Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (
nausea
)
23,468
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The main treatment of the acute migraine attack remains sleep, sedation, an anti-nauseant and analgesics, and in some patients 1 or 2 mg of ergotamine tartrate. Drugs containing large amounts of caffeine should not be used. Absorption of drugs may be impaired in a migraine attack. Metoclopramide is probably the anti-emetic of choice because it is an effective anti-nauseant and promotes normal gastrointestinal activity. Domperidone has a similar action but is said not to go through the blood-brain barrier, so is less likely to cause extrapyramidal reactions. All drugs, including analgesics such as aspirin and paracetamol, are best given in a soluble or effervescent form. Where vomiting occurs early in the attack, suppositories may be indicated.
Ergotamine tartrate
is necessary in about one third of attacks and is best given by suppository or by inhalation. Doses higher than 2 mg per attack or 6 mg in one week may cause toxic symptoms, the early signs of which are headache,
nausea
, vomiting and a feeling of not being very well. The non-drug treatments of an acute attack include pressing on the temporal artery, hot and cold compresses and relaxation.
...
PMID:Treatment of the acute migraine attack--current status. 640 72
Ergotamine tartrate
(ET) and dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) have been widely and effectively used in the treatment of migraine for many decades, although few randomized, controlled clinical trials have been conducted with these compounds. To compare their safety profiles, the world literature on the two agents was surveyed. The results are summarized, along with a critical analysis of the strengths and limitations of the various sources of safety data (in vitro research, animal studies, Phase I and II studies, controlled clinical trials, and postmarketing surveillance). Significant pharmacologic and safety differences exist between ET and DHE. Dihydroergotamine mesylate is a less potent arterial vasoconstrictor than ET, although nearly equipotent as a venoconstrictor. It is a more potent alpha-adrenergic antagonist, but is much less emetic, has less effect on the uterus, and is not associated with rebound headache. Adverse effects associated with ET (which are often due to excessive dosage and/or chronic usage) include
nausea
, acroparesthesia, ischemia, habituation and overuse headache, and, rarely, overt ergotism. Reports of serious adverse effects following recommended doses of DHE are rare. As with most antimigraine drugs, the most frequent adverse effect with intravenous (i.v.) DHE is
nausea
; however, following intramuscular (i.m.) or intranasal (IN) administration, the incidence of
nausea
is low and concomitant administration of an antiemetic is not needed. In patients without contraindications, both DHE and ET are safe and effective when used in recommended doses. Nearly 50 years of clinical experience without major safety problems allows a high level of confidence in their clinical use.
...
PMID:Ergotamine tartrate and dihydroergotamine mesylate: safety profiles. 900 72
Considerable uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate use and dose limitations for ergotamine tartrate (ET) and dihydroergotamine (DHE) for the treatment of migraine despite more than 50 years of clinical experience. The Quality Standards Subcommittee (QSS) of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) appointed an advisory committee from experts in the Headache and Facial Pain Section. As their initial project, the committee elected to review the clinical literature on the appropriate use of these compounds in the treatment of migraine. Subsequently, clinical practice guidelines were formulated and recently published in Neurology. The Headache and Facial Plan Section and the QSS of the AAN were able to reach consensus on the basis of a thorough literature review and formulated practice parameters that describe and define the limits of ergot use, provide information on the oral and parenteral dosing of ET and DHE, and provide physicians with guidance to avoid ET overuse by patients. Because this project was completed prior to the availability of the intranasal (IN) formulation of DHE, intranasal DHE is not included in the practice parameter.
Ergotamine tartrate
and DHE were found to be safe and effective for the treatment of migraine as long as recommended dosages are not exceeded and high-risk patients such as those with uncontrolled hypertension, coronary or peripheral artery disease, thyrotoxicosis, or sepsis do not receive these compounds. In addition, the committee recommended restricting the use of ET in some instances because the overuse of ET has been associated with physical and psychological dependence resulting in predictable recurrent and/or rebound headaches, and subsequent severe withdrawal symptoms, including
nausea
, upon discontinuance of ET. None of these symptoms have been reported for DHE. These guidelines should help physicians provide optimal antimigraine therapy with these drugs.
...
PMID:Appropriate use of ergotamine tartrate and dihydroergotamine in the treatment of migraine: current perspectives. 900 73