Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Recently, a new nasal spray formulation of dihydroergotamine was developed which facilitates at-home treatment of migraine. We studied the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dihydroergotamine nasal spray as monotherapy in the acute treatment of classic and common migraine in two, identical, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Of the 229 patients enrolled, 206 (102 dihydroergotamine nasal spray, 104 placebo) were included in the intent-to-treat analyses; 182 treated two headaches and 24 treated one headache. Based on both the patients' and physicians' ratings, dihydroergotamine nasal spray was significantly superior to placebo for reducing the severity of headache pain in both studies, and in relieving nausea in Study 2. The onset of significant efficacy with dihydroergotamine nasal spray compared to that with placebo for both severity of headache pain and relief of nausea occurred at 1 hour in Study 2 and at 3 hours in Study 1. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray was also significantly superior to placebo for the relief of headache pain in both studies. Based on the physicians' global evaluations of treatment efficacy for headache pain, 71% of the dihydroergotamine-treated patients in Study 2 and 59% of their counterparts in Study 1 were considered to be responders. The dihydroergotamine-treated patients had less newly-occurring vomiting than the placebo-treated patients. The majority of adverse events reported by the dihydroergotamine-treated patients were nasopharyngeal. The results demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dihydroergotamine nasal spray as monotherapy in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dihydroergotamine nasal spray as monotherapy in the treatment of acute migraine. Dihydroergotamine Nasal Spray Multicenter Investigators. 777 72

The Regional Migraine Field Trial assessed the efficacy and safety of dihydroergotamine mesylate (D.H.E. 45) for migraine in the office setting. Patients were admitted to the study provided they met the International Headache Society definition of migraine with or without aura. Thirty-eight neurologists enrolled 311 patients (274 women and 37 men) between the ages of 13 and 70 years in this open-design study. Ninety-five percent of the patients had moderate or severe headache pain at entry, and 62% had nausea. All patients received a single intramuscular injection of D.H.E. 45 1 mg. A second intramuscular injection of 1 mg was given 60 minutes after the first injection, if needed. An antiemetic was administered concomitantly with D.H.E. 45, if needed. Rescue therapy was given at the investigators' discretion. Efficacy was judged by the relief of pain, patients' ability to function, need for a second injection, need for rescue medication, and need for an antiemetic. At 30 and 60 minutes, 46% and 72% of patients had only mild or no head pain, respectively. At 24 hours, 77% of all patients had mild or no head pain. D.H.E. 45 also improved functional ability. At 30 and 60 minutes, 58% and 75% of patients had only mild or no disability, respectively. At 24 hours, 81% had mild or no impairment. Nausea was present in 62% of patients at the outset, 40% of patients at 30 minutes, and 30% at 60 minutes. An antiemetic was given to 43% of patients at the outset. The presence of nausea was similar whether or not patients received an antiemetic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Office-based treatment of acute migraine with dihydroergotamine mesylate. 826 92

A woman with a 7-year history of intermittent migraine had 3 months of gradually worsening headaches. Initial neurologic examination including fundus examination was normal, and initial head computerized tomographic (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were thought to be normal. The patient was given dihydroergotamine (DHE-45), 1.0 mg, intravenously for relief of headache. Five hours later, she complained of severe diffuse headache and nausea. Neurologic examination showed left arm weakness and sensory loss, blurring of the left optic disc, and bilateral Babinski signs. Cerebral arteriography demonstrated thrombosis of the sagittal sinus, which in retrospect was present on the initial contrast CT scan and MRI scan. The patient's deficits worsened, and she eventually died 20 days later as a result of cerebral infarctions and increased intracranial pressure, despite attempts at selective thrombolysis of the sagittal sinus. DHE has potent venoconstrictive effects. We suspect that DHE helped precipitate neurologic deterioration in this patient with sagittal sinus thrombosis.
 ...
PMID:Onset of neurologic deficits after treatment with dihydroergotamine in a patient with sagittal sinus thrombosis. 877 72

The effectiveness of dihydroergotamine administered by home subcutaneous injection by the patient or family for severe headache attacks was assessed retrospectively in 51 patients. Average follow-up was 21 weeks. Twenty-one patients had intermittent migraine attacks, 27 had transformed migraine with chronic daily headache, and 3 had chronic tension-type headache. Of the 51 patients taught home injection, 35% had an excellent overall response, 18% had a good response, 12% had a poor response but continued to use dihydroergotamine, and 35% had discontinued dihydroergotamine use. Side effects were the main reason for stopping dihydroergotamine. These included nausea or vomiting or both, limb pain or numbness or both, chest or throat tightness or both, and soreness at the injection site. Thirty-three patients (65%) continued to use dihydroergotamine at the end of the follow-up period. In patients who previously required injections from medical personnel for headache crises and in whom home injection of dihydroergotamine was effective, a dramatic reduction occurred in hospital emergency room and physician office utilization. Dihydroergotamine use by home injection can be an effective treatment for a significant proportion of patients with severe migraine including patients with transformed migraine and medication overuse.
 ...
PMID:Effectiveness of subcutaneous dihydroergotamine by home injection for migraine. 898 85

Ergotamine tartrate (ET) and dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) have been widely and effectively used in the treatment of migraine for many decades, although few randomized, controlled clinical trials have been conducted with these compounds. To compare their safety profiles, the world literature on the two agents was surveyed. The results are summarized, along with a critical analysis of the strengths and limitations of the various sources of safety data (in vitro research, animal studies, Phase I and II studies, controlled clinical trials, and postmarketing surveillance). Significant pharmacologic and safety differences exist between ET and DHE. Dihydroergotamine mesylate is a less potent arterial vasoconstrictor than ET, although nearly equipotent as a venoconstrictor. It is a more potent alpha-adrenergic antagonist, but is much less emetic, has less effect on the uterus, and is not associated with rebound headache. Adverse effects associated with ET (which are often due to excessive dosage and/or chronic usage) include nausea, acroparesthesia, ischemia, habituation and overuse headache, and, rarely, overt ergotism. Reports of serious adverse effects following recommended doses of DHE are rare. As with most antimigraine drugs, the most frequent adverse effect with intravenous (i.v.) DHE is nausea; however, following intramuscular (i.m.) or intranasal (IN) administration, the incidence of nausea is low and concomitant administration of an antiemetic is not needed. In patients without contraindications, both DHE and ET are safe and effective when used in recommended doses. Nearly 50 years of clinical experience without major safety problems allows a high level of confidence in their clinical use.
 ...
PMID:Ergotamine tartrate and dihydroergotamine mesylate: safety profiles. 900 72

In order to investigate headache related to intravenous immunoglobulin, we studied a 36-year-old woman with a history of migraine receiving weekly intravenous immunoglobulin for refractory myasthenia gravis who experienced severe headaches with each treatment. Neurological examination, CT scan of the head, and a lumber puncture after the first headache were normal. Significant therapeutic response was based upon 50% reduction in pain and associated features. Headache features included throbbing pain which worsened with head movement and was associated with severe photophobia and nausea. Sumatriptan, 6 mg subcutaneous, reduced headache significantly with resolution of associated complaints. Treatment prior to intravenous immunoglobulin with dihydroergotamine mesylate resulted in development of only a mild dull ache without further development of severe head pain. Dihydroergotamine mesylate was also abortive in the few instances when the headache worsened. Headaches associated with intravenous immunoglobulin may have features of migraine and may be successfully prevented and/or treated with 5-HT1D receptor agonists.
 ...
PMID:Successful treatment of headache related to intravenous immunoglobulin with antimigraine medications. 959 75

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intravenous diphenhydramine with dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE-45; Novartis International AG, Switzerland) in the treatment of severe, refractory, migraine headache. A retrospective review was conducted to include eighty randomly chosen patients who were admitted to the Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute's inpatient program at Chelsea Community Hospital. Patients had received nine doses of diphenhydramine or nine doses of DHE-45 during a 3-day period. Patients receiving DHE-45 also received metoclopramide (Reglan; AH Robins Company, Inc., Richmond, VA) as prophylaxis for nausea. Demographics, headache diagnosis, psychiatric discharge diagnoses, abortive medications, and adverse events were recorded and assessed.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of intravenous diphenhydramine versus intravenous DHE-45 in the treatment of severe migraine headache. 1562 28

Dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE), an ergot alkaloid, has been extensively utilized and studied in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy and safety of DHE, particularly in comparison to ergotamine tartrate (ET), a similar ergot alkaloid with a long history of use in the treatment of migraine. Structural differences between these 2 compounds account for clinically important distinctions in their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and adverse event profiles. DHE is a significantly less potent arterioconstrictor than is ET, which makes it a potentially much safer drug. In addition, DHE is associated with a markedly lower incidence of medication-withdrawal headache, nausea, and vomiting than is ET. The safety and efficacy data presented here are derived from clinical trials and case series involving DHE administered by intravenous infusion, intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, or intranasal spray.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacology of dihydroergotamine and evidence for efficacy and safety in migraine. 1707 49

Dihydroergotamine (DHE) was first used to treat migraine in 1945 and is currently included among migraine-specific treatments for moderate-severe migraine. DHE may be administered through several routes of delivery, with efficacy and tolerability varying among formulations. We review DHE formulation approaches for the acute treatment of migraine, reviewing pharmacokinetics/dynamics and comparing clinical response among various formulations. Pharmacokinetic properties vary among DHE formulations, with peak concentration occurring in 6 min with intravenous, 34 min with intramuscular, 56 min with intranasal, 12 min with oral inhalation and 75 min with oral administration. DHE is a potent agonist at serotonin 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors. Adverse effects due to binding to select adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors are significantly less with orally inhaled than intravenous DHE when comparing therapeutically effective doses. Among parenteral formulations (including subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous and nasal spray), efficacy is superior with injectable dosing. Nasal spray DHE is generally more effective than placebo, but less effective than sumatriptan. Orally inhaled DHE is likewise more effective than placebo, but there are no head-to-head comparisons with triptans available for review. Adverse effects, particularly nausea, may limit use of parenteral DHE. Nausea is generally less frequent with non-injectable dosing.
 ...
PMID:Dihydroergotamine: a review of formulation approaches for the acute treatment of migraine. 2362 Jan 46

Orally inhalable dihydroergotamine (iDHE), before the US Food and Drug Administration in 2013 for consideration for approval for acute treatment of episodic migraine in adults, is a user-friendly formulation of an older medication. Dihydroergotamine (DHE) has a heterogeneous receptor profile, central penetration, and persistent receptor binding that may account for its clinical prolonged benefits in acute treatment of migraine. The same features may result in the ability of DHE to reverse central sensitization and allodynia and to maintain efficacy deep into attacks. These characteristics make DHE particularly useful in treating migraine upon awakening, prolonged migraine and status migrainosus, menstrually related migraine, and for bridging patients out of medication-overuse headache/chronic migraine. The inhalable formulation has helpful pharmacokinetics, with a lower maximal serum concentration than intravenous DHE which may account for minimal nausea, and less binding to the potentially toxic serotonin2B receptor. The inhaler itself is designed for delivery of reproducible aliquots of intrapulmonary DHE with only nominal need for patient coordination. The inhalable form allows for bypassing the gastrointestinal tract in the setting of migraine nausea or vomiting, and greatly reduces first-pass effect. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported during the Phase 3 study of iDHE. Product taste and nausea were the most common side effects in both the Phase 3 regulatory trial and in the safety extension trial. Limitations for use of iDHE are those for any ergot or triptan, ie, contraindication in the setting of vascular disease. In addition, iDHE is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 liver enzymatic system. Inhalable DHE provides the promise of a new formulation of a valued medication with important clinical features, useful deep into attacks in a variety of situations.
...
PMID:Orally inhaled dihydroergotamine: a review. 2402 2


1