Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Using the technique of site-directed mutagenesis, point mutants of human PDE4A have been developed in order to identify amino acids involved in inhibitor binding. Relevant amino acids were selected according to a peptidic binding site model for PDE4 inhibitors, which suggests interaction with two tryptophan residues, one histidine and one tyrosine residue, as well as one Zn(2+) ion. Mutations were directed at those tryptophan, histidine, and tyrosine residues, which are conserved among the PDE4 subtypes (PDE4A-D) and lie within the high-affinity 4-[3-(cyclopentoxyl)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2-pyrrolidone (rolipram) binding domain of human PDE4A (amino acids 276-681 according to the PDE4A sequence L20965). Truncations to this region do not alter enzyme activity or inhibitor sensitivity. The mutants were expressed in COS1 cells, and the recombinant cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) forms have been characterized in terms of their catalytic activity and inhibitor sensitivities. Tyrosine residues 432 and 602, as well as histidine 588, were found to be involved in inhibitor binding, but no interaction was detected between tryptophan and PDE inhibitors tested. To test the possibility that other amino acids are of importance for hydrophobic interactions, selected phenylalanine residues were also mutated. We found phenylalanine 613 and 645 to influence inhibitor binding to PDE4. The significant differences in the inhibitor sensitivities of the mutants show that the various inhibitors have different enzyme binding sites. Based on the assumption that the known side effects of PDE4 inhibitors (like emesis and nausea) are caused directly by selective inhibition of different conformation states of PDE4, our results may be a hint to differ between PDE4 inhibitors, which have emetic side effects (like rolipram), and those that do not have side effects (like N-(3,5-dichlorpyrid-4-yl)-[1-(4-fluorbenzyl)-5-hydroxy-indol-3-yl]-glyoxylateamide [AWD12-281]) by the differences of their binding sites and in that context contribute to the development of novel drugs. Furthermore, the identification of amino acid interactions proposed by the peptidic binding site model, which was used for the mutant selection, verifies the PrGen modeling as a useful method for the prediction of inhibitor binding sites in cases where detailed knowledge of the protein structure is not available.
 ...
PMID:Identification of inhibitor binding sites of the cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4. 1130 46

Cilostazol, a type III phosphodiesterase inhibitor, was approved in the United States in 1999 for the reduction of the symptoms of intermittent claudication. This article summarizes the safety data from 8 cilostazol phase 3 controlled clinical trials, involving 2,702 patients: 1,374 receiving cilostazol, 973 assigned to placebo, and 355 taking pentoxifylline. The trials ranged from 12 to 24 weeks in duration. There were a total of 475 patient-exposure years on cilostazol, 357 patient-exposure years on placebo, and 135 patient-exposure years on pentoxifylline. Headache, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal complaints were seen more often in cilostazol-treated than placebo-treated patients; pharyngitis and nausea were more common in pentoxifylline-treated than placebo-treated patients. Headache requiring discontinuation occurred in 1.3% of patients taking cilostazol 50 mg bid and 3.7% of those receiving cilostazol 100 mg bid, compared with 0.3% of placebo-treated patients. Discontinuations due to diarrhea, palpitations, or myocardial infarction were similar in cilostazol-, placebo-, and pentoxifylline-treated patients. The rate of serious cardiovascular events was similar in all 3 treatment groups. Myocardial infarction occurred in 1.0% of cilostazol-treated, 0.8% of placebo-treated, and 1.1% of pentoxifylline-treated patients. The incidence of stroke was 0.5% in both cilostazol- and placebo-treated patients and 1.1% in pentoxifylline-treated patients. Total cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality was 6.5% for cilostazol 100 mg bid, 6.3% for cilostazol 50 mg bid, and 7.7% for placebo. There were 16 deaths occurring in 0.6%, 0.5%, and 0.6% of cilostazol-, placebo-, and pentoxifylline-treated patients, respectively. The evaluations showed no trend toward increased cardiovascular morbidity or mortality risk in patients receiving cilostazol. In addition, postmarketing surveillance in the United States, representing 70,430 patient-years of cilostazol exposure, has shown minimal accounts of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. The safety profile of cilostazol in doses of 50 mg bid and 100 mg bid appears to offer an acceptable risk-benefit ratio in patients with intermittent claudication.
 ...
PMID:Analysis of the cilostazol safety database. 1143 97

Phosphodiesterase (PDE) enzymes are responsible for the inactiviation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is a cAMP specific phosphodiesterase expressed in inflammatory cells such as eosinophils. Inhibition of PDE4 results in an elevation of cAMP in these cells, which in turn downregulates the inflammatory response. The anti-inflammatory effects of PDE4 inhibitors have been well documented both in vitro and in vivo in a range of animal models. The potential use of PDE4 inhibitors as anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and multiple sclerosis (MS), has received considerable attention from the pharmaceutical industry but to date, there are no selective PDE4 inhibitors on the market. Early PDE4 inhibitors, such as rolipram suffered from dose limiting side effects, including nausea and emesis, which severely restricted their therapeutic utility. Second generation compounds such as cilomilast have been identified with reduced side effect liability. Indeed, cilomilast is showing good therapeutic effects in clinical trials for asthma and COPD and represents the most advanced selective PDE4 inhibitor for any indication. The utility of this class of inhibitor in other inflammatory diseases is less well advanced. However, data in animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and MS suggests that there is also significant potential for PDE4 inhibitors as treatments for these diseases and the results of clinical trials in these disease areas are eagerly awaited.
 ...
PMID:Update on the therapeutic potential of PDE4 inhibitors. 1177 17

The phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are responsible for the hydrolysis of intracellular cyclic adenosine and guanosine monophosphate (cAMP and cGMP, respectively). They are classified into 11 major families (PDE1-11) and the type 4 phosphodiesterase (PDE4) is a cAMP-specific enzyme localized in airway smooth muscle cells as well as in immune and inflammatory cells. The PDE4 activity is associated with a wide variety of diseases some of which have been related to an inflammatory state, (e.g. asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA)) while others have recently been connected to autoimmune pathology. Therefore, an intense effort toward the development of PDE4 inhibitors has been generated for the last decade. Unfortunately, the effects of prototype PDE4 inhibitors have been compromised by side effects such as nausea and emesis and the clinical use of those compounds is still limited. Several companies have focused on the design of a new generation of PDE4 inhibitors dissociating beneficial activity and adverse effects. This review highlights the recent data of the most advanced clinical candidates, the design and structure activity relationships of the recent structural series reported in the literature over the last two years, as well as recent advances in the multiple therapeutic indications of PDE4 inhibitors (a review with 375 references).
 ...
PMID:Recent advances in PDE4 inhibitors as immunoregulators and anti-inflammatory drugs. 1205 19

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men worldwide. Many drugs are now available for the treatment of ED, with oral pharmacotherapy representing the first-line option for most patients. Sildenafil citrate, an inhibitor of the enzyme phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), is the most widely prescribed oral agent and has a very satisfactory efficacy-safety profile in all patient categories. Tadalafil (Cialis; Eli Lilly & Co., ICOS) and vardenafil (Levitra; Bayer Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline) are new PDE5 inhibitors that have recently been approved worldwide. Both have been associated with significant positive efficacy-safety profiles. Apomorphine sublingual is a dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonist, which has been approved for marketing in Europe. It is best selected for treating patients with mild-to-moderate ED, but it is seldom used in clinical practice due to its limited efficacy and side effects, particularly nausea. Patients who do not respond to oral pharmacotherapy or who are unable to use it are appropriate candidates for intracavernosal and intraurethral therapy. The efficacy of second-line treatment is high, but the attrition rate remains significant. For the purpose of this review, clinical and pharmacological analysis focuses on the recent advances in the field of oral therapy, including PDE5 inhibitors and sublingual apomorphine.
 ...
PMID:Emerging oral drugs for erectile dysfunction. 1515 43

Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) act by increasing intracellular concentrations of cyclic AMP, which has a broad range of anti-inflammatory effects on various key effector cells involved in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The therapeutic ratio for PDE4 inhibitors is thought to be determined by selectivity on receptor subtypes for relative effects on PDE4B (anti-inflammatory) and PDE4D (emesis). The two main orally active PDE4 inhibitors in the late phase III of clinical development are cilomilast and roflumilast; the latter (and its active metabolite N-oxide) is more selective and potent with a superior therapeutic ratio. Studies on cilomilast in COPD based on bronchial biopsy material have shown a broad range of anti-inflammatory activity, and the available evidence on clinical outcomes for up to 6 months with cilomilast 15 mg twice daily and roflumilast 500 mug once daily have shown variable but significant effects on exacerbations and quality of life, with small improvements in measures of pulmonary function. Roflumilast has a better safety and tolerability profile than cilomilast, with the main adverse effects being nausea, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain. Roflumilast also has activity in asthma as assessed by its attenuation of allergen and exercise challenges, and it shows clinical efficacy equivalent to that of beclomethasone dipropionate 400 mug daily. The emerging results of clinical trials on PDE4 inhibitors in asthma and COPD should be interpreted with cautious optimism since much of the evidence has been published only in abstract form to date. The next few years should resolve important issues about the potential role of these drugs as oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma and COPD and their place in management guidelines. Ultimately, clinicians will want to know whether PDE4 inhibitors are anything more than expensive "designer" theophylline, the archetypal non-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor.
 ...
PMID:Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 1563

Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) are well established as an oral treatment for the majority of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). PDE-5 is found in high concentration in smooth muscle cells of the corpora cavernosa. However, enzymes of the PDE family are also expressed in various other tissues, including the brain. Little is known about its effects on the central nervous system (CNS), although it has been suggested that PDE-5 inhibitors might cross the blood-brain barrier. Side effects, such as headache, nasal congestion, flushing, nausea, are much more common. We describe a patient who had a transient global amnesia (TGA) after his first-ever use of tadalafil, a potent PDE-5 inhibitor. Despite the fact that the aetiology of TGA has not entirely been clarified at present, we consider the hypothesis of a causal relationship as tempting with respect to the current hypotheses of TGA pathophysiology. This case, together with others, suggests that PDE-5 inhibitors might be capable of exerting adverse effects in the CNS. Physicians should be aware of the possibility of neurological disturbances when prescribing PDE-5 inhibitors for ED.
 ...
PMID:Transient global amnesia after intake of tadalafil, a PDE-5 inhibitor: a possible association? 1567 2

Phosphodiesterase enzymes are responsible for the inactivation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is a cAMP specific phosphodiesterase expressed in inflammatory cells such as eosinophils. Inhibition of PDE4 results in an elevation of cAMP in these cells, which in turn downregulates the inflammatory response. The anti-inflammatory effects of PDE4 inhibitors have been well documented both in vitro and in vivo in a variety of animal models. The potential use of PDE4 inhibitors as anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of asthma and other inflammatory disorders has received considerable attention from the pharmaceutical industry, but to date, there are no selective PDE4 inhibitors on the market. Early PDE4 inhibitors, typified by rolipram, suffered from dose-limiting side effects, including nausea and emesis, which severely restricted their therapeutic utility. Second generation compounds, including CDP840 and SB207499 (Ariflo), have been identified with reduced side effect liability. Recent evidence suggests a correlation between side effects and the ability of compounds to bind at the so-called high affinity rolipram binding site (HPDE), whilst beneficial effects appear to correlate with binding at the catalytic site. A number of companies are actively pursuing compounds which exhibit improved affinity for the catalytic site and reduced affinity for the HPDE, in the expectation that this will provide compounds with an improved therapeutic index.
 ...
PMID:The therapeutic potential of PDE4 inhibitors. 1599 51

This meeting underscored advances in the exploitation of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) as drug targets. One highlight of the meeting was the disclosure of a new PDE isozyme, bringing to 11 the total number of genetically distinct isozyme families thus far identified. Also reported was the phenotypic characterization of a PDE4D murine genetic knockout. With respect to drug discovery and development, the most encouraging information presented centered on advances in targeting PDE4 with therapeutically useful inhibitors. Historically, the therapeutic utility of isozyme-selective PDE4 inhibitors has been limited by class-associated side effects, namely nausea and dyspepsia. New PDE4 inhibitors are being designed with the specific intent of improving upon the therapeutic ratio of first-generation agents. The profiles of two second-generation PDE4 inhibitors, SB-207499 (Ariflo; Smithkline Beecham plc) and PD-189659, were presented. SB-207499 demonstrated marked efficacy in phase II clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a disease of very high unmet medical need. PD-189659 has yet to enter clinical trials, but its preclinical profile indicates that this agent can produce substantial anti-inflammatory effects without producing class-associated side effects in animal models. A number of presentations were also given on the utility of PDE5 inhibitors in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction (MED). The widespread use of Viagra (sildenafil; Pfizer Inc) over the last year has reinforced the perception that PDE5 inhibitors are safe and effective agents for the treatment of MED. The overall tenor of the meeting was distinctly upbeat, with most participants believing that PDE isozymes are becoming ever more accessible as targets for drug discovery in a variety of therapeutic areas.
 ...
PMID:PDE inhibitors--Second William Harvey Research Conference. Drugs with an expanding range of therapeutic uses. 1-3 December 1999, Nice, France. 1610 32

There is now a range of treatments for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) beyond the psychosexual counselling and surgical implants that were the only available management options for many years. Oral treatments, which are minimally invasive, are the favoured first-line option for treatments and include the phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and dopamine agonists such as apomorphine. Psychosexual counselling may still be an appropriate treatment, on its own or in combination, in a minority of patients who do not respond to oral treatment, or where an origin for the ED is likely from the history. The PDE5 inhibitors, sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil, have proven to be effective and well tolerated and facilitate erectile function. Apomorphine is also effective, but causes nausea in a minority of men. The alpha-receptor antagonist yohimbine has been found to be effective in some placebo-controlled trials, but its effectiveness is probably inadequate for treatment of most ED. Intracavernosal injection of drugs such as prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine (sometimes in combination) is an effective but invasive treatment. Other treatments include testosterone, vacuum-pump treatment, surgery, and surgical implants, and tend to be used where patients do not respond to oral treatment and counselling.
 ...
PMID:Available and future treatments for erectile dysfunction. 1615 22


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>