Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (
nausea
)
23,468
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The anti-emetic efficacy and safety of granisetron, a highly selective and potent 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, was compared with that of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in 281 patients due to receive single-day cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 49 mg m-2). In this single-blind, multicentre study, granisetron (40 micrograms kg-1) was administered as a single prophylactic 5-min infusion. Dexamethasone (12 mg) was administered as a 30-min infusion followed by a loading dose of 3 mg kg-1 metoclopramide. A maintenance dose of metoclopramide 4 mg kg-1 was then infused over 8 h. A single prophylactic dose of granisetron was as effective as the combination regimen in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Of 143 granisetron-treated patients, 100 (70%) were complete responders (no vomiting and no or only mild
nausea
) compared with 93/138 (67%) patients who received the comparator regimen. Twenty-three percent of granisetron-treated patients experienced one of more adverse events compared with 33% of patients in the comparator group. No extrapyramidal reactions were reported in the granisetron group compared with 13 in comparator-treated patients (8%). This difference was significant (P < 0.05). The commonest adverse event in the granisetron group, headache (9.8%) described by the majority of patients as mild, was significantly higher than that reported in the comparator group (3% P = 0.02).
Granisetron
appears to be a safe and effective agent which can be used as a single agent for the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis. The simplicity of administration, a single 5-min infusion prior to chemotherapy, and the lack of somnolence or extrapyramidal reactions offer clear advantages over the comparator combination regimen.
...
PMID:The control of acute cisplatin-induced emesis--a comparative study of granisetron and a combination regimen of high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone. Granisetron Study Group. 839 4
We investigated the antiemetic effect, safety and usefulness of granisetron tablet on
nausea
/vomiting induced by cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) in the chemotherapy for tumors in the hematopoietic organs. Out of 52 cases with malignant tumors in the hematopoietic organs including acute leukemia, 30 in granisetron group had no antiemetic treatment, were evaluated for the clinical efficacy of granisetron and 22 in control group. Their chemotherapies were combination therapy with Ara-C and daunorubicin (DNR), Ara-C and mitoxantrone (MIT), or Ara-C and etoposide (VP-16). In the trial, the dosage of granisetron tablet was 2 mg once a day, and the drug was given before each chemotherapy for 6 consecutive days. In clinical efficacy the effective rate of granisetron (the percentage of cases in which the trial drug was assessed as "Remarkably effective" or "Effective") was more than 80% on each day of administration. There was no adverse event. As the abnormal laboratory test value, only 1 case tested positive in urine protein, whose causal relation to the trial drug was judged as "Unassessable".
Granisetron
was judged as "Safe" in 31 out of 32 cases (96.9%). In terms of usefulness, the drug was rated "Extremely useful" or "Useful" in 26 out of 30 cases (86.7%). The above results have shown that granisetron tablet, when administered orally once daily at a dose of 2 mg, has an excellent antiemetic effect, and is a safe and useful drug.
...
PMID:[Study on the inhibitory effect of oral granisetron against nausea/vomiting induced by cytosine arabinoside containing chemotherapy for tumors in the hematopoietic organs]. 839 61
In this randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study, we have compared three doses (0.1 mg, 1.0 mg and 3.0 mg) of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, granisetron (Kytril), as prophylactic therapy for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The aims were to determine the optimal dose of granisetron and to evaluate its safety profile. We studied 527 adult patients, undergoing elective open abdominal surgery or vaginal hysterectomy during general anaesthesia. Antiemetic prophylaxis with a single dose of granisetron 1.0 mg or 3.0 mg resulted in a significant reduction (P < 0.001 compared with placebo) in the numbers of patients experiencing postoperative vomiting, or
nausea
, or who achieved total control during the postoperative periods 0-6 h and 0-24 h. The two higher doses of granisetron (1.0 mg and 3.0 mg) provided effective prophylaxis against vomiting, with 78% and 77% of patients, respectively, being free from vomiting in the first 6 h after surgery, and 63% and 62% in the first 24 h. This compares with 50% and 34% at 0-6 h and 0-24 h, respectively, in the placebo group.
Granisetron
was well tolerated and the optimum dose was 1.0 mg.
...
PMID:Single-dose i.v. granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 865 23
In this study, the usefulness of granisetron rescue therapy for nausea and vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapies, including CDDP, was examined.
Granisetron
was given to twenty patients with urogenital malignant tumor by iv infusion for thirty minutes after the onset of
nausea
or vomiting.
Nausea
disappeared in 15 out of 20 patients (75%), 8 of whom (40%) experienced its disappearance while the granisetron was being administered. Vomiting was perfectly controlled in 5 out of 20 patients (25%) for 24 hours after the granisetron administration. No adverse event seemingly due to granisetron was observed. The result of this study confirmed the speedy effect granisetron on
nausea
induced by cancer chemotherapy including CDDP, but it stopped short of demonstrating sufficient efficacy for vomiting. Prophylactic use, therefore, seems more desirable in view of the patient's QOL, when a highly emetogenic anti-tumor drug, such as CDDP, is used.
...
PMID:[Efficacy of granisetron rescue therapy for nausea and vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapies in urogenital malignant tumor]. 867 39
Patient functional status after administration of either granisetron or ondansetron to prevent acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) was studied. Pharmacists and nurses from six cancer centers distributed Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaires to 115 outpatients receiving either granisetron or ondansetron for prevention of CINV. The emetogenic potential of each patient's chemotherapy regimen was high, moderately high, or moderate. Immediately before and 72 hours after chemotherapy, each patient rated his or her reaction to each of 18 items on the questionnaire on a 7-point scale. Possible scores ranged from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating higher levels of functioning. The occurrence of
nausea
in the granisetron group was 40.0% compared with 43.2% in the ondansetron group; the occurrence of vomiting was 18.8% in the granisetron group and 11.1% in the ondansetron group. Patients who received highly emetogenic chemotherapy had significantly lower scores on the FLIE after chemotherapy than before. Patients with both nausea and vomiting reported a much higher negative impact on functional status after chemotherapy than those with
nausea
only. The mean prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy FLIE scores were 124.2 and 110.4 for granisetron and 124.9 and 111.9 for ondansetron.
Granisetron
and ondansetron did not differ significantly in their effect on functional status reported by patients before and 72 hours after receiving cancer chemotherapy.
...
PMID:Patients' self-reported functional status after granisetron or ondansetron therapy to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting at six cancer centers. 935 54
The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron alone in controlling nausea and vomiting during two consecutive cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy given for up to 5 days were compared in a two-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. In all, 110 evaluable patients received either dexamethasone, 20 mg i.v., or matching placebo, plus open-label granisetron, 3 mg i.v., given on each chemotherapy day. At cycle 2, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment; 72 patients completed the crossover. In these 72 patients, the complete response rates over 24 h for granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron plus placebo in cycle 1 were 87% and 70% (ns), respectively. In cycle 2 the complete response rates over 24 h were 73% and 62% (ns). Combining the two cycles, the complete response rates over 24 h were 80.6% (granisetron plus dexamethasone) and 65.3% (granisetron plus placebo; P = 0.015).
Granisetron
plus dexamethasone was significantly more effective in terms of times to less than complete response (P = 0.041), to first episode of moderate/severe
nausea
(P = 0.04), to first episode of vomiting (0.03) and to use of rescue medication (P = 0.02). Adverse events tended to be minor, with asthenia and insomnia the most common. Of those patients who expressed a preference, 67% preferred granisetron plus dexamethasone (P < 0.05). A single dose of dexamethasone added to granisetron thus enhances the efficacy of granisetron alone in preventing nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
...
PMID:A double-blind crossover study comparing prophylactic intravenous granisetron alone or in combination with dexamethasone as antiemetic treatment in controlling nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy. 938 22
The safety and efficacy of granisetron (10 micrograms/kg and 40 micrograms/kg) were evaluated during a second (n = 393) and third (n = 200) cycle of chemotherapy in this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.
Granisetron
was administered as a single intravenous dose before the start of cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 60 mg/m2). Total control (no vomiting, no retching, no
nausea
, and no use of antiemetic rescue medication) after the first 24 hr following chemotherapy was achieved in 40% and 49% of patients in Cycles 2 and 3, respectively, for the 10 micrograms/kg group, and in 42% and 38% of patients in Cycles 2 and 3, respectively, for the 40 micrograms/kg group. Both dose levels of granisetron were well tolerated. The results demonstrate comparable efficacy between the 10 micrograms/kg and 40 micrograms/kg doses of granisetron in preventing nausea and vomiting during repeat cycles of high-dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The results of this study show that granisetron 10 micrograms/kg is safe and well tolerated, and remains effective with repeat cycle use.
...
PMID:Efficacy of intravenous granisetron to control nausea and vomiting during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. 951 74
The aim of the present study was to assess the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron in repeated cycles of chemotherapy with platinum derivatives. The study included 50 patients (28 females, 22 males; aged 17-72, mean age 51 years). From 2 to 5 cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin were performed.
Granisetron
was administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg, 5 minutes before commencement of cytostatic chemotherapy. In case of 2 episodes of vomiting and severe
nausea
2 additional doses of granisetron were given. Total control of emesis was achieved in 60% of patients after the first cycle of chemotherapy, and this percentage did not change significantly over the 5 cycles of chemotherapy. There were no differences in the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron in relation to patient sex up to cycle III, while in cycles IV and V a tendency towards less efficacy in females was observed. The adverse effects (headache, dizziness) were observed with the same frequency in the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy, while these were absent in cycles IV and V. Severe side effects were recorded only in cycle I, after that they were less expressed. In conclusion, granisetron is highly effective in prevention of emesis, induced by platinum derivatives and its efficacy is maintained over repeated cycles of chemotherapy. The toxicity of granisetron is mostly expressed in the first cycle, while after that it decreases significantly.
...
PMID:Granisetron in repeated cycles of chemotherapy with platinum. 960 2
This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized study compared the 24 h efficacy and safety of granisetron alone (3 mg i.v. over 30 s) or in combination with methylprednisolone (250 mg i.v. twice daily) in preventing nausea and vomiting in 308 patients (254 males) receiving high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m2 or above) for mainly lung, and head and neck cancers. All patients received oral follow-on therapy comprising oral granisetron and methylprednisolone during the following 6 days. Primary efficacy variables were the proportions of complete responses (CR; no vomiting, no worse than mild
nausea
, no rescue and no withdrawal), no vomiting and no
nausea
over the first 24 h following initiation of the cisplatin infusion. The two treatment groups were well matched for demographics, cancer site, cisplatin dose and duration of infusion.
Granisetron
plus methylprednisolone was significantly more effective than granisetron alone for all primary efficacy variables: CR 78 versus 59% (p<0.001), no vomiting 80 versus 61% (p<0.001) and no
nausea
74 versus 57% (p<0.002). Significantly more patients receiving the combination were free of any emetic symptoms (74 versus 54%, p<0.001). Significantly fewer patients receiving combination therapy also required rescue therapy with i.v. granisetron (12.2 versus 21.7%, p=0.026). During the follow-on period, complete response rates varied day by day from 50 to 71%. Both treatments were well tolerated, with constipation, abdominal pain and headache as the most frequent adverse events.
...
PMID:Granisetron plus methylprednisolone for the control of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis. 966 May 34
The prevention of
nausea
, vomiting and appetite loss induced by remission induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia was compared by randomization between granisetron alone and combination with granisetron plus methylprednisolone.
Granisetron
was administered at 40 micrograms/kg during chemotherapy, and methylprednisolone was administered concomitantly at 125 mg/body for 3 days or more in the combination group. The single and combination groups comprised 14 and 13 patients, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the background of both groups. To evaluate the effect they were scored according to 4 grades, and evaluated every 24 hours from the start of chemotherapy to 5 days after its completion. The complete inhibition rate of vomiting was as high as 71.4% and 92.3% in the single and combination groups, respectively, showing no significant difference. The grade of vomiting was mild in both groups.
Nausea
was noted in 71.4% and 46.2%, respectively, and the inhibitory effect tended to be higher in the combination group. Appetite loss developed in 92.9% and 41.7%, respectively, and the prevention effect was clearly higher in the combination group. The prevention effects on
nausea
7, 8 and 10 days after the start of chemotherapy, on appetite loss 2-10 days after it, and 2-5 days after its completion, were higher in the combination group.
Granisetron
revealed an excellent inhibitory effect on vomiting induced by remission induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia, but combination with granisetron and methylprednisolone was considered useful for
nausea
in the latter half of the treatment period and for appetite loss during the whole period.
...
PMID:[Efficacy of combination with granisetron and methylprednisolone for nausea, vomiting and appetite loss in remission induction chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia--a randomized comparative trial between granisetron alone and granisetron plus methylprednisolone]. 1041 Jan 52
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
Next >>