Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy and safety of oral sumatriptan as a 100-mg dispersible tablet was compared with oral Cafergot (2 mg ergotamine tartrate, 200 mg caffeine) in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial. In the trial, 580 patients were treated from 47 investigating centres in nine European countries. Sumatriptan was significantly more effective than Cafergot at reducing the intensity of headache from severe or moderate to mild or none; 66% (145/220) of those treated with sumatriptan improved in this way by 2 h, compared with 48% (118/246) of those treated with Cafergot (p less than 0.001). The onset of headache resolution was more rapid with sumatriptan, whereas recurrence of migraine headache within 48 h was lower with Cafergot. Sumatriptan was also significantly more effective at reducing the incidence of nausea (p less than 0.001), vomiting (p less than 0.01) and photophobia/phonophobia (p less than 0.001) 2 h after treatment, and fewer patients on sumatriptan (24%) than on Cafergot (44%, p less than 0.001) required other medication after 2 h. The overall incidence of patients reporting adverse events was 45% after sumatriptan and 39% after Cafergot; the difference was not significant. The most commonly reported events in the sumatriptan-treated patients were malaise or fatigue and bad taste; these were generally mild and transient. Nausea and/or vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness or vertigo were reported by a greater proportion of Cafergot-treated patients. It is concluded that oral sumatriptan was well tolerated and is a more effective acute treatment for migraine than Cafergot.
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind comparison of sumatriptan and Cafergot in the acute treatment of migraine. The Multinational Oral Sumatriptan and Cafergot Comparative Study Group. 165 39

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of Cafergot P-B with that of its components, Cafergot, pentobarbital, and Bellafoline, and with placebo for the treatment of migraine. Patients with vascular headaches of the migraine type who regularly experienced nervous tension and some form of gastrointestinal distress with their headaches were randomized to one of five treatment groups. They were given treatment packets containing their assigned drug for use during two separate migraine attacks. Patients made pretreatment evaluations of the following symptoms: head pain, nervous tension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, abdominal cramps, and photophobia. They made posttreatment evaluations of these symptoms 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 hours after ingesting their assigned drug. Improvement scores were calculated from the differences between the pretreatment and the posttreatment ratings. Patients also made a final global assessment of their drug's efficacy. All patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and completed a baseline evaluation and at least one postdose evaluation of severity of pain were included in the analysis (n = 254). The comparisons of particular interest were those between Cafergot P-B and Cafergot and between Cafergot P-B and placebo. Cafergot P-B was significantly more effective than Cafergot in relieving head pain at hours 2 and 3, nervous tension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and photophobia. Cafergot P-B was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving head pain, nervous tension, nausea (second headache only), vomiting, and photphobia. The incidence of reported adverse effects was no greater with Cafergot P-B than with Cafergot; however, patients given Cafergot P-B reported less vomiting than did patients given Cafergot. The results of this study show that addition of pentobarbital and Bellafoline to Cafergot provides greater relief of pain, vomiting, nervous tension, photophobia, and other symptoms associated with migraine, while reducing the severity of the nausea that may accompany a migraine headache or Cafergot therapy.
 ...
PMID:Symptomatic relief of migraine: multicenter comparison of Cafergot P-B, Cafergot, and placebo. 249 84

3 case studies of migrainous patients taking oral contraceptives (OCs) are presented in this report. The role of OCs in triggering a migraine attack and possibly elevating the risk of a stroke in a patient with migraines is examined. In the 1st case, a 27-year old white female accountant complained of temporal throbbing headaches associated with nausea, vomiting, hazy vision, small scotomas, and photophobia. The patient had been having the headaches twice a month since 1978 and she took Fiorinal to relieve them. Her physician diagnosed the headaches as migraine. The patient acknowledged that she started getting these headaches after beginning to use OCs 3 years earlier. Her family history revealed that her mother had severe migraine headaches which sometimes were accompanied by unilaterial paresthesia, as well as high blood pressure. Ophthalmoscopy, slitlamp, accommodation, and intraocular pressure findings were unremarkable. The patient was counseled about the factors which can trigger a migraine attack and was advised that eliminating these factors may reduce the frequency and intensity of the headaches. The patient was advised that OCs could increase her risk of having a stroke, especially with her family history. Her family physician subsequently reduced the dosage of her OCs. 5 months later the patient reported that she was trying to avoid the migraine triggering factors (e.g., she was wearing her sunglasses). Her headaches had become less frequent and less severe. The 2nd patient also began to have migraine attacks after beginning to use OCs. The 3rd patient's headaches became so severe after taking the pill that she consulted a neurologist. The 2nd and 3rd patients complained that the headaches were most severe at the time each month when they resumed OC use. None of the 3 patients discontinued OC use. The 2nd and 3rd patients were using a low estrogen OC, and the 1st patient was put on a low estrogen dosage after this optometrist's recommendation to her physician. Encouraging the patients to discuss the dosage of OCs with their family physician may be one of the ways to reduce the unwanted effect of the pill. The effect of OCs goes beyond triggering a headache. They may trigger a stroke particularly if the patient has a family history of high blood pressure as did the patients in this study. Differential diagnosis of migraine headaches includes muscle contraction, tension, sinus, and allergic headaches. Optometrists can be most helpful to the patients by counseling them to avoid the triggering factors. Glare, a triggering factor, could be reduced by tinted spectacles.
 ...
PMID:Migraine and oral contraceptives. 714 75

Sumatriptan is a selective 5-HT1-like agonist, which is effective in the treatment of migraine and cluster headache. It has been rigorously assessed in clinical trials involving over 7000 patients who have treated over 35,000 migraine attacks. Both subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan provide a high level of efficacy with 86% of patients obtaining relief after a single 6 mg injection (at 2 h) and 75% after 100 mg oral sumatriptan (4 h), compared with up to 37% in the placebo-treated group (P < 0.001). The onset of effect is rapid, occurring 10 min after injection and 30 min after the tablet. Oral sumatriptan (100 mg) has been evaluated against ergotamine, 2 mg, plus caffeine, 200 mg (as Cafergot); and against aspirin, 900 mg, plus metoclopramide, 10 mg. Headache relief was superior in sumatriptan-treated patients; 66% obtaining relief at 2 h, compared with 48% on Cafergot (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients obtaining complete relief of headache (Grade 0, no pain) was significantly higher with sumatriptan (40%) than with Cafergot (14%) at 2 h. Associated symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and photophobia are effectively relieved by sumatriptan, whereas Cafergot provoked nausea and vomiting in a proportion of patients. Headache relief with sumatriptan was also superior to that seen with aspirin plus metoclopramide. Sumatriptan was as effective in the relief of accompanying nausea and vomiting as aspirin plus metoclopramide. The efficacy of sumatriptan is maintained after repeated long-term use; over a six-month period efficacy was comparable in the first and last attacks, regardless of how many attacks were treated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. 838 52

Ten patients with menstrually related migraine headaches and significant features of cluster headache are described. The mean age of onset of the headache was 29 years. The duration of the pain was more typical for migraine, with an average of 3 days. The pain was sharp with associated tear formation and nasal congestion. Eight of the women described significant nausea. Only one reported any type of cluster headache outside of the menstrual time. Four patients experienced tension headaches, and four also had migraines not related to menses (without cluster features). Preventive medications were generally not helpful. The abortive medications that did help included sumatriptan, Cafergot PB suppositories, and corticosteroids. Oxygen was useful in two patients. While analgesics did help three patients, lidocaine nasal spray was ineffective in four of the women.
 ...
PMID:Menstrual migraine with features of cluster headache. A report of 10 cases. 898 89

This retrospective study sought to examine the benefits of the nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine (AAC; Excedrin Migraine, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New York, New York) for the treatment of menstruation-associated migraine compared with migraine not associated with menses. Data were derived from 3 double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose trials enrolling subjects who met the International Headache Society's diagnostic criteria for migraine with or without aura. Subjects with incapacitating disability (attacks requiring bed rest >50% of the time) and those who usually experienced vomiting > or =20% of the time were excluded. Retrospective analysis of the 1220 subjects included in the efficacy-evaluable data set indicated that 185 women treated menstruation-associated migraine, 781 women treated migraine not associated with menses, and 1 woman provided no information regarding menstrual status. At baseline and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours postdose, subjects assessed the intensity of headache pain, functional disability, nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Pain intensity, nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia were rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 = none to 3 = severe; functional disability was rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = none to 4 = incapacitating. For both menstruation-associated migraine and migraine not associated with menses, the proportion of subjects with pain intensity reduced to mild or none (responders) was significantly greater with AAC than with placebo at all postdose time points from 0.5 through 6 hours (P< or =0.05), with no statistically significant difference in treatment effect between menstruation-associated migraine and migraine not associated with menses at any postdose time point. Migraine characteristics such as photophobia, phonophobia, and functional disability were significantly improved in AAC-treated subjects at all time points from 1 through 6 hours (P< or =0.01) in both the menstruating and nonmenstruating groups. Significant relief from nausea was experienced in both menstruation-associated migraine and migraine not associated with menses, but relief appeared earlier in the AAC nonmenstruating subjects (2 hours postdose, P< or =0.01) than in the menstruating subjects (6 hours postdose, P< or =0.05). Beginning at 3 hours postdose, significantly fewer subjects treated with AAC required rescue medication (P< or =0.05) for menstruation-associated migraine (AAC 6%, placebo 15%) and migraine not associated with menses (AAC 7%, placebo 14%). The most commonly used rescue medications in both the menstruating and nonmenstruating groups were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prescription combination analgesics/narcotics, and prescription migraine preparations. AAC was well tolerated in both menstruation-associated migraine and migraine not associated with menses; in general, adverse experiences were similar in both groups. The proportion of subjects who had 1 or more adverse experiences was significantly higher among those receiving AAC than among those receiving placebo (menstruation-associated migraine: AAC 26.4%, placebo 12.6%, P = 0.025; nonmenstruation-associated migraine: AAC 18.6%, placebo 11.4%, P = 0.005). Adverse experiences were similar in type and severity to those previously associated with single doses of acetaminophen, aspirin, or caffeine. Thus the nonprescription combination of AAC was highly effective in treating the pain, disability, and associated symptoms of both menstruation-associated migraine and migraine not associated with menses.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of menstruation-associated migraine with the nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine: results from three randomized, placebo-controlled studies. 1032 17

The 5-HT(1B/1D/1F) agonist eletriptan, at an oral dose of 80 mg, has been shown to be more efficacious than sumatriptan 100 mg and placebo in the treatment of migraine attacks with or without aura. Another commonly prescribed oral treatment for migraine attacks is Cafergot (1 mg ergotamine tartrate with 100 mg caffeine per tablet). The efficacy, tolerability and safety of 40- and 80-mg doses of eletriptan and 2 tablets of Cafergot were compared in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial involving 733 migraine patients. Patients recorded symptoms at baseline (before treatment) and 1, 2, 4 and 24 h after dosing. Headache intensity was assessed on a 4-point scale (3 = severe pain, 2 = moderate pain, 1 = mild pain, 0 = no pain). Significantly more eletriptan-treated patients (80 mg, 68%; 40 mg, 54%) than Cafergot-treated patients (33%; p < 0.001) reported headache response (improvement from moderate-to-severe to mild or no pain) at 2 h. Substantially more eletriptan recipients reported no pain (80 mg, 38%; 40 mg, 28%; Cafergot, 10%; placebo, 5%; p < 0.001). Eletriptan headache response rates at 1 h were significantly higher (80 mg, 39%; 40 mg, 29%; Cafergot, 13%; placebo, 13%; p < 0.002 for each comparison). Both doses of eletriptan were significantly more effective than Cafergot in reducing nausea (p < 0.0001), photophobia (80 mg, p < 0.0001; 40 mg, p < 0.002), phonophobia (80 mg, p < 0.0001; 40 mg, p < 0.003) and functional impairment (p < or = 0.001) at 2 h. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate and transient. This randomised trial shows that oral eletriptan is more efficacious in the acute treatment of migraine than oral Cafergot and is well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy, tolerability and safety of oral eletriptan and ergotamine plus caffeine (Cafergot) in the acute treatment of migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. 1184 98

Ergotamine is a well known pharmacological remedy applied in neurology (treatment of vascular headache) and in obstetrics (abortive remedy, uterus atony). But today it is rarely used, because of new safer anti-migraine medicine (triptanes) which cause fewer side effects. According to obstetrical indications ergotamine is applied only in hospital treatment. For that reason, cases of intoxication by this class of drugs are rarely observed. Ergotamine causes constriction of the blood vessels through the blockade of alpha-receptors and stimulation of the serotonin-receptors on the walls of blood vessels both in the central nervous system and in peripheral circulation. Intoxication/overdose symptoms may appear on application of therapeutic dose by sensitive patients, mostly by patients with migraine headache using ergotamine preparation for relief of migraine attacks. In the Regional Centre of Clinical Toxicology, a 21-year-old patient was hospitalized. She took about 20 tablets of Cafergot (complex preparation containing 1mg ergotamine tartare and 100mg caffeine). During her stay on the ward, typical symptoms of severe poisoning were observed: nausea, severe vomiting, dizziness, decreased blood pressure without perceptible pulse, narrowing of the blood vessels in the extremities of the body (peripheral vasoconstriction) - paresthesia, digital cyanosis, refrigeration of legs, angina. Due to taking once of a great dose of the drug by the patient, violent process of intoxication, possibility of dangerous complication and also the unavailability of specific antidotes and lack of efficient methods of extracorporeal elimination of the drug, the patient was intensively controlled and symptomatic treatments according to the law of intensive therapy was applied.
 ...
PMID:[Ergotamine poisoning: a case study]. 2324 49