Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Seventeen patients with malignant hypercalcemia were treated with a combination of a single dose of 3-amino 1-hydroxypropylidene-1-bisphosphonate (APD [also known as AHPrBP or palmidronate disodium]) and salmon calcitonin given as suppositories for 3 days. To assess whether such a combined short treatment has a significant benefit leading to earlier normalization of the plasma calcium level than does APD alone, 17 additional patients matched for the type of tumor, initial plasma calcium level, urinary hydroxyproline level, and the dose of APD served as controls. All patients receiving the combination of calcitonin and APD achieved normalization of the plasma calcium level within 9 days, with a decrease from 3.22 +/- 0.90 mmol/L (mean +/- SEM) to 2.29 +/- 0.03 mmol/L. In the group receiving APD alone, the plasma calcium level normalized in only 14 of 17 patients by day 9. In the group receiving calcitonin and APD, the drop in the plasma calcium level occurred more rapidly, and the plasma calcium values were lower from days 2 to 4. This advantage was explained by the calciuric effect of calcitonin, as reflected by a significant decrease in the notional setting of renal reabsorption of calcium, reaching 2.16 +/- 0.06 mmol/L compared with 2.34 +/- 0.06 mmol/L in the group receiving APD alone. There were no side effects of both treatments, in particular neither flushing nor nausea induced by the suppositories of calcitonin. Clinical Improvement occurred after 2 days in the group receiving the combined treatment. In conclusion, the combined treatment is rapidly effective and safe in the treatment of patients with hypercalcemia, particularly when the notional setting of renal tubular reabsorption of calcium is increased and a rapid correction of the plasma calcium level is needed.
 ...
PMID:Fast and effective treatment of malignant hypercalcemia. Combination of suppositories of calcitonin and a single infusion of 3-amino 1-hydroxypropylidene-1-bisphosphonate. 222 97

Ten patients with severe Paget's disease of bone and serum alkaline phosphatase (sAP) greater than 900 IU/l were treated for six months with the oral diphosphonate APD, (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate). By the end of the treatment period there was a reduction in the log mean urine hydroxyproline (uHP) and the log mean sAP of 92% and 87% respectively. In four patients both sAP and uHP fell to within the normal range and remained normal for at least six months after therapy was stopped. Bone scintigraphy showed a fall in 99mTc-MDP uptake in sites of active Paget's disease in all patients and histomorphometry showed no increase in osteoid. Repair of radiological osteolytic lesions was observed in 6/6 patients and progression of tibial osteolytic wedges was arrested in 5/5 patients and reversed in four. This improvement persisted six months after completion of therapy but further wedge progression occurred in one patient whose urine HP remained elevated. There were no serious effects though five patients complained of nausea. The clinical and biochemical responses to APD were equivalent to those observed in the same patients during a previous six month course of combined therapy with human calcitonin (CT) + EHDP except that there was additional biochemical and radiological evidence of bone healing. This study confirms PAD as an effective treatment of severe Paget's disease of bone.
 ...
PMID:Effective oral treatment of severe Paget's disease of bone with APD (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate); a comparison with combined calcitonin + EHDP (1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate). 644 63

Background. The efficacy, safety, and cost benefit of olanzapine (OLN) when compared to aprepitant (APR) in the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) were evaluated. Methods. A prospective pilot study was done in chemotherapy-naive patients receiving HEC to compare OLN versus APR along with palonosetron and dexamethasone. 100 patients consented to the protocol and were randomized and evaluated for Complete Response (CR) (no emesis, no rescue). Results. CR was 86% for the acute period, 86% for the delayed period, and 80% for the overall period in 50 patients receiving the APD regimen. CR was 84% for the acute period, 88% for the delayed period, and 78% for the overall period for 50 patients receiving the OPD regimen. Patients without nausea were APD: 88% acute, 84% delayed, and 84% overall, and OPD: 84% acute, 88% delayed, and 84% overall. There were no significant grade 3 or 4 toxicities. OPD was comparable to APD in the control of CINV. Conclusion. In this study, there was no significant difference between olanzapine and aprepitant in preventing CINV with highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Olanzapine may thus be used as a potential, safe, and cost beneficial alternative to prevent nausea and vomiting in HEC.
...
PMID:The Efficacy, Safety, and Cost Benefit of Olanzapine versus Aprepitant in Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Pilot Study from South India. 2692 65