Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 60.6 years (44-78 years, 22 male, 13 female) with advanced low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), or prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL) were treated every 4 weeks with prednimustine 100 mg/m2 p.o. d 1-d 5 and mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 i.v. d 1 and d 2. Seven patients had CLL, one lymphocytic NHL, two PLL, 13 immunocytoma, nine centroblastic/centrocytic NHL, and three centrocytic NHL. Twenty-five patients were pretreated. The subjective toxicity of the treatment was mild, with no WHO grade-3 alopecia, polyneuropathy, cardiotoxicity, mucositis, nausea, or vomiting. Hematologic side effects with WHO grade-4 granulopenia and thrombopenia were experienced by 26% and 23% of the patients, respectively. The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 72% for lymphoma patients and 37% for CLL patients, with a median remission duration of 14.6 months. The maximum response was achieved after a median of two treatment courses. Prednimustine with mitoxantrone is a subjectively well tolerated treatment for low-grade malignant NHL, to be further evaluated in phase-III studies. The regimen may shorten the duration of treatment, saving time-consuming out-patient visits and costs.
...
PMID:Prednimustine and mitoxantrone (PmM) in patients with low-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL). 155 99

Prednimustine is an ester of chlorambucil and prednisolone. The drug has had some activity in experimental as well as in human tumors, including breast cancer. The objective of the current study is to compare the clinical effectiveness and toxicity of prednimustine with its components of chlorambucil plus prednisolone, and to compare the clinical effectiveness and toxicity of a continuous treatment with an intermittent one. Two hundred and one patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to the following treatments: I: prednimustine continuously; 40 mg/m2 d; II: prednimustine intermittently, 160 mg/m2 d 1 to 5, repeated every three weeks; and III: chlorambucil 8 mg/m2 d plus prednisolone 8 mg/m2 d, both given continuously. All treatments were given orally. One hundred and ninety five patients were evaluable for assessment of response to the treatments. The response rates were 21% in both of the prednimustine-treated groups, whereas only 11% of the patients treated with chlorambucil and prednisolone responded. The duration of remission with continuous prednimustine was longer than with the other two treatment groups, but not significantly so. One hundred and ninety five patients were evaluable for assessment of hematologic toxicity. No differences were observed between the two prednimustine-treated groups, whereas the group treated with chlorambucil plus prednisolone experienced a significantly higher degree of leukopenia and/or thrombopenia. Subjective toxicities, nausea, vomiting and psychical symptoms were only moderate in the three treatment groups, but significantly more pronounced in the group treated with intermittent prednimustine. Because of these promising results, prednimustine should be compared to other alkylating agents in patients with advanced breast cancer in randomized trials.
...
PMID:A phase III trial comparing prednimustine (LEO 1031) to chlorambucil plus prednisolone in advanced breast cancer. 635 5

153 women with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated for treatment with SMF [prednimustine (Sterecyt) + methotrexate + 5-fluorouracil, 83 patients] or CMF (cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+5-fluorouracil, 70 patients). Prednimustine was administered orally 100 mg/m2 daily, for 5 days, and cyclophosphamide was administered orally 100 mg/m2, for 14 days, each, every 4 weeks. Methotrexate was given at a dose of 40 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil at 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, every 4 weeks. Leucovorin was used in 39 patients to alleviate mucositis. The two treatment groups were balanced in terms of age, performance status, lymph node status, histology, menopausal status and previous therapy. Response was evaluated in 140 patients. Of 76 patients treated with SMF, 4 had a complete and 21 a partial response (CR+PR = 33%), 40 had no change (NC) and 11 had progressive disease (PD). Of 64 patients treated with CMF, 3 had a complete and 18 a partial response (CR+PR = 33%), 30 had no change (NC) and 13 had progressive disease (PD). Time to treatment failure and survival were similar in both groups. A relationship between haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity and therapeutic efficacy was demonstrated with a superior survival and response rate recorded for patients with such toxicity than in patients without. Haematological toxicity was, in general, mild to moderate with no difference between the two groups. Alopecia (P = 0.008), nausea/vomiting (P = 0.02) and euphoria (P = 0.03) were more common in the CMF-treated group. Diarrhoea was more common in the SMF group (P = 0.03). In conclusion, SMF seems to be as efficient as CMF with regard to response rate, time to treatment failure and survival. However, SMF was tolerated better than CMF.
...
PMID:Prednimustine (Sterecyt) versus cyclophosphamide both in combination with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. 851 20