Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms are common in the elderly and, despite a paucity of data, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are believed to be important risk factors. We aimed to evaluate the association of NSAIDs with dyspepsia and heartburn in a population-based study. An age- and gender-stratified random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota, Caucasian residents aged 65 years and older was mailed a valid self-report questionnaire; 74% responded (N = 1375). Age- and gender-adjusted (to 1980 US Caucasian population) prevalence rates for NSAID use, dyspepsia (defined as pain located in the upper abdomen or nausea), and heartburn (defined as retrosternal burning pain) were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association of dyspepsia and heartburn with potential risk factors adjusting for age and gender. The age- and gender-adjusted annual prevalences (per 100) of aspirin and nonaspirin NSAID use were 60.0 (95% CI 57.2, 62.7) and 26.1 (95% CI 23.6, 28.7), respectively. The annual prevalences of dyspepsia and heartburn were 15.0 (95% CI 12.9, 17.0) and 12.9 (95% CI 10.9, 14.8), respectively. Aspirin was associated with dyspepsia and/or heartburn (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.2) as were nonaspirin NSAIDs (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.3, 2.6), but smoking and alcohol were not significant risk factors. Aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs are associated with almost a twofold risk of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms in elderly community subjects.
 ...
PMID:Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and dyspepsia in the elderly. 867 3

Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and alfentanil was compared with balanced anaesthesia (BA) in 30 uraemic patients undergoing renal transplantation. TIVA (n = 15) was induced with propofol and alfentanil and maintained with propofol and alfentanil infusions, which were started immediately after induction. Thereafter the infusion rates were adjusted as needed. Ventilation was with oxygen in air. BA (n = 15) was induced with thiopentone and fentanyl and maintained with isoflurane/N2O/fentanyl. Vecuronium was used for muscle relaxation in both groups. Mean infusion rates for propofol and alfentanil were 10 +/- 1.8 mg kg-1 h-1 and 70 +/- 9 micrograms kg-1 h-1, respectively. To control hypertension during TIVA, larger amounts of propofol and alfentanil were needed and slower recovery was observed than in previous studies in ASA 1-2 patients. Also, significantly more vecuronium was needed during TIVA than during BA (P < 0.05). The recovery parameters were similar in both groups, except for the occurrence of nausea, which was less after TIVA. In conclusion, TIVA had no clinical advantages over BA.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of propofol/alfentanil anaesthesia with isoflurane/N2O/fentanyl anaesthesia for renal transplantation. 783 74

The efficacy and safety of prophylactic intravenous ondansetron on prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting were investigated in 65 ASA grades I-III patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery and receiving general anesthesia. Patients received ondansetron 4mg i.v. prior to a standardized technique for induction and intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with N2O-O2 and enflurane. The results showed that, by ondansetron 4mg, nausea and emesis could be significantly decreased. The effect lasted around 24h postoperatively without sedation. No one developed vomiting and only 9 patients developed nausea. No changes on laboratory parameters as well as vital signs were observed. No side-effects related to ondansetron were found. In prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting, ondansetron is effective and safe.
 ...
PMID:[Ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting]. 784 86

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and quality of recovery when general anaesthesia was induced with a mixture of thiopentone and propofol, compared with thiopentone or propofol alone. Sixty ASA class I and II women scheduled for out-patient laparoscopic surgery underwent induction of anaesthesia with either (i) thiopentone, (ii) propofol, or (iii) a mixture of the two, in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Anaesthesia was then maintained using nitrous oxide, isoflurane and fentanyl. A psychometric test was administered before and after surgery, and the time taken to reach a series of recovery milestones was noted. Patients were discharged as soon as they were ambulant and had satisfactory control of pain and nausea with oral agents. They were telephoned at 24-48 hr later, and asked to rate their experience of a list of side effects on an ordinal scale. Patient groups were demographically comparable and underwent surgery of the same duration. Those receiving thiopentone were discharged after a mean time of 3 hr 25 +/- 58 min (SD). The corresponding figures for propofol and the thiopentone/propofol mixture were 2 hr 40 min (+/- 49) and 2 hr 48 min (+/- 68) respectively. The recovery time between thiopentone and the other two regimes was different (P < 0.05). All three groups experienced equally frequent and severe nausea, headache, tiredness and other side effects during the next 24 hr. It is concluded that induction with a mixture of thiopentone and propofol leads to a similar rate and quality of recovery to that of propofol above.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Recovery characteristics following induction of anaesthesia with a combination of thiopentone and propofol. 758 23

To investigate the effects of different types of anticholinesterase on the incidence of the postoperative nausea and vomiting, 100 ASA class I-II adult premenopausal female patients undergoing elective lower abdominal surgery were randomized into two groups. In both groups, anesthesia was induced with thiopental and fentanyl and 50% nitrous oxide and 0.5-1.5% of isoflurane were used for anesthetic maintenance with succinylcholine 1 approximately 1.5 mg/kg for intubation and atracurium 0.3 mg/kg/hr for maintenance of muscle relaxation. Patients received reversal agents for neuromuscular blockade after operation when the evoked train-of-four (TOF) count returned to four visual responses. A mixture of atropine 8 micrograms/kg and edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg was given to the first group of patients while atropine 15 micrograms/kg and neostigmine 40 micrograms/kg was given to another group of patients. All the patients were observed for the occurrence of nausea or vomiting for 2 hours after the operation in the recovery room. The incidence of nausea was not statistically significantly different in both groups (20% in neostigmine group and 26% in edrophonium group). The occurrence of vomiting was also similar in both groups (8% in neostigmine group and 6% in edrophonium group). We concluded that there were no difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting with the use of either neostigmine or edrophonium with atropine for antagonizing neuromuscular blockade after the lower abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the combined effects of atropine and neostigmine with atropine and edrophonium on the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 793 82

Shivering is a common and complex phenomenon that occurs in many patients during spinal anesthesia. Shivering can increase oxygen consumption up to 500 per cent which may be detrimental to patients with decreased myocardial reserve. The metabolic costs and cardiorespiratory consequences of shivering are important particularly for patients with anemia, coronary arterial disease, cardiopulmonary insufficient, debilitated status or are elderly. We studied whether intrathecal meperidine could prevent shivering after spinal anesthesia. 60 patients with ASA class I-II were divided into intrathecal meperidine group (Group I) (n = 30) and control group (Group II) (n = 30). Group I received spinal tetracaine 12-16 mg with meperidine 0.2 mg/kg and Group II received spinal tetracaine 12-16 mg without meperidine. During operation the highest level of spinal anesthesia, ambient and rectal temperatures, blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), presence or absence of shivering, intensity of shivering in both groups were recorded. Close observation for side effects was given post-operatively. There was a significant reduction (p < .005) in incidence of shivering in group I patients (16.7%) when compared with group II (56.7%). There was no or less side effects observed with other neuraxial opioids except nausea. We concluded that intrathecal meperidine could suppress shivering induced by spinal anesthesia.
 ...
PMID:[Intrathecal meperidine attenuates shivering induced by spinal anesthesia]. 796 24

A double-blind, randomised, controlled trial was performed to assess the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide when included in a morphine patient-controlled analgesia regimen. Fifty ASA grade 1 or 2 patients scheduled for elective intermediate or major gynaecological surgery were allocated into one of two groups. All patients received a standardised anaesthetic and metoclopramide 5 mg was given intravenously 10 min before the end of the procedure. Group 1 received a patient-controlled analgesia regimen using morphine 1 mg.ml-1 solution. Group 2 received a patient-controlled analgesia regimen using morphine 1mg.ml-1 with metoclopramide 0.5 mg.ml-1 solution. Postoperative antiemetic treatment was with metoclopramide 10 mg intramuscularly or cyclizine 50 mg intramuscularly if this was ineffective. Pain scores, sedation scores, and morphine requirement were not significantly different between the groups. There was no difference in nausea scores between the groups, but more patients suffered moderate or severe nausea in group 1 (10 patients) than group 2 (three patients, p < 0.026). We conclude that metoclopramide, when included in a patient-controlled analgesia regimen, reduces the incidence of moderate to severe nausea, but not the overall incidence of nausea.
 ...
PMID:Antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide when included in a patient-controlled analgesia infusion. 797 41

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has recently been shown, in a dose of 8 mg, to be superior to 1.25 mg droperidol in preventing postoperative vomiting. There are indications that a dose of 4 mg of ondansetron may be just as effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting as a dose of 8 mg. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the adverse effects of 4 mg ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to droperidol in patients undergoing surgery with inhalation anaesthesia supplemented with alfentanil. METHODS. Following institutional approval, 40 ASA physical status I and II women scheduled for minor gynaecological surgery gave informed consent to participate in this randomized, double-blind comparative study. Five minutes before induction of general anaesthesia, 20 patients received a single intravenous (i.v.) dose of 4 mg of ondansetron and the remaining 20 received 1.25 mg droperidol i.v. Anaesthesia was induced with 2.1-4 mg/kg of thiopental and 0.1 mg of alfentanil i.v. and maintained with 65% nitrous oxide and 1.5%-3% enflurane in oxygen. On pain stimuli another 0.2-0.4 mg of alfentanil was given. Total effective antiemetic response was defined as the absence of nausea and vomiting for 24 h postoperatively. The incidence of nausea, vomiting and the number of patients showing total antiemetic response as well as the incidence of adverse effects were compared with the chi 2 test and P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS. Patients were similar with respect to age, height, body weight and total anaesthetic agents received. Duration of anaesthesia and the time until awakening was not significantly different among groups. Postoperatively 7 out of 20 patients given 4 mg of ondansetron and 3 out of 20 patients with droperidol vomited (n.s.). The incidence of nausea was 11 out of 20 in the ondansetron group, and 4 out of 20 in the droperidol group (P < 0.05). Sixteen patients in the droperidol group and 8 patients in the ondansetron group showed a total effective antiemetic response (P < 0.05). Postoperative sedation and well-being scores did not differ significantly among groups. CONCLUSION. Our results show that for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting 4 mg of Ondansetron was inferior to 1.25 mg of droperidol. The drugs were given intravenously prior to general anaesthesia for minor gynaecological surgery with nitrous oxide and enflurane in oxygen supplemented with small boluses of alfentanil.
 ...
PMID:[Ondansetron as prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting. A prospective randomized double-blind comparative study with droperidol]. 797 72

Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is increasingly used in short-stay surgery such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TIVA may provide fast recovery of psychomotor function, thus being of benefit to both the patient's behaviour and postoperative management. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare postoperative recovery from TIVA using propofol or methohexitone as the hypnotic component and balanced anaesthesia with isoflurane. PATIENTS AND METHODS. After giving informed consent and approval by the ethical committee of our hospital, 51 patients (ASA I, II) were investigated in a prospective study. Patients were randomised to receive either isoflurane, methohexitone, or propofol. Perioperative management with regard to premedication, intraoperative analgesia, relaxation, ventilation, and postoperative analgesia was carried out identically for all groups. Postoperative vigilance, pain, and nausea scores were assessed 15, 30, 60, 120, and 360 min after extubation with a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the same points, psychomotor recovery was investigated with the following assays: sedation as shown in Table 1; orientation with ten questions as to person, time, and location; memory as expressed by the patient's ability to repeat five words; a calculation test with five subtractions of the number 7 beginning from 100; and word generation by the number of words with an initial "m" given within 1 min and with animal names. Data were analysed with Kruskal Wallis' test for multiple comparisons between the groups and with Friedman's test for repeated measurements. All values are given as medians (interquartile range) or ranges. RESULTS. There was no difference between the groups' physical condition (Table 2). All intraoperative parameters compared well between groups; the management of anaesthesia was smoother with isoflurane than with the other anaesthetics. Psychomotor recovery was somewhat faster in the propofol group than the methohexitone group, as indicated by sedation score, orientation, memory and calculation tests (Table 4), word generation tests (Fig. 4), and subjective vigilance score (Fig. 3). The difference in recovery time between the propofol and isoflurane groups was minimal and without any significance or relevance. The incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly lower after balanced anaesthesia with isoflurane (24%, P < 0.05) as compared to TIVA with either propofol (53%) or methohexitone (41%). However, there were only minor differences between the groups; the ability to cooperate and be mobilised was not limited. DISCUSSION. Each of the three techniques used in this study is suitable for anaesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Since fast recovery of vigilance and psychomotor function is very important in outpatient surgery, opioid-supplemented propofol anaesthesia is well established. Inhalation anaesthesia with isoflurane in air/oxygen without adding nitrous oxide compares well to propofol TIVA for laparoscopic surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Comparative study of the recovery phase. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy following isoflurane, methohexital and propofol anesthesia]. 797 83

Sevoflurane is a "new" volatile inhaled anaesthetic that is currently undergoing phase III clinical trial in Europe and the United States. Owing to the low blood solubility, rapid induction of anaesthesia and emergence from anaesthesia would be expected. In this study, we compared emergence times and haemodynamics in patients receiving either sevoflurane or isoflurane. Furthermore, all adverse effects were recorded and the relationship to the drug administered was rated. METHODS. Fifty ASA physical status I and II patients were studied in an open, prospective, randomised clinical trial. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl, thiopentone, and vecuronium for facilitating endotracheal intubation and maintained with sevoflurane or isoflurane, 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen (O2), and additional doses of fentanyl (1-2 micrograms/kg.h). The electrocardiogram, blood pressure (non-invasive), O2 saturation, temperature, and end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane or isoflurane, N2O, and carbon dioxide were monitored continuously. At the end of surgery, administration of sevoflurane or isoflurane and N2O was discontinued without tapering and emergence times were recorded. All adverse events that occurred until the 3rd postoperative day were recorded and the relationship to the inhaled anaesthetic was rated as "none", "unlikely", "possible", "probable", or "highly probable". RESULTS. With the exception of gender, the two patient groups were comparable (Tables 1 and 2). Due to the higher MAC value, mean end-tidal concentrations were higher for sevoflurane (0.82% vs. 0.59% for isoflurane). The duration of anaesthetic exposure was 1.3 MAC h (calculation with FIO2 = 1.0 MAC value) and 3.1 MAC h (calculation with FIO2 = 0.4 in N2O MAC value), respectively, for both inhaled anaesthetics. Pulmonary elimination was faster (Fig. 1) and emergence time shorter (7 min vs. 11.5 min, Table 3) with sevoflurane. There was no difference in the time courses of heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure (Figs. 2 and 3). No adverse effects with a "probable" or "highly probable" relationship to the inhaled anaesthetic were observed. Table 4 shows the adverse events with a possible relationship to the drug administered. Further evaluations of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness are shown in Table 5. DISCUSSION. Emergence time after inhalation anaesthesia depends on pulmonary elimination and MACawake, that is, the end-tidal concentration that would allow opening of the eyes on verbal command. Pulmonary elimination depends on dose applied (MAC h), alveolar ventilation, and blood-gas solubility coefficient. Due to the lower blood-gas solubility coefficient (0.6-0.7 for sevoflurane vs. 1.3-1.4 for isoflurane) and in accordance with the investigations of Frink et al. [4] and Smith et al. [16], emergence time was significantly shorter with sevoflurane. Gender, the only difference between the two patient groups, does not influence pulmonary elimination and MACawake [8]. Supplementing inhalation anaesthesia with fentanyl, there was no difference in the time courses of heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure between sevoflurane and isoflurane. Adverse events with a possible relationship to the inhaled anaesthetic occurred in both groups.
 ...
PMID:[Emergence times, hemodynamics and adverse effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane: an open, randomized, comparative phase iii study]. 797 85


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>