Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Vasodepressor (vasovagal) syncope, the most common cause of acute loss of consciousness, can occur in otherwise vigorously healthy people during exposure to stimuli decreasing cardiac filling. Antecedent physiological or neuroendocrine conditions for this dramatic syndrome are poorly understood. This study compared neurocirculatory responses to non-hypotensive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in subjects who subsequently developed vasodepressor reactions during hypotensive LBNP with responses in subjects who did not. In 26 healthy subjects, LBNP at -15 and -40 mmHg was applied to inhibit cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors. All the subjects tolerated 30 min of LBNP at -15 mmHg, but during subsequent LBNP at -40 mmHg 11 subjects had vasodepressor reactions, with sudden hypotension, nausea, and dizziness. In these subjects, arterial plasma adrenaline responses to LBNP both at -15 and at -40 mmHg exceeded those in subjects who did not experience these reactions. In 16 of the 26 subjects, forearm noradrenaline spillover was measured; in the eight subjects with a vasodepressor reaction, mean forearm noradrenaline spillover failed to increase during LBNP at -15 mmHg (delta = -0.06 +/- (SEM) 0.04 pmol min-1 100mL-1), whereas in the eight subjects without a vasodepressor reaction, mean forearm noradrenaline spillover increased significantly (delta = 0.31 +/- 0.13 pmol min-1 100mL-1). Plasma levels of beta-endorphin during LBNP at -15 mmHg increased in some subjects who subsequently had a vasodepressor reaction during LBNP at -40mmHg. The findings suggest that a neuroendocrine pattern including adrenomedullary stimulation, skeletal sympathoinhibition, and release of endogenous opioids can precede vasodepressor syncope.
 ...
PMID:Neurohumoral antecedents of vasodepressor reactions. 855 62

An important aim of drug development has been to retain efficacy while reducing side effects and toxicity. It is now clear that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are more effective than noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (NARIs) in the treatment of obsessional compulsive disorder, and obsessional features in depression predict a responsivity to SSRIs. Furthermore, panic disorder and depression may be more responsive to SSRIs than NARIs. However, there is evidence that inhibition of both sites produces slightly greater efficacy and the addition of an NARI has been reported to potentiate the antidepressant effect of SSRIs. Tricyclic noradrenaline-serotonin uptake inhibitors have many other pharmacological properties, which probably relate to high rates of side effects and cardiotoxicity. Whether in practice these features reduce compliance or increase deaths from suicide is debatable, but it seems wrong to subject patients to burdensome side effects. Certainly, in overdose, older non-selective antidepressants are far more likely to kill than SSRIs. SSRIs have their own side effects, such as nausea and anorgasmia, due to their potency at the uptake site, but these are reversible and sometimes treatable. Clearly, selectivity for specific uptake sites matters for efficacy, and selectivity for uptake over other sites matters for tolerability and safety.
 ...
PMID:Does selectivity matter? 873 39

In drug development the move from tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) involved not only the loss of the direct receptor interactions responsible for the adverse side effects of TCAs, but also the ability to inhibit the reuptake of noradrenaline. Selectivity for the single neurotransmitter, serotonin, may explain why SSRIs tend to be less efficacious than the TCAs, especially in more serious forms of depression. The advent of selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) has tended to confirm the idea that an action on both monoamine systems is important for maximal antidepressant efficacy. This paper reviews clinical trials comparing the new SNRI milnacipran with the SSRIs fluoxetine and fluvoxamine. A meta-analysis of the principal trials shows greater response rates (the proportion of patients with a decrease in symptom scores of 50% or more) with milnacipran (50 mg twice a day) than with fluoxetine (20 mg once a day), or fluvoxamine (100 mg twice a day) (milnacipran: 64%; SSRIs: 50%). Remission rates (the proportion of patients with Hamilton Depression Rating Scores of 7 or below) were also higher with milnacipran than with SSRIs (39 versus 28%). In one study, in which 100 mg milnacipran was given once a day in the evening, the higher response rate obtained with fluoxetine appears to be largely attributable to an inappropriate milnacipran dosage regimen. Data from a pharmacovigilance database including all patients participating in clinical trials with milnacipran (n = 5732) showed that, compared with the SSRIs, milnacipran produced fewer gastrointestinal side effects, such as nausea, and less anxiety. Milnacipran was, however, associated with a higher incidence of headache, dry mouth and dysuria. The results of these studies suggest that milnacipran is superior in efficacy to SSRIs and is equally well tolerated. Milnacipran, therefore, appears to offer a therapeutic advantage over the SSRIs.
 ...
PMID:Milnacipran and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in major depression. 892 26

Nefazodone hydrochloride is a phenylpiperazine antidepressant with a mechanism of action that is distinct from those of other currently available drugs. It potently and selectively blocks postsynaptic serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 5-HT2A receptors and moderately inhibits serotonin and noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake. In short term clinical trials of 6 or 8 weeks' duration, nefazodone produced clinical improvements that were significantly greater than those with placebo and similar to those achieved with imipramine, and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline. The optimum therapeutic dosage of nefazodone appears to be between 300 and 600 mg/day. Limited long term data suggest that nefazodone is effective in preventing relapse of depression in patients treated for up to 1 year. Analyses of pooled clinical trial results indicate that nefazodone and imipramine produces similar and significant improvements on anxiety- and agitation-related rating scales compared with placebo in patients with major depression. Short term tolerability data indicate that nefazodone has a lower incidence of adverse anticholinergic, antihistaminergic and adrenergic effects than imipramine. Compared with SSRIs, nefazodone causes fewer activating symptoms, adverse gastrointestinal effects (nausea, diarrhoea, anorexia) and adverse effects on sexual function, but is associated with more dizziness, dry mouth, constipation, visual disturbances and confusion. Available data also suggest that nefazodone is not associated with abnormal weight gain, seizures, priapism or significant sleep disruption, and appears to be relatively safe in overdosage. Nefazodone inhibits the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme and thus has the potential to interact with a number of drugs. Further long term and comparative studies will provide a more accurate assessment of the relative place of nefazodone in the management of major depression. Nonetheless, available data suggest that nefazodone is a worthwhile treatment alternative to tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs in patients with major depression.
 ...
PMID:Nefazodone. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of major depression. 921 Oct 88

(+/-)-Tramadol is a synthetic 4-phenyl-piperidine analogue of codeine. It is a central analgesic with a low affinity for opioid receptors. Its selectivity for mu receptors has recently been demonstrated, and the M1 metabolite of tramadol, produced by liver O-demethylation, shows a higher affinity for opioid receptors than the parent drug. The rate of production of this M1 derivative (O-demethyl tramadol), is influenced by a polymorphic isoenzyme of the debrisoquine-type, cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). Nevertheless, this affinity for mu receptors of the CNS remains low, being 6000 times lower than that of morphine. Moreover, and in contrast to other opioids, the analgesic action of tramadol is only partially inhibited by the opioid antagonist naloxone, which suggests the existence of another mechanism of action. This was demonstrated by the discovery of a monoaminergic activity that inhibits noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake, making a significant contribution to the analgesic action by blocking nociceptive impulses at the spinal level. (+/-)-Tramadol is a racemic mixture of 2 enantiomers, each one displaying differing affinities for various receptors. (+/-)-Tramadol is a selective agonist of mu receptors and preferentially inhibits serotonin reuptake, whereas (-)-tramadol mainly inhibits noradrenaline reuptake. The action of these 2 enantiomers is both complementary and synergistic and results in the analgesic effect of (+/-)-tramadol. After oral administration, tramadol demonstrates 68% bioavailability, with peak serum concentrations reached within 2 hours. The elimination kinetics can be described as 2-compartmental, with a half-life of 5.1 hours for tramadol and 9 hours for the M1 derivative after a single oral dose of 100mg. This explains the approximately 2-fold accumulation of the parent drug and its M1 derivative that is observed during multiple dose treatment with tramadol. The recommended daily dose of tramadol is between 50 and 100mg every 4 to 6 hours, with a maximum dose of 400 mg/day; the duration of the analgesic effect after a single oral dose of tramadol 100mg is about 6 hours. Adverse effects, and nausea in particular, are dose-dependent and therefore considerably more likely to appear if the loading dose is high. The reduction of this dose during the first days of treatment is an important factor in improving tolerability. Other adverse effects are generally similar to those of opioids, although they are usually less severe, and can include respiratory depression, dysphoria and constipation. Tramadol can be administered concomitantly with other analgesics, particularly those with peripheral action, while drugs that depress CNS function may enhance the sedative effect of tramadol. Tramadol should not be administered to patients receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and administration with tricyclic antidepressant drugs should also be avoided. Tramadol has pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties that are highly unlikely to lead to dependence. This was confirmed by various controlled studies and postmarketing surveillance studies, which reported an extremely small number of patients developing tolerance or instances of tramadol abuse. Tramadol is a central acting analgesic which has been shown to be effective and well tolerated, and likely to be of value for treating several pain conditions (step II of the World Health Organization ladder) where treatment with strong opioids is not required.
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacology of tramadol]. 919 Mar 21

Milnacipran (Ixel) is a new antidepressant with essentially equal potency for inhibiting the reuptake of both serotonin and noradrenaline, with no affinity for any neurotransmitter receptor studied. A review of the studies comparing milnacipran, placebo and active comparator antidepressants provides clear-cut evidence of its efficacy in both severe and moderate depression in hospitalized and community settings. Meta-analyses of the original data of controlled trials involving 1032 patients, comparing milnacipran with imipramine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), show that milnacipran provides antidepressant efficacy similar to that of imipramine and significantly superior to that of the SSRIs. An analysis of a database of over 3300 patients shows that both the general and cardiovascular tolerability of milnacipran are superior to those of the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) with fewer cholinergic side-effects. The tolerability of milnacipran was comparable to that of the SSRIs, with a higher incidence of dysuria with milnacipran, and a higher frequency of nausea and anxiety with the SSRIs. Milnacipran is a new therapeutic option in depression, which offers a clinical efficacy in the range of the TCAs combined with a tolerability equivalent to that of the SSRIs.
 ...
PMID:Milnacipran, a new serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor: an overview of its antidepressant activity and clinical tolerability. 921 45

Basic guidelines for cancer pain treatment can be found in many different handbooks published in the last years. Particularly those of the World Health Organisation published in 1986 and revised in 1996, furnish useful indication for cancer pain treatment. The authors therefore focused on resuming the most recent development in this field. In the research regarding alternative routes of administration of opioids in alternative to the oral route, the rectal administration of morphine and methadone and the transdermal route for fentanyl have proved to be efficacious. The subcutaneous route (for morphine) as well as the intravenous, peridural and subaracnoid routes, being known for some time are not taken in consideration in this paper. Various studies suggest that alternative routes are necessary in 53-70% of patients in their last days or months of live. The most frequent causes for the need to stop oral administration are dysphagia, nausea, and uncontrollable vomiting, bowel obstruction, malabsorption, cognitive failure, coma, and pain syndromes requiring anaesthetics which need be administered via the spinal route. Among the drugs, tramadol seems to be effective in the control of moderate pain. Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic drug; it has an agonist effect on mu 1 receptors of opioids and acts also by inhibiting the re-uptake of noradrenaline and serotonine which activates descending monoaminergic inhibitory pathways. Recent clinical studies revealed that pamidronate has an analgesic effect in pain due to bone metastasis. Pamidronate is part of the biphosphonates, which are active on bone metabolism and are usually being used for the treatment of hypercalcaemia in cancer. The authors also describe briefly the indication of ketamin in association with morphine for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
 ...
PMID:[Treatment of pain in oncology]. 923 25

Mirtazapine is a new antidepressant that falls into the general class of receptor-blocking drugs rather than being an uptake or enzyme inhibitor. It can be described as a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA). The unique pharmacology of mirtazapine means that it has a very different side effect profile from the tricyclic antidepressants, producing less alpha 1 adrenergic and muscarinic blockade, and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), causing much less nausea and sexual dysfunction by virtue of its blockade of 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors.
 ...
PMID:Mirtazapine: pharmacology in relation to adverse effects. 926 49

Venlafaxine (Efexor) is the first representative of a new class of antidepressants: serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Its usual dose is 75 mg/d in two intakes but can be progressively increased until a maximal daily dose of 375 mg/d in severe or resistant depression, particularly among inpatients. The efficacy of venlafaxine is at least equivalent to reference antidepressants. At high doses, venlafaxine could even exhibit a better efficacy and a shorter latency than current compounds. Its profile of side-effects is quite similar to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with mainly nausea, with the exception if an increase in blood pressure which can appear at high doses. In total, venlafaxine represents an interesting innovation in the pharmacological treatment of depression.
 ...
PMID:[Pharma-Clinics. The drug of the month. Venlafaxine (Efexor)]. 956 31

Acute autonomic and sensory neuropathy (AASN) is a rare neuropathy characterized by acute autonomic dysfunction and objective sensory disturbances. A 26-year-old pregnant woman with severe autonomic and sensory dysfunction is reported. This patient suddenly developed marked nausea and vomitting in about 2 days after having a sore throat. She then developed signs of autonomic dysfunction including dilated non-reactive pupils, dryness of the eyes and oral mucous membranes, generalized anhidrosis, paralytic ileus, orthostatic hypotension, and continuous tachycardia. She also had severe generalized sensory impairments of all modalities, and all deep tendon reflexes were absent. Sensation was almost totally lost for all modalities below the neck. There was marked pseudoathetosis and sensory ataxia in all extremities. Motor examination was normal. She had inability to urinate. At this time she was 38 weeks pregnant, and when she showed signs of fetal distress, a Caesarean section was performed. Albumino-cytological dissociation was seen in the CSF. Serum noradrenaline was reduced, no sensory nerve action potentials could be elicited, and reduced coefficient of variation of the R-R interval on electrocardiography was observed. Plasma exchange was performed every other day for 3 days for about 3 weeks after the onset of the illness, but no favorable effects. Seven months after the onset, her autonomic dysfunction slightly improved, but there was no recovery from the sensory disturbances. Many symptoms and signs that characterize AASN occurred in this patient, and each was severe. The patient developed SIADH, sleep apnea, personality change, and amenorrhea in the course of the disease. We suggest that AASN patients might have both peripheral and central nervous system manifestations including seizures and personality changes.
 ...
PMID:[A severe case of acute autonomic and sensory neuropathy]. 986 13


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>