Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although reported in the aerospace literature and anecdotally by anesthesiologists, the putative antiemetic effect of ephedrine remains unquantitated. We therefore prospectively studied ephedrine as an antiemetic agent in the perioperative setting in 97 patients undergoing general anesthesia for outpatient gynecologic laparoscopy. Patients were assigned in a double-blind randomized fashion to receive a standardized general anesthetic followed by an intramuscular dose of either ephedrine (0.5 mg/kg), droperidol (0.04 mg/kg), or saline before the conclusion of surgery. Nausea, retching, or vomiting, as well as the degree of sedation and discharge times, were assessed in the recovery room and for 24 h postoperatively. Ephedrine was found to have a significantly antiemetic effect (P less than 0.05) when compared with placebo and an antiemetic effect similar to that of droperidol. Sedation scores were also significantly less in the ephedrine group than in both placebo and droperidol groups. Finally, variations in mean arterial blood pressure among the three groups were not statistically significant. We conclude that ephedrine is an effective antiemetic agent with minimal sedative side effects in patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopy.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of ephedrine in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 182 85

Ondansetron is a selective 5-HT3 antagonist with significant antiemetic properties in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients who had suffered severe vomiting on carboplatin alone (23 patients with ovarian carcinoma) or in combination (two patients with testicular cancer) despite intensive antiemetic regimens were treated with ondansetron, given as 8 mg immediately prior to carboplatin followed by 8 mg orally, 8 hourly for 5 days. Twenty-five patients received 58 courses of ondansetron. In the first 24 h after the first course of chemotherapy with ondansetron, 17 patients (68%) experienced no vomiting, five patients (20%) had almost complete control and the other three patients had partial control. During the subsequent 4 days slightly lesser control was achieved. Nausea was similarly controlled in most patients. Twenty-two patients stated a preference for ondansetron with future chemotherapy. Fourteen patients received additional chemotherapy with ondansetron and in only three patients did the efficacy of therapy lessen. Toxicity was mild and transient with headache and constipation predominant. No extrapyramidal reaction was seen. Sedation was absent. Ondansetron is highly effective in refractory vomiting associated with carboplatin chemotherapy. It may be particularly beneficial when an extrapyramidal reaction has occurred on previous antiemetics and when sedation is unacceptable.
 ...
PMID:Reduction of carboplatin induced emesis by ondansetron. 182 54

In a randomized double-blind, cross-over trial of 34 patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy (20-100 mg/m2), the antiemetic effect of high-dose metoclopramide (HDM) (10 mg/kg iv. loading dose + 7 hours continuous infusion) + lorazepam (L) (2.5 mg x 4 po) was compared with low-dose metoclopramide (LDM) (70 mg) + L (2.5 mg x 2 po) + dehydrobenzperidol (5 mg x 2 im). Among the 29 patients who completed the cross-over, HDM significantly reduced the number of vomiting episodes (p = 0.002) and the degree of nausea (p = 0.004). Seventeen patients preferred the HDM and 4 the LDM regimen (p = 0.01). Sedation was seen in all but 1 patient, and was graded as severe in 6 patients receiving the HDM and in 2 patients receiving the LDM regimen. No extrapyramidal adverse reactions were seen. We conclude that high-dose metoclopramide + lorazepam is a safe antiemetic regimen and significantly superior to low-dose metoclopramide + lorazepam + dehydrobenzperidol. Owing to the severe sedation which occurs in some patients, the dose of lorazepam should be individually adjusted.
 ...
PMID:High-dose metoclopramide + lorazepam versus low-dose metoclopramide + lorazepam + dehydrobenzperidol in the treatment of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. 204 93

In a prospective and randomized pilot study two antiemetic regimens comprising dixyrazine (240 mg) and metoclopramide (10 mg/kg) in high doses and given by continuous i.v. infusion were compared as means of preventing cisplatin-doxorubicin-induced nausead and vomiting. Twenty chemotherapy-naive women with the diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma stages III-IV (FIGO) were included in the study. Medium doses (50 mg/m2) of cisplatin and doxorubicin were used. The antiemetic drugs (the above-mentioned ones plus betamethasone 20 mg, and biperiden 5 mg) were administered by small portable infusion pumps during 24 hours. The effects and adverse reactions were evaluated during the course of chemotherapy and the first week thereafter. Complete protection from nausea during the first 24 hours was achieved in 80% by the metoclopramide cocktail and in 50% by the dixyrazine combination. During days 2-7 there were no significant differences between the two regimens. Vomiting was not satisfactorily prevented by either treatment. Sedation was significantly more common after dixyrazine than after metoclopramide but other recorded side effects were similar for the two antiemetic regimens. Serum concentrations of dixyrazine and metoclopramide were determined.
 ...
PMID:Betamethasone-dixyrazine versus betamethasone-metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment of cisplatin-doxorubicin-induced nausea in ovarian carcinoma patients. 205 Jan 57

Fifty-three breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy entered a double-blind randomized trial of lorazepam 2.5 mg orally prior to chemotherapy and repeated after 12 hours (Arm A) versus placebo (Arm B) with methylprednisolone (MPN) 375 mg in 3 equal doses: 125 mg i.v. prior to chemotherapy and repeated i.m. 6 and 12 hours later. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, 4'-epi-doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (FEC) day 1 was alternated every 21 days with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CMF) day 1 for a total of 12 courses. The majority of patients experienced greater than or equal to 5 emetic episodes with FEC therapy (Arm A = 52%; Arm B = 55%). Mild and moderate nausea were reported by 60% and 68% of patients in Arms A and B, respectively. With CMF therapy complete control of emesis was observed in 33% (Arm A) and 35% (Arm B) of patients. The addition of lorazepam did not improve results either with FEC or CMF. Sedation was experienced by 86 to 92% of patients treated with lorazepam and amnesia was observed in 48-50% of cases. FEC therapy must be considered a highly emetic regimen and antiemetic therapy planned accordingly.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind randomized trial of lorazepam versus placebo with methylprednisolone for control of emesis due to non-cisplatin containing chemotherapy. 209 Jul 73

The authors conducted a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing groups of patients receiving iv or epidural fentanyl infusions to determine whether, at comparable levels of analgesia, 1) the severity of side effects was different; and 2) plasma fentanyl concentrations differed between the two groups. Twenty-eight ASA physical status 2 women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups to either receive fentanyl intravenously and saline epidurally or fentanyl epidurally and saline intravenously. After delivery of the infants under epidural anesthesia, each patient received a bolus of fentanyl 1.5 microgram/kg either intravenously or epidurally, and a fentanyl infusion was begun via the same route. Concurrently, a saline bolus and infusion were given via the alternate route. The rates of the fentanyl and saline infusions were adjusted until each patient was comfortable. Patients rated their pain, nausea, and pruritus on visual analogue scales. Sedation was evaluated by an observer. Respiratory depression was evaluated by end-tidal PCO2. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tail t tests. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured at 12 and 24 h. Three patients in the iv group were dropped from the study because of inadequate pain relief. For the remaining 25 patients, similar infusion rates of fentanyl were required to produce similar levels of analgesia at 12 and 24 h. The severity of nausea, pruritus and sedation, and end-tidal PCO2 were similar for both groups. The plasma concentrations of fentanyl were significantly greater in those who received iv fentanyl at 12 h but not at 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after cesarean section. 200 64

Sixty-four patients treated with cisplatin-containing regimens were entered into a randomized, double-blinded study examining the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide with and without lorazepam for control of cisplatin-induced emesis. Metoclopramide was administered to all patients at 2 mg/kg, intravenously, 30 minutes before chemotherapy and 1.5, 3.5, and 5.5 hours posttreatment. Patients randomized to receive combined antiemetic therapy were administered lorazepam at 2 mg/m2 (maximum, 4 mg dose) intravenously, 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Those patients not receiving lorazepam were given normal saline placebo. Degree of nausea and number of vomiting episodes were recorded on a data flow sheet with a visual analogue scale. Drug toxicities were evaluated before each administered dose. Patients receiving both metoclopramide and lorazepam experienced significantly less vomiting episodes (P less than 0.05) and nausea (P less than 0.01) when compared to patients given metoclopramide alone. Forty-four percent of those receiving the combined therapy reported no nausea or vomiting episodes compared to only 22% receiving metoclopramide alone. Sedation was significantly more common in patients receiving lorazepam (88%) as opposed to patients receiving only metoclopramide (43%), P less than 0.01. Amnesia was seen in 25% receiving lorazepam. No significant difference in diarrhea, dystonia, or disinhibition was observed between the two arms. The authors conclude that the combination of lorazepam and metoclopramide was superior to metoclopramide alone in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, with sedation and amnesia more commonly observed in the combined regimen.
 ...
PMID:Metoclopramide versus metoclopramide and lorazepam. Superiority of combined therapy in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. 291 33

Since transdermal scopolamine (TS) seems effective against seasickness, we compared its antiemetic effect with intravenous droperidol (DHBP), our routine antidote for postoperative emesis. Ninety-six female patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for short-stay surgery were randomly allocated to three study groups after giving their informed consent. The three groups were as follows: TS adhesive, delivering 140 micrograms initially and 5 micrograms/h thereafter + placebo 0.5 ml i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo adhesive preoperatively + DHBP 0.5 ml (1.25 mg) i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo + 0.5 ml placebo i.v. as indicated above. Oxycodone i.m. and glycopyrrolate i.v. were given for premedication together with the test adhesive. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with nitrous oxide and oxygen, enflurane, vecuronium and fentanyl. Neostigmine and glycopyrrolate were administered for reversal. In the recovery room no differences in nausea or vomiting were observed between the groups. Sedation was significantly more marked (P less than 0.15-0.0001) after DHBP than after either TS or the given DHBP and 6% of those given the placebo (P less than 0.05). During the following 24 h nausea was reported more by the placebo patients (25) than by those on TS (20) or DHBP (15) (P less than 0.05). However, actual vomiting on the ward did not differ between the groups. Visual disturbances were more frequent after TS (P less than 0.01). We conclude that prophylactic transdermal scopolamine does not diminish postoperative emetic sequelae.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of transdermal scopolamine, droperidol and placebo against postoperative nausea and vomiting. 305 39

The antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP) and metoclopramide (MTC) in prevention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide methotrexate 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy has been evaluated in a double-blind trial. The two antiemetic drugs (MP vs. MTC) offered the majority of patients a similar complete protection from vomiting (76.5 vs. 66.7%) and nausea (82.4 vs. 81.8%), but in older patients MTC seems more efficacious than MP. Sedation was found more frequently (p = 0.02) in patients treated with MTC. In conclusion, in patients treated with CMF the use of MP as preventive therapy of nausea and vomiting is to be preferred to MTC due to its better tolerability, but in older patients MTC should be considered if MP fails.
 ...
PMID:Methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide for prevention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide methotrexate 5-fluorouracil: a double-blind randomized study. 341 41

In a double-blind randomized study of three groups of 18 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery the efficacy and side effects of sublingual buprenorphine were tested and compared to intramuscular meperidine and buprenorphine. Single doses of either 75 mg of meperidine, 0.4 mg of sublingual buprenorphine, or 0.3 mg of intramuscular buprenorphine were used. Patients given buprenorphine as sublingual tablets were significantly more conscious in the immediate postoperative period (Glasgow Coma Scale) than when given buprenorphine or meperidine intramuscularly. Median pain intensity differences (PID) showed equal pain relief, whereas the summarized pain intensity differences (SPID) were significantly higher in the intramuscular buprenorphine group compared to the meperidine group. Three cases of respiratory acidosis in the meperidine group required IPPV treatment, and one case in the intramuscular buprenorphine group required treatment. Sedation and nausea were the most common side effects in all three groups. We conclude that sublingual buprenorphine is useful for relief of postoperative pain and exhibited administrative advantages, when the patients were able to cooperate.
 ...
PMID:Pain relief after major abdominal surgery: a double-blind controlled comparison of sublingual buprenorphine, intramuscular buprenorphine, and intramuscular meperidine. 354 57


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>