Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Women in labour receiving epidural analgesia with 15 ml bupivacaine 0.1% and 2 microg.ml(-1) fentanyl followed by 10-15-ml top-ups as required, who needed Caesarean section, were randomly allocated to receive 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.5% over 3 min with either 75 microg fentanyl (1.5 ml) or 1.5 ml saline. Further top-ups or inhaled or intravenous supplementation were given for breakthrough pain. Time to onset (loss of cold sensation to T4 and touch sensation to T5 bilaterally), quality of analgesia and side-effects were recorded. The study was stopped after 112 patients had been randomly assigned, due to a unit protocol change, from midwife-administered top-ups to patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Data from 51 patients given fentanyl and 54 given saline were available for analysis. There were no significant differences in onset times or supplementation between the groups, but there was more intra-operative nausea/vomiting with fentanyl (53%) than with saline (18%; p = 0.004). We found no advantage of adding fentanyl to epidural levobupivacaine when extending epidural analgesia in women already receiving epidural fentanyl during labour and there was an increased incidence of intra-operative nausea and vomiting. Power analysis suggested the same conclusion even had the study proceeded to completion.
 ...
PMID:Extending low-dose epidural analgesia in labour for emergency Caesarean section - a comparison of levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl. 1799 Dec 79

Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) is a new opioid formulation providing rapid-onset analgesia for the treatment of breakthrough pain (BTP). This study evaluated FBT for BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic cancer pain. The study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and was conducted at 30 outpatient treatment centers in the United States. Following open-label titration, patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 18 double-blind dose sequences (7 FBT tablets, 3 placebo) to treat 10 BTP episodes. Pain intensity was measured on an 11-point scale (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain). The primary efficacy measure was the sum of pain intensity differences (PIDs) for the first 60 minutes (SPID60); secondary efficacy measures included PIDs and pain relief (PR) measured from 5 minutes through 2 hours. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Of 129 patients enrolled, 87 entered the double-blind phase. SPID60 significantly favored FBT versus placebo (mean +/- SE, 9.7 +/- 0.63 vs 4.9 +/- 0.50; P < 0.0001). Secondary measures also favored FBT: PIDs and PR showed significant differences versus placebo at 10 minutes (0.9 vs 0.5; 0.815 vs 0.606, respectively, P < 0.0001) and all subsequent time points (P < 0.0001). AEs were typical of opioids (eg, nausea, dizziness, fatigue). In conclusion, in this study of opioid-tolerant patients with chronic cancer pain and BTP, FBT was efficacious, well tolerated, demonstrated rapid onset of analgesia (within 10 minutes), and had a sustained effect.
 ...
PMID:Fentanyl buccal tablet for relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related chronic pain. 1770 23

Studies of populations with chronic cancer pain have shown a high prevalence of breakthrough pain (BTP), defined as transitory, severe flares of pain that occur on a background of otherwise controlled, persistent pain. High BTP prevalence rates have also been reported in patients with chronic noncancer pain, although data in these patient populations are more limited. The incidence of BTP appears to be associated with progression of chronic disease, with more than 80% of patients reporting BTP with far-advanced, end-stage cancer and noncancer terminal conditions (1). The most widely accepted therapeutic approach for the management of BTP involves use of short-acting opioids taken as needed in addition to the around-the-clock opioid regimen being used for the continuous component of the persistent pain syndrome. For some patients, an optimal treatment outcome for BTP may be unattainable because of a mismatch between the time course of the BTP episode and the onset of analgesia of short-acting opioids. Breakthrough pain typically reaches peak intensity within a few minutes, whereas the onset of analgesia with traditional, orally administered short-acting opioids is between 30 and 60 minutes (2-7). Consequently, treatment outcomes for BTP are likely to be improved with agents that have a more rapid onset of analgesia. Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) is a new formulation of fentanyl indicated for the management of BTP in patients with cancer who are already receiving, and who are tolerant to, opioid therapy for their underlying persistent cancer pain. The FBT formulation uses OraVescent (Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA, USA) drug delivery technology to provide rapid absorption of fentanyl through the buccal mucosa. In pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers, FBT demonstrated high, early systemic absorption. In addition, FBT delivered a larger proportion of the fentanyl dose transmucosally and produced a greater early systemic exposure than oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC), which is also indicated for the management of BTP in opioid-tolerant cancer patients. A number of short-term studies have evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of FBT in the management of BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain. All these studies included an open-label dose-titration phase prior to randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment. Pain Intensity of a BTP episode was measured using an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), and the primary outcome measure was the Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) at a specified time point. Secondary efficacy measures included Pain Relief, Pain Intensity Differences, and the proportion of BTP episodes demonstrating >or=33% and >or=50% improvement in Pain Intensity scores at each time point postdose, and the proportion of BTP episodes requiring supplemental medication. In a pivotal study of opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related chronic pain and BTP, the primary outcome measure, SPID at 30 minutes (SPID(30)), significantly favored FBT compared with placebo (mean +/- SE: 3.0 +/- 0.12 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.18, p<0.0001). Better efficacy was also observed with FBT compared with placebo for pain relief, Pain Intensity Differences, and the proportion of episodes showing >or=33% and >or=50% improvement in Pain Intensity Scores. Treatment with FBT was generally well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and typical of those associated with opioid use (e.g., nausea, dizziness) (8). Similar results have been observed in studies of opioid-tolerant patients with BTP in association with noncancer-related chronic pain. In a study of patients with chronic low back pain, the primary outcome measure, SPID(60), significantly favored FBT over placebo (mean +/- SE: 8.3 +/- 0.66 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.57, p <0.0001). All secondary efficacy measures were similarly improved, with Pain Intensity Differences and Pain Relief scores showing significant differences versus placebo as early as 10 and 15 minutes, respectively. As in the study of cancer patients, treatment with FBT was well tolerated (9). Across all studies, there was no simple linear relationship between the effective dose of FBT and the dose of the around-the-clock opioid regimen or the previous supplemental opioid, indicating that doses of FBT should be individually titrated to effectiveness rather than calculated as a percentage of existing opioid regimens. This monograph summarizes current data on the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, safety and tolerability of FBT relating to the management of opioid-tolerant patients with BTP in association with chronic pain.
 ...
PMID:Fentanyl buccal tablet. 1830 3

The adequate use of opioids in the treatment of chronic cancer pain requires sound knowledge of selection criteria for the various opioids, the routes of administration, dosages, dosing schemes and possible side effects. Drug selection depends on the intensity of pain rather than on the specific pathophysiology. Mild to moderate pain can often be treated effectively by so-called "weak" opioids. These include codeine, dihydrocodeine and dextropropoxyphene. Non-opioid analgesics, like acetylsalicylic acid or paracetamol can be added according to the "analgesic ladder" proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). If adequate pain relief is not achieved "strong" opioids are required. The route of administration that is the safest and the least invasive for the patient should be chosen. Non-invasive (oral, rectal, sublingual, transdermal and intranasal) and invasive routes (intravenous, subcutaneous, spinal and epidural) are available (Table 8). Noninvasive routes are preferred, and most patients can be maintained on oral opioids. Alternatively, in some patients pain can be managed by the sublingual (buprenorphine) route. A transdermal preparation exists for fentanyl, but has not yet been approved for the German market. If the oral route cannot be used or if large doses are required, it will be necessary to change to an invasive route. Intravenous bolus injections provide the fastest onset of analgesic action. They are mostly used in very severe pain. Repeated injections can be avoided by using intravenous or subcutaneous infusions. Various types of pumps delivering analgesics at constant basal infusion rates with the option of rescue doses in case of breakthrough pain are available (patient-controlled analgesia=PCA). Opioids frequently used for s. c. infusion are morphine and hydromorphone. Adjuvant drugs (antiemetics, anxiolytics) can be added. Epidural or intrathecal administration of opioids should only be used in intractable pain or if severe side effects, such as sedation and confusion, will arise with systemic opioids. Morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl and sufentanil have been used, as have other additional compounds (e.g. local anaesthetics, clonidine). Intracerebroventricular application of morphine has been used only occasionally. In all cases, opioids should be given on to a fixed time schedule thereby, preventing pain from recurring. Additional rescue doses (approximately 50% of baseline single dose) are given for break-through pain. The most frequent side effect of opioids is constipation, and the administration of laxatives is often recommended (Table 5). Nausea, vomiting, sedation and confusion mostly occur in the beginning of opioid therapy. In contrast to constipation, tolerance to these effects develops within days or weeks. True dependence or psychological addiction rarely occurs in patients with chronic cancer pain. In most cases, progression of the underlying disease associated with increasing tissue damage and increasing pain is found. Fear of dependence and addiction often contributes to undertreatment of patients suffering from chronic cancer pain.
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacotherapy of cancer pain : 2. Use of opioids.]. 1841 94

ABSTRACT Although the preferred route of opioid administration is oral, patients with cancer often require an alternative route. Options include continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) or regularly scheduled intermittent subcutaneous injections (ISCI). CSCI maintains steady drug levels, theoretically avoiding the "bolus effect" of nausea and sedation immediately post-dose, and breakthrough pain prior to the next dose. However, portable infusion pumps can be costly to use. The Edmonton Injector is an inexpensive portable device for ISCI. CSCI and ISCI have not been directly compared. The objective of this trial was to compare CSCI and ISCI of opioid for treatment of cancer pain. Patients were recruited from two tertiary palliative care units. Eligibility criteria included stable cancer pain requiring opioid therapy, need for parenteral route, and normal cognition. Patients were randomly assigned to receive opioid by CSCI by portable pump or ISCI by Edmonton Injector for 48 hours, followed by crossover to the alternative modality for 48 hours. During each phase, placebo was administered by the alternative modality. The study was closed after 12 patients were entered, due to slow accrual. Eleven patients completed the study. There were no differences between CSCI and ISCI in mean visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, nausea or drowsiness; categorical rating score of pain; number of breakthrough opioid doses per day; global rating of treatment effectiveness; or adverse effects. In all cases, patients and investigators expressed no preference for one modality over another. Further research is required to confirm that opioid administration by CSCI and ISCI provide similar analgesic and adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of continuous and intermittent subcutaneous administration of opioid for cancer pain. 1845 9

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT; FENTORA(R), Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA, USA) is indicated in the US for breakthrough pain in patients with cancer who are already receiving and are tolerant to around-the-clock opioid therapy for underlying persistent cancer pain. For each individual patient, FBT should be titrated to the effective dose. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of FBT 400 microg administered as a single 400 microg tablet (regimen A) or as two 200 microg tablets given simultaneously (regimen B) and determine whether these are bioequivalent in healthy Japanese volunteers. Regimen C (two 200 microg tablets 30 minutes apart) was also compared as a secondary objective. METHODS: Healthy Japanese adults received regimens A, B, and C in a crossover fashion. Naltrexone was given to minimize the opioid effects of fentanyl. Serum fentanyl concentrations were determined in venous blood collected through 36 hours post dose. Regimens were declared bioequivalent with respect to bioavailability (as reflected by AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-last), and C(max)) if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the regimens' ratio fell within 0.80-1.25 (80%-125%). RESULTS: Twenty-nine volunteers (13 men, 16 women) were enrolled; 24 completed the study. Regimens A and B had bioequivalent systemic exposure parameters (B/A [90% CI]: AUC(0-infinity)108.4 [103.4, 113.7], AUC(0-last) 106.1 [100.7, 111.7], and C(max) 92.3 [83.2, 102.4]). Regimen C was bioequivalent to both A and B for AUCs, but only to B for C(max). Median time to C(max) was 45 minutes for regimen A and 60 minutes for regimens B and C. The most frequent AEs were dizziness, application-site erythema, headache, somnolence, nausea, and vomiting. All AEs were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Bioavailability of fentanyl after FBT 400 microg administered as a single tablet was bioequivalent to that after 2 simultaneously administered 200 microg tablets in healthy Japanese volunteers. AEs were mild or moderate.
 ...
PMID:Relative Bioavailability of Fentanyl Following Various Dosing Regimens of Fentanyl Buccal Tablet in Healthy Japanese Volunteers. 1991 9

In this study we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of sublingual fentanyl (SLF) for breakthrough pain (BTP) in adult opioid-tolerant cancer patients. Patients received one dose of placebo, SLF 100, 200 and 400 microg in random order at four pain episodes. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline. Twenty-seven patients received study medication. Overall PID increased significantly with SLF 400 microg versus placebo (8.57 mm, p <0.0001). Improvements were statistically different from placebo at 15 min (p = 0.005). SLF 100 and 200 microg showed a numerical trend towards improved pain relief. A dose that gave a clinically important reduction in pain (PID > 20 mm) was identified by 95% of patients. Reduced use of rescue medication (p < 0.001, SLF 400 microg) and improved global assessment of treatment (p = 0.0146, SLF 400 microg) confirmed these differences as clinically important. Nausea and dizziness were the most common treatment-related adverse effects. SLF appears to be a fast, effective and well-tolerated treatment for BTP.
 ...
PMID:Sublingual administration of fentanyl to cancer patients is an effective treatment for breakthrough pain: results from a randomized phase II study. 2001 21

Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) is indicated for the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients who are already receiving, and who are tolerant to, opioid therapy for underlying, persistent cancer pain. Breakthrough pain may be severe or excruciating, and some patients may require high doses of rapid-onset opioids to obtain adequate analgesia. The objective of this study was to assess the dose proportionality of FBT over a range of 600-1300 microg in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover, single-centre study of FBT (Fentora) conducted in healthy adult subjects who were not tolerant to opioids. The study included 120 men and women aged 18-45 years with a body mass index of 20-30 kg/m2 who had no clinically significant findings on medical and psychiatric histories, physical examination, ECG or standard clinical laboratory tests, and who had a negative urine screen for drugs and alcohol. Eligible subjects were randomized to one of four dose sequences: ABDC, BCAD, CDBA and DACB, where A, B, C and D were FBT doses from lowest to highest (600, 1000, 1200 and 1300 microg). Each dose of FBT was separated by a minimum of 7 days. Naltrexone 50 mg was administered to block the opioid receptor-mediated effects of fentanyl. Plasma fentanyl concentration was measured through 72 hours after placement of FBT. The main outcome measures, maximum plasma fentanyl concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)), were analysed to determine dose proportionality. Other pharmacokinetic parameters were also evaluated. Dose proportionality was concluded if the two-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the slopes of the C(max) versus dose and AUC(infinity) versus dose curves were completely contained within the range of 0.711-1.289. The safety and tolerability of FBT were assessed throughout the study. The slope for C(max) versus dose was 0.8627 (90% CI 0.7730, 0.9525), and the slope for AUC(infinity) versus dose was 0.9330 (90% CI 0.8738, 0.9922). Given that the CIs for C(max) and AUC(infinity) were within the predefined range of 0.711-1.289, dose proportionality was concluded over the 600-1300 microg range. The mean dose-normalized plasma fentanyl concentration reached 80% of C(max) within 25 minutes; plasma fentanyl concentration was maintained at this level for 3 hours after dose. No unexpected safety or tolerability concerns were noted in the naltrexone-blocked healthy subjects. Seventy-four subjects (68%) experienced adverse events (AEs); all were mild (56 [51%]) or moderate (18 [17%]). The most common AEs were nausea, dizziness and headache. No serious AEs were reported. The dose proportionality of FBT from 600-1300 microg was shown in healthy subjects. Based on the data, when FBT is titrated up to 1300 microg, a predictable and linear increase in systemic exposure can be expected. Currently, FBT is approved up to 800 microg. This study provides pharmacokinetic data to support a potential, expanded therapeutic dose range of FBT.
 ...
PMID:Dose proportionality of fentanyl buccal tablet in doses ranging from 600 to 1300 microg in healthy adult subjects: a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover, single-centre study. 2044 Dec 45

Tapentadol HCI is an opioid (narcotic) analgesic, which also inhibits norepinephrine reuptake. While it appears to display a somewhat lower incidence of nausea and constipation than oxycodone 10 mg to 15 mg, its analgesic efficacy in acute postsurgical dental pain is inferior to ibuprofen 400 mg. Like other single-entity opioids, tapentadol should not be used as a first-line agent for postsurgical dental pain but can be employed as an add-on drug for breakthrough pain in patients already using a regimen of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and/or acetaminophen.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic update: tapentadol hydrochloride. 2096 Sep 89

Spinal anaesthesia is the most preferred anaesthetic technique for elective as well as for unplanned Caesarean sections. Spinal-induced hypotension remains the most important side effect with a reported incidence between 20% and 100%. It can cause -maternal discomfort (nausea and vomiting) and impaired utero-placental perfusion. The present study was designed to examine the influence of epidural volume effect on the spread and duration of low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of epidural restriction (injection of saline) on the distribution of anaesthesia as well as the incidence of hypotension during the spinal anaesthesia.After the approval by the ethics committee, 60 full-term parturient women (ASA I or II) with uncomplicated pregnancies were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: the SA group (single shot spinal anaesthesia) included 37 patients and the CSE-EVR group (combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia) included 39 patients in whom we induced the restriction of the spinal space by epidural volume compression. The blocks were performed at the L2/3 or L3/4 level in a sitting position, in the CSE-EVR group using the needle-through-needle technique. The initial dose for CSE-EVR was exactly half of the SA dose (0.5 mg per 10 cm height of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and 20 microg fentanyl). After spinal injection, an epidural catheter was located in the CSE-EVR and a volume of 20 mL saline solution injected. After injection, the women were turned supine with a left uterine displacement. Surgery was allowed when a sensory block at or above the T8 dermatome was established. We evaluated the height of the block by the pinprick method and the motor block by the Bromage scale, 10 min after spinal injection, during the operation time and at the end of surgery. Haemodynamic monitoring (NIBP, HR) was assessed every 2 min until the childbirth, then every 5 min during operative time. Anaesthetic efficacy was evaluated for breakthrough pain by visual analogue pain score (VAPS), Apgar score at birth, umbilical artery pH, and epinephrine consumption.The level of anaesthesia 10 min after the induction was significantly higher in the spinal group (SA) than in the CSE-EVR T5 (T4-T7) vs. T7 (T6-T8) group.The SA group experienced complete motor block during the time of anaesthesia, while the CSE-EVR group demonstrated significantly faster motor recovery. The incidence of hypotension and ephedrine supplementation was significantly lower in the CSE-EVR group (19 vs. 35 patients) than in the SA group (p<0.05).The neonatal outcome and umbilical artery pH were higher in the CSE-EVR group. Both groups were comparable in demographic data, VAS scores, preloading and infusion volume, atropine or ephedrine use, and adverse effects such as nausea or skin pruritus.We demonstrated a possible restriction of the spread of spinal anaesthesia by using epidural volume restriction with 20 mL saline as part of a combined spinal epidural technique. The study shows that CSE with EVR using only 50% of the levobupivacaine dose provided adequate anaesthesia for elective Caesarean delivery, as well as better maternal haemodynamic stability.
 ...
PMID:Do we need cephalic spread of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section? A different approach to CSE-EVE for reducing hypotension. 2398 39


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>