Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Pain management, nutritional support, and psychosocial support are fundamental services that enhance patients' ability to cope with their cancer and its therapy. The common goal of symptom prevention mandates that each of these supportive services be provided to all patients throughout their cancer experience. Comprehensive cancer pain management begins with identifying the origin of all of the patient's pains and treating each one specifically. Pain prevention can be achieved through around-the-clock opioid administration with as-needed supplements for breakthrough pain and dose titration. Common narcotic side effects such as constipation and nausea also must be prevented. Successful opioid analgesia requires that patient and family concerns regarding addiction and tolerance be dispelled at the outset. Cancer pain prevention can be further optimized with the use of appropriate coanalgesics in response to the pathophysiology of the patient's pains. Cognitive and behavioral therapies may also be useful adjuncts to reduce both pain and suffering. Procedure-oriented pain control should be considered when systemic pharmacologic therapy does not provide adequate pain relief or is associated with intolerable side effects. The only absolute contraindications for pain-relieving procedures are untreatable coagulopathy and a decrease in mental status not related to medical pain management. Useful neurodestructive techniques include radiofrequency lesioning, cryoanalgesia, and chemical neurolysis with agents such as phenol, alcohol, and hypertonic saline. The most beneficial pain-relieving procedures and percutaneous cordotomy, spinal narcotics, celiac and hypogastric plexus ablation, spinal neurolysis, and epidural injection of steroids and hypertonic saline. Procedure selection depends on the cause of the pain and the patient's prognosis. Common indications for pain-relieving procedures include unilateral pain below the shoulder, upper abdominal visceral pains, pelvic visceral pain, perineal pain, vertebral body metastasis, discogenic pain, and spinal stenosis. As results of well-conducted scientific trials begin to appear in the literature, the indications for these procedures will be better understood, resulting in their more appropriate use. Principles of nutritional support in patients with cancer include an awareness of the problem of malnutrition and its impact on performance status, quality of life, prognosis, and treatment; identification of those patients at risk; prophylactic versus therapeutic intervention; and analysis and management of the specific impediment(s) to adequate nutrient intake and absorption. The primary goals for nutritional support in cancer patients are prevention of weight loss and maintenance of adequate protein status. Appreciation of practical issues of nutritional support will enable the practicing physician to achieve these goals using primarily oral nutrition options.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Supportive care in oncology. 128 50

Few controlled clinical trials have tested the efficacy of psychological techniques for reducing cancer pain or post-chemotherapy nausea and emesis. In this study, 67 bone marrow transplant patients with hematological malignancies were randomly assigned to one of four groups prior to beginning transplantation conditioning: (1) hypnosis training (HYP); (2) cognitive behavioral coping skills training (CB); (3) therapist contact control (TC); or (4) treatment as usual (TAU; no treatment control). Patients completed measures of physical functioning (Sickness Impact Profile; SIP) and psychological functioning (Brief Symptom Inventory; BSI), which were used as covariates in the analyses. Biodemographic variables included gender, age and a risk variable based on diagnosis and number of remissions or relapses. Patients in the HYP, CB and TC groups met with a clinical psychologist for two pre-transplant training sessions and ten in-hospital "booster" sessions during the course of transplantation. Forty-five patients completed the study and provided all covariate data, and 80% of the time series outcome data. Analyses of the principal study variables indicated that hypnosis was effective in reducing reported oral pain for patients undergoing marrow transplantation. Risk, SIP, and BSI pre-transplant were found to be effective predictors of inpatient physical symptoms. Nausea, emesis and opioid use did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. The cognitive behavioral intervention, as applied in this study, was not effective in reducing the symptoms measured.
 ...
PMID:Hypnosis or cognitive behavioral training for the reduction of pain and nausea during cancer treatment: a controlled clinical trial. 140 23

Fifty-one patients with moderate (11/51) and severe (40/51) cancer pain were given a new non-narcotic analgesic -Tromadol HCL capsule (THC). In 42 of these patients, partial relief was obtained with an average relief time (ART) of 4.1 hours. The average starting time was 58 minutes. Pain relief rate (PRR) in moderate and severe pain was 82% (P = 0.945), and the ARTs were 7.4 hr. and 3.2 hr., respectively (P = 0.005). In 43 patients who were entered into a randomized study with control drugs of AT-237 (36 cases) or Anfendein (7 cases), the PRR was 60.4% (26/43), ART was 1.3 hours. The PRR and ART of THC and control drugs were statistically significant (P less than 0.001 and P = 0.023). Within adequate dose range, increase of THC dose could improve its analgesic effect (P = 0.011). The main side-effects were: somnolence (37.3%), nausea (35.3%), dizziness (33.3%), palpitation and anorexia (25.5%) and constipation (9.8%) which did not necessitate the suspension of THC administration.
 ...
PMID:[Pain-relief effect of tramadol HCL capsule for moderate and severe cancer pain]. 139 64

In this study, 6 patients with pain from advanced cancer were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label seeding trial of transdermal fentanyl. Following equianalgesic dose conversion, transdermal fentanyl patches were applied every 3 days. Mean fentanyl dosage doubled by week 2 and tripled by week 4. Pain control improved in all patients. There were no significant changes in mood, constipation, nausea, sedation, daily activities, or interpersonal relationships from pretrial to posttrial analyses. Following the study period, 5 patients were monitored for a mean total of 55 days with a mean final fentanyl dose of 240 micrograms/hr. As part of a comprehensive cancer pain management program, transdermal fentanyl appears to be safe and effective, and should prove to be a useful addition to currently available opioid analgesics.
 ...
PMID:Transdermal fentanyl: seeding trial in patients with chronic cancer pain. 151 33

A multicenter study was conducted to determine the patient and physician acceptability of transdermal fentanyl in the management of cancer-related pain. In this study, 10 cancer patients at the University of Iowa received transdermal fentanyl after discontinuing their prior opioid analgesic; 7 patients completed questionnaires before and at 2 and 4 wk following transdermal fentanyl application. There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale scores for pain or mood. Verbal pain descriptor scores improved at 2 wk (P less than .05). There was a nonsignificant tendency toward increased depression and nausea; however, patients spent less time thinking about their illness and felt their cancer was less disruptive to their closest friends/relatives. Constipation, appetite, drowsiness, and concentration were not statistically different. Patients reported improved sleep habits at 2 wk (P less than .05) and tended to require less help with eating, dressing, washing, and using the bathroom. All patients completing the study chose to continue transdermal fentanyl for their cancer pain management. In summary, these data demonstrate the analgesic efficacy of the transdermal fentanyl system and suggest that some patients with cancer-related pain could benefit from its use.
 ...
PMID:Management of cancer pain with transdermal fentanyl: phase IV trial, University of Iowa. 151 36

In contrast to the use of opioids for the treatment of acute and chronic cancer pain, the administration of chronic opioid therapy for pain not due to malignancy remains controversial. We describe 100 patients who were chronically given opioids for treatment of nonmalignant pain. Most patients experienced neuropathic pain or back pain. We used sustained-release dihydrocodeine, buprenorphine, and sustained-release morphine. Pain reduction was measured with visual analogue scales (VAS), and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale was used to assess the patient's function. Good pain relief was obtained in 51 patients and partial pain relief was reported by 28 patients. Only 21 patients had no beneficial effect from opioid therapy. There was a close correlation between the sum and the peak VAS values (r = 0.983; p less than 0.0001) and pain reduction was associated with an increase in performance (p less than 0.0001). The most common side effects were constipation and nausea. There were no cases of respiratory depression or addiction to opioids. Our results indicate that opioids can be effective in chronic nonmalignant pain, with side effects that are comparable to those that complicate the treatment of cancer pain.
 ...
PMID:Long-term oral opioid therapy in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. 157 87

The purpose of this double-blind crossover study was to determine whether a sustained-release morphine sulfate (SRMS) tablet given orally every 12 hours could adequately replace immediate-release morphine sulfate solution (IRMS) given orally every 4 hours in hospitalized patients with chronic pain from advanced cancer. Of 33 patients entered, 27 completed the study and were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. Patients were initially randomized to receive either 30-mg SRMS tablets every 12 hours or IRMS at the same mg/24 hours dose, every 4 hours. After 2 days, a crossover was performed, and patients received the alternate treatment for 3 days. Pain and side effects were assessed using a standard 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups for mean VAS pain scores or scores for sleepiness, nausea, depression, and anxiety. The incidence of breakthrough pain was similar for both treatment groups, as was the incidence of confusion and constipation. The results demonstrated that SRMS is a safe, effective analgesic preparation for patients who require oral opioids for cancer pain. The data also support the conclusion that sustained-release morphine tablets administered every 12 hours can replace an immediate-release morphine solution administered every 4 hours.
 ...
PMID:A controlled study of sustained-release morphine sulfate tablets in chronic pain from advanced cancer. 159 Feb 84

Persistent severe cancer pain should be treated with opioid drugs, principally morphine. It can be administered orally, rectally and parenterally. Morphine is metabolised in the liver mainly to glucuronides, of which morphine-6-glucuronide is a powerful analgesic. Oral morphine should be administered regularly and in individualized doses. The use of morphine is frequently accompanied by adverse effects such as constipation, nausea, vomiting and sedation. Management of these is critical for successful pain treatment. Although alternatives are available none has any clear advantage over morphine in cancer pain, and should be reserved for special situations. Oral morphine is successful in more than 90% of cancer pain patients. Slow release morphine sulphate tablets (MS Contin) are often the best choice. For the few patients who need parenteral medication, continuous subcutaneous morphine sulphate infusion is generally the most suitable. Some pains are morphine resistant, especially those due to nerve injury. In these cases pain is best treated with tricyclic antidepressants and/or anticonvulsants.
 ...
PMID:Oral opioids in the treatment of cancer pain. 166 Jan 7

Seventy-six cancer patients were studied on the use of controlled-release morphine sulphate (MS Contin) for cancer pain relief in the hospice of Yodogama Christian Hospital in Japan. The mean initial and maximum dosages were 81.4 mg and 178.6 mg respectively. While 46 patients (61%) did not need an increase in the initial dosage, 26 patients (34%) needed an increase ranging between 8 and 125%. Four patients (5%) required an increment of more than 500% of the initial dosage, because of apparent nerve involvement. This clinical survey showed that the total effectiveness was 92% and that 90% of the patients could experience control of pain with a daily dosage of 240 mg or less of MS Contin. Side effects observed were as follows: drowsiness 21%, nausea 11%, vomiting 8%, constipation 8%, confusion 7%, hallucination 3%. In conclusion, MS Contin offers effective cancer pain relief with minimal side effects in the majority of patients.
 ...
PMID:A clinical survey of controlled-release morphine sulphate for cancer pain relief in a Japanese hospice. 175 22

One hundred and three patients with moderate and severe cancer pain were given a sublingual analgesic agent--dihydroetorphine hydrochloride (DHE). Relief of cancer pain was moderate or complete in 89.3% (92/103). The average relief time (ART) was 3.9 hours and the average time before effectiveness was 20 minutes. In patients with acute or chronic cancer pain, moderate and complete pain-relief rates were 91.3% and 82.2% (P = 0.237). Difference of ART between them was insignificant (P = 0.299). The main clinical side-effects were somnolence (60%), dizziness (72%), nausea (30%), vomiting (16.5%), constipation (5%) and shortness of breath (8%). In two of the patients, the administration of DHE had to be stopped due to its side-effects. Age, sex and site of cancer pain were not related to the analgesic effects of DHE, but the pain-relief in patients with bladder cancer was poor (P less than 0.001). Within certain range, increase in dose was able to enhance its analgesic effect (P less than 0.001) and reduce drug resistance (P less than 0.001).
 ...
PMID:[Dihydroetorphine hydrochloride for moderate and severe cancer pain]. 188 41


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>