Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

As most patients undergoing pulmonary surgery by postero-lateral thoracotomy have decreased preoperative pulmonary function, efficient postoperative analgesia is mandatory. Nalbuphine, a new agonist-antagonist opioid analgesic, and nefopam were compared in a double blind trial involving 60 patients. Intravenous injections of 0.3 mg.kg-1 of either drug were started when the patient evaluated his pain as being above 60 mm on a visual scale graduated from 0 to 100 mm. Repeated injections were carried out at the same dose, at the patient's request, after a minimal interval of 3 h for nalbuphine, and 6 h for nefopam. Analgesia was assessed by the visual scale, and by the patient's verbal appraisal. The respiratory and cardiovascular repercussions were evaluated clinically, and by monitoring breathing rate, blood gases, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, and consciousness. Nalbuphine provided a convenient analgesia to all patients whereas analgesia with nefopam was insufficient in 15 out of 30 patients. No significant respiratory depression with either drug occurred. Nefopam led to a 30% increase in heart rate for one hour (p less than 0.01). Whereas patients given nalbuphine were more drowsy, although easily aroused, (p less than 0.001), nefopam was responsible for adverse effects (sweating, nausea, tachycardia with pallor, vertigo, malaise) requiring the exclusion of 7 patients from the study. Nalbuphine, although not ideal, would therefore seem to be a better analgesic than nefopam in thoracotomy patients.
 ...
PMID:[Analgesic and respiratory effects of nalbuphine during the immediate postoperative period in thoracotomy]. 218 3

Epidural morphine is effective in the treatment of postoperative pain, but the incidence of associated side effects is high. To assess a potential reduction of opioid side effects by droperidol, 4 mg morphine with either placebo or 2.5 mg droperidol was injected epidurally in a double-blind, randomized, postoperative trial. Forty patients undergoing hip replacement surgery were studied. The overall incidence of side effects during the first 24 h in the group receiving droperidol and morphine was less than 50% of that in the group receiving placebo and morphine (P less than 0.008). Pruritus, emesis, nausea, urinary retention, and hypotension were diminished in the group with droperidol. No significant differences in duration or quality of analgesia were seen. Epidural injection of droperidol did not result in any local or systemic side effects.
 ...
PMID:Epidural droperidol and morphine for postoperative pain. 199 79

In a double-blind crossover study, morphine and oxycodone hydrochloride were administered to 20 patients who were experiencing severe cancer pain. The peroral doses were determined on the basis of patient-controlled intravenous titration. The assumed oral bioavailability ratios were 44% (group 1, first 10 patients) and 33% (group 2, last 10 patients) for morphine and 66% (group 1) and 50% (group 2) for oxycodone hydrochloride, respectively. However, the patients were able to readjust their oral dosings. Equal analgesia was achieved with both drugs, but the intravenous dose of oxycodone hydrochloride needed was 30% higher than that of morphine. The median calculated oral/intravenous ratios giving comparable analgesia were 0.31 for morphine and 0.70 for oxycodone hydrochloride. Morphine caused more nausea than oxycodone hydrochloride and hallucinations occurred only during morphine treatment. Otherwise, there were no major differences in the side effects between these two opioids.
 ...
PMID:Morphine and oxycodone hydrochloride in the management of cancer pain. 218 74

The authors conducted a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing groups of patients receiving iv or epidural fentanyl infusions to determine whether, at comparable levels of analgesia, 1) the severity of side effects was different; and 2) plasma fentanyl concentrations differed between the two groups. Twenty-eight ASA physical status 2 women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups to either receive fentanyl intravenously and saline epidurally or fentanyl epidurally and saline intravenously. After delivery of the infants under epidural anesthesia, each patient received a bolus of fentanyl 1.5 microgram/kg either intravenously or epidurally, and a fentanyl infusion was begun via the same route. Concurrently, a saline bolus and infusion were given via the alternate route. The rates of the fentanyl and saline infusions were adjusted until each patient was comfortable. Patients rated their pain, nausea, and pruritus on visual analogue scales. Sedation was evaluated by an observer. Respiratory depression was evaluated by end-tidal PCO2. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tail t tests. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured at 12 and 24 h. Three patients in the iv group were dropped from the study because of inadequate pain relief. For the remaining 25 patients, similar infusion rates of fentanyl were required to produce similar levels of analgesia at 12 and 24 h. The severity of nausea, pruritus and sedation, and end-tidal PCO2 were similar for both groups. The plasma concentrations of fentanyl were significantly greater in those who received iv fentanyl at 12 h but not at 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after cesarean section. 200 64

The purpose of this study was to determine if a small dose of intrathecal meperidine would achieve adequate spinal anaesthesia while minimizing complications and to compare its effectiveness with lidocaine. The spinal anaesthetic effects of five per cent lidocaine 0.5 mg.kg-1 in 7.5 percent glucose (n = 20) or five per cent meperidine 0.5 mg.kg-1 (n = 22) were evaluated in 42 ASA physical status II or III patients. Intrathecal injection of the anaesthetic agent was given with the patient in the sitting position in which he remained for ten minutes before being placed in the lithotomy position. The onset time for sensory blockade was seven minutes in the lidocaine group and ten minutes in the meperidine group. Final sensory levels were identical in both groups. Mean arterial blood pressure decreased significantly in the lidocaine group but not in the meperidine group. Motor block was absent in ten patients in the meperidine group but was present in all the patients in the lidocaine group. Duration of postoperative analgesia was 968 min in the meperidine group and 681 min in the lidocaine group (NS). Complications such as nausea, vomiting, itching, drowsiness and respiratory depression were similar in the two groups. It is concluded that low-dose meperidine, 0.5 mg.kg-1, is effective as a spinal anaesthetic agent and has few complications.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of intrathecal meperidine and lidocaine in endoscopic urological procedures. 219 5

The Acute Pain Service began at the Royal Adelaide Hospital in April 1989. Funding, education programmes, policies, procedures, protocols, techniques (particularly patient-controlled analgesia, epidural opioid analgesia and subcutaneous morphine therapy) and daily organisation of the service are described in this article, and the experience with the 1053 patients referred to the Service during the first year of operation is reported. The occurrence of major complications was small. Mild-to-moderate respiratory depression occurred in four (0.5%) of the 747 patients who received patient-controlled analgesia and in none of the 177 who received epidural opioids. Five patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia had persistent nausea/vomiting; 320 (35%) of all patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia or epidural opioids suffered nausea/vomiting that required no treatment or was alleviated by treatment with an antiemetic. Around 13% of patients reported mild-to-moderate itching. In our experience, the combination of appropriately trained nursing and medical staff, standardised orders and procedures, and proper supervision can lead to safe, more effective management of acute pain.
 ...
PMID:An acute pain service in an Australian teaching hospital: the first year. 221 14

Nalbuphine hydrochloride, an agonist-antagonist opioid, is reported to reverse the respiratory depression of moderate doses of fentanyl (20 micrograms.kg-1) and still provide good analgesia. We report four patients having abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in which we attempted to reverse the respiratory depression of large doses of fentanyl (50-75 micrograms.kg-1) with nalbuphine (0.3 mg.kg-1, 0.1 mg.kg-1 or 0.05 mg.kg-1). Nalbuphine reversed respiratory depression in all four patients and the respiratory rate increased from 10 to 23 breaths per minute, end-tidal CO2 decreased from 7.0 +/- 0.3 per cent to 5.6 +/- 0.7 per cent, and peak inspiratory pressure after 0.1 seconds increased from 4 +/- 1.4 to 13 +/- 2.6 mmHg. However, hypertension, increased heart rate, and significant increase in analogue pain scores accompanied reversal of respiratory depression. Agitation, nausea, vomiting, and cardiac dysrhythmias also were observed frequently. We do not recommend the use of nalbuphine to facilitate early extubation of the trachea after large doses of fentanyl for abdominal aortic surgery.
 ...
PMID:Side effects of nalbuphine while reversing opioid-induced respiratory depression: report of four cases. 165

Forty-five patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly divided into three groups. An epidural tube was inserted into one of the following three sites, Th11-12, L2-3, and caudal region. General anesthesia was then maintained with nitrous oxide-oxygen-enflurane, and pancuronium bromide. Morphine hydrochloride 2 mg in 8 ml of normal saline was administered into one of the designated epidural spaces one to two hours before the assumed end of surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed every four hours after the end of the operation until the next morning. Morphine exerted a relatively profound and prolonged analgesic effect in 40% of the Th11-12 group of patients, as well as in 6.7% of the L2-3 and caudal groups. But, supplementary analgesics were necessary in the other patients. No significant differences were found in the degree and extension of postoperative pain, as well as the doses of supplementary analgesics among the three groups. Adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting and itching, occurred in 30 to 40% of each of the morphine administered groups. Though morphine was applied into different spinal levels, this clinical study did not show any difference in extension of analgesia. The epidurally applied morphine may be distributed widely in the spinal arachnoid space after some time, and may exert an effect on the brain as well as on the spinal nerves. When morphine is administered epidurally one to two hours before the end of a surgical operation, selection of an injection site according to the dermatome level of the skin incision may be unnecessary.
 ...
PMID:[Degree and extension of analgesic effect of morphine applied at three different spinal levels of epidural space]. 227 45

The efficacy and safety of two dose levels of FS 205-397 (either 250 or 500 mg) were compared with the efficacy and safety of aspirin 650 mg and placebo in a 6-hour, single-dose, double-blind study in 161 patients who had undergone extraction of third molars. Each of the doses of FS 205-397, as well as aspirin, produced analgesia. However, the analgesic effects of both the 500 mg dose of FS 205-397 and aspirin were at times significantly better and more prolonged than those produced by the lower dose of FS 205-397. On the other hand, both doses of FS 205-397 had a significantly faster onset of action than aspirin. Side effects, reported by 17% of the 161 patients, did not differ significantly among the four treatment groups with respect to frequency, type, or severity. The most commonly reported side effects were nausea (7%) and drowsiness (6%). The results indicated that FS 205-397, administered in single doses of either 500 or 250 mg, is a safe and effective analgesic for the relief of pain following dental surgery, and may offer particular advantages in terms of onset of effects.
 ...
PMID:A single-dose study of the efficacy and safety of FS 205-397 (250 mg or 500 mg) versus aspirin and placebo in the treatment of postsurgery dental pain. 227 29

The management of postoperative pain with continuous epidural fentanyl infusion was compared with continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion. In a randomized, doubleblind protocol we prospectively studied 20 patients undergoing repair of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. The quality of analgesia and the incidence of side effects were documented. Compared with patients receiving continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion, at 18 h postoperatively patients given continuous epidural fentanyl infusion reported similar pain scores both at rest (22 +/- 25 vs 27 +/- 21, P = 0.52) and with ambulation (59 +/- 18 vs 56 +/- 22, P = 0.82). Plasma fentanyl levels were 1.8 +/- 0.4 and 1.7 +/- 0.4 ng/mL (P = 0.91) for the intravenous and epidural groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of nausea, pruritus, or urinary retention. There was no respiratory depression in either group. We conclude that when compared with continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion, continuous epidural fentanyl infusion offers no clinical advantages for the management of postoperative pain after knee surgery.
 ...
PMID:Epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions are clinically equivalent after knee surgery. 197 97


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>