used in continuous i.v. infusion for postoperative pain relief were compared in a double-blind, controlled, prospective study in 81 consecutive consenting adult patients after open-heart surgery, with permission from the hospital ethics committee. During the first postoperative period, the infusion rates were fixed. Later on, when the infusion rate could be regulated according to individual patient needs, the variation in infusion rate was large, in accordance with earlier studies. No significant differences were demonstrated between the three analgesics with respect to efficacy of analgesia or side effects like shivering, nausea or vomiting. Respiratory depression following extubation was not observed. During shivering, there was a significant increase in the arterio-mixed venous difference of oxygen in all groups. The amounts of opioids used were relatively small compared to amounts used in patients following abdominal surgery. When interviewed some days after surgery, 18/74 patients remembered moderate pain and 11 severe pain during the stay in the ICU.
 ...
PMID:A comparison between morphine, meperidine and ketobemidone in continuous intravenous infusion for postoperative relief. 200 97

Morphine-6-glucuronide is an active metabolite of morphine that has analgesic properties and is measurable in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of patients treated with this opioid. Decreased clearance of the compound has been observed in patients with renal insufficiency, and this has been associated with an increase in the ratio of morphine-6-glucuronide to morphine. Clinical effects from accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide have not been described with the exception of case reports in which patients with renal failure were noted to develop opioid toxicity with high plasma levels of the metabolite and low levels of the parent drug. We describe a patient who experienced chronic nausea and an episode of confusion while treated with a small, stable dose of oral morphine in the setting of mild renal insufficiency. Relatively high levels of morphine-6-glucuronide were measured and all symptoms resolved promptly as the concentration of this metabolite declined. This case provides suggestive evidence that morphine-6-glucuronide can produce clinically significant effects in patients with mild renal insufficiency.
 ...
PMID:Chronic nausea and morphine-6-glucuronide. 201 56

In a double-blind crossover study, morphine and oxycodone hydrochloride were administered to 20 patients who were experiencing severe cancer pain. The peroral doses were determined on the basis of patient-controlled intravenous titration. The assumed oral bioavailability ratios were 44% (group 1, first 10 patients) and 33% (group 2, last 10 patients) for morphine and 66% (group 1) and 50% (group 2) for oxycodone hydrochloride, respectively. However, the patients were able to readjust their oral dosings. Equal analgesia was achieved with both drugs, but the intravenous dose of oxycodone hydrochloride needed was 30% higher than that of morphine. The median calculated oral/intravenous ratios giving comparable analgesia were 0.31 for morphine and 0.70 for oxycodone hydrochloride. Morphine caused more nausea than oxycodone hydrochloride and hallucinations occurred only during morphine treatment. Otherwise, there were no major differences in the side effects between these two opioids.
 ...
PMID:Morphine and oxycodone hydrochloride in the management of cancer pain. 218 74

Forty-five patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly divided into three groups. An epidural tube was inserted into one of the following three sites, Th11-12, L2-3, and caudal region. General anesthesia was then maintained with nitrous oxide-oxygen-enflurane, and pancuronium bromide. Morphine hydrochloride 2 mg in 8 ml of normal saline was administered into one of the designated epidural spaces one to two hours before the assumed end of surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed every four hours after the end of the operation until the next morning. Morphine exerted a relatively profound and prolonged analgesic effect in 40% of the Th11-12 group of patients, as well as in 6.7% of the L2-3 and caudal groups. But, supplementary analgesics were necessary in the other patients. No significant differences were found in the degree and extension of postoperative pain, as well as the doses of supplementary analgesics among the three groups. Adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting and itching, occurred in 30 to 40% of each of the morphine administered groups. Though morphine was applied into different spinal levels, this clinical study did not show any difference in extension of analgesia. The epidurally applied morphine may be distributed widely in the spinal arachnoid space after some time, and may exert an effect on the brain as well as on the spinal nerves. When morphine is administered epidurally one to two hours before the end of a surgical operation, selection of an injection site according to the dermatome level of the skin incision may be unnecessary.
 ...
PMID:[Degree and extension of analgesic effect of morphine applied at three different spinal levels of epidural space]. 227 45

The analgesic effect of ketobemidone hydrochloride + the spasmolytic component A29 (Ketogan) and morphine hydrochloride was compared double-blindly in patients with suspect acute myocardial infarction. The test drugs were administered i.v. in an initial dose of 0.5 ml (2.5 mg Ketogan, 5 mg morphine) followed, if necessary, by additional injections of 0.25 ml. Altogether, 309 patients participated in the trial. The total consumption of the test drugs showed that 5 mg Ketogan was equipotent with 10 mg of morphine. Treatment with Ketogan resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients who were completely free of pain 15 and 30 min after the initial injection: 16% and 15% more, respectively, compared to morphine. Within 2 hours after the initial injection, approximately 15% of the patients in both treatment groups had reported nausea and about 7% had vomited (patients who vomited or were nauseated before treatment were not included in this analysis). The frequency of other side-effects was low, with no differences between the two treatment groups. Morphine caused a greater reduction of the systolic blood pressure than Ketogan. The effect of both drugs on pulse rate and respiration was the same.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. A double-blind comparison of ketobemidone + the spasmolytic A29 (Ketogan) and morphine. 289 63


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>