Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (
nausea
)
23,468
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
A double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at 21 centers in 14 countries compared the effectiveness and side effects of the traditional Yuzpe method of emergency contraception (200 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and 1 mg of levonorgestrel divided into 2 equal doses) and levonorgestrel alone (2 doses of 0.75 mg each). 1955 women (979 in the Yuzpe group and 976 in the levonorgestrel group) completed the study. 42 women had subsequent pregnancies, although at least 4 women were pregnant at the time of treatment. The pregnancy rate was 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.0) for the levonorgestrel group and 3.2% (95% CI, 2.2-3.5) for the Yuzpe regimen. The relative risk of pregnancy was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.18-0.70).
Levonorgestrel
prevented 85% of expected pregnancies while the Yuzpe method prevented only 57%. Efficacy increased when the regimen was initiated within 24 hours and decreased as the time after unprotected intercourse approached 72 hours. Women in the levonorgestrel group reported less
nausea
, vomiting, dizziness, and fatigue than their counterparts in the Yuzpe group. Overall, 57% of women started bleeding within 3 days of their expected menses and the mean duration of menses of 4.7 days in both groups. Results of this study support use of levonorgestrel alone as an alternative for emergency contraception.
...
PMID:Levonorgestrel versus the "Yuzpe" regimen. New choices in emergency contraception. 1009 1
Estrogen content represents a tradeoff between cycle control and side effects, but few direct comparisons of 20 and 30/35 mcg preparations are available. To address this issue, researchers conducted a randomized, open-label multicenter clinical trial comparing
Alesse
(20 mcg ethinyl estradiol [EE]), Mircette (20 mcg EE), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (35 mcg EE) among 463 oral contraceptive starters or switchers. Bloating, breast tenderness, and
nausea
were approximately 50% more common in women using 35 mcg EE as in those using 20 mcg EE preparations. Cycle control was similar in all products, although during the first two cycles among starters, users of Mircette and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (Tri-Cyclen) exhibited better cycle control than
Alesse
users. Discontinuation and pregnancy rates were not significantly higher in 35 mcg EE users.
...
PMID:Efficacy, cycle control, and side effects of low- and lower-dose oral contraceptives: a randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35 micrograms estrogen preparations. 1071 66
A study of 2 low-dose oral contraceptives, Loestrin and
Nordette
, was conducted in association with the National Family Planning Board in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, West Malaysia, to determine differences in continuation rates and reasons for discontinuation. This report includes analysis of 96 women, 91.7% of whom were interval patients, randomly allocated to 1 of the above OCs between December 1979 and January 1981. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3 and 6 months after admission with symptom grids completed during the 1st, 3rd, and 6th cycles. The continuation rates at 6 months were 85.9 and 89.8 for Loestrin and
Nordette
, respectively. The corresponding follow-up rates were 73.9 and 68.3. The side effect reported most often among both groups was breakthrough bleeding (BTB). In addition, the proportion of Loestrin users who reported BTB at least once during the study was significantly higher than the proportion of
Nordette
users (38.3% versus 18.4%, p 0.05). Other symptoms reported were
nausea
, headaches, intestinal problems, and abdominal pain. No accidental pregancies were reported during this study. There were a total of 6 (11.8%) discontinuations in the Loestrin group and 4 (8.9%) in the
Nordette
group.
...
PMID:A comparative study of Loestrin versus Nordette in Kelantan, West Malaysia. 1226 18
Results of a large multicentered clinical trial of a new contraceptive vaginal ring show that the new ring may be about as effective as oral contraceptives but with fewer side effects. The ring, which is a little smaller than a 75 mm diaphragm and has a Silastic inner core and outer tubing, is avilable in 2 sizes (50 mm or 58 mm) and contains a middle layer with a steroid mixture of estrogen and progestin. Both types of ring contain about 100 mg levonorgestrel and 50 mg estradiol. Ovulation is suppressed by the steroids in the ring. The ring is placed in the vagina for about 3 weeks and then removed for 1 week. Withdrawal bleeding occurs when the ring is removed. Comparative studies of the effectiveness of the ring and a pill (
Nordette
, which contains 150 mcg levonorgestrel and 30 mcg estradiol) show that after a year's use, both type of contraceptives had a pregnancy rate of about 3 pregnancies per 100 users. Ring users had higher continuation rates than pill users (50/100 women for the ring vs. 30/100 for the pill). Reasons for discontinuation for the ring include occurrence of vaginal discharge, vaginitis, and menstrual problems. Ring users had lesser incidence of
nausea
and headache compared to pill users; they also did not experience an increase in angiotensinogen levels or blood pressure. Another advantage of the ring is its once-a-month administration. Investigators are still testing the best method for using the ring. However, as testing is not yet complete, application for approval by the Food and Drug Administration may take quite some time.
...
PMID:Trials point to effectiveness of new vaginal ring. 1227 58
The 3 triphasic oral contraceptives currently marketed in the US are describes in reference to steroid composition and manufacturers claims concerning the reduced side affects associated with the triphasics. These triphasics are 1)Ortho-Novum 7-7-7, producted by the Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation; 2) Tri-Norinyl, produces by Syntex; and 3)
Triphasil
, produced by Wyeth Laboratries. The 1st 2 formulations were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (fda) in early 1984, andd
Triphasil
was approved in December, 1984. Despite the recency of triphasic availability, a survey of 13 family planning clinicians, conducted by Contraceptive Technology Update, revealrd that triphasics were the 2nd most common type of OC prescribed by the clinicians. All 3 triphasics provide varying daily doses of progestogen throughout the cycle but only
Triphasil
varies the daily dose of estrogen.
Triphasil
provides a total progestogen dose of 1.925 mg of levonor estrel for the entire cycle, and a daily dose of 0.05 mg for 6 days, 0.075 mg for 5 days, and 0.125 mg for 10 days. The total dose of ethinyl estradiol provides by
Triphasil
is 700 mcg, and the daily dose is 30 mcg for 6 days, 40 mcg for 5 days, and mcg for 10 days. Tri-Norinyl provides a total progedtogen dose of 15.0 mg ofnorethindine at a daily dose of 0.5 mg for 7 days, 1.0 mg for & days, anf 0.5 mg for 5 days. The total ethinyl estradiol dose is 735 mcg provided at a constant rate of 35 mcg for 21 days. Ortho-Novum 7-7-7 provides a total progestogen dose of 15.75 mg of norethindrone at a rate of 0.5 mg for 7 days, 0.75 mg for 7 days, and 1.0 mg for 7 days. The total dose of ethinyl estradiol is 735 mcg provided at a constant rate of 35 mcg/day for 21 days. The triphasics provide low steriod dosages in order to minimize longterm adverse effects; however, unlike other low dose formulations, the triphasics, according to the manufacturers, are associated with only minimal breakthrough bleeding problems. Ortho claims women who use Otrho-Novum 7-7-7 have bleeding patterns similar to those associated with Ortho-Novum 1-35 by the end of the 3rd menstrual cycle. Syntex claims that the incidence of breakthrough bleeding, amenorrhea, weight gain, headachess,
nausea
, and edema among women who use Tri-Norinyl is similar to that observed among women who use Norinyl 1-35. Wyeth reported that among women who took
Triphasil
for 25 montha, the total incidence of breakthrough bleeding was only 5.7%. The cost of the triphasics is similar to the cost of other low dose OCs, and the reiphasics are reportedly as effective as the higher dose OCs.
...
PMID:Three triphasic oral contraceptives now available in U.S. 1227 12
The acceptability and effectiveness of a progestogen-only oral contraceptive (OC),
Ovrette
, during lactation were investigated in 200 women recruited from a teaching hospital in Khartoum, Sudan.
Ovrette
contained 0.075 mg of norgestrel. 69 women (34.5%) had used OCs at some point prior to the index pregnancy. Serious complications (e.g., severe headache, chest pain, leg pain, abdominal pain, blurred vision) were reported by 8 respondents during the 12-month study period. Less serious side effects included dysmenorrhea (49 women),
nausea
(28 women), dizziness (38 women), vaginal discharge (86 women), headaches (78 women), and breast discomfort (21 women). Overall, 143 women (71.5%) experienced at least 1 side effect. Of the 21 women (10.5%) who discontinued
Ovrette
use before 12 months, 9 were motivated by menstrual problems and other side effects. The 12-month continuation rate was 89.1%. There were 2 pregnancies, only 1 of which represented method failure. These findings are consistent with previous studies indicating that use of progestin contraceptive agents is associated with more menstrual disturbances and pregnancies than combined OCs. Use of combined OCs is contraindicated during lactation, however.
...
PMID:A study of a progestogen only oral contraceptive for lactating women in Khartoum, Sudan. 1229 69
This article focuses on issues concerning the prescription and restriction of oral contraceptive (OC) use among smokers and new moms based on the findings from Contraceptive Technology's Update 2000 Contraception Survey involving family planning providers and clinicians. Overall, a majority (72%) of the providers restrict the pills to smokers aged 35-39 years, and 88.6% withhold the pills from smokers aged 40 and above. Providers believed that smoking increases the risk for developing cardiovascular disease; thus, all smokers are warned of that risk and are encouraged and advised to stop smoking. In addition, 42.5% of providers recommend new mothers to begin using the pills 4-6 weeks postpartum; and 45.1% say they start nursing mothers on progestin-only pills 4-6 weeks postpartum. Finally, half of survey participants chose
Alesse
, a 20 mcg pill, as their top choice for women who have experienced
nausea
on previous OC formulations.
...
PMID:Providing combined OCs: examine special issues. 1229 41
Women who do not have contraindications for oral contraceptives (OCs) and have experienced failure of their contraceptive method or used no contraceptive at all an use emergency postcoital contraceptive pills (ECPs). In fact, if used correctly, they could prevent 1.7 million unplanned pregnancies each year which is 50% lower than such pregnancies which already occur each year. They could also reduce the number of annual induced abortions by 50% from (1.6 million to 800,000). Various postcoital treatments in the US are 2 pills of Ovral within 72 hours of intercourse then 2 more pills 12 hours later and 4 pills of either Lo/Ovral,
Nordette
,
Levlen
,
Triphasil
, or
Tri-Levlen
followed by 4 more pills 12 hours later. Some gynecologists contend that any low-dose combined OC could be used as an ECP, but not study proves this. Besides, providers who do so risk a malpractice suit, because postcoital contraception is not on OC labels. An attorney suggests using OCs only for an emergency and to document all attempts at informed consent. Many children and clinicians have limited or no knowledge about ECPs. Those health providers who are familiar with them tend not to prescribe them because they fear legal actions. ECP side effects include severe
nausea
or vomiting, headache, breast tenderness,, dizziness, and fluid retention. These effects are not as great as the health risks of unplanned pregnancies, however. Yet, they are unpleasant enough to discourage repeated ECP use. Use of different methods of determining the number of pregnancies has resulted in broad ECP effectiveness rates (0-96% and 56-94%). Another analysis using combined data from the studies yielding the various results shows the effectiveness rate to be 75%. Anti-abortion groups may object to ECP use, just as they do for RU-486 which has fewer side effects, because one of its mechanisms of preventing pregnancy is it prevents implantation.
...
PMID:Postcoital pills could cut unplanned pregnancies by half. 1231 83
Oral contraceptive (OCs) users continue to complain of side effects such as headaches, mood swings, and weight gain, and switch pill formulations. Questionnaires for an annual oral contraceptive survey were mailed to subscribers in the May 1992 issue of Contraceptive Technology Update (CTU) 137 of 1600 surveys mailed were returned for a response rate of 8.5%. 64% of the respondents were nurse practitioners, 19% were physicians, 7% were physician assistants, 5% were registered nurses, and 5% were other types of providers. OC users tend to blame headaches, mood swings, or gaining weight on the pills. The CTU survey found that more than 60% of health care providers would advocate switching to a lower-dose estrogen pill or to a progestin-only pill for headaches and mood swings. For weight gain their first choice of treatment would be counseling about life style changes. 50-60% of American women discontinue OCs in the first year, mainly because of side effects such as breakthrough bleeding, headaches,
nausea
, weight gain, and acne. 89% of respondents said few women had sever, recurring headaches, but should that occur 66% of respondents would change to a lower-dose estrogen pill. Only 9% of respondents would recommend relaxation exercises and analgesics. 67% of respondents would change the pill formulation before suggesting a life style change when patients complain about mood swings. Ortho Novum 7/7/7 was the pill of choice for 61% of survey respondents, and
Triphasil
was the 2nd choice by 43%. An international group of physicians recommended that manufacturers, physicians, and OC providers take the lead in providing patients with acceptable counseling concerning correct OC use.
...
PMID:Experts debate pill switching to combat noncompliance. Special report: annual pill survey. 1234 22
Emergency contraception may avoid pregnancy after unprotected intercourse or when regular contraceptive measures fail.
Levonorgestrel
, a synthetic gestagen, is recommended for emergency contraception as a single 1.5-mg dose or, alternatively, two 0.75-mg doses taken 12 h apart. Its efficacy is moderate, preventing about 80% of pregnancies. Efficacy is higher the earlier after unprotected intercourse the drug is taken, but it may be administered up to 5 days post-coitum. Tolerance is similar to, or better than, those of other oral emergency contraceptives. Adverse effects include
nausea
, vomiting, headache, breast tenderness and transient alteration of menstrual bleeding pattern. It is not known whether levonogestrel increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy when the treatment fails. Its use as an ongoing contraceptive method is discouraged. When given before the preovulatory LH peak, levonorgestrel blocks or delays ovulation. It may also affect sperm migration in the female reproductive tract and have an effect on fertilization. Although it has been often postulated, there is no evidence for an anti-implantatory effect. Acquaintance with the method is quite variable among different societies, but it remains underutilized even where it is well known. Advance provision of the drug has been proposed as a way to promote its use. In clinical trials, advance provision did not adversely modify sexual or regular contraceptive behavior, but it did not reduce pregnancy or abortion rate either. Therefore, emergency contraception with levonorgestrel should be regarded as a backup method which is not a substitute for the continued use of more effective contraceptive methods.
...
PMID:[Emergency contraception with levonorgestrel]. 1805 Dec 34
<< Previous
1
2