Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We report a patient with metastatic colon carcinoma who was treated effectively with a continuous intrahepatic artery-infusion of 5-FU, Leucovorin and cisplatin, and systemic chemotherapy with CPT-11. A 50-year-old man was diagnosed as having well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon with multiple liver metastases in March, 1997. Left hemicolectomy and subsequent catheterization into the common hepatic artery via the gastroduodenal artery were performed in April, 1997. He was treated with 3 courses of continuous intrahepatic artery-infusion of 5-FU, Leucovorin and cisplatin, and two courses of systemic chemotherapy with CPT-11 during hospitalization, followed by 6 courses of a similar intraarterial therapy in an outpatient setting. Reinstallation of the catheter into the hepatic artery via the femoral artery was performed because of occlusion of the reservoir. During the 6th course of intraarterial therapy, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting appeared and angiography revealed a narrowing of the hepatic artery. Therefore, the intrahepatic artery-infusion therapy was reinitiated with doses of 5-FU, Leucovorin and cisplatin reduced to approximately 80%. After 5 courses of this therapy, the computed tomography scan showed a marked decrease in the size of the metastatic hepatic lesions by 90%, and the serum level of CEA decreased from 657.7 ng/ml to 4.5 ng/ml. No severe side effects were seen during the treatment. Though multiple lung metastases were indicated during the intrahepatic artery-infusion therapy, both the liver and lung metastases have been well controlled with continuous intrahepatic artery-infusion chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. The continuous intrahepatic arterial infusion of 5-FU, leucovorin and cisplatin appears to be very effective for the treatment of colon carcinoma with liver metastasis without reducing the quality of life.
 ...
PMID:[A case of metastatic colon carcinoma in which a continuous intrahepatic artery-infusion of 5-FU leucovorin and cisplatin, and systemic chemotherapy with CPT-11 was very effective]. 1096 4

In preclinical studies, the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) has demonstrated activity as a radiosensitizer, probably due to its ability to inhibit potentially lethal radiation damage repair. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of weekly irinotecan with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. For this study, 13 patients received three dose escalations (from 30 to 40 to 50 mg/m2/wk). At the first dose level, one patient developed grade 5 esophagitis. Accrual was expanded to seven patients. None of the remaining six patients developed esophagitis. At the second dose level (40 mg/m2/wk), the worst toxicity, which developed in one patient, was grade 2 esophagitis. At the third dose level (50 mg/m2/wk), two of three patients developed grade 4 nausea and vomiting; grade 3 or 4 esophagitis also occurred in two patients. Of the 12 evaluable patients, seven achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 58%. In conclusion, nausea, vomiting, and esophagitis appear to be the principal DLTs of concurrent weekly irinotecan and thoracic radiation in the outpatient setting. The MTD of concurrent weekly irinotecan with thoracic radiation therapy appears to be 40 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks. To confirm the MTD of this combination, this study is still open to accrual at the second dose level (40 mg/m2) in combination with carboplatin.
 ...
PMID:Weekly irinotecan and concurrent radiation therapy for stage III unresectable NSCLC. 1098 Dec 90

Exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) is a new hexacyclic camptothecin analogue with favorable attributes compared to topotecan and CPT-11, including watersolubility, greater potency against topoisomerase I, lack of esterase-dependent activation, broad antitumor activity, and low cross-resistance against MDR-1 overexpressing tumors. In preclinical studies, the compound demonstrated a favorable toxicology profile with hematologic dose-limiting toxicity and moderate gastrointestinal toxicity, linear pharmacokinetics, P450 hepatic metabolism (CYP3A4 and CYP1A2), and predominately fecal excretion. The results of six U.S. and European phase I clinical trials as well as two Japanese studies are presented including total DX-8951 and lactone DX-8951 pharmacokinetics. The toxicity profile was similar for all schedules of administration. Hematologic toxicity was dose-dependent and reversible. Neutropenia was dose-limiting in minimally pretreated patients, whereas neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting in heavily pretreated patients. Non-hematologic toxicity included moderate gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, vomiting > diarrhea), transient elevation of hepatic transaminases, asthenia, and alopecia. Two cases of acute pancreatitis not predicted by preclinical toxicology were also observed. Antineoplastic activity was detected in several solid tumor types: non-small cell lung cancer, extrapulmonary small cell cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular cancer, and sarcoma. Antitumor activity was seen in CPT-11 and topotecan-resistant tumors. Pharmacokinetics were linear within the dose range tested. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model predictive of DX-8951f-induced neutropenia in individual patients was developed. The daily x5, every 3-week schedule with the drug administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion was selected for future phase II clinical trials based on its superior antitumor activity.
 ...
PMID:DX-8951f: summary of phase I clinical trials. 1119 1

It has been reported that 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptothecin (CPT-11) and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38), have absorption characteristics of weakly basic drugs, suggesting that alkalization of the intestinal lumen might reduce reabsorption and its attendant side effects. Furthermore, stasis of stools containing these compounds is thought to induce damage to the intestinal mucosa. The prevention of CPT-11-induced side effects by oral alkalization (OA) combined with control of defecation (CD) was estimated in a case-control study of lung cancer patients. Coinciding with day 1 of CPT-11 infusion and for 4 days thereafter, OA and CD were practiced utilizing orally administered sodium bicarbonate, magnesium oxide, basic water and ursodeoxycholic acid. OA involved the daily use of all four therapeutics, and CD required doses of up to 4.0 g/day of magnesium oxide and 2 L/day of excess basic water. From three ongoing prospective phase I/II studies, we selected 37 consecutive patients who were treated with CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin in the presence of OA and CD (group B). Thirty-two control subjects who were matched to the background characteristics of the case patients were treated with the same regimen in the absence of OA and CD (group A). Toxicities induced by the CPT-11/cisplatin combination were evaluated and analyzed in group A and group B in a case-control format. The use of OA and CD resulted in significantly higher stool pH (p < 0.0001), while reducing the incidence of delayed diarrhea (> or = grade 2: group A 32.3% versus group B 9.4%; p = 0.005), nausea (p = 0.0001), vomiting (p = 0.001) and myelotoxicity, especially granulocytopenia (p = 0.03) and lymphocytopenia (p = 0.034). In addition, dose intensification was well tolerated in patients receiving OA and CD, allowing dose escalation from 35.6 +/- 6.0 to 39.9 +/- 5.6 mg/m(2)/week (p < 0.001). Tumor response rates for non-small cell lung cancer were 59.3% (16/27 patients) in group B compared with 38.5% (10/26 patients) in group A. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk of CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea greater than grade 2 was associated with OA and CD (odds ratio for delayed diarrhea, 0.14 with use of OA and CD; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.4; p = 0.0002) and age (odds ratio, 1.08 per increase in age; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.15; p = 0.009). OA and CD appear to be useful in preventing the dose-limiting side effects of CPT-11 noted in clinical practice, mainly nausea, vomiting, granulocytopenia and especially delayed diarrhea. Risk factors statistically associated with delayed diarrhea include advanced age and the use of CPT-11 without OA and CD.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation in cancer patients. 1129 Oct 56

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with a broad antitumor spectrum. In the present study, we combined CPT-1 and mitoxantrone (MIT) with dexamethasone because the effect elicited by this combination was additive or better in a preclinical study. This study was performed to determine the efficacy and toxicities of this combination. Thirty-two patients were evaluable. CPT-11 combined with MIT achieved a complete remission in 11 patients (34.4%) and a partial remission in 9 patients (28.1%). The median follow-up period was 20 months. The 4-year survival rate was 31.8% (95% confidence intervals: 11.2-64.6%), and the 3-year event-free survival rate was 16.1% (95% confidence intervals: 8.2-24.6%). Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicity included neutropenia in 96.9%, anemia in 3.1%, and thrombocytopenia in 15.6%. Grades 1, 2, and 3 nonhematological toxicity included diarrhea in one patient, nausea/vomiting in five patients, and hematuria in one patient, respectively. CPT-11 combined with MIT was safe even for elderly patients and was effective even in patients who had received pretreatment with doxorubicin. In addition, this regimen can be used on an outpatient basis. This combination should be tested further to determine the optimum doses and administration schedule.
 ...
PMID:Combination therapy with irinotecan (CPT-11), mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study. 1152 67

The patient was a 52-year-old woman who had sigmoid colon cancer with liver metastasis and multiple lung metastases. Resection of curability B was performed, and alternating adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of hepatic artery injection of 5-FU and systemic administration of CPT-11 was performed. Lung recurrence was found and no antitumor effect of chemotherapy was observed, so the CPT-11 which had been administered every other week was given every week in a dose of 60 mg/body, half of the original dose. Moreover, 5'-DFUR was administered in a dose of 800 mg/day every day. As a result, lung metastasis tumors were reduced markedly. Adverse events such as nausea, vomiting and depilation were mitigated, and no other toxicity was observed. The patient could thus be treated extremely safely in the outpatient clinic. This was considered to be a valuable case suggestive of the significance of combination chemotherapy of CPT-11 and 5'-DFUR and the importance of appropriate administration of CPT-11.
 ...
PMID:[A case of lung metastasis from colon cancer treated successfully with combined chemotherapy of CPT-11 and 5'-DFUR]. 1172 88

A phase II study was conducted to assess the activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin (CBDCA) combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligibility included chemo-naive advanced NSCLC patients with measurable disease and a good performance status. CPT-11 of 50 mg/m(2) was administered as a 90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15. CBDCA dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mgmin/ml, using Calvert's formula, was administered by 90-min infusion after the CPT-11 infusion on day 1. Treatment was repeated 28 days interval for at least two cycles. Haematopoietic growth factors were not routinely used. From December 1997 to January 1999, 36 patients were entered into the study. The overall response rate was 25.0% (95% confidence interval: 12.1-42.2%). The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were 10.2 months and 42.2%, respectively. Major toxicity by Japan Clinical Oncology Group criteria was as follows: grade 3-4 neutropenia 76.5%; grade 3 anemia 26.5%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia 47.1%; grade 3 nausea/vomiting 36.1%; grade 3-4 diarrhoea 5.9%; grade 3 alopecia 5.9%; grade 3-4 skin rush 2.9%. Four patients developed febrile neutropenia and only one had serious diarrhea induced by CPT-11. Actual relative delivery dose of CPT-11 to the projected one on days 8 and 15 were 0.86 and 0.43, respectively. It seemed that CPT-11 and CBDCA was more toxic regimen than CPT-11 and CDDP in advanced NSCLC. The relatively disappointing response rate could be related with low dose intensity of CPT-11.
 ...
PMID:Phase II study of irinotecan and carboplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1244 53

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is an oral prodrug that is enzymatically converted to fluorouracil (5-FU) within cancer cells. Data from two large phase III trials performed in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer showed that capecitabine yielded higher objective response rates and equivalent median time to tumor progression and overall survival rates as 5-FU/leucovorin. In these studies, capecitabine demonstrated lower rates of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and severe neutropenia than bolus 5-FU/leucovorin, but a higher rate of hand-foot syndrome and hyperbilirubinemia. The natural extension of this work has been to evaluate substitution of capecitabine for 5-FU/leucovorin in combination chemotherapy trials with irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) or oxaliplatin (Eloxatin). This is especially important due to concerns regarding toxicities observed with regimens that combine bolus 5-FU/leucovorin with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Phase I/II and phase II trials of capecitabine in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with advanced disease indicate that the combinations are well tolerated and produce response rates that are in the range of those that would be expected with infusional 5-FU/leucovorin combined with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Phase III trials have been initiated in the advanced disease and adjuvant settings and should help determine the efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability of the capecitabine/irinotecan or capecitabine/oxaliplatin combination in direct comparison to intravenous 5-FU/leucovorin and irinotecan or oxaliplatin.
 ...
PMID:Current status of capecitabine in the treatment of colorectal cancer. 1252 Jun 35

This phase I study was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated doses, and recommended phase II doses of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) and temozolomide (Temodar). Patients have received irinotecan and temozolomide on one of three different dosing schedules: (1) oral temozolomide on days 1-14 plus a single i.v. dose of irinotecan on day 8 every 28 days (arm 1); (2) weekly i.v. irinotecan on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 plus oral temozolomide on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 42 days (arm 2); and (3) every-other-week i.v. irinotecan on days 1 and 15 plus oral temozolomide on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 28 days (arm 3). A total of 49 patients have received 112+ cycles of therapy on all three dosing schedules to date. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was encountered at a temozolomide dose of 125 mg/m2/d and an irinotecan dose of 250 mg/m2 on treatment arm 1. As a result, the protocol has been amended to explore lower doses of temozolomide in combination with higher doses of irinotecan, and patient accrual is currently continuing. Dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were reported in 7/12 patients enrolled on the two dose levels explored on treatment arm 2, so this dosing regimen was considered intolerable. Patient accrual currently continues at dose level 1 of treatment arm 3, so it is too early to determine dose-limiting toxicities and recommended phase II doses for this treatment schedule. Two partial responses have been reported to date in patients with glioblastoma and head and neck cancer, respectively. One evaluable response has also been observed in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan weekly x 4 plus temozolomide on days 1-7 and 15-21 is intolerable due to the development of dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxicities. The recommended phase II doses of irinotecan and temozolomide on treatment arms 1 and 3 remain to be determined as patient accrual is currently ongoing.
 ...
PMID:Phase I. Trial of irinotecan and temozolomide in patients with solid tumors. 1280 Jun 6

A novel schema of intrapatient dose escalation was applied to determine a population-based maximum tolerated dose (pMTD) for irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) and carboplatin (Paraplatin) in a phase I trial. A total of 74 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled with the following characteristics: men/women, 46/28; median age, 61 years; 51 patients with and 23 patients without prior chemotherapy; performance status of 0-1 (93%) and 2 (7%). Patients were started at dose level 1 with irinotecan at 200 mg/m2, and carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL x min, administered every 21 days. Depending on degree of toxicity observed, the dose for each patient in each subsequent cycle was determined according to a predetermined schema of dose levels. Individual maximum tolerated dose (iMTD) was determined for each patient. The pMTD was defined as the highest dose level for which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity occurred in less than 33% of the patient population. The most common dose-limiting toxicity included neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (15%), diarrhea (8%), and nausea/emesis (7%). The iMTD ranged from dose level-3 (irinotecan at 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an AUC of 4) to dose level 5 (irinotecan at 350 mg/m2 and carboplatin at AUC 6). The pMTD was determined to be dose level-1 and 1 for previously chemotherapy-treated and--untreated patients, respectively. Fifty-nine patients were assessable for response. Of note, a response rate of 40% was observed in 15 patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based therapy. We recommend dose level 1 of irinotecan (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) for chemotherapynaive patients, and dose level-1 of irinotecan (150 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) for chemotherapy-treated patients in phase II trials.
 ...
PMID:Population-based maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan and carboplatin. 1288 68


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>