Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that there is a direct prophylactic antiemetic effect of small-dose propofol given by continuous infusion. Sixty female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopy under general anesthesia were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by a constant infusion of 1 mg.kg-1.h-1 of propofol or an equivalent volume of 10% Intralipid (placebo) beginning 30 min before induction of anesthesia and continuing until discharge from Stage I postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Anesthesia was induced and maintained in a standard fashion in all patients. The number of emetic episodes before and after discharge from PACU, nausea scores (11-point numerical scale), and time to discharge were evaluated. No significant differences between Intralipid and propofol were found for any of the outcome variables tested. While small-dose propofol is an effective adjuvant in reducing chemotherapy-induced emesis, we were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of propofol in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting when used as the sole prophylactic medication in this patient population. Propofol may have a synergistic effect when administered with other antiemetics, or the specific antiemetic effect of propofol, if it exists, may be dose-dependent and the dose used in this study was below the efficacy threshold.
 ...
PMID:Small-dose propofol by continuous infusion does not prevent postoperative vomiting in females undergoing outpatient laparoscopy. 898 2

Data from two published and one new meta-analysis were reviewed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of three different anaesthetic regimens: (i) propofol anaesthesia compared with another anaesthetic (control); (ii) anaesthesia without nitrous oxide compared with the same anaesthetic with nitrous oxide (control); (iii) propofol anaesthesia without nitrous oxide (TIVA) compared with another anaesthetic with nitrous oxide (control). Efficacy (prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with control) was estimated using odds ratio and number-needed-to-treat methods, and compared within a range of 20-60% control event rates for early efficacy (0-6 h) and 40-80% for late efficacy (0-48 h). Propofol anaesthesia or omitting nitrous oxide had similar effects on vomiting, both early and late. Propofol (but not omitting nitrous oxide) decreased the incidence of nausea. TIVA studies were documented poorly; appropriate comparison with other interventions were not possible. Efficacy of treatments should be compared within a setting-specific range of control event rates. There is insufficient evidence that TIVA with propofol is an anaesthetic technique with a low emetogenic potency.
 ...
PMID:Meta-analytic comparison of prophylactic antiemetic efficacy for postoperative nausea and vomiting: propofol anaesthesia vs omitting nitrous oxide vs total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol. 913

Propofol has been reported to reduce emesis. This study was performed to evaluate the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in gynecologic abdominal surgery patients after propofol anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia. Sixty patients were evaluated for the incidence of PONV. Thirty patients received oxygen-propofol-epidural anesthesia (propofol group) and the others were maintained with nitrous oxide-oxygen-isoflurane/sevoflurane--epidural anesthesia (inhalational group). The incidence of PONV was 33.3% in propofol group and 60% in inhalational group (P < 0.05). The means of frequency of postoperative nausea were 0.63 and 1.97 in propofol-group and inhalational group, respectively (P < 0.05). Those of postoperative vomiting were 0.17 after propofol and 1.00 following inhalational anesthesia (P < 0.01). For the gynecologic abdominal surgery patients, PONV was significantly less following intravenous anesthesia with propofol than after isoflurane or sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia. This study indicated that propofol anesthesia was useful in reducing PONV after gynecologic abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic abdominal surgery--a comparison of propofol versus inhalational technique]. 940 28

The anti-nauseant efficacy of low-dose propofol was investigated in a blinded, randomized trial. Patients who complained of nausea and/or vomiting following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery and who requested antiemetic were randomly assigned to receive placebo, propofol 3 mg, propofol 9 mg or propofol 27 mg by intravenous injection. Nausea, vomiting and sedation were recorded by a blinded observer for 90 minutes following administration of the test drug, prior to discharge, and 24 hours following surgery. Rescue antiemetic (droperidol 1.0 mg i.v.) was available from 10 minutes after administration of test drug. Propofol failed to reduce nausea scores and did not reduce the incidence of vomiting. Numbers of patients receiving rescue antiemetic were similar in the four treatment groups. In the first 10 minutes following test drug administration, sedation scores were increased by propofol in a dose-related manner. We conclude that, in the dose range studied, propofol is ineffective for the treatment of nausea and vomiting occurring soon after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.
 ...
PMID:Lack of efficacy of propofol in the treatment of early postoperative nausea and vomiting. 974 49

We compared target-controlled propofol with sevoflurane in a randomised, double-blind study in 61 day-case patients. Anaesthesia was induced with a propofol target of 8 microgram.ml-1 or 8% sevoflurane, reduced to 4 microgram.ml-1 and 3%, respectively, after laryngeal mask insertion and subsequently titrated to clinical signs. Mean (SD) times to unconsciousness and laryngeal mask insertion were significantly shorter with propofol [50 (9) s and 116 (33) s, respectively] than with sevoflurane [73 (14) s and 146 (29) s; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively]; however, these differences were not apparent to the blinded observer. Propofol was associated with a higher incidence of intra-operative movement (55 vs. 10%; p = 0.0003), necessitating more adjustments to the delivered anaesthetic. Emergence was faster after sevoflurane [5.3 (2.2) min vs. 7.1 (3.7) min; p = 0.027], but the inhaled anaesthetic was associated with more nausea and vomiting (30 vs. 3%; p = 0.006), which delayed discharge [258 (102) min vs. 193 (68) min; p = 0.005]. Direct costs were lower with sevoflurane but nausea would have increased indirect costs. Patient satisfaction was high (>/= 90%) with both techniques. In conclusion, both techniques had advantages and disadvantages for day-case anaesthesia.
 ...
PMID:Target-controlled propofol vs. sevoflurane: a double-blind, randomised comparison in day-case anaesthesia. 1086 32

Otologic procedures require a still surgical field and are associated with a 50% incidence of emetic symptoms. Propofol reduces nausea and vomiting but not intraoperative movement. This study compares a remifentanil/propofol anesthetic to a propofol/fentanyl combination to determine which provides the best perioperative conditions for otologic microsurgery. Eighty healthy patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the anesthetic combinations. Demographic data, hemodynamic variables, movement, and bispectral index monitoring values in addition to anesthetic emergence, nausea, vomiting, pain, and other recovery variables were compared between groups with appropriate statistical methods. Both groups were similar. Times to eye opening (7.7 +/- 0.7 vs 12.4 +/- 1.2 minutes) and extubation (9.8 +/- 0.9 vs 12.4 +/- 1.0 minutes) were shorter with remifentanil. This group also had lower hemodynamic variables and movement (23% vs 65%) under anesthesia. Postoperative pain was mild in both groups, but remifentanil patients had more than the propofol group. All other postoperative parameters were similar. Remifentanil-based anesthesia produces better hemodynamic stability, less movement, and faster emergence after otologic surgery, with propofol's antiemetic effect, for the same cost.
 ...
PMID:Remifentanil-based anesthesia versus a propofol technique for otologic surgical procedures. 1065 94

The introduction of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and the use of volatile induction/maintenance anaesthesia (VIMA) has led to the rediscovery of 'single agent' anaesthesia, eliminating the transition phase from induction to maintenance. We compared quality, patient acceptability and cost of TIVA using target control infusion (TCI) with propofol and VIMA with sevoflurane. Forty patients undergoing spinal surgery of 1-3 h were assigned to one of two groups. Group I received propofol-air-oxygen for induction followed by propofol-air-oxygen for maintenance. Group II received 8% sevoflurane-oxygen for induction and sevoflurane-oxygen-nitrous oxide for maintenance. Propofol had a significantly faster mean (SD) induction time (67 (20) s) than sevoflurane (97 (38) s) but was associated with double the incidence of involuntary movements. Although not significant, twice the number of interventions by the anaesthetist were required to maintain an adequate level of anaesthesia in the sevoflurane group. Emergence times, characteristics, postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain were unaffected by the anaesthetic technique. However, a more predictable emergence time was found following sevoflurane. Cardiovascular stability was good and comparable in both groups. The majority of patients found either technique acceptable and would choose the same anaesthetic again. Induction and maintenance was substantially cheaper with sevoflurane (28.06 Pounds) compared with propofol (41.43 Pounds).
 ...
PMID:Clinical comparison of 'single agent' anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus target controlled infusion of propofol. 1106 11

The success of out-patients laparoscopic surgery depends on a careful selection of patients and the ability of anesthetic technique to ensure a rapid emergence from anesthesia, with a satisfactory control of postoperative pain and the absence of side effects. This study was undertaken to investigate the influence of a total intravenous anesthetic management on the recovery process after laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Fifty-three ASA 1 patients aged 12-41 yrs (mean 26.02) scheduled to undergo laparoscopic varicocelectomy as day surgery procedure were included in this study. Propofol was used as inductor agent and in variable-rate infusion (170-100 mcg/Kg/min) to maintain anesthesia supplemented with Fentanyl (FNT) before endotracheal intubation, incision surgery and if the patient manifested clinical signs of inadequate analgesia. Local anesthesia was infiltrated into the skin before incision. Tramadol 100 mg and Ketorolac 30 mg were administered before the end of surgery to delay the onset of the postoperative pain. Pain was evaluated using a self-rating visual analoque scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 at 0-0.5 hrs postoperatively and every 2 hrs until discharge. At the same time nausea was clinically evaluated using a scale ranging from 0 to 3. Postoperative pain and nausea (PONV) treatment were standardized. Patients were discharged by Post-Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System (PADS). Mean operating time was 34.2 min and mean estubation time was 11.6 min. At time 0 all patients had VAS pain score < 3, on the same time 2 of patients was treated for mild PONV; mean time to first request for postoperative analgesia treatment in 89% of patients was more than 6 hrs, 5 patients required pain treatment before discharge in a mean time 216' +/- 156'. Using the PADS system, 64% of patients were discharged at 4 hrs and 89% at 6 hrs after surgery. One patient was admitted to hospital for an overnight stay for walking dizziness; another was readmitted for surgical complications. This results suggest that the proposed anesthetic management provided adequate pain control with minimun postoperative nausea and a good recovery rate. This permitted a short postoperative hospital stay without compromising in safety, efficacy, or patient satisfaction.
 ...
PMID:[Laparoscopic surgery of varicocele. Role of total endovenous anesthesia in same-day discharge]. 1112 41

We evaluated the use of remifentanil administered as a component of an inhalation or of a Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) anesthetic technique during outpatient oral surgery. Sixty-three unpremedicated patients undergoing removal of four impacted third molars participated to this prospective, randomized study. Anesthesia was induced with Propofol and Rocuronium. Remifentanil 1 microgram.kg-1 i.v. was given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion reduced from 25% each time a tooth was removed (0.25-->0.0625 microgram.kg-1 min-1). Anesthesia was maintained with Desflurane (group D, n = 31) (end-tidal concentration 4-6%) or Propofol (group P, n = 32) (initial infusion TCI 8 micrograms.ml-1 reduced to 2-3 micrograms.ml-1 after intubation). Corticosteroids, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (Diclofenac) and a partial mu agonist drug (Tramadol) were administered i.v. during the procedure to prevent early postoperative pain. Recovery time, postoperative pain, recovery of cognition and nausea or vomiting were also evaluated during the first six postoperative hours. Overall mean systolic blood pressures and heart rate were similar in the two groups during surgery. Mean times to extubation and to recall of birth-date and room number were also similar. The quality of awakening was good in the two groups. Most patients complained of moderate pain or had no pain during the first six postoperative hours. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in both groups. No other side effect was observed. These data suggest that the association of Remifentanil, Methylprednisolone, Diclofenac and Tramadol is an useful technique in ambulatory oral surgery in two comparable anesthetic regimens.
 ...
PMID:Use of remifentanil in combination with desflurane or propofol for ambulatory oral surgery. 1153 10

Propofol and alfentanil are commonly used for sedation and pain control. A preliminary study to compare the usefulness of these drugs was carried out in ten healthy patients requiring bilateral wisdom tooth surgery. The operations were done in two appointments with the patient receiving a different drug on each occasion. Anxiety levels were recorded on visual analogue scales pre and post-operatively. Both agents caused a decrease in anxiety scores, with propofol causing a more significant reduction. Vomiting and nausea with alfentanil was noted in three patients. Propofol also had an amnesic effect which alfentanil did not have. In conclusion, propofol would appear to be the drug of choice within the limitations of this pilot study.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil for third molar surgery--preliminary results of a pilot study. 1169 58


<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>