Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (
nausea
)
23,468
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The cause of postanesthesia shaking (PS) is unknown. PS develops spontaneously and unpredictably in up to 67% of patients emerging from general anesthesia, and it continues for minutes to hours when not treated with medications or radiant heat lamps. The purposes of this study were to (1) examine whether butorphanol tartrate (
Stadol
; Anaquest, Madison, WI/Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Evansville, IN), meperidine (Demerol; Winthrop, NY, NY), and morphine are differentially effective in suppressing PS, (2) compare PS suppression by sex, and (3) determine time to PS development. PS, measured on a 0 to 3 visual scale, developed in 120 of 533 patients (23%). Medication treatment was initiated for 66 of 120 patients by PACU nurses following standard policies and procedures for intravenous doses of 1 mg butorphanol (n = 12), 15 to 30 mg meperidine (n = 18; n = 23), or 2 to 4 mg morphine (n = 13). Treatment effect was measured in units on a 0 to 2 visual scale. By t test, butorphanol is more effective within 2 minutes than meperidine for suppressing shaking alone (P less than .02) or shaking among patients also complaining of pain (P less than .02). Morphine does not relieve shaking. The chi 2 test indicates women suppress PS more rapidly than men (P less than .01), and PS develops within 5 minutes of PACU arrival (P less than .001). Findings suggest that butorphanol is an alternative PS treatment to meperidine, since it relieves shaking within 2 to 5 minutes without producing
nausea
, vomiting, or recurrence of shaking.
...
PMID:Butorphanol tartrate (Stadol) relieves postanesthesia shaking more effectively than meperidine (Demerol) or morphine. 157
Butorphanol
(
Stadol
) is a synthetic agonist-antagonist analgesic from the 14-hydroxymorphinan series. Animal studies display analgesia, antitussive effects, low gastrointestinal activity, limited respiratory depression, some cardiovascular and skeletal muscle actions, diuresis, slight miosis and opiate antagonism.
Butorphanol
is metabolized in the liver with renal excretion, yielding a half-life of 3-4 h. Pain relief is good to excellent with parenteral administration in 90% of patients with moderate to severe pain. Surgical anesthetic indications involve preoperative and preinduction supplementation, balanced anesthesia and postoperative pain. Side effects are sedation,
nausea
, elevated pulmonary vascular pressures and rarely CNS excitation. Limited respiratory depression exists.
Butorphanol
is a potent analgesic agent with a favorable side effect profile.
...
PMID:Butorphanol. 388 79
One hundred women with moderate-to-very-severe prepartum pain participated in a double-blind study of intravenously injected butorphanol and meperidine that compared the analgesic properties, effect on the process of labor, condition of the newborn and the incidence of side effects associated with the two drugs. Cervical dilation, infant birth weight and Apgar scores were not significantly different between the test groups. The mean fetal heart rate for the butorphanol group was significantly faster than that of the meperidine group.
Butorphanol
provided significantly more analgesia than meperidine at 30 minutes and one hour after administration, based on pain intensity and pain relief scores. Some side effects, including sedation, dizziness, lightheadedness,
nausea
, vomiting and pain at the injection site, were reported for both drugs.
...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of intravenously injected butorphanol and meperidine in parturients. 611 May 84
Butorphanol
is a synthetic opioid agonist-antagonist analgesic with a pharmacological and therapeutic profile that has been well established since its launch as a parenteral formulation in 1978. The introduction of a transnasal formulation of butorphanol represents a new and noninvasive presentation of an analgesic for moderate to severe pain. This route of administration bypasses the gastrointestinal tract, and this is an advantage for a drug such as butorphanol that undergoes significant first-pass metabolism after oral administration. The onset of action and systemic bioavailability of butorphanol following transnasal delivery are similar to those after parenteral administration. The analgesic efficacy of transnasal butorphanol was generally superior to that of placebo in clinical trials in patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain or migraine headache. Results from single trials indicate that transnasal butorphanol provides pain relief comparable to that of intramuscular pethidine (meperidine) in postsurgical pain and comparable to or greater than intramuscular methadone in migraine headache. Moderate to severe musculoskeletal pain also appears to be responsive to transnasal butorphanol on the basis of results from 1 small noncomparative study. Tolerability of transnasal butorphanol parallels that of the injectable form, with somnolence, dizziness, nausea and/or vomiting reported most frequently. Thus, transnasal butorphanol is a novel formulation of an established analgesic which appears suitable for the short term treatment of moderate to severe pain, especially in an ambulatory setting. Transnasal butorphanol is likely to provide an alternative to oral opioid analgesics, particularly in the presence of
nausea
or vomiting, or to parenteral opioids when the oral route of administration is not appropriate.
...
PMID:Transnasal butorphanol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in acute pain management. 758 85
We studied transnasal butorphanol (
Stadol
NS) for pain relief during acute migraine in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial using ambulatory patients at 10 geographically diverse headache centers. Patients were volunteer adults diagnosed with migraine with or without aura by International Headache Society criteria. One hundred fifty-seven patients completed the study. We treated the pain of one headache in each patient with either transnasal butorphanol (n = 107) or transnasal placebo (n = 50). Pain relief, pain intensity,
nausea
, vomiting, and effect on function were measured periodically. Adverse experiences were documented. Global assessments were made at follow-up. With butorphanol, migraine pain was reduced from moderate, severe, or incapacitating to slight or absent for 35 patients (33%) within 30 minutes, for 50 patients (47%) within 1 hour, and for 76 (71%) within 6 hours, compared to 2 (4%), 8 (16%) and 15 (30%) respectively for placebo. Side effects were prominent, though confounded by the migraine. The most common side effects, compared to placebo, were dizziness (58% vs 4%), nausea and/or vomiting (38% vs 18%), and drowsiness (29% vs 0%). We conclude that transnasal butorphanol is a useful analgesic for the pain of acute migraine. Its prominent side effects and low self reinforcement rate may limit its usefulness in some patients, while increasing its appropriateness for others.
...
PMID:Transnasal butorphanol in the treatment of acute migraine. 773 63
Transnasal administration of systemic medication offers a convenient alternative to intravenous and intramuscular routes.
Butorphanol
, a noncontrolled, synthetic opioid agonist-antagonist analgesic is available in a nasal spray formulation. Transnasal butorphanol appears to be a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative and migraine headache pain. Side effects include sedation,
nausea
and confusion; transnasal butorphanol also has the potential to induce abstinence syndromes in opioid-dependent patients.
...
PMID:Transnasal butorphanol. 794 13
Background:
Patients undergoing microvascular decompression are often accompanied with high risk of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). In this study, we compare the antiemetic efficacy of butorphanol or sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing microvascular decompression.
Methods:
Patients undergoing microvascular decompression were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence and severity of PONV during the 72 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included levels of pain intensity and sedation and consumption of opioids at 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. We also recorded the intraoperative hemodynamics, consumption of narcotic drugs, operation and anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, infusion volume and urine output, requirements of rescue antiemetics or analgesics, the satisfaction scores of patients and surgeons, complications, and length of stay.
Results:
The overall incidence rates of nausea and vomiting during the 72 h after surgery were significantly reduced in group DB (76.00 and 44.00% in group DS vs. 54.17% and 22.92% in group DB,
P
< 0.05). Patients in group DB had a lower incidence of
nausea
than those in group DS at intervals of 1-6 and 6-24 h (
P
< 0.05). However, patients in group DB had a lower incidence of vomiting than those in group DS only at intervals of 1-6 h (
P
< 0.05). Similarly, the number of patients requiring rescue antiemetics was also significantly reduced in group DB compared with that in group DS at intervals of 1-6 h (
P
< 0.05). The number of patients experiencing moderate to severe PONV was comparable between the two groups during 72 h after surgery (
P
> 0.05). The consumption of opioid morphine equivalent was significantly reduced in group DB (
P
< 0.05). Compared with those in group DS, the satisfaction scores of both patients and surgeons were significantly increased in group DB (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusion:
Butorphanol
combined with dexmedetomidine could reduce early PONV and the number of patients requiring rescue antiemetics, especially at intervals of 1-6 h, while the satisfaction scores of both patients and surgeons were significantly increased.
...
PMID:Dexmedetomidine Combined With Butorphanol or Sufentanil for the Prevention of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Decompression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 3319 32